%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : AGT004+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v3.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 11:47:24 AM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 0.13s 0.45s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.13s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 6
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 20 ( 11 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 42 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 10 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 42 ( 20 ~; 13 |; 6 &)
% ( 1 <=>; 2 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 12 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 7 ( 6 usr; 1 prp; 0-4 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 5 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 30 ( 3 sgn 20 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(a1_5,axiom,
! [X1,X4,X2] :
( any_agent_in_all_proposed_teams(X1,X4,X2)
=> accept_leader(X1,X4) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/AGT001+0.ax',a1_5) ).
fof(query_4,conjecture,
~ accept_team(countryamedicalorganization,countryahumanitarianorganization,coastvillage,n5),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',query_4) ).
fof(a1_6,axiom,
! [X1,X4,X2] :
( the_agent_not_in_any_proposed_teams(X1,X4,X2)
=> ~ ( accept_leader(X1,X4)
& accept_city(X1,X2) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/AGT001+0.ax',a1_6) ).
fof(event_38,axiom,
any_agent_in_all_proposed_teams(countryamedicalorganization,christiancountrychumanitarianorganization,coastvillage),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/AGT001+1.ax',event_38) ).
fof(a1_1,axiom,
! [X1,X2,X3,X4] :
( accept_team(X1,X4,X2,X3)
<=> ( accept_number(X1,X3)
& accept_leader(X1,X4)
& accept_city(X1,X2) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/AGT001+0.ax',a1_1) ).
fof(event_37,axiom,
the_agent_not_in_any_proposed_teams(countryamedicalorganization,christiancountrychumanitarianorganization,coastvillage),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/AGT001+1.ax',event_37) ).
fof(c_0_6,plain,
! [X64,X65,X66] :
( accept_leader(X64,X65)
| ~ any_agent_in_all_proposed_teams(X64,X65,X66) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[a1_5])])]) ).
fof(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
~ ~ accept_team(countryamedicalorganization,countryahumanitarianorganization,coastvillage,n5),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[query_4]) ).
fof(c_0_8,plain,
! [X21,X22,X23] :
( ~ accept_leader(X21,X22)
| ~ accept_city(X21,X23)
| ~ the_agent_not_in_any_proposed_teams(X21,X22,X23) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[a1_6])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
( ~ any_agent_in_all_proposed_teams(X1,X2,X3)
| accept_leader(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
any_agent_in_all_proposed_teams(countryamedicalorganization,christiancountrychumanitarianorganization,coastvillage),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[event_38]) ).
fof(c_0_11,plain,
! [X57,X58,X59,X60] :
( ( accept_team(X57,X60,X58,X59)
| ~ accept_number(X57,X59)
| ~ accept_leader(X57,X60)
| ~ accept_city(X57,X58) )
& ( ~ accept_team(X57,X60,X58,X59)
| accept_number(X57,X59) )
& ( ~ accept_team(X57,X60,X58,X59)
| accept_leader(X57,X60) )
& ( ~ accept_team(X57,X60,X58,X59)
| accept_city(X57,X58) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[a1_1])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
accept_team(countryamedicalorganization,countryahumanitarianorganization,coastvillage,n5),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
( ~ accept_leader(X1,X2)
| ~ accept_city(X1,X3)
| ~ the_agent_not_in_any_proposed_teams(X1,X2,X3) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
the_agent_not_in_any_proposed_teams(countryamedicalorganization,christiancountrychumanitarianorganization,coastvillage),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[event_37]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
accept_leader(countryamedicalorganization,christiancountrychumanitarianorganization),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
( ~ accept_team(X1,X3,X2,X4)
| accept_city(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
accept_team(countryamedicalorganization,countryahumanitarianorganization,coastvillage,n5),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
~ accept_city(countryamedicalorganization,coastvillage),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]),c_0_15])]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]),c_0_18]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02 % Problem : AGT004+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v3.1.0.
% 0.00/0.04 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.08/0.35 % Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% 0.08/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/0.35 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.08/0.35 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.08/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.08/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.08/0.35 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 12:50:48 UTC 2026
% 0.08/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.08/0.36 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.13/0.40 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.13/0.40 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.13/0.45 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.13/0.45 % Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.13/0.45 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.13/0.45 % Starting G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with 900s (3) cores
% 0.13/0.45 % Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.13/0.45 % Starting new_bool_1 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.13/0.45 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.45 % sh5l with pid 3323111 completed with status 0
% 0.13/0.45 % Result found by sh5l
% 0.13/0.45 % Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.13/0.45 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.13/0.45 % Starting G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with 900s (3) cores
% 0.13/0.45 % Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.13/0.45 % Starting new_bool_1 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.13/0.45 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.45 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000)
% 0.13/0.45 % SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.13/0.45 % Search class: FGHSF-FFLM21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.13/0.45 % partial match(1): FGHSF-FFMM21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.13/0.45 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.13/0.45 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 28s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.45 % SubtermCWHack with pid 3323112 completed with status 0
% 0.13/0.45 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.13/0.45 % Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.13/0.45 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.13/0.45 % Starting G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with 900s (3) cores
% 0.13/0.45 % Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.13/0.45 % Starting new_bool_1 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.13/0.45 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.45 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000)
% 0.13/0.45 % SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.13/0.45 % Search class: FGHSF-FFLM21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.13/0.45 % partial match(1): FGHSF-FFMM21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.13/0.45 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.13/0.45 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 28s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.45 % Preprocessing time : 0.004 s
% 0.13/0.45
% 0.13/0.45 % Proof found!
% 0.13/0.45 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.13/0.45 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.13/0.45 % Parsed axioms : 556
% 0.13/0.45 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 259
% 0.13/0.45 % Initial clauses : 310
% 0.13/0.45 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.13/0.45 % Initial clauses in saturation : 310
% 0.13/0.45 % Processed clauses : 429
% 0.13/0.45 % ...of these trivial : 32
% 0.13/0.45 % ...subsumed : 1
% 0.13/0.45 % ...remaining for further processing : 396
% 0.13/0.45 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 2
% 0.13/0.45 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.13/0.45 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.13/0.45 % Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.13/0.45 % Generated clauses : 335
% 0.13/0.45 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 229
% 0.13/0.45 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.13/0.45 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.13/0.45 % Paramodulations : 331
% 0.13/0.45 % Factorizations : 2
% 0.13/0.45 % NegExts : 0
% 0.13/0.45 % Equation resolutions : 2
% 0.13/0.45 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.13/0.45 % Total rewrite steps : 58
% 0.13/0.45 % ...of those cached : 17
% 0.13/0.45 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.13/0.45 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.13/0.45 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.13/0.45 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.13/0.45 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.13/0.45 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.13/0.45 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.13/0.45 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.13/0.45 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.13/0.45 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.13/0.45 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.13/0.45 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.13/0.45 % Current number of processed clauses : 394
% 0.13/0.45 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 321
% 0.13/0.45 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.13/0.45 % Negative unit clauses : 43
% 0.13/0.45 % Non-unit-clauses : 30
% 0.13/0.45 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 98
% 0.13/0.45 % ...number of literals in the above : 251
% 0.13/0.45 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.13/0.45 % Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 0.13/0.45 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 186
% 0.13/0.45 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 165
% 0.13/0.45 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.13/0.45 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 614
% 0.13/0.45 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.13/0.45 % BW rewrite match attempts : 126
% 0.13/0.45 % BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.13/0.45 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.13/0.45 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.13/0.45 % Termbank termtop insertions : 14711
% 0.13/0.45 % Search garbage collected termcells : 1738
% 0.13/0.45
% 0.13/0.45 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.13/0.45 % User time : 0.015 s
% 0.13/0.45 % System time : 0.008 s
% 0.13/0.45 % Total time : 0.023 s
% 0.13/0.45 % Maximum resident set size: 4852 pages
% 0.13/0.45
% 0.13/0.45 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.13/0.45 % User time : 0.025 s
% 0.13/0.45 % System time : 0.012 s
% 0.13/0.45 % Total time : 0.037 s
% 0.13/0.45 % Maximum resident set size: 5120 pages
% 0.13/0.45 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------