↑ Up

DT2H2X---1.9.5.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : DT2H2X---1.9.5
% Problem  : ALG001^5 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/run_DT2H2X /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300

% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Feb 25 08:37:24 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 1.46s 1.29s
% Output   : Refutation 1.46s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   10
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   15 (   6 unt;   0 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   35 (  34 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  310 (  13   ~;   0   |;  15   &; 277   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   5  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   11 (   6 avg)
%            Number of types       :    3 (   3 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   56 (  56   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :    9 (   7 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   93 (   0   ^;  61   !;  32   ?;  93   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(type_def_5,type,
    g: $tType ).

thf(type_def_6,type,
    b: $tType ).

thf(type_def_8,type,
    a: $tType ).

thf(func_def_0,type,
    g: $tType ).

thf(func_def_1,type,
    b: $tType ).

thf(func_def_2,type,
    a: $tType ).

thf(func_def_6,type,
    sK0: b > a ).

thf(func_def_7,type,
    sK1: a > a > a ).

thf(func_def_8,type,
    sK2: g > b ).

thf(func_def_9,type,
    sK3: g > g > g ).

thf(func_def_10,type,
    sK4: b > b > b ).

thf(func_def_11,type,
    sK5: g ).

thf(func_def_12,type,
    sK6: g ).

thf(f16,plain,
    $false,
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f15]) ).

thf(f15,plain,
    ( ( sK0 @ ( sK2 @ ( sK3 @ sK5 @ sK6 ) ) )
   != ( sK0 @ ( sK2 @ ( sK3 @ sK5 @ sK6 ) ) ) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[f14,f11]) ).

thf(f11,plain,
    ! [X10: g,X9: g] :
      ( ( sK2 @ ( sK3 @ X9 @ X10 ) )
      = ( sK4 @ ( sK2 @ X9 ) @ ( sK2 @ X10 ) ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f10]) ).

thf(f10,plain,
    ( ( ( sK0 @ ( sK2 @ ( sK3 @ sK5 @ sK6 ) ) )
     != ( sK1 @ ( sK0 @ ( sK2 @ sK5 ) ) @ ( sK0 @ ( sK2 @ sK6 ) ) ) )
    & ! [X7: b,X8: b] :
        ( ( sK1 @ ( sK0 @ X8 ) @ ( sK0 @ X7 ) )
        = ( sK0 @ ( sK4 @ X8 @ X7 ) ) )
    & ! [X9: g,X10: g] :
        ( ( sK2 @ ( sK3 @ X9 @ X10 ) )
        = ( sK4 @ ( sK2 @ X9 ) @ ( sK2 @ X10 ) ) ) ),
    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1,sK2,sK3,sK4,sK5,sK6])],[f7,f9,f8]) ).

thf(f8,plain,
    ( ? [X0: b > a,X1: a > a > a,X2: g > b,X3: g > g > g,X4: b > b > b] :
        ( ? [X5: g,X6: g] :
            ( ( X0 @ ( X2 @ ( X3 @ X5 @ X6 ) ) )
           != ( X1 @ ( X0 @ ( X2 @ X5 ) ) @ ( X0 @ ( X2 @ X6 ) ) ) )
        & ! [X7: b,X8: b] :
            ( ( X1 @ ( X0 @ X8 ) @ ( X0 @ X7 ) )
            = ( X0 @ ( X4 @ X8 @ X7 ) ) )
        & ! [X9: g,X10: g] :
            ( ( X2 @ ( X3 @ X9 @ X10 ) )
            = ( X4 @ ( X2 @ X9 ) @ ( X2 @ X10 ) ) ) )
   => ( ? [X6: g,X5: g] :
          ( ( sK0 @ ( sK2 @ ( sK3 @ X5 @ X6 ) ) )
         != ( sK1 @ ( sK0 @ ( sK2 @ X5 ) ) @ ( sK0 @ ( sK2 @ X6 ) ) ) )
      & ! [X8: b,X7: b] :
          ( ( sK1 @ ( sK0 @ X8 ) @ ( sK0 @ X7 ) )
          = ( sK0 @ ( sK4 @ X8 @ X7 ) ) )
      & ! [X10: g,X9: g] :
          ( ( sK2 @ ( sK3 @ X9 @ X10 ) )
          = ( sK4 @ ( sK2 @ X9 ) @ ( sK2 @ X10 ) ) ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[],[choice_axiom]) ).

thf(f9,plain,
    ( ? [X6: g,X5: g] :
        ( ( sK0 @ ( sK2 @ ( sK3 @ X5 @ X6 ) ) )
       != ( sK1 @ ( sK0 @ ( sK2 @ X5 ) ) @ ( sK0 @ ( sK2 @ X6 ) ) ) )
   => ( ( sK0 @ ( sK2 @ ( sK3 @ sK5 @ sK6 ) ) )
     != ( sK1 @ ( sK0 @ ( sK2 @ sK5 ) ) @ ( sK0 @ ( sK2 @ sK6 ) ) ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[],[choice_axiom]) ).

thf(f7,plain,
    ? [X0: b > a,X1: a > a > a,X2: g > b,X3: g > g > g,X4: b > b > b] :
      ( ? [X5: g,X6: g] :
          ( ( X0 @ ( X2 @ ( X3 @ X5 @ X6 ) ) )
         != ( X1 @ ( X0 @ ( X2 @ X5 ) ) @ ( X0 @ ( X2 @ X6 ) ) ) )
      & ! [X7: b,X8: b] :
          ( ( X1 @ ( X0 @ X8 ) @ ( X0 @ X7 ) )
          = ( X0 @ ( X4 @ X8 @ X7 ) ) )
      & ! [X9: g,X10: g] :
          ( ( X2 @ ( X3 @ X9 @ X10 ) )
          = ( X4 @ ( X2 @ X9 ) @ ( X2 @ X10 ) ) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f6]) ).

thf(f6,plain,
    ? [X3: b > a,X4: a > a > a,X2: g > b,X0: g > g > g,X1: b > b > b] :
      ( ? [X10: g,X9: g] :
          ( ( X3 @ ( X2 @ ( X0 @ X10 @ X9 ) ) )
         != ( X4 @ ( X3 @ ( X2 @ X10 ) ) @ ( X3 @ ( X2 @ X9 ) ) ) )
      & ! [X8: b,X7: b] :
          ( ( X4 @ ( X3 @ X7 ) @ ( X3 @ X8 ) )
          = ( X3 @ ( X1 @ X7 @ X8 ) ) )
      & ! [X5: g,X6: g] :
          ( ( X2 @ ( X0 @ X5 @ X6 ) )
          = ( X1 @ ( X2 @ X5 ) @ ( X2 @ X6 ) ) ) ),
    inference(flattening,[status(thm)],[f5]) ).

thf(f5,plain,
    ? [X3: b > a,X4: a > a > a,X2: g > b,X0: g > g > g,X1: b > b > b] :
      ( ? [X10: g,X9: g] :
          ( ( X3 @ ( X2 @ ( X0 @ X10 @ X9 ) ) )
         != ( X4 @ ( X3 @ ( X2 @ X10 ) ) @ ( X3 @ ( X2 @ X9 ) ) ) )
      & ! [X8: b,X7: b] :
          ( ( X4 @ ( X3 @ X7 ) @ ( X3 @ X8 ) )
          = ( X3 @ ( X1 @ X7 @ X8 ) ) )
      & ! [X5: g,X6: g] :
          ( ( X2 @ ( X0 @ X5 @ X6 ) )
          = ( X1 @ ( X2 @ X5 ) @ ( X2 @ X6 ) ) ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f4]) ).

thf(f4,plain,
    ~ ! [X3: b > a,X4: a > a > a,X2: g > b,X0: g > g > g,X1: b > b > b] :
        ( ( ! [X8: b,X7: b] :
              ( ( X4 @ ( X3 @ X7 ) @ ( X3 @ X8 ) )
              = ( X3 @ ( X1 @ X7 @ X8 ) ) )
          & ! [X5: g,X6: g] :
              ( ( X2 @ ( X0 @ X5 @ X6 ) )
              = ( X1 @ ( X2 @ X5 ) @ ( X2 @ X6 ) ) ) )
       => ! [X10: g,X9: g] :
            ( ( X3 @ ( X2 @ ( X0 @ X10 @ X9 ) ) )
            = ( X4 @ ( X3 @ ( X2 @ X10 ) ) @ ( X3 @ ( X2 @ X9 ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f2]) ).

thf(f2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X2: g > g > g,X3: b > b > b,X0: g > b,X1: b > a,X4: a > a > a] :
        ( ( ! [X5: g,X6: g] :
              ( ( X0 @ ( X2 @ X5 @ X6 ) )
              = ( X3 @ ( X0 @ X5 ) @ ( X0 @ X6 ) ) )
          & ! [X5: b,X6: b] :
              ( ( X1 @ ( X3 @ X5 @ X6 ) )
              = ( X4 @ ( X1 @ X5 ) @ ( X1 @ X6 ) ) ) )
       => ! [X6: g,X5: g] :
            ( ( X1 @ ( X0 @ ( X2 @ X5 @ X6 ) ) )
            = ( X4 @ ( X1 @ ( X0 @ X5 ) ) @ ( X1 @ ( X0 @ X6 ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f1]) ).

thf(f1,conjecture,
    ! [X2: g > g > g,X3: b > b > b,X0: g > b,X1: b > a,X4: a > a > a] :
      ( ( ! [X5: g,X6: g] :
            ( ( X0 @ ( X2 @ X5 @ X6 ) )
            = ( X3 @ ( X0 @ X5 ) @ ( X0 @ X6 ) ) )
        & ! [X5: b,X6: b] :
            ( ( X1 @ ( X3 @ X5 @ X6 ) )
            = ( X4 @ ( X1 @ X5 ) @ ( X1 @ X6 ) ) ) )
     => ! [X6: g,X5: g] :
          ( ( X1 @ ( X0 @ ( X2 @ X5 @ X6 ) ) )
          = ( X4 @ ( X1 @ ( X0 @ X5 ) ) @ ( X1 @ ( X0 @ X6 ) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.zRiXtsyW3L/DTF2THF_18311.p',cTHM133_pme) ).

thf(f14,plain,
    ( ( sK0 @ ( sK2 @ ( sK3 @ sK5 @ sK6 ) ) )
   != ( sK0 @ ( sK4 @ ( sK2 @ sK5 ) @ ( sK2 @ sK6 ) ) ) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[f13,f12]) ).

thf(f12,plain,
    ! [X8: b,X7: b] :
      ( ( sK1 @ ( sK0 @ X8 ) @ ( sK0 @ X7 ) )
      = ( sK0 @ ( sK4 @ X8 @ X7 ) ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f10]) ).

thf(f13,plain,
    ( ( sK0 @ ( sK2 @ ( sK3 @ sK5 @ sK6 ) ) )
   != ( sK1 @ ( sK0 @ ( sK2 @ sK5 ) ) @ ( sK0 @ ( sK2 @ sK6 ) ) ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f10]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem  : ALG001^5 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.12/0.13  % Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/run_DT2H2X /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 0.14/0.33  % Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.33  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.14/0.33  % DateTime : Tue Feb 24 03:30:14 EST 2026
% 0.14/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.14/0.33  Running /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/run_DT2H2X /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 0.18/0.45  ---- Original DTF file ---
% 0.18/0.45  thf(spec,logic,$$dhol).
% 0.18/0.45  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.18/0.45  % File     : ALG001^5 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.18/0.45  % Domain   : General Algebra
% 0.18/0.45  % Problem  : TPS problem THM133
% 0.18/0.45  % Version  : Especial.
% 0.18/0.45  % English  : The composition of homomorphisms of binary operators is a
% 0.18/0.45  %            homomorphisms. Boyer et al JAR 2 page 284.
% 0.18/0.45  
% 0.18/0.45  % Refs     : [BL+86] Boyer et al. (1986), Set Theory in First-Order Logic:
% 0.18/0.45  %          : [Bro09] Brown (2009), Email to Geoff Sutcliffe
% 0.18/0.45  % Source   : [Bro09]
% 0.18/0.45  % Names    : tps_0365 [Bro09]
% 0.18/0.45  %          : THM133 [TPS]
% 0.18/0.45  %          : Problem 221-223 [BL+86]
% 0.18/0.45  
% 0.18/0.45  % Status   : Theorem
% 0.18/0.45  % Rating   : 0.00 v6.0.0, 0.14 v5.5.0, 0.17 v5.4.0, 0.20 v5.3.0, 0.40 v5.2.0, 0.00 v4.0.0
% 0.18/0.45  % Syntax   : Number of formulae    :    4 (   0 unt;   3 typ;   0 def)
% 0.18/0.45  %            Number of atoms       :    3 (   3 equ;   0 cnn)
% 0.18/0.45  %            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   3 avg)
% 0.18/0.45  %            Number of connectives :   26 (   0   ~;   0   |;   1   &;  24   @)
% 0.18/0.45  %                                         (   0 <=>;   1  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
% 0.18/0.45  %            Maximal formula depth :   10 (  10 avg)
% 0.18/0.45  %            Number of types       :    3 (   3 usr)
% 0.18/0.45  %            Number of type conns  :    8 (   8   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
% 0.18/0.45  %            Number of symbols     :    1 (   0 usr;   0 con; 2-2 aty)
% 0.18/0.45  %            Number of variables   :   11 (   0   ^;  11   !;   0   ?;  11   :)
% 0.18/0.45  % SPC      : TH0_THM_EQU_NAR
% 0.18/0.45  
% 0.18/0.45  % Comments : This problem is from the TPS library. Copyright (c) 2009 The TPS
% 0.18/0.45  %            project in the Department of Mathematical Sciences at Carnegie
% 0.18/0.45  %            Mellon University. Distributed under the Creative Commons copyleft
% 0.18/0.45  %            license: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/
% 0.18/0.45  %          : Polymorphic definitions expanded.
% 0.18/0.45  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.18/0.45  thf(g_type,type,
% 0.18/0.45      g: $tType ).
% 0.18/0.45  
% 0.18/0.45  thf(b_type,type,
% 0.18/0.45      b: $tType ).
% 0.18/0.45  
% 0.18/0.45  thf(a_type,type,
% 0.18/0.45      a: $tType ).
% 0.18/0.45  
% 0.18/0.45  thf(cTHM133_pme,conjecture,
% 0.18/0.45      ! [Xh1: g > b,Xh2: b > a,Xf1: g > g > g,Xf2: b > b > b,Xf3: a > a > a] :
% 0.18/0.45        ( ( ! [Xx: g,Xy: g] :
% 0.18/0.45              ( ( Xh1 @ ( Xf1 @ Xx @ Xy ) )
% 0.18/0.45              = ( Xf2 @ ( Xh1 @ Xx ) @ ( Xh1 @ Xy ) ) )
% 0.18/0.45          & ! [Xx: b,Xy: b] :
% 0.18/0.45              ( ( Xh2 @ ( Xf2 @ Xx @ Xy ) )
% 0.18/0.45              = ( Xf3 @ ( Xh2 @ Xx ) @ ( Xh2 @ Xy ) ) ) )
% 0.18/0.45       => ! [Xx: g,Xy: g] :
% 0.18/0.45            ( ( Xh2 @ ( Xh1 @ ( Xf1 @ Xx @ Xy ) ) )
% 0.18/0.45            = ( Xf3 @ ( Xh2 @ ( Xh1 @ Xx ) ) @ ( Xh2 @ ( Xh1 @ Xy ) ) ) ) ) ).
% 0.18/0.45  
% 0.18/0.45  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.18/0.45  ------------------------
% 1.46/1.26  ---- Embedded in THF ---
% 1.46/1.26  %%% This output was generated by embedproblem, version 1.9.5 (library version 1.9).
% 1.46/1.26  %%% Generated on Tue Feb 24 03:30:15 EST 2026
% 1.46/1.26  %%% using '$$dhol' embedding, version 1.3.0.
% 1.46/1.26  %%% Logic specification used:
% 1.46/1.26  %%% thf(spec, logic, $$dhol).
% 1.46/1.26  
% 1.46/1.26  % SZS output start ListOfTHF for /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.zRiXtsyW3L/DTF2DTF18311.p
% See solution above
% 1.46/1.26  ------------------------
% 1.46/1.27  ---- Cleaned THF ---
% 1.46/1.27  thf(g_type,type,
% 1.46/1.27      g: $tType ).
% 1.46/1.27  
% 1.46/1.27  thf(b_type,type,
% 1.46/1.27      b: $tType ).
% 1.46/1.27  
% 1.46/1.27  thf(a_type,type,
% 1.46/1.27      a: $tType ).
% 1.46/1.27  
% 1.46/1.27  thf(cTHM133_pme,conjecture,
% 1.46/1.27      ! [Xh1: g > b,Xh2: b > a,Xf1: g > g > g,Xf2: b > b > b,Xf3: a > a > a] :
% 1.46/1.27        ( ( ! [Xx: g,Xy: g] :
% 1.46/1.27              ( ( Xh1 @ ( Xf1 @ Xx @ Xy ) )
% 1.46/1.27              = ( Xf2 @ ( Xh1 @ Xx ) @ ( Xh1 @ Xy ) ) )
% 1.46/1.27          & ! [Xx: b,Xy: b] :
% 1.46/1.27              ( ( Xh2 @ ( Xf2 @ Xx @ Xy ) )
% 1.46/1.27              = ( Xf3 @ ( Xh2 @ Xx ) @ ( Xh2 @ Xy ) ) ) )
% 1.46/1.27       => ! [Xx: g,Xy: g] :
% 1.46/1.27            ( ( Xh2 @ ( Xh1 @ ( Xf1 @ Xx @ Xy ) ) )
% 1.46/1.27            = ( Xf3 @ ( Xh2 @ ( Xh1 @ Xx ) ) @ ( Xh2 @ ( Xh1 @ Xy ) ) ) ) ) ).
% 1.46/1.27  ------------------------
% 1.46/1.28  % (18641)lrs+10_1:1_c=on:cnfonf=conj_eager:fd=off:fe=off:kws=frequency:spb=intro:i=4:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_18311 for (2999ds/4Mi)
% 1.46/1.29  % (18640)lrs+1002_1:8_bd=off:fd=off:hud=10:tnu=1:i=183:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_18311 for (2999ds/183Mi)
% 1.46/1.29  % (18641)First to succeed.
% 1.46/1.29  % (18640)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 1.46/1.29  % (18641)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 1.46/1.29  % SZS status Theorem for DTF2THF_18311
% 1.46/1.29  % SZS output start Proof for DTF2THF_18311
% 1.46/1.29  thf(type_def_5, type, g: $tType).
% 1.46/1.29  thf(type_def_6, type, b: $tType).
% 1.46/1.29  thf(type_def_8, type, a: $tType).
% 1.46/1.29  thf(func_def_0, type, g: $tType).
% 1.46/1.29  thf(func_def_1, type, b: $tType).
% 1.46/1.29  thf(func_def_2, type, a: $tType).
% 1.46/1.29  thf(func_def_6, type, sK0: b > a).
% 1.46/1.29  thf(func_def_7, type, sK1: a > a > a).
% 1.46/1.29  thf(func_def_8, type, sK2: g > b).
% 1.46/1.29  thf(func_def_9, type, sK3: g > g > g).
% 1.46/1.29  thf(func_def_10, type, sK4: b > b > b).
% 1.46/1.29  thf(func_def_11, type, sK5: g).
% 1.46/1.29  thf(func_def_12, type, sK6: g).
% 1.46/1.29  thf(f16,plain,(
% 1.46/1.29    $false),
% 1.46/1.29    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f15])).
% 1.46/1.29  thf(f15,plain,(
% 1.46/1.29    ((sK0 @ (sK2 @ (sK3 @ sK5 @ sK6))) != (sK0 @ (sK2 @ (sK3 @ sK5 @ sK6))))),
% 1.46/1.29    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[f14,f11])).
% 1.46/1.29  thf(f11,plain,(
% 1.46/1.29    ( ! [X10 : g,X9 : g] : (((sK2 @ (sK3 @ X9 @ X10)) = (sK4 @ (sK2 @ X9) @ (sK2 @ X10)))) )),
% 1.46/1.29    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f10])).
% 1.46/1.29  thf(f10,plain,(
% 1.46/1.29    ((sK0 @ (sK2 @ (sK3 @ sK5 @ sK6))) != (sK1 @ (sK0 @ (sK2 @ sK5)) @ (sK0 @ (sK2 @ sK6)))) & ! [X7 : b,X8 : b] : ((sK1 @ (sK0 @ X8) @ (sK0 @ X7)) = (sK0 @ (sK4 @ X8 @ X7))) & ! [X9 : g,X10 : g] : ((sK2 @ (sK3 @ X9 @ X10)) = (sK4 @ (sK2 @ X9) @ (sK2 @ X10)))),
% 1.46/1.29    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1,sK2,sK3,sK4,sK5,sK6])],[f7,f9,f8])).
% 1.46/1.29  thf(f8,plain,(
% 1.46/1.29    ? [X0 : b > a,X1 : a > a > a,X2 : g > b,X3 : g > g > g,X4 : b > b > b] : (? [X5 : g,X6 : g] : ((X0 @ (X2 @ (X3 @ X5 @ X6))) != (X1 @ (X0 @ (X2 @ X5)) @ (X0 @ (X2 @ X6)))) & ! [X7 : b,X8 : b] : ((X1 @ (X0 @ X8) @ (X0 @ X7)) = (X0 @ (X4 @ X8 @ X7))) & ! [X9 : g,X10 : g] : ((X2 @ (X3 @ X9 @ X10)) = (X4 @ (X2 @ X9) @ (X2 @ X10)))) => (? [X6 : g,X5 : g] : ((sK0 @ (sK2 @ (sK3 @ X5 @ X6))) != (sK1 @ (sK0 @ (sK2 @ X5)) @ (sK0 @ (sK2 @ X6)))) & ! [X8 : b,X7 : b] : ((sK1 @ (sK0 @ X8) @ (sK0 @ X7)) = (sK0 @ (sK4 @ X8 @ X7))) & ! [X10 : g,X9 : g] : ((sK2 @ (sK3 @ X9 @ X10)) = (sK4 @ (sK2 @ X9) @ (sK2 @ X10))))),
% 1.46/1.29    introduced(definition,[],[choice_axiom])).
% 1.46/1.29  thf(f9,plain,(
% 1.46/1.29    ? [X6 : g,X5 : g] : ((sK0 @ (sK2 @ (sK3 @ X5 @ X6))) != (sK1 @ (sK0 @ (sK2 @ X5)) @ (sK0 @ (sK2 @ X6)))) => ((sK0 @ (sK2 @ (sK3 @ sK5 @ sK6))) != (sK1 @ (sK0 @ (sK2 @ sK5)) @ (sK0 @ (sK2 @ sK6))))),
% 1.46/1.29    introduced(definition,[],[choice_axiom])).
% 1.46/1.29  thf(f7,plain,(
% 1.46/1.29    ? [X0 : b > a,X1 : a > a > a,X2 : g > b,X3 : g > g > g,X4 : b > b > b] : (? [X5 : g,X6 : g] : ((X0 @ (X2 @ (X3 @ X5 @ X6))) != (X1 @ (X0 @ (X2 @ X5)) @ (X0 @ (X2 @ X6)))) & ! [X7 : b,X8 : b] : ((X1 @ (X0 @ X8) @ (X0 @ X7)) = (X0 @ (X4 @ X8 @ X7))) & ! [X9 : g,X10 : g] : ((X2 @ (X3 @ X9 @ X10)) = (X4 @ (X2 @ X9) @ (X2 @ X10))))),
% 1.46/1.29    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f6])).
% 1.46/1.29  thf(f6,plain,(
% 1.46/1.29    ? [X3 : b > a,X4 : a > a > a,X2 : g > b,X0 : g > g > g,X1 : b > b > b] : (? [X10 : g,X9 : g] : ((X3 @ (X2 @ (X0 @ X10 @ X9))) != (X4 @ (X3 @ (X2 @ X10)) @ (X3 @ (X2 @ X9)))) & ! [X8 : b,X7 : b] : ((X4 @ (X3 @ X7) @ (X3 @ X8)) = (X3 @ (X1 @ X7 @ X8))) & ! [X5 : g,X6 : g] : ((X2 @ (X0 @ X5 @ X6)) = (X1 @ (X2 @ X5) @ (X2 @ X6))))),
% 1.46/1.29    inference(flattening,[status(thm)],[f5])).
% 1.46/1.29  thf(f5,plain,(
% 1.46/1.29    ? [X3 : b > a,X4 : a > a > a,X2 : g > b,X0 : g > g > g,X1 : b > b > b] : (? [X10 : g,X9 : g] : ((X3 @ (X2 @ (X0 @ X10 @ X9))) != (X4 @ (X3 @ (X2 @ X10)) @ (X3 @ (X2 @ X9)))) & (! [X8 : b,X7 : b] : ((X4 @ (X3 @ X7) @ (X3 @ X8)) = (X3 @ (X1 @ X7 @ X8))) & ! [X5 : g,X6 : g] : ((X2 @ (X0 @ X5 @ X6)) = (X1 @ (X2 @ X5) @ (X2 @ X6)))))),
% 1.46/1.29    inference(ennf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f4])).
% 1.46/1.29  thf(f4,plain,(
% 1.46/1.29    ~! [X3 : b > a,X4 : a > a > a,X2 : g > b,X0 : g > g > g,X1 : b > b > b] : ((! [X8 : b,X7 : b] : ((X4 @ (X3 @ X7) @ (X3 @ X8)) = (X3 @ (X1 @ X7 @ X8))) & ! [X5 : g,X6 : g] : ((X2 @ (X0 @ X5 @ X6)) = (X1 @ (X2 @ X5) @ (X2 @ X6)))) => ! [X10 : g,X9 : g] : ((X3 @ (X2 @ (X0 @ X10 @ X9))) = (X4 @ (X3 @ (X2 @ X10)) @ (X3 @ (X2 @ X9)))))),
% 1.46/1.29    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f2])).
% 1.46/1.29  thf(f2,negated_conjecture,(
% 1.46/1.29    ~! [X2 : g > g > g,X3 : b > b > b,X0 : g > b,X1 : b > a,X4 : a > a > a] : ((! [X5 : g,X6 : g] : ((X0 @ (X2 @ X5 @ X6)) = (X3 @ (X0 @ X5) @ (X0 @ X6))) & ! [X5 : b,X6 : b] : ((X1 @ (X3 @ X5 @ X6)) = (X4 @ (X1 @ X5) @ (X1 @ X6)))) => ! [X6 : g,X5 : g] : ((X1 @ (X0 @ (X2 @ X5 @ X6))) = (X4 @ (X1 @ (X0 @ X5)) @ (X1 @ (X0 @ X6)))))),
% 1.46/1.29    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f1])).
% 1.46/1.29  thf(f1,conjecture,(
% 1.46/1.29    ! [X2 : g > g > g,X3 : b > b > b,X0 : g > b,X1 : b > a,X4 : a > a > a] : ((! [X5 : g,X6 : g] : ((X0 @ (X2 @ X5 @ X6)) = (X3 @ (X0 @ X5) @ (X0 @ X6))) & ! [X5 : b,X6 : b] : ((X1 @ (X3 @ X5 @ X6)) = (X4 @ (X1 @ X5) @ (X1 @ X6)))) => ! [X6 : g,X5 : g] : ((X1 @ (X0 @ (X2 @ X5 @ X6))) = (X4 @ (X1 @ (X0 @ X5)) @ (X1 @ (X0 @ X6)))))),
% 1.46/1.29    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.zRiXtsyW3L/DTF2THF_18311.p',cTHM133_pme)).
% 1.46/1.29  thf(f14,plain,(
% 1.46/1.29    ((sK0 @ (sK2 @ (sK3 @ sK5 @ sK6))) != (sK0 @ (sK4 @ (sK2 @ sK5) @ (sK2 @ sK6))))),
% 1.46/1.29    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[f13,f12])).
% 1.46/1.29  thf(f12,plain,(
% 1.46/1.29    ( ! [X8 : b,X7 : b] : (((sK1 @ (sK0 @ X8) @ (sK0 @ X7)) = (sK0 @ (sK4 @ X8 @ X7)))) )),
% 1.46/1.29    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f10])).
% 1.46/1.29  thf(f13,plain,(
% 1.46/1.29    ((sK0 @ (sK2 @ (sK3 @ sK5 @ sK6))) != (sK1 @ (sK0 @ (sK2 @ sK5)) @ (sK0 @ (sK2 @ sK6))))),
% 1.46/1.29    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f10])).
% 1.46/1.29  % SZS output end Proof for DTF2THF_18311
% 1.46/1.29  % (18641)------------------------------
% 1.46/1.29  % (18641)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 7b44b1c2f on 2025-07-15 09:50:17 +0100)
% 1.46/1.29  % (18641)Termination reason: Refutation
% 1.46/1.29  
% 1.46/1.29  % (18641)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 1.46/1.29  % (18641)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 1.46/1.29  % (18641)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 1.46/1.29  % (18641)------------------------------
% 1.46/1.29  % (18641)------------------------------
% 1.46/1.29  % (18639)Success in time 0.013 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------