↑ Up

SOS---2.0.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SOS---2.0
% Problem  : ALG030+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.7.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : sos-script %s

% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 14 18:00:55 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.47s 0.71s
% Output   : Refutation 0.47s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.13  % Problem  : ALG030+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.7.0.
% 0.13/0.13  % Command  : sos-script %s
% 0.13/0.35  % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.20/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.20/0.35  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.20/0.35  % DateTime : Wed Jun  8 23:53:03 EDT 2022
% 0.20/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.20/0.37  ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.20/0.37  The process was started by sandbox on n017.cluster.edu,
% 0.20/0.37  Wed Jun  8 23:53:03 2022
% 0.20/0.37  The command was "./sos".  The process ID is 21995.
% 0.20/0.37  
% 0.20/0.37  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.20/0.37  set(auto).
% 0.20/0.37     dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.20/0.37     dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.20/0.37     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.20/0.37     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.20/0.37     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.20/0.37     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.20/0.37     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.20/0.37     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.20/0.37     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.20/0.37     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.20/0.37     dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.20/0.37     dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.20/0.37     dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.20/0.37  clear(print_given).
% 0.20/0.37  
% 0.20/0.37  formula_list(usable).
% 0.20/0.37  
% 0.20/0.37  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=1, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=3.
% 0.20/0.37  
% 0.20/0.37  This is a Horn set with equality.  The strategy will be
% 0.20/0.37  Knuth-Bendix and hyper_res, with positive clauses in
% 0.20/0.37  sos and nonpositive clauses in usable.
% 0.20/0.37  
% 0.20/0.37     dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.20/0.37     dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.20/0.37     dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.20/0.37     dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.20/0.37     dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.20/0.37     dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.20/0.37     dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.20/0.37     dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.20/0.37     dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.20/0.37     dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.20/0.37     dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.20/0.37     dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.20/0.37     dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.20/0.37     dependent: clear(order_hyper).
% 0.20/0.37  
% 0.20/0.37  ------------> process usable:
% 0.20/0.37  
% 0.20/0.37  ------------> process sos:
% 0.20/0.37    Following clause subsumed by 13 during input processing: 0 [copy,13,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.20/0.37  
% 0.20/0.37  ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.20/0.39  
% 0.20/0.39  Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.20/0.39  
% 0.20/0.39  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.20/0.39  
% 0.20/0.39  
% 0.20/0.39  -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.20/0.39  
% 0.20/0.39  UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.20/0.39  SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.20/0.39  SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.20/0.39  number of clauses in intial UL: 10
% 0.20/0.39  number of clauses initially in problem: 13
% 0.20/0.39  percentage of clauses intially in UL: 76
% 0.20/0.39  percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 100
% 0.20/0.39  percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.20/0.39  absolute distinct symbol count: 9
% 0.20/0.39     distinct predicate count: 3
% 0.20/0.39     distinct function count: 4
% 0.20/0.39     distinct constant count: 2
% 0.20/0.39  
% 0.20/0.39  ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.20/0.39  
% 0.20/0.39  
% 0.20/0.39  
% 0.20/0.39  =========== start of search ===========
% 0.47/0.71  
% 0.47/0.71  -------- PROOF -------- 
% 0.47/0.71  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.47/0.71  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.47/0.71  
% 0.47/0.71  Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.47/0.71  
% 0.47/0.71  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.47/0.71  
% 0.47/0.71  Model 3 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.47/0.71  
% 0.47/0.71  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.47/0.71  
% 0.47/0.71  Model 4 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.47/0.71  
% 0.47/0.71  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.47/0.71  
% 0.47/0.71  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.47/0.71  
% 0.47/0.71  Model 5 [ 1 1 174 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 0.47/0.71  
% 0.47/0.71  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.47/0.71  
% 0.47/0.71  Model 6 [ 1 0 98 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 0.47/0.71  
% 0.47/0.71  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.47/0.71  
% 0.47/0.71  Model 7 [ 1 0 64 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 0.47/0.71  
% 0.47/0.71  ----> UNIT CONFLICT at   0.32 sec ----> 83 [binary,81.1,3.1] {-} $F.
% 0.47/0.71  
% 0.47/0.71  Length of proof is 10.  Level of proof is 3.
% 0.47/0.71  
% 0.47/0.71  ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 0.47/0.71  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.47/0.71  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.47/0.71  
% 0.47/0.71  1 [] {+} -sorti1(A)| -sorti1(B)|sorti1(op1(A,B)).
% 0.47/0.71  3 [] {+} op1($c2,$c1)!=op1($c1,$c2).
% 0.47/0.71  4 [] {+} -sorti2(A)| -sorti2(B)|op2(A,B)=op2(B,A).
% 0.47/0.71  5 [] {+} -sorti1(A)|sorti2(h(A)).
% 0.47/0.71  7 [] {+} -sorti1(A)| -sorti1(B)|h(op1(A,B))=op2(h(A),h(B)).
% 0.47/0.71  8 [] {+} -sorti2(A)| -sorti2(B)|j(op2(A,B))=op1(j(A),j(B)).
% 0.47/0.71  10 [] {+} -sorti1(A)|j(h(A))=A.
% 0.47/0.71  11 [] {+} sorti1($c2).
% 0.47/0.71  12 [] {+} sorti1($c1).
% 0.47/0.71  15,14 [hyper,11,10] {+} j(h($c2))=$c2.
% 0.47/0.71  18 [hyper,11,5] {+} sorti2(h($c2)).
% 0.47/0.71  21,20 [hyper,12,10] {+} j(h($c1))=$c1.
% 0.47/0.71  27,26 [hyper,12,7,11] {-} h(op1($c1,$c2))=op2(h($c1),h($c2)).
% 0.47/0.71  28 [hyper,12,5] {+} sorti2(h($c1)).
% 0.47/0.71  31 [hyper,12,1,11] {+} sorti1(op1($c1,$c2)).
% 0.47/0.71  36,35 [hyper,31,10,demod,27] {-} j(op2(h($c1),h($c2)))=op1($c1,$c2).
% 0.47/0.71  77 [hyper,28,8,18,demod,15,21] {-} j(op2(h($c2),h($c1)))=op1($c2,$c1).
% 0.47/0.71  80,79 [hyper,28,4,18] {-} op2(h($c2),h($c1))=op2(h($c1),h($c2)).
% 0.47/0.71  81 [back_demod,77,demod,80,36,flip.1] {-} op1($c2,$c1)=op1($c1,$c2).
% 0.47/0.71  83 [binary,81.1,3.1] {-} $F.
% 0.47/0.71  
% 0.47/0.71  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.47/0.71  ------------ end of proof -------------
% 0.47/0.71  
% 0.47/0.71  
% 0.47/0.71  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 0.47/0.71  
% 0.47/0.71  
% 0.47/0.71  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 0.47/0.71  
% 0.47/0.71  ============ end of search ============
% 0.47/0.71  
% 0.47/0.71  ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 0.47/0.71  
% 0.47/0.71  true clauses given           3      (33.3%)
% 0.47/0.71  false clauses given          6
% 0.47/0.71  
% 0.47/0.71        FALSE     TRUE
% 0.47/0.71     4  2         0
% 0.47/0.71     6  3         8
% 0.47/0.71     8  0         4
% 0.47/0.71    10  4         3
% 0.47/0.71    15  4         4
% 0.47/0.71    20  1         3
% 0.47/0.71  tot:  14        22      (61.1% true)
% 0.47/0.71  
% 0.47/0.71  
% 0.47/0.71  Model 7 [ 1 0 64 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 0.47/0.71  
% 0.47/0.71  That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 0.47/0.71  
% 0.47/0.71  Process 21995 finished Wed Jun  8 23:53:04 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------