%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.5.1
% Problem : AGT017+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v3.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 11:47:37 AM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 0.15s 10.48s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.15s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 17 ( 11 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 26 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 23 ( 14 ~; 6 |; 1 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 2 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 7 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 5 ( 4 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 3 ( 3 usr; 3 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 23 ( 2 sgn 13 !; 3 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(query_17,conjecture,
? [X7] : ~ accept_city(muslimcountrybhumanitarianorganization,X7),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',query_17) ).
fof(a1_5,axiom,
! [X1,X4,X2] :
( any_agent_in_all_proposed_teams(X1,X4,X2)
=> accept_leader(X1,X4) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/AGT001+0.ax',a1_5) ).
fof(a1_6,axiom,
! [X1,X4,X2] :
( the_agent_not_in_any_proposed_teams(X1,X4,X2)
=> ~ ( accept_leader(X1,X4)
& accept_city(X1,X2) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/AGT001+0.ax',a1_6) ).
fof(event_249,axiom,
any_agent_in_all_proposed_teams(muslimcountrybhumanitarianorganization,sufferterragovernment,towna),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/AGT001+1.ax',event_249) ).
fof(event_248,axiom,
the_agent_not_in_any_proposed_teams(muslimcountrybhumanitarianorganization,sufferterragovernment,towna),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/AGT001+1.ax',event_248) ).
fof(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
~ ? [X7] : ~ accept_city(muslimcountrybhumanitarianorganization,X7),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[query_17]) ).
fof(c_0_6,plain,
! [X32,X33,X34] :
( accept_leader(X32,X33)
| ~ any_agent_in_all_proposed_teams(X32,X33,X34) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[a1_5])])]) ).
fof(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
~ ? [X7] : ~ accept_city(muslimcountrybhumanitarianorganization,X7),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
fof(c_0_8,plain,
! [X26,X27,X28] :
( ~ accept_leader(X26,X27)
| ~ accept_city(X26,X28)
| ~ the_agent_not_in_any_proposed_teams(X26,X27,X28) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[a1_6])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
( ~ any_agent_in_all_proposed_teams(X1,X2,X3)
| accept_leader(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
any_agent_in_all_proposed_teams(muslimcountrybhumanitarianorganization,sufferterragovernment,towna),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[event_249]) ).
fof(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
! [X18] : accept_city(muslimcountrybhumanitarianorganization,X18),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_7])]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
( ~ accept_leader(X1,X2)
| ~ accept_city(X1,X3)
| ~ the_agent_not_in_any_proposed_teams(X1,X2,X3) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
the_agent_not_in_any_proposed_teams(muslimcountrybhumanitarianorganization,sufferterragovernment,towna),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[event_248]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
accept_leader(muslimcountrybhumanitarianorganization,sufferterragovernment),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
accept_city(muslimcountrybhumanitarianorganization,X1),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]),c_0_14]),c_0_15])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : AGT017+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v3.1.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/10.38 % Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% 0.11/10.38 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/10.38 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/10.38 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/10.38 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/10.38 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/10.38 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.11/10.38 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 12:51:28 UTC 2026
% 0.11/10.39 % CPUTime :
% 0.11/10.39 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.15/10.43 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.15/10.43 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.15/10.48 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.15/10.48 % Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/10.48 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/10.48 % Starting G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with 900s (3) cores
% 0.15/10.48 % Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.15/10.48 % Starting new_bool_1 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.15/10.48 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/10.48 % sh5l with pid 133760 completed with status 0
% 0.15/10.48 % Result found by sh5l
% 0.15/10.48 % Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/10.48 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/10.48 % Starting G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with 900s (3) cores
% 0.15/10.48 % Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.15/10.48 % Starting new_bool_1 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.15/10.48 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/10.48 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000)
% 0.15/10.48 % SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.15/10.48 % Search class: FGHSF-FFLM21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.15/10.48 % partial match(1): FGHSF-FFMM21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.15/10.48 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.15/10.48 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 28s (1) cores
% 0.15/10.48 % SubtermCWHack with pid 133765 completed with status 0
% 0.15/10.48 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.15/10.48 % Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/10.48 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/10.48 % Starting G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with 900s (3) cores
% 0.15/10.48 % Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.15/10.48 % Starting new_bool_1 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.15/10.48 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/10.48 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000)
% 0.15/10.48 % SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.15/10.48 % Search class: FGHSF-FFLM21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.15/10.48 % partial match(1): FGHSF-FFMM21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.15/10.48 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.15/10.48 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 28s (1) cores
% 0.15/10.48 % Preprocessing time : 0.004 s
% 0.15/10.48
% 0.15/10.48 % Proof found!
% 0.15/10.48 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.15/10.48 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.15/10.48 % Parsed axioms : 556
% 0.15/10.48 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 265
% 0.15/10.48 % Initial clauses : 304
% 0.15/10.48 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.15/10.48 % Initial clauses in saturation : 304
% 0.15/10.48 % Processed clauses : 385
% 0.15/10.48 % ...of these trivial : 29
% 0.15/10.48 % ...subsumed : 0
% 0.15/10.48 % ...remaining for further processing : 356
% 0.15/10.48 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 2
% 0.15/10.48 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.15/10.48 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.15/10.48 % Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.15/10.48 % Generated clauses : 158
% 0.15/10.48 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 150
% 0.15/10.48 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.15/10.48 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.15/10.48 % Paramodulations : 154
% 0.15/10.48 % Factorizations : 2
% 0.15/10.48 % NegExts : 0
% 0.15/10.48 % Equation resolutions : 2
% 0.15/10.48 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.15/10.48 % Total rewrite steps : 33
% 0.15/10.48 % ...of those cached : 0
% 0.15/10.48 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.15/10.48 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.15/10.48 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.15/10.48 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.15/10.48 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.15/10.48 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.15/10.48 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.15/10.48 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.15/10.48 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.15/10.48 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.15/10.48 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.15/10.48 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.15/10.48 % Current number of processed clauses : 354
% 0.15/10.48 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 292
% 0.15/10.48 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.15/10.48 % Negative unit clauses : 39
% 0.15/10.48 % Non-unit-clauses : 23
% 0.15/10.48 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 68
% 0.15/10.48 % ...number of literals in the above : 128
% 0.15/10.48 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.15/10.48 % Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 0.15/10.48 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 129
% 0.15/10.48 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 116
% 0.15/10.48 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.15/10.48 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 459
% 0.15/10.48 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.15/10.48 % BW rewrite match attempts : 124
% 0.15/10.48 % BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.15/10.48 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.15/10.48 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.15/10.48 % Termbank termtop insertions : 13185
% 0.15/10.48 % Search garbage collected termcells : 1751
% 0.15/10.48
% 0.15/10.48 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/10.48 % User time : 0.018 s
% 0.15/10.48 % System time : 0.008 s
% 0.15/10.48 % Total time : 0.026 s
% 0.15/10.48 % Maximum resident set size: 4852 pages
% 0.15/10.48
% 0.15/10.48 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/10.48 % User time : 0.028 s
% 0.15/10.48 % System time : 0.012 s
% 0.15/10.48 % Total time : 0.040 s
% 0.15/10.48 % Maximum resident set size: 5120 pages
% 0.15/10.48 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------