%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.5.1
% Problem : AGT015+2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v3.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 11:47:36 AM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 0.17s 0.69s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.17s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 2
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 10 ( 10 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 10 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 9 ( 9 ~; 0 |; 0 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 5 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 2 ( 2 usr; 2 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 10 ( 2 sgn 2 !; 6 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(query_15,conjecture,
? [X7,X8] : ~ accept_city(X7,X8),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',query_15) ).
fof(deduced_366,axiom,
~ accept_city(muslimcountrybhumanitarianorganization,towna),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/AGT001+2.ax',deduced_366) ).
fof(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
~ ? [X7,X8] : ~ accept_city(X7,X8),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[query_15]) ).
fof(c_0_3,plain,
~ accept_city(muslimcountrybhumanitarianorganization,towna),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[deduced_366]) ).
fof(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
~ ? [X7,X8] : ~ accept_city(X7,X8),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).
fof(c_0_5,plain,
~ accept_city(muslimcountrybhumanitarianorganization,towna),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).
fof(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
! [X18,X19] : accept_city(X18,X19),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,plain,
~ accept_city(muslimcountrybhumanitarianorganization,towna),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
accept_city(X1,X2),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : AGT015+2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v3.1.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.13/0.59 % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.59 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.59 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.59 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.13/0.59 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.13/0.59 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.59 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.59 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 12:51:54 UTC 2026
% 0.13/0.60 % CPUTime :
% 0.13/0.60 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.17/0.64 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.17/0.64 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.17/0.69 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.17/0.69 % Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.17/0.69 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.17/0.69 % Starting G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with 900s (3) cores
% 0.17/0.69 % Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.17/0.69 % Starting new_bool_1 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.17/0.69 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.69 % new_bool_3 with pid 2300140 completed with status 0
% 0.17/0.69 % Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.17/0.69 % Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.17/0.69 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.17/0.69 % Starting G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with 900s (3) cores
% 0.17/0.69 % Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.17/0.69 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.17/0.69 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.17/0.69 % Search class: FHUNF-FSLM11-SFFFFFNN
% 0.17/0.69 % partial match(2): FGUNF-FSLF11-SFFFFFNN
% 0.17/0.69 % Scheduled 6 strats onto 2 cores with 600 seconds (600 total)
% 0.17/0.69 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 61s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.69 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 225s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.69 % SubtermCWHack with pid 2300146 completed with status 0
% 0.17/0.69 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.17/0.69 % Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.17/0.69 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.17/0.69 % Starting G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with 900s (3) cores
% 0.17/0.69 % Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.17/0.69 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.17/0.69 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.17/0.69 % Search class: FHUNF-FSLM11-SFFFFFNN
% 0.17/0.69 % partial match(2): FGUNF-FSLF11-SFFFFFNN
% 0.17/0.69 % Scheduled 6 strats onto 2 cores with 600 seconds (600 total)
% 0.17/0.69 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 61s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.69 % Preprocessing time : 0.003 s
% 0.17/0.69
% 0.17/0.69 % Proof found!
% 0.17/0.69 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.17/0.69 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.17/0.69 % Parsed axioms : 923
% 0.17/0.69 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 442
% 0.17/0.69 % Initial clauses : 484
% 0.17/0.69 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.17/0.69 % Initial clauses in saturation : 484
% 0.17/0.69 % Processed clauses : 230
% 0.17/0.69 % ...of these trivial : 37
% 0.17/0.69 % ...subsumed : 0
% 0.17/0.69 % ...remaining for further processing : 192
% 0.17/0.69 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.17/0.69 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.17/0.69 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.17/0.69 % Backward-rewritten : 42
% 0.17/0.69 % Generated clauses : 0
% 0.17/0.69 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 0
% 0.17/0.69 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.17/0.69 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.17/0.69 % Paramodulations : 0
% 0.17/0.69 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.17/0.69 % NegExts : 0
% 0.17/0.69 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.17/0.69 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.17/0.69 % Total rewrite steps : 80
% 0.17/0.69 % ...of those cached : 0
% 0.17/0.69 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.17/0.69 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.17/0.69 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.17/0.69 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.17/0.69 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.17/0.69 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.17/0.69 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.17/0.69 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.17/0.69 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.17/0.69 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.17/0.69 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.17/0.69 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.17/0.69 % Current number of processed clauses : 150
% 0.17/0.69 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 150
% 0.17/0.69 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.17/0.69 % Negative unit clauses : 0
% 0.17/0.69 % Non-unit-clauses : 0
% 0.17/0.69 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 254
% 0.17/0.69 % ...number of literals in the above : 260
% 0.17/0.69 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.17/0.69 % Current number of archived clauses : 42
% 0.17/0.69 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.17/0.69 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.17/0.69 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.17/0.69 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.17/0.69 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.17/0.69 % BW rewrite match attempts : 42
% 0.17/0.69 % BW rewrite match successes : 42
% 0.17/0.69 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.17/0.69 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.17/0.69 % Termbank termtop insertions : 14544
% 0.17/0.69 % Search garbage collected termcells : 1860
% 0.17/0.69
% 0.17/0.69 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.17/0.69 % User time : 0.009 s
% 0.17/0.69 % System time : 0.007 s
% 0.17/0.69 % Total time : 0.016 s
% 0.17/0.69 % Maximum resident set size: 5008 pages
% 0.17/0.69
% 0.17/0.69 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.17/0.69 % User time : 0.027 s
% 0.17/0.69 % System time : 0.011 s
% 0.17/0.69 % Total time : 0.038 s
% 0.17/0.69 % Maximum resident set size: 5376 pages
% 0.17/0.69 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------