%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : Duper---1.0 % Problem : AGT015+1 : TPTP v9.2.0. Bugfixed v3.1.0. % Transfm : none % Format : tptp:raw % Command : duper %s % Computer : n014.cluster.edu % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz % Memory : 8042.1875MB % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % CPULimit : 300s % WCLimit : 300s % DateTime : Fri Oct 3 07:43:50 PM UTC 2025 % Result : Theorem 41.47s 41.67s % Output : Proof 41.47s % Verified : % SZS Type : - % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % 0.11/0.13 % Problem : AGT015+1 : TPTP v9.2.0. Bugfixed v3.1.0. % 0.11/0.14 % Command : duper %s % 0.13/0.35 % Computer : n014.cluster.edu % 0.13/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % 0.13/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz % 0.13/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB % 0.13/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % 0.13/0.35 % CPULimit : 300 % 0.13/0.35 % WCLimit : 300 % 0.13/0.35 % DateTime : Thu Oct 2 09:04:08 EDT 2025 % 0.13/0.35 % CPUTime : % 41.47/41.67 SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p % 41.47/41.67 SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark.p % 41.47/41.67 Clause #4 (by assumption #[]): Eq (∀ (A L C : Iota), any_agent_in_all_proposed_teams A L C → accept_leader A L) True % 41.47/41.67 Clause #5 (by assumption #[]): Eq (∀ (A L C : Iota), the_agent_not_in_any_proposed_teams A L C → Not (And (accept_city A C) (accept_leader A L))) True % 41.47/41.67 Clause #267 (by assumption #[]): Eq (the_agent_not_in_any_proposed_teams muslimcountrybhumanitarianorganization sufferterragovernment towna) True % 41.47/41.67 Clause #268 (by assumption #[]): Eq (any_agent_in_all_proposed_teams muslimcountrybhumanitarianorganization sufferterragovernment towna) True % 41.47/41.67 Clause #555 (by assumption #[]): Eq (Not (Exists fun X => Exists fun Y => Not (accept_city X Y))) True % 41.47/41.67 Clause #613 (by clausification #[4]): ∀ (a : Iota), Eq (∀ (L C : Iota), any_agent_in_all_proposed_teams a L C → accept_leader a L) True % 41.47/41.67 Clause #614 (by clausification #[613]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota), Eq (∀ (C : Iota), any_agent_in_all_proposed_teams a a_1 C → accept_leader a a_1) True % 41.47/41.67 Clause #615 (by clausification #[614]): ∀ (a a_1 a_2 : Iota), Eq (any_agent_in_all_proposed_teams a a_1 a_2 → accept_leader a a_1) True % 41.47/41.67 Clause #616 (by clausification #[615]): ∀ (a a_1 a_2 : Iota), Or (Eq (any_agent_in_all_proposed_teams a a_1 a_2) False) (Eq (accept_leader a a_1) True) % 41.47/41.67 Clause #627 (by clausification #[5]): ∀ (a : Iota), % 41.47/41.67 Eq (∀ (L C : Iota), the_agent_not_in_any_proposed_teams a L C → Not (And (accept_city a C) (accept_leader a L))) True % 41.47/41.67 Clause #628 (by clausification #[627]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota), % 41.47/41.67 Eq (∀ (C : Iota), the_agent_not_in_any_proposed_teams a a_1 C → Not (And (accept_city a C) (accept_leader a a_1))) % 41.47/41.67 True % 41.47/41.67 Clause #629 (by clausification #[628]): ∀ (a a_1 a_2 : Iota), % 41.47/41.67 Eq (the_agent_not_in_any_proposed_teams a a_1 a_2 → Not (And (accept_city a a_2) (accept_leader a a_1))) True % 41.47/41.67 Clause #630 (by clausification #[629]): ∀ (a a_1 a_2 : Iota), % 41.47/41.67 Or (Eq (the_agent_not_in_any_proposed_teams a a_1 a_2) False) % 41.47/41.67 (Eq (Not (And (accept_city a a_2) (accept_leader a a_1))) True) % 41.47/41.67 Clause #631 (by clausification #[630]): ∀ (a a_1 a_2 : Iota), % 41.47/41.67 Or (Eq (the_agent_not_in_any_proposed_teams a a_1 a_2) False) % 41.47/41.67 (Eq (And (accept_city a a_2) (accept_leader a a_1)) False) % 41.47/41.67 Clause #632 (by clausification #[631]): ∀ (a a_1 a_2 : Iota), % 41.47/41.67 Or (Eq (the_agent_not_in_any_proposed_teams a a_1 a_2) False) % 41.47/41.67 (Or (Eq (accept_city a a_2) False) (Eq (accept_leader a a_1) False)) % 41.47/41.67 Clause #767 (by superposition #[268, 616]): Or (Eq (accept_leader muslimcountrybhumanitarianorganization sufferterragovernment) True) (Eq False True) % 41.47/41.67 Clause #768 (by superposition #[267, 632]): Or (Eq (accept_city muslimcountrybhumanitarianorganization towna) False) % 41.47/41.67 (Or (Eq (accept_leader muslimcountrybhumanitarianorganization sufferterragovernment) False) (Eq False True)) % 41.47/41.67 Clause #843 (by clausification #[767]): Eq (accept_leader muslimcountrybhumanitarianorganization sufferterragovernment) True % 41.47/41.67 Clause #1189 (by clausification #[768]): Or (Eq (accept_city muslimcountrybhumanitarianorganization towna) False) % 41.47/41.67 (Eq (accept_leader muslimcountrybhumanitarianorganization sufferterragovernment) False) % 41.47/41.67 Clause #9047 (by clausification #[555]): Eq (Exists fun X => Exists fun Y => Not (accept_city X Y)) False % 41.47/41.67 Clause #9048 (by clausification #[9047]): ∀ (a : Iota), Eq (Exists fun Y => Not (accept_city a Y)) False % 41.47/41.67 Clause #9049 (by clausification #[9048]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota), Eq (Not (accept_city a a_1)) False % 41.47/41.67 Clause #9050 (by clausification #[9049]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota), Eq (accept_city a a_1) True % 41.47/41.67 Clause #9053 (by backward demodulation #[9050, 1189]): Or (Eq True False) (Eq (accept_leader muslimcountrybhumanitarianorganization sufferterragovernment) False) % 41.47/41.67 Clause #9063 (by clausification #[9053]): Eq (accept_leader muslimcountrybhumanitarianorganization sufferterragovernment) False % 41.47/41.67 Clause #9064 (by superposition #[9063, 843]): Eq False True % 41.47/41.67 Clause #9069 (by clausification #[9064]): False % 41.47/41.67 SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark.p %------------------------------------------------------------------------------