↑ Up

E---3.5.1.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : AGT003+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v3.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 11:47:24 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.20s 0.51s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.20s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   23 (  15 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   44 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   10 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   40 (  19   ~;  15   |;   5   &)
%                                         (   1 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   12 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   4 usr;   1 prp; 0-4 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    8 (   8 usr;   8 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   27 (   6 sgn   8   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(a1_1,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3,X4] :
      ( accept_team(X1,X4,X2,X3)
    <=> ( accept_number(X1,X3)
        & accept_leader(X1,X4)
        & accept_city(X1,X2) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/AGT001+0.ax',a1_1) ).

fof(event_90,axiom,
    accept_team(christiansufferterrahumanitarianorganization,countryahumanitarianorganization,coastvillage,n5),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/AGT001+1.ax',event_90) ).

fof(query_3,conjecture,
    accept_team(christiansufferterrahumanitarianorganization,countryafirstaidorganization,towna,n5),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',query_3) ).

fof(event_93,axiom,
    accept_team(christiansufferterrahumanitarianorganization,countryafirstaidorganization,coastvillage,n6),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/AGT001+1.ax',event_93) ).

fof(event_26,axiom,
    accept_team(christiansufferterrahumanitarianorganization,countryacivilorganization,towna,n6),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/AGT001+1.ax',event_26) ).

fof(c_0_5,plain,
    ! [X18,X19,X20,X21] :
      ( ( accept_team(X18,X21,X19,X20)
        | ~ accept_number(X18,X20)
        | ~ accept_leader(X18,X21)
        | ~ accept_city(X18,X19) )
      & ( ~ accept_team(X18,X21,X19,X20)
        | accept_number(X18,X20) )
      & ( ~ accept_team(X18,X21,X19,X20)
        | accept_leader(X18,X21) )
      & ( ~ accept_team(X18,X21,X19,X20)
        | accept_city(X18,X19) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[a1_1])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_6,plain,
    ( ~ accept_team(X1,X3,X4,X2)
    | accept_number(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_7,plain,
    accept_team(christiansufferterrahumanitarianorganization,countryahumanitarianorganization,coastvillage,n5),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[event_90]) ).

fof(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
    ~ accept_team(christiansufferterrahumanitarianorganization,countryafirstaidorganization,towna,n5),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[query_3]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,plain,
    ( ~ accept_number(X1,X4)
    | ~ accept_leader(X1,X3)
    | ~ accept_city(X1,X2)
    | accept_team(X1,X3,X2,X4) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,plain,
    accept_number(christiansufferterrahumanitarianorganization,n5),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    ( ~ accept_team(X1,X2,X3,X4)
    | accept_leader(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    accept_team(christiansufferterrahumanitarianorganization,countryafirstaidorganization,coastvillage,n6),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[event_93]) ).

fof(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
    ~ accept_team(christiansufferterrahumanitarianorganization,countryafirstaidorganization,towna,n5),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    ( ~ accept_city(christiansufferterrahumanitarianorganization,X2)
    | ~ accept_leader(christiansufferterrahumanitarianorganization,X1)
    | accept_team(christiansufferterrahumanitarianorganization,X1,X2,n5) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    accept_leader(christiansufferterrahumanitarianorganization,countryafirstaidorganization),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    ( ~ accept_team(X1,X3,X2,X4)
    | accept_city(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    accept_team(christiansufferterrahumanitarianorganization,countryacivilorganization,towna,n6),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[event_26]) ).

fof(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
    ~ accept_team(christiansufferterrahumanitarianorganization,countryafirstaidorganization,towna,n5),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    ( ~ accept_city(christiansufferterrahumanitarianorganization,X1)
    | accept_team(christiansufferterrahumanitarianorganization,countryafirstaidorganization,X1,n5) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    accept_city(christiansufferterrahumanitarianorganization,towna),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
    ~ accept_team(christiansufferterrahumanitarianorganization,countryafirstaidorganization,towna,n5),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]),c_0_21]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : AGT003+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v3.1.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.09/0.36  % Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.36  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.36  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.09/0.36  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 12:49:47 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.37  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.09/0.37  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.09/0.41  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.09/0.41  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.20/0.51  % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.20/0.51  % Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.51  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.51  % Starting G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with 900s (3) cores
% 0.20/0.51  % Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.20/0.51  % Starting new_bool_1 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.20/0.51  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.51  % G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with pid 131514 completed with status 0
% 0.20/0.51  % Result found by G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI
% 0.20/0.51  % Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.51  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.51  % Starting G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with 900s (3) cores
% 0.20/0.51  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.20/0.51  % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.20/0.51  % Search class: FGHSF-FSLM21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.20/0.51  % Scheduled 11 strats onto 3 cores with 900 seconds (900 total)
% 0.20/0.51  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 82s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.51  % Starting G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with 91s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.51  % Starting G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_S4d with 82s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.51  % G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with pid 131530 completed with status 0
% 0.20/0.51  % Result found by G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI
% 0.20/0.51  % Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.51  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.51  % Starting G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with 900s (3) cores
% 0.20/0.51  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.20/0.51  % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.20/0.51  % Search class: FGHSF-FSLM21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.20/0.51  % Scheduled 11 strats onto 3 cores with 900 seconds (900 total)
% 0.20/0.51  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 82s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.51  % Starting G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with 91s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.51  % Preprocessing time       : 0.006 s
% 0.20/0.51  
% 0.20/0.51  % Proof found!
% 0.20/0.51  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.20/0.51  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.20/0.51  % Parsed axioms                        : 556
% 0.20/0.51  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.20/0.51  % Initial clauses                      : 629
% 0.20/0.51  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.20/0.51  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 629
% 0.20/0.51  % Processed clauses                    : 1030
% 0.20/0.51  % ...of these trivial                  : 211
% 0.20/0.51  % ...subsumed                          : 1
% 0.20/0.51  % ...remaining for further processing  : 818
% 0.20/0.51  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 2
% 0.20/0.51  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.20/0.51  % Backward-subsumed                    : 1
% 0.20/0.51  % Backward-rewritten                   : 1
% 0.20/0.51  % Generated clauses                    : 1242
% 0.20/0.51  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 1138
% 0.20/0.51  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.20/0.51  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.20/0.51  % Paramodulations                      : 1238
% 0.20/0.51  % Factorizations                       : 2
% 0.20/0.51  % NegExts                              : 0
% 0.20/0.51  % Equation resolutions                 : 2
% 0.20/0.51  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.20/0.51  % Total rewrite steps                  : 324
% 0.20/0.51  % ...of those cached                   : 191
% 0.20/0.51  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.20/0.51  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.20/0.51  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.20/0.51  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.20/0.51  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.20/0.51  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.20/0.51  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.20/0.51  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.20/0.51  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.20/0.51  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.20/0.51  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.20/0.51  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.20/0.51  % Current number of processed clauses  : 814
% 0.20/0.51  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 660
% 0.20/0.51  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.20/0.51  %    Negative unit clauses             : 44
% 0.20/0.51  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 110
% 0.20/0.51  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 735
% 0.20/0.51  % ...number of literals in the above   : 1645
% 0.20/0.51  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.20/0.51  % Current number of archived clauses   : 2
% 0.20/0.51  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 2636
% 0.20/0.51  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1103
% 0.20/0.51  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 1
% 0.20/0.51  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1955
% 0.20/0.51  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.20/0.51  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 209
% 0.20/0.51  % BW rewrite match successes           : 1
% 0.20/0.51  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.20/0.51  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.20/0.51  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 36383
% 0.20/0.51  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 1158
% 0.20/0.51  
% 0.20/0.51  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.51  % User time                : 0.051 s
% 0.20/0.51  % System time              : 0.008 s
% 0.20/0.51  % Total time               : 0.059 s
% 0.20/0.51  % Maximum resident set size: 4596 pages
% 0.20/0.51  
% 0.20/0.51  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.51  % User time                : 0.156 s
% 0.20/0.51  % System time              : 0.029 s
% 0.20/0.51  % Total time               : 0.185 s
% 0.20/0.51  % Maximum resident set size: 5376 pages
% 0.20/0.51  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------