%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : AGT016+2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v3.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 11:47:27 AM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 0.14s 0.48s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.14s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 13 ( 10 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 38 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 16 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 49 ( 24 ~; 15 |; 9 &)
% ( 1 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 9 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 11 ( 11 usr; 11 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 13 ( 2 sgn 4 !; 6 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(query_16,conjecture,
? [X7,X8] : ~ accept_population(muslimcountrybhumanitarianorganization,X7,X8),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',query_16) ).
fof(deduced_366,axiom,
~ accept_city(muslimcountrybhumanitarianorganization,towna),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/AGT001+2.ax',deduced_366) ).
fof(a2_9,axiom,
! [X1] :
( ( accept_population(X1,other,n0)
& accept_population(X1,native,n0)
& accept_population(X1,muslim,n1)
& accept_population(X1,christian,n24)
& accept_population(X1,atheist,n75) )
<=> accept_city(X1,towna) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/AGT001+0.ax',a2_9) ).
fof(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
~ ? [X7,X8] : ~ accept_population(muslimcountrybhumanitarianorganization,X7,X8),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[query_16]) ).
fof(c_0_4,plain,
~ accept_city(muslimcountrybhumanitarianorganization,towna),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[deduced_366]) ).
fof(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
~ ? [X7,X8] : ~ accept_population(muslimcountrybhumanitarianorganization,X7,X8),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).
fof(c_0_6,plain,
~ accept_city(muslimcountrybhumanitarianorganization,towna),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
fof(c_0_7,plain,
! [X21] :
( ( ~ accept_city(X21,towna)
| accept_population(X21,other,n0) )
& ( ~ accept_city(X21,towna)
| accept_population(X21,native,n0) )
& ( ~ accept_city(X21,towna)
| accept_population(X21,muslim,n1) )
& ( ~ accept_city(X21,towna)
| accept_population(X21,christian,n24) )
& ( ~ accept_city(X21,towna)
| accept_population(X21,atheist,n75) )
& ( accept_city(X21,towna)
| ~ accept_population(X21,other,n0)
| ~ accept_population(X21,native,n0)
| ~ accept_population(X21,muslim,n1)
| ~ accept_population(X21,christian,n24)
| ~ accept_population(X21,atheist,n75) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[a2_9])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
! [X18,X19] : accept_population(muslimcountrybhumanitarianorganization,X18,X19),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
~ accept_city(muslimcountrybhumanitarianorganization,towna),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
( ~ accept_population(X1,other,n0)
| ~ accept_population(X1,native,n0)
| ~ accept_population(X1,muslim,n1)
| ~ accept_population(X1,christian,n24)
| ~ accept_population(X1,atheist,n75)
| accept_city(X1,towna) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
accept_population(muslimcountrybhumanitarianorganization,X1,X2),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]),c_0_11]),c_0_11]),c_0_11]),c_0_11]),c_0_11])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02 % Problem : AGT016+2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v3.1.0.
% 0.00/0.04 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.10/0.35 % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.35 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.35 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.36 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.10/0.36 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 12:51:14 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.10/0.36 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.14/0.40 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.14/0.40 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.14/0.48 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.14/0.48 % Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.14/0.48 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.14/0.48 % Starting G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with 900s (3) cores
% 0.14/0.48 % Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.14/0.48 % Starting new_bool_1 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.14/0.48 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.48 % sh5l with pid 1919934 completed with status 0
% 0.14/0.48 % Result found by sh5l
% 0.14/0.48 % Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.14/0.48 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.14/0.48 % Starting G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with 900s (3) cores
% 0.14/0.48 % Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.14/0.48 % Starting new_bool_1 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.14/0.48 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.48 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000)
% 0.14/0.48 % SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.14/0.48 % Search class: FHUNF-FSLM21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.14/0.48 % partial match(2): FHUNF-FFLF21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.14/0.48 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.14/0.48 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.48 % SubtermCWHack with pid 1919938 completed with status 0
% 0.14/0.48 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.14/0.48 % Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.14/0.48 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.14/0.48 % Starting G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with 900s (3) cores
% 0.14/0.48 % Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.14/0.48 % Starting new_bool_1 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.14/0.48 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.48 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000)
% 0.14/0.48 % SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.14/0.48 % Search class: FHUNF-FSLM21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.14/0.48 % partial match(2): FHUNF-FFLF21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.14/0.48 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.14/0.48 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.48 % Preprocessing time : 0.006 s
% 0.14/0.48
% 0.14/0.48 % Proof found!
% 0.14/0.48 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.14/0.48 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.14/0.48 % Parsed axioms : 923
% 0.14/0.48 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 278
% 0.14/0.48 % Initial clauses : 669
% 0.14/0.48 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.14/0.48 % Initial clauses in saturation : 669
% 0.14/0.48 % Processed clauses : 682
% 0.14/0.48 % ...of these trivial : 39
% 0.14/0.48 % ...subsumed : 0
% 0.14/0.48 % ...remaining for further processing : 643
% 0.14/0.48 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.14/0.48 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.14/0.48 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.14/0.48 % Backward-rewritten : 14
% 0.14/0.48 % Generated clauses : 760
% 0.14/0.48 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 94
% 0.14/0.48 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.14/0.48 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.14/0.48 % Paramodulations : 760
% 0.14/0.48 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.14/0.48 % NegExts : 0
% 0.14/0.48 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.14/0.48 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.14/0.48 % Total rewrite steps : 744
% 0.14/0.48 % ...of those cached : 404
% 0.14/0.48 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.14/0.48 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.14/0.48 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.14/0.48 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.14/0.48 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.14/0.48 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.14/0.48 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.14/0.48 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.14/0.48 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.14/0.48 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.14/0.48 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.14/0.48 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.14/0.48 % Current number of processed clauses : 629
% 0.14/0.48 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 551
% 0.14/0.48 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.14/0.48 % Negative unit clauses : 45
% 0.14/0.48 % Non-unit-clauses : 33
% 0.14/0.48 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 80
% 0.14/0.48 % ...number of literals in the above : 234
% 0.14/0.48 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.14/0.48 % Current number of archived clauses : 14
% 0.14/0.48 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 166
% 0.14/0.48 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 79
% 0.14/0.48 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.14/0.48 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1164
% 0.14/0.48 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.14/0.48 % BW rewrite match attempts : 335
% 0.14/0.48 % BW rewrite match successes : 14
% 0.14/0.48 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.14/0.48 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.14/0.48 % Termbank termtop insertions : 24534
% 0.14/0.48 % Search garbage collected termcells : 1696
% 0.14/0.48
% 0.14/0.48 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.14/0.48 % User time : 0.029 s
% 0.14/0.48 % System time : 0.012 s
% 0.14/0.48 % Total time : 0.041 s
% 0.14/0.48 % Maximum resident set size: 5272 pages
% 0.14/0.48
% 0.14/0.48 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.14/0.48 % User time : 0.041 s
% 0.14/0.48 % System time : 0.018 s
% 0.14/0.48 % Total time : 0.059 s
% 0.14/0.48 % Maximum resident set size: 5376 pages
% 0.14/0.48 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------