%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.5.1
% Problem : AGT016+2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v3.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 11:47:37 AM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 0.32s 0.69s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.32s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 13 ( 10 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 38 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 16 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 49 ( 24 ~; 15 |; 9 &)
% ( 1 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 9 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 11 ( 11 usr; 11 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 13 ( 2 sgn 4 !; 6 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(query_16,conjecture,
? [X7,X8] : ~ accept_population(muslimcountrybhumanitarianorganization,X7,X8),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',query_16) ).
fof(deduced_366,axiom,
~ accept_city(muslimcountrybhumanitarianorganization,towna),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/AGT001+2.ax',deduced_366) ).
fof(a2_9,axiom,
! [X1] :
( ( accept_population(X1,other,n0)
& accept_population(X1,native,n0)
& accept_population(X1,muslim,n1)
& accept_population(X1,christian,n24)
& accept_population(X1,atheist,n75) )
<=> accept_city(X1,towna) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/AGT001+0.ax',a2_9) ).
fof(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
~ ? [X7,X8] : ~ accept_population(muslimcountrybhumanitarianorganization,X7,X8),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[query_16]) ).
fof(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
~ ? [X7,X8] : ~ accept_population(muslimcountrybhumanitarianorganization,X7,X8),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).
fof(c_0_5,plain,
~ accept_city(muslimcountrybhumanitarianorganization,towna),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[deduced_366]) ).
fof(c_0_6,plain,
! [X48] :
( ( ~ accept_city(X48,towna)
| accept_population(X48,other,n0) )
& ( ~ accept_city(X48,towna)
| accept_population(X48,native,n0) )
& ( ~ accept_city(X48,towna)
| accept_population(X48,muslim,n1) )
& ( ~ accept_city(X48,towna)
| accept_population(X48,christian,n24) )
& ( ~ accept_city(X48,towna)
| accept_population(X48,atheist,n75) )
& ( accept_city(X48,towna)
| ~ accept_population(X48,other,n0)
| ~ accept_population(X48,native,n0)
| ~ accept_population(X48,muslim,n1)
| ~ accept_population(X48,christian,n24)
| ~ accept_population(X48,atheist,n75) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[a2_9])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
! [X88,X89] : accept_population(muslimcountrybhumanitarianorganization,X88,X89),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])]) ).
fof(c_0_8,plain,
~ accept_city(muslimcountrybhumanitarianorganization,towna),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
( ~ accept_population(X1,other,n0)
| ~ accept_population(X1,native,n0)
| ~ accept_population(X1,muslim,n1)
| ~ accept_population(X1,christian,n24)
| ~ accept_population(X1,atheist,n75)
| accept_city(X1,towna) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
accept_population(muslimcountrybhumanitarianorganization,X1,X2),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
~ accept_city(muslimcountrybhumanitarianorganization,towna),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]),c_0_10]),c_0_10]),c_0_10]),c_0_10])]),c_0_11]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.05 % Problem : AGT016+2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v3.1.0.
% 0.00/0.08 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.19/0.45 % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.19/0.45 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.19/0.45 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.19/0.45 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.19/0.45 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.19/0.45 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.19/0.45 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.19/0.45 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 12:49:20 UTC 2026
% 0.19/0.46 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.46 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.25/0.56 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.25/0.56 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.32/0.69 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.32/0.69 % Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.32/0.69 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.32/0.69 % Starting G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with 900s (3) cores
% 0.32/0.69 % Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.32/0.69 % Starting new_bool_1 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.32/0.69 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.32/0.69 % G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with pid 4097986 completed with status 0
% 0.32/0.69 % Result found by G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI
% 0.32/0.69 % Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.32/0.69 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.32/0.69 % Starting G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with 900s (3) cores
% 0.32/0.69 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.32/0.69 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.32/0.69 % Search class: FGHSF-FSLM21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.32/0.69 % Scheduled 11 strats onto 3 cores with 900 seconds (900 total)
% 0.32/0.69 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 82s (1) cores
% 0.32/0.69 % Starting G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with 91s (1) cores
% 0.32/0.69 % Starting G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_S4d with 82s (1) cores
% 0.32/0.69 % G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with pid 4097991 completed with status 0
% 0.32/0.69 % Result found by G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI
% 0.32/0.69 % Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.32/0.69 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.32/0.69 % Starting G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with 900s (3) cores
% 0.32/0.69 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.32/0.69 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.32/0.69 % Search class: FGHSF-FSLM21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.32/0.69 % Scheduled 11 strats onto 3 cores with 900 seconds (900 total)
% 0.32/0.69 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 82s (1) cores
% 0.32/0.69 % Starting G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with 91s (1) cores
% 0.32/0.69 % Preprocessing time : 0.007 s
% 0.32/0.69
% 0.32/0.69 % Proof found!
% 0.32/0.69 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.32/0.69 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.32/0.69 % Parsed axioms : 923
% 0.32/0.69 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.32/0.69 % Initial clauses : 996
% 0.32/0.69 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.32/0.69 % Initial clauses in saturation : 996
% 0.32/0.69 % Processed clauses : 934
% 0.32/0.69 % ...of these trivial : 37
% 0.32/0.69 % ...subsumed : 0
% 0.32/0.69 % ...remaining for further processing : 897
% 0.32/0.69 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 2
% 0.32/0.69 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.32/0.69 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.32/0.69 % Backward-rewritten : 14
% 0.32/0.69 % Generated clauses : 1236
% 0.32/0.69 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 581
% 0.32/0.69 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.32/0.69 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.32/0.69 % Paramodulations : 1232
% 0.32/0.69 % Factorizations : 2
% 0.32/0.69 % NegExts : 0
% 0.32/0.69 % Equation resolutions : 2
% 0.32/0.69 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.32/0.69 % Total rewrite steps : 795
% 0.32/0.69 % ...of those cached : 443
% 0.32/0.69 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.32/0.69 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.32/0.69 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.32/0.69 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.32/0.69 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.32/0.69 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.32/0.69 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.32/0.69 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.32/0.69 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.32/0.69 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.32/0.69 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.32/0.69 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.32/0.69 % Current number of processed clauses : 881
% 0.32/0.69 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 738
% 0.32/0.69 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.32/0.69 % Negative unit clauses : 45
% 0.32/0.69 % Non-unit-clauses : 98
% 0.32/0.69 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 643
% 0.32/0.69 % ...number of literals in the above : 1519
% 0.32/0.69 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.32/0.69 % Current number of archived clauses : 14
% 0.32/0.69 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 2087
% 0.32/0.69 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 827
% 0.32/0.69 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.32/0.69 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 747
% 0.32/0.69 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.32/0.69 % BW rewrite match attempts : 360
% 0.32/0.69 % BW rewrite match successes : 14
% 0.32/0.69 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.32/0.69 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.32/0.69 % Termbank termtop insertions : 43445
% 0.32/0.69 % Search garbage collected termcells : 1142
% 0.32/0.69
% 0.32/0.69 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.32/0.69 % User time : 0.058 s
% 0.32/0.69 % System time : 0.012 s
% 0.32/0.69 % Total time : 0.070 s
% 0.32/0.69 % Maximum resident set size: 4760 pages
% 0.32/0.69
% 0.32/0.69 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.32/0.69 % User time : 0.145 s
% 0.32/0.69 % System time : 0.033 s
% 0.32/0.69 % Total time : 0.178 s
% 0.32/0.69 % Maximum resident set size: 5120 pages
% 0.32/0.69 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------