↑ Up

E-SAT---3.5.1.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E-SAT---3.5.1
% Problem  : ALG002-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 11:56:07 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.12s 0.44s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.12s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    8
%            Number of leaves      :   12
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   42 (  12 unt;   8 nHn;  32 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   85 (   0 equ;  46 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   3 con; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   57 (   4 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(commutativity_of_product,axiom,
    ( ~ product(X1,X2,X3)
    | product(X2,X1,X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',commutativity_of_product) ).

cnf(product_to_inverse,axiom,
    ( ~ product(X1,X2,X3)
    | product(X1,additive_inverse(X2),additive_inverse(X3)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',product_to_inverse) ).

cnf(square_to_0,axiom,
    ( ~ product(X1,X1,additive_identity)
    | ~ product(X1,X2,X3)
    | product(X3,X3,additive_identity) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',square_to_0) ).

cnf(inverse_and_identity,axiom,
    ( product(X1,X1,additive_identity)
    | product(X1,multiplicative_inverse(X1),multiplicative_identity) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',inverse_and_identity) ).

cnf(not_abelian,axiom,
    ~ product(multiplicative_identity,multiplicative_identity,additive_identity),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',not_abelian) ).

cnf(product_and_greater_than_0,axiom,
    ( ~ greater_than_0(X2)
    | ~ greater_than_0(X1)
    | ~ product(X1,X2,X3)
    | greater_than_0(X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',product_and_greater_than_0) ).

cnf(right_identity,axiom,
    product(X1,multiplicative_identity,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',right_identity) ).

cnf(inverse_greater_than_0,axiom,
    ( ~ greater_than_0(additive_inverse(X1))
    | ~ greater_than_0(X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',inverse_greater_than_0) ).

cnf(greater_than_0_square,axiom,
    ( ~ product(X1,X1,additive_identity)
    | ~ greater_than_0(X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',greater_than_0_square) ).

cnf(product_and_inverse,axiom,
    ( greater_than_0(additive_inverse(X1))
    | product(X1,X1,additive_identity)
    | greater_than_0(X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',product_and_inverse) ).

cnf(prove_a_inverse_greater_than_0,negated_conjecture,
    ~ greater_than_0(multiplicative_inverse(a)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_a_inverse_greater_than_0) ).

cnf(a_greater_than_0,hypothesis,
    greater_than_0(a),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',a_greater_than_0) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    ( ~ product(X1,X2,X3)
    | product(X2,X1,X3) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[commutativity_of_product]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    ( ~ product(X1,X2,X3)
    | product(X1,additive_inverse(X2),additive_inverse(X3)) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[product_to_inverse]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    ( ~ product(X1,X1,additive_identity)
    | ~ product(X1,X2,X3)
    | product(X3,X3,additive_identity) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[square_to_0]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    ( ~ product(X1,X2,X3)
    | product(X2,X1,X3) ),
    c_0_12 ).

cnf(c_0_16,axiom,
    ( product(X1,X1,additive_identity)
    | product(X1,multiplicative_inverse(X1),multiplicative_identity) ),
    inverse_and_identity ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    ~ product(multiplicative_identity,multiplicative_identity,additive_identity),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[not_abelian]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    ( ~ greater_than_0(X2)
    | ~ greater_than_0(X1)
    | ~ product(X1,X2,X3)
    | greater_than_0(X3) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[product_and_greater_than_0]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    ( ~ product(X1,X2,X3)
    | product(X1,additive_inverse(X2),additive_inverse(X3)) ),
    c_0_13 ).

cnf(c_0_20,axiom,
    product(X1,multiplicative_identity,X1),
    right_identity ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    ( ~ greater_than_0(additive_inverse(X1))
    | ~ greater_than_0(X1) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inverse_greater_than_0]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    ( ~ product(X1,X1,additive_identity)
    | ~ product(X1,X2,X3)
    | product(X3,X3,additive_identity) ),
    c_0_14 ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    ( product(X1,X1,additive_identity)
    | product(multiplicative_inverse(X1),X1,multiplicative_identity) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    ~ product(multiplicative_identity,multiplicative_identity,additive_identity),
    c_0_17 ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    ( ~ product(X1,X1,additive_identity)
    | ~ greater_than_0(X1) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[greater_than_0_square]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,plain,
    ( ~ greater_than_0(X2)
    | ~ greater_than_0(X1)
    | ~ product(X1,X2,X3)
    | greater_than_0(X3) ),
    c_0_18 ).

cnf(c_0_27,plain,
    product(X1,additive_inverse(multiplicative_identity),additive_inverse(X1)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,plain,
    ( ~ greater_than_0(additive_inverse(X1))
    | ~ greater_than_0(X1) ),
    c_0_21 ).

cnf(c_0_29,plain,
    ( ~ product(multiplicative_inverse(X1),multiplicative_inverse(X1),additive_identity)
    | product(X1,X1,additive_identity) ),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23]),c_0_24]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,axiom,
    ( greater_than_0(additive_inverse(X1))
    | product(X1,X1,additive_identity)
    | greater_than_0(X1) ),
    product_and_inverse ).

cnf(c_0_31,plain,
    ( product(X1,X1,additive_identity)
    | product(X1,additive_inverse(multiplicative_inverse(X1)),additive_inverse(multiplicative_identity)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,plain,
    ( ~ product(X1,X1,additive_identity)
    | ~ greater_than_0(X1) ),
    c_0_25 ).

cnf(c_0_33,plain,
    ( ~ greater_than_0(X1)
    | ~ greater_than_0(additive_inverse(multiplicative_identity)) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_27]),c_0_28]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,plain,
    ( product(X1,X1,additive_identity)
    | greater_than_0(multiplicative_inverse(X1))
    | greater_than_0(additive_inverse(multiplicative_inverse(X1))) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_30]) ).

cnf(c_0_35,negated_conjecture,
    ~ greater_than_0(multiplicative_inverse(a)),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[prove_a_inverse_greater_than_0]) ).

cnf(c_0_36,plain,
    ( ~ greater_than_0(X1)
    | ~ greater_than_0(additive_inverse(multiplicative_inverse(X1))) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_31]),c_0_32]),c_0_33]) ).

cnf(c_0_37,plain,
    ( ~ greater_than_0(X1)
    | greater_than_0(multiplicative_inverse(X1))
    | greater_than_0(additive_inverse(multiplicative_inverse(X1))) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_32,c_0_34]) ).

cnf(c_0_38,negated_conjecture,
    ~ greater_than_0(multiplicative_inverse(a)),
    c_0_35 ).

cnf(c_0_39,plain,
    ( ~ greater_than_0(X1)
    | greater_than_0(multiplicative_inverse(X1)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_36,c_0_37]) ).

cnf(c_0_40,hypothesis,
    greater_than_0(a),
    a_greater_than_0 ).

cnf(c_0_41,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_38,c_0_39]),c_0_40])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : ALG002-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.12/0.37  % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.37  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.12/0.37  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.12/0.37  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.37  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.12/0.37  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 12:54:14 UTC 2026
% 0.12/0.37  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.12/0.37  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.12/0.41  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.12/0.41  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.12/0.44  % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.12/0.44  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.12/0.44  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.12/0.44  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.12/0.44  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.44  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.44  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.44  % G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 1926093 completed with status 0
% 0.12/0.44  % Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.12/0.44  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.12/0.44  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.12/0.44  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.12/0.44  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.12/0.44  % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.12/0.44  % Search class: FGHNF-FFSF11-SFFFFFNN
% 0.12/0.44  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.12/0.44  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.44  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.44  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.44  % Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.44  % Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.44  % new_bool_3 with pid 1926102 completed with status 0
% 0.12/0.44  % Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.12/0.44  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.12/0.44  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.12/0.44  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.12/0.44  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.12/0.44  % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.12/0.44  % Search class: FGHNF-FFSF11-SFFFFFNN
% 0.12/0.44  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.12/0.44  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.44  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.44  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.44  % Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.44  % Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 0.12/0.44  % Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.12/0.44  
% 0.12/0.44  % Proof found!
% 0.12/0.44  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.12/0.44  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.12/0.44  % Parsed axioms                        : 14
% 0.12/0.44  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.12/0.44  % Initial clauses                      : 14
% 0.12/0.44  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.12/0.44  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 14
% 0.12/0.44  % Processed clauses                    : 81
% 0.12/0.44  % ...of these trivial                  : 2
% 0.12/0.44  % ...subsumed                          : 20
% 0.12/0.44  % ...remaining for further processing  : 59
% 0.12/0.44  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.12/0.44  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.12/0.44  % Backward-subsumed                    : 3
% 0.12/0.44  % Backward-rewritten                   : 0
% 0.12/0.44  % Generated clauses                    : 146
% 0.12/0.44  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 111
% 0.12/0.44  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.12/0.44  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 6
% 0.12/0.44  % Paramodulations                      : 146
% 0.12/0.44  % Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.12/0.44  % NegExts                              : 0
% 0.12/0.44  % Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.12/0.44  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.12/0.44  % Total rewrite steps                  : 18
% 0.12/0.44  % ...of those cached                   : 4
% 0.12/0.44  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.12/0.44  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.12/0.44  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.12/0.44  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.12/0.44  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.12/0.44  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.12/0.44  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.12/0.44  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.12/0.44  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.12/0.44  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.12/0.44  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.12/0.44  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.12/0.44  % Current number of processed clauses  : 42
% 0.12/0.44  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 10
% 0.12/0.44  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.12/0.44  %    Negative unit clauses             : 2
% 0.12/0.44  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 30
% 0.12/0.44  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 56
% 0.12/0.44  % ...number of literals in the above   : 148
% 0.12/0.44  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.12/0.44  % Current number of archived clauses   : 17
% 0.12/0.44  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 143
% 0.12/0.44  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 130
% 0.12/0.44  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 27
% 0.12/0.44  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2
% 0.12/0.44  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.12/0.44  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 7
% 0.12/0.44  % BW rewrite match successes           : 1
% 0.12/0.44  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.12/0.44  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.12/0.44  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 2425
% 0.12/0.44  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 22
% 0.12/0.44  
% 0.12/0.44  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.12/0.44  % User time                : 0.005 s
% 0.12/0.44  % System time              : 0.005 s
% 0.12/0.44  % Total time               : 0.010 s
% 0.12/0.44  % Maximum resident set size: 3636 pages
% 0.12/0.44  
% 0.12/0.44  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.12/0.44  % User time                : 0.032 s
% 0.12/0.44  % System time              : 0.017 s
% 0.12/0.44  % Total time               : 0.050 s
% 0.12/0.44  % Maximum resident set size: 4608 pages
% 0.12/0.44  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------