↑ Up

E---3.5.1.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : AGT037^1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v5.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Sep 30 07:44:30 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.21s 0.29s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.21s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    9
%            Number of leaves      :   16
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   53 (  32 unt;   0 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  113 (  22 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    8 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  242 (  33   ~;  23   |;   0   &; 180   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   6  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   13 (   4 avg)
%            Number of types       :    3 (   1 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   49 (  49   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :   20 (  18 usr;   4 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :  110 (  48   ^;  59   !;   3   ?; 110   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(decl_sort1,type,
    mu: $tType ).

thf(decl_25,type,
    mnot: ( $i > $o ) > $i > $o ).

thf(decl_26,type,
    mor: ( $i > $o ) > ( $i > $o ) > $i > $o ).

thf(decl_28,type,
    mimplies: ( $i > $o ) > ( $i > $o ) > $i > $o ).

thf(decl_32,type,
    mforall_ind: ( mu > $i > $o ) > $i > $o ).

thf(decl_38,type,
    mbox: ( $i > $i > $o ) > ( $i > $o ) > $i > $o ).

thf(decl_39,type,
    mdia: ( $i > $i > $o ) > ( $i > $o ) > $i > $o ).

thf(decl_41,type,
    msymmetric: ( $i > $i > $o ) > $o ).

thf(decl_42,type,
    mserial: ( $i > $i > $o ) > $o ).

thf(decl_50,type,
    mvalid: ( $i > $o ) > $o ).

thf(decl_54,type,
    a1: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(decl_56,type,
    a3: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(decl_57,type,
    jan: mu ).

thf(decl_59,type,
    cola: mu ).

thf(decl_62,type,
    likes: mu > mu > $i > $o ).

thf(decl_64,type,
    possibly_likes: mu > mu > $i > $o ).

thf(decl_65,type,
    subrel: ( $i > $i > $o ) > ( $i > $i > $o ) > $o ).

thf(decl_72,type,
    esk6_1: $i > $i ).

thf(decl_75,type,
    esk9_0: $i ).

thf(mbox,axiom,
    ( mbox
    = ( ^ [X13: $i > $i > $o,X6: $i > $o,X3: $i] :
        ! [X14: $i] :
          ( ~ ( X13 @ X3 @ X14 )
          | ( X6 @ X14 ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.K82AgikRAH/E---3.1_1608500.p',mbox) ).

thf(mvalid,axiom,
    ( mvalid
    = ( ^ [X6: $i > $o] :
        ! [X3: $i] : ( X6 @ X3 ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.K82AgikRAH/E---3.1_1608500.p',mvalid) ).

thf(subrel_def,axiom,
    ( subrel
    = ( ^ [X18: $i > $i > $o,X19: $i > $i > $o] :
        ! [X20: $i,X21: $i] :
          ( ( X18 @ X20 @ X21 )
         => ( X19 @ X20 @ X21 ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.K82AgikRAH/E---3.1_1608500.p',subrel_def) ).

thf(msymmetric,axiom,
    ( msymmetric
    = ( ^ [X13: $i > $i > $o] :
        ! [X15: $i,X16: $i] :
          ( ( X13 @ X15 @ X16 )
         => ( X13 @ X16 @ X15 ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.K82AgikRAH/E---3.1_1608500.p',msymmetric) ).

thf(mserial,axiom,
    ( mserial
    = ( ^ [X13: $i > $i > $o] :
        ! [X15: $i] :
        ? [X16: $i] : ( X13 @ X15 @ X16 ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.K82AgikRAH/E---3.1_1608500.p',mserial) ).

thf(mimplies,axiom,
    ( mimplies
    = ( ^ [X6: $i > $o,X7: $i > $o] : ( mor @ ( mnot @ X6 ) @ X7 ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.K82AgikRAH/E---3.1_1608500.p',mimplies) ).

thf(mnot,axiom,
    ( mnot
    = ( ^ [X6: $i > $o,X3: $i] :
          ~ ( X6 @ X3 ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.K82AgikRAH/E---3.1_1608500.p',mnot) ).

thf(mor,axiom,
    ( mor
    = ( ^ [X6: $i > $o,X7: $i > $o,X3: $i] :
          ( ( X6 @ X3 )
          | ( X7 @ X3 ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.K82AgikRAH/E---3.1_1608500.p',mor) ).

thf(mdia,axiom,
    ( mdia
    = ( ^ [X13: $i > $i > $o,X6: $i > $o] : ( mnot @ ( mbox @ X13 @ ( mnot @ X6 ) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.K82AgikRAH/E---3.1_1608500.p',mdia) ).

thf(axiom_a3_1,axiom,
    mvalid @ ( mbox @ a3 @ ( likes @ jan @ cola ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.K82AgikRAH/E---3.1_1608500.p',axiom_a3_1) ).

thf(axiom_I_a1_a3,axiom,
    subrel @ a1 @ a3,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.K82AgikRAH/E---3.1_1608500.p',axiom_I_a1_a3) ).

thf(axioms_B_a1,axiom,
    msymmetric @ a1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.K82AgikRAH/E---3.1_1608500.p',axioms_B_a1) ).

thf(axioms_D_a1,axiom,
    mserial @ a1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.K82AgikRAH/E---3.1_1608500.p',axioms_D_a1) ).

thf(mforall_ind,axiom,
    ( mforall_ind
    = ( ^ [X8: mu > $i > $o,X3: $i] :
        ! [X1: mu] : ( X8 @ X1 @ X3 ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.K82AgikRAH/E---3.1_1608500.p',mforall_ind) ).

thf(axiom_user_communication_3,axiom,
    ( mvalid
    @ ( mforall_ind
      @ ^ [X1: mu] :
          ( mforall_ind
          @ ^ [X2: mu] : ( mimplies @ ( mdia @ a1 @ ( likes @ X1 @ X2 ) ) @ ( possibly_likes @ X1 @ X2 ) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.K82AgikRAH/E---3.1_1608500.p',axiom_user_communication_3) ).

thf(conj,conjecture,
    mvalid @ ( possibly_likes @ jan @ cola ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.K82AgikRAH/E---3.1_1608500.p',conj) ).

thf(c_0_16,plain,
    ( mbox
    = ( ^ [Z0: $i > $i > $o,Z1: $i > $o,Z2: $i] :
        ! [X14: $i] :
          ( ~ ( Z0 @ Z2 @ X14 )
          | ( Z1 @ X14 ) ) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[mbox]) ).

thf(c_0_17,plain,
    ( mvalid
    = ( ^ [Z0: $i > $o] :
        ! [X3: $i] : ( Z0 @ X3 ) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[mvalid]) ).

thf(c_0_18,plain,
    ( subrel
    = ( ^ [Z0: $i > $i > $o,Z1: $i > $i > $o] :
        ! [X20: $i,X21: $i] :
          ( ( Z0 @ X20 @ X21 )
         => ( Z1 @ X20 @ X21 ) ) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[subrel_def]) ).

thf(c_0_19,plain,
    ( msymmetric
    = ( ^ [Z0: $i > $i > $o] :
        ! [X15: $i,X16: $i] :
          ( ( Z0 @ X15 @ X16 )
         => ( Z0 @ X16 @ X15 ) ) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[msymmetric]) ).

thf(c_0_20,plain,
    ( mserial
    = ( ^ [Z0: $i > $i > $o] :
        ! [X15: $i] :
        ? [X16: $i] : ( Z0 @ X15 @ X16 ) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[mserial]) ).

thf(c_0_21,plain,
    ( mimplies
    = ( ^ [Z0: $i > $o,Z1: $i > $o,Z2: $i] :
          ( ~ ( Z0 @ Z2 )
          | ( Z1 @ Z2 ) ) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[mimplies]) ).

thf(c_0_22,plain,
    ( mnot
    = ( ^ [Z0: $i > $o,Z1: $i] :
          ~ ( Z0 @ Z1 ) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[mnot]) ).

thf(c_0_23,plain,
    ( mor
    = ( ^ [Z0: $i > $o,Z1: $i > $o,Z2: $i] :
          ( ( Z0 @ Z2 )
          | ( Z1 @ Z2 ) ) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[mor]) ).

thf(c_0_24,plain,
    ( mdia
    = ( ^ [Z0: $i > $i > $o,Z1: $i > $o,Z2: $i] :
          ~ ! [X24: $i] :
              ( ~ ( Z0 @ Z2 @ X24 )
              | ~ ( Z1 @ X24 ) ) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[mdia]) ).

thf(c_0_25,plain,
    ! [X50: $i,X49: $i] :
      ( ~ ( a3 @ X50 @ X49 )
      | ( likes @ jan @ cola @ X49 ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[axiom_a3_1,c_0_16]),c_0_17])]) ).

thf(c_0_26,plain,
    ! [X95: $i,X96: $i] :
      ( ( a1 @ X95 @ X96 )
     => ( a3 @ X95 @ X96 ) ),
    inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[axiom_I_a1_a3,c_0_18]) ).

thf(c_0_27,plain,
    ! [X81: $i,X82: $i] :
      ( ( a1 @ X81 @ X82 )
     => ( a1 @ X82 @ X81 ) ),
    inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[axioms_B_a1,c_0_19]) ).

thf(c_0_28,plain,
    ! [X87: $i] :
    ? [X88: $i] : ( a1 @ X87 @ X88 ),
    inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[axioms_D_a1,c_0_20]) ).

thf(c_0_29,plain,
    ( mimplies
    = ( ^ [Z0: $i > $o,Z1: $i > $o,Z2: $i] :
          ( ~ ( Z0 @ Z2 )
          | ( Z1 @ Z2 ) ) ) ),
    inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]),c_0_23]) ).

thf(c_0_30,plain,
    ( mforall_ind
    = ( ^ [Z0: mu > $i > $o,Z1: $i] :
        ! [X1: mu] : ( Z0 @ X1 @ Z1 ) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[mforall_ind]) ).

thf(c_0_31,plain,
    ( mdia
    = ( ^ [Z0: $i > $i > $o,Z1: $i > $o,Z2: $i] :
          ~ ! [X24: $i] :
              ( ~ ( Z0 @ Z2 @ X24 )
              | ~ ( Z1 @ X24 ) ) ) ),
    inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_22]),c_0_16]) ).

thf(c_0_32,plain,
    ! [X160: $i,X161: $i] :
      ( ~ ( a3 @ X160 @ X161 )
      | ( likes @ jan @ cola @ X161 ) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[c_0_25])]) ).

thf(c_0_33,plain,
    ! [X206: $i,X207: $i] :
      ( ~ ( a1 @ X206 @ X207 )
      | ( a3 @ X206 @ X207 ) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_26])])]) ).

thf(c_0_34,plain,
    ! [X192: $i,X193: $i] :
      ( ~ ( a1 @ X192 @ X193 )
      | ( a1 @ X193 @ X192 ) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_27])])]) ).

thf(c_0_35,plain,
    ! [X198: $i] : ( a1 @ X198 @ ( esk6_1 @ X198 ) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[c_0_28])]) ).

thf(c_0_36,plain,
    ! [X72: $i,X71: mu,X70: mu] :
      ( ~ ~ ! [X69: $i] :
              ( ~ ( a1 @ X72 @ X69 )
              | ~ ( likes @ X71 @ X70 @ X69 ) )
      | ( possibly_likes @ X71 @ X70 @ X72 ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[axiom_user_communication_3]),c_0_29]),c_0_30]),c_0_31]),c_0_17])]) ).

thf(c_0_37,plain,
    ! [X3: $i,X14: $i] :
      ( ( likes @ jan @ cola @ X14 )
      | ~ ( a3 @ X3 @ X14 ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_32]) ).

thf(c_0_38,plain,
    ! [X3: $i,X14: $i] :
      ( ( a3 @ X3 @ X14 )
      | ~ ( a1 @ X3 @ X14 ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_33]) ).

thf(c_0_39,plain,
    ! [X3: $i,X14: $i] :
      ( ( a1 @ X14 @ X3 )
      | ~ ( a1 @ X3 @ X14 ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_34]) ).

thf(c_0_40,plain,
    ! [X3: $i] : ( a1 @ X3 @ ( esk6_1 @ X3 ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_35]) ).

thf(c_0_41,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( mvalid @ ( possibly_likes @ jan @ cola ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[conj]) ).

thf(c_0_42,plain,
    ! [X180: $i,X181: mu,X182: mu,X183: $i] :
      ( ~ ( a1 @ X180 @ X183 )
      | ~ ( likes @ X181 @ X182 @ X183 )
      | ( possibly_likes @ X181 @ X182 @ X180 ) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_36])])])]) ).

thf(c_0_43,plain,
    ! [X14: $i,X3: $i] :
      ( ( likes @ jan @ cola @ X3 )
      | ~ ( a1 @ X14 @ X3 ) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_37,c_0_38]) ).

thf(c_0_44,plain,
    ! [X3: $i] : ( a1 @ ( esk6_1 @ X3 ) @ X3 ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_39,c_0_40]) ).

thf(c_0_45,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X135: $i] : ( possibly_likes @ jan @ cola @ X135 ),
    inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[c_0_41,c_0_17]) ).

thf(c_0_46,plain,
    ! [X3: $i,X2: mu,X1: mu,X14: $i] :
      ( ( possibly_likes @ X1 @ X2 @ X3 )
      | ~ ( a1 @ X3 @ X14 )
      | ~ ( likes @ X1 @ X2 @ X14 ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_42]) ).

thf(c_0_47,plain,
    ! [X3: $i] : ( likes @ jan @ cola @ X3 ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_43,c_0_44]) ).

thf(c_0_48,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( possibly_likes @ jan @ cola @ esk9_0 ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_45])])])]) ).

thf(c_0_49,plain,
    ! [X3: $i,X14: $i] :
      ( ( possibly_likes @ jan @ cola @ X3 )
      | ~ ( a1 @ X3 @ X14 ) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_46,c_0_47]) ).

thf(c_0_50,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( possibly_likes @ jan @ cola @ esk9_0 ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_48]) ).

thf(c_0_51,plain,
    ! [X3: $i] : ( possibly_likes @ jan @ cola @ X3 ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_49,c_0_40]) ).

thf(c_0_52,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_50,c_0_51])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : AGT037^1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v5.4.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.08/0.19  % Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% 0.08/0.19  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/0.19  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/0.19  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.08/0.19  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.08/0.19  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.08/0.19  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.08/0.19  % DateTime : Tue Sep 29 17:33:22 UTC 2026
% 0.08/0.19  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.08/0.19  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.08/0.24  Running higher-order theorem proving
% 0.08/0.26  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.K82AgikRAH/E---3.1_1608500.p
% 0.21/0.29  % Version: 3.5.1-ho
% 0.21/0.29  % Preprocessing class: HSMSSMSSMLLNHSN.
% 0.21/0.29  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.29  % Starting new_ho_10_cnf2 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.29  % Starting post_as_ho3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.29  % Starting new_ho_12 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.29  % Starting new_bool_2 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.29  % new_ho_10_cnf2 with pid 1608530 completed with status 0
% 0.21/0.29  % Result found by new_ho_10_cnf2
% 0.21/0.29  % Preprocessing class: HSMSSMSSMLLNHSN.
% 0.21/0.29  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.29  % Starting new_ho_10_cnf2 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.29  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.21/0.29  % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.21/0.29  % Search class: HGUNM-FFMF32-SHSSMFNN
% 0.21/0.29  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.21/0.29  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.29  % Starting new_ho_10_cnf2 with 151s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.29  % Starting sh5l with 136s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.29  % Starting ehoh_best_sine_rwall with 136s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.29  % Starting lpo1_def_fix with 136s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.29  % sh5l with pid 1608540 completed with status 0
% 0.21/0.29  % Result found by sh5l
% 0.21/0.29  % Preprocessing class: HSMSSMSSMLLNHSN.
% 0.21/0.29  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.29  % Starting new_ho_10_cnf2 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.29  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.21/0.29  % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.21/0.29  % Search class: HGUNM-FFMF32-SHSSMFNN
% 0.21/0.29  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.21/0.29  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.29  % Starting new_ho_10_cnf2 with 151s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.29  % Starting sh5l with 136s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.29  % Preprocessing time       : 0.002 s
% 0.21/0.29  % Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.21/0.29  
% 0.21/0.29  % Proof found!
% 0.21/0.29  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.21/0.29  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.21/0.29  % Parsed axioms                        : 118
% 0.21/0.29  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.21/0.29  % Initial clauses                      : 91
% 0.21/0.29  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 45
% 0.21/0.29  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 46
% 0.21/0.29  % Processed clauses                    : 112
% 0.21/0.29  % ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 0.21/0.29  % ...subsumed                          : 7
% 0.21/0.29  % ...remaining for further processing  : 105
% 0.21/0.29  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.21/0.29  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.21/0.29  % Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.21/0.29  % Backward-rewritten                   : 16
% 0.21/0.29  % Generated clauses                    : 119
% 0.21/0.29  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 107
% 0.21/0.29  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.21/0.29  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.21/0.29  % Paramodulations                      : 119
% 0.21/0.29  % Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.21/0.29  % NegExts                              : 0
% 0.21/0.29  % Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.21/0.29  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.21/0.29  % Total rewrite steps                  : 28
% 0.21/0.29  % ...of those cached                   : 8
% 0.21/0.29  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.21/0.29  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.21/0.29  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.21/0.29  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.21/0.29  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.21/0.29  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.21/0.29  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.21/0.29  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.21/0.29  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.21/0.29  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.21/0.29  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.21/0.29  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.21/0.29  % Current number of processed clauses  : 45
% 0.21/0.29  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 16
% 0.21/0.29  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.21/0.29  %    Negative unit clauses             : 0
% 0.21/0.29  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 29
% 0.21/0.29  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 76
% 0.21/0.29  % ...number of literals in the above   : 181
% 0.21/0.29  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.21/0.29  % Current number of archived clauses   : 60
% 0.21/0.29  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 179
% 0.21/0.29  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 137
% 0.21/0.29  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 7
% 0.21/0.29  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 14
% 0.21/0.29  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.21/0.29  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 29
% 0.21/0.29  % BW rewrite match successes           : 14
% 0.21/0.29  % Condensation attempts                : 112
% 0.21/0.29  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.21/0.29  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 11654
% 0.21/0.29  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 3138
% 0.21/0.29  
% 0.21/0.29  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.29  % User time                : 0.018 s
% 0.21/0.29  % System time              : 0.003 s
% 0.21/0.29  % Total time               : 0.021 s
% 0.21/0.29  % Maximum resident set size: 4244 pages
% 0.21/0.29  
% 0.21/0.29  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.29  % User time                : 0.046 s
% 0.21/0.29  % System time              : 0.016 s
% 0.21/0.29  % Total time               : 0.062 s
% 0.21/0.29  % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 0.21/0.29  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------