↑ Up

Leo-III---1.8.0.UNS-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Leo-III---1.8.0
% Problem  : ALG030-10 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v7.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39

% Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 06:45:56 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 4.46s 18.04s
% Output   : Refutation 5.00s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    2
%            Number of leaves      :   14
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   29 (  29 unt;   0 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   29 (  28 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  266 (   2   ~;   0   |;   0   &; 264   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :   13 (  11 usr;   4 con; 0-4 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   40 (   0   ^;  40   !;   0   ?;  40   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(ifeq_decl,type,
    ifeq: $i > $i > $i > $i > $i ).

thf(sorti1_decl,type,
    sorti1: $i > $i ).

thf(true_decl,type,
    true: $i ).

thf(sorti2_decl,type,
    sorti2: $i > $i ).

thf(h_decl,type,
    h: $i > $i ).

thf(ifeq2_decl,type,
    ifeq2: $i > $i > $i > $i > $i ).

thf(op2_decl,type,
    op2: $i > $i > $i ).

thf(op1_decl,type,
    op1: $i > $i > $i ).

thf(j_decl,type,
    j: $i > $i ).

thf(sK2_ax3_U_decl,type,
    sK2_ax3_U: $i ).

thf(sK1_ax3_V_decl,type,
    sK1_ax3_V: $i ).

thf(14,axiom,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( B @ ( A @ op2 ) @ ( B @ ( A @ op2 ) @ ( A @ ( B @ op2 ) @ ( true @ ( B @ sorti2 @ ifeq2 ) ) ) @ ( true @ ( A @ sorti2 @ ifeq2 ) ) ) )
      = ( B @ ( A @ op2 ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax4) ).

thf(42,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( B @ ( A @ op2 ) @ ( B @ ( A @ op2 ) @ ( A @ ( B @ op2 ) @ ( true @ ( B @ sorti2 @ ifeq2 ) ) ) @ ( true @ ( A @ sorti2 @ ifeq2 ) ) ) )
      = ( B @ ( A @ op2 ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[14]) ).

thf(6,negated_conjecture,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( A @ ( A @ j @ h @ ( true @ ( A @ sorti2 @ ifeq2 ) ) ) )
      = A ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_5) ).

thf(17,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( A @ ( A @ j @ h @ ( true @ ( A @ sorti2 @ ifeq2 ) ) ) )
      = A ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[6]) ).

thf(7,axiom,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( C @ ( B @ ( A @ ( A @ ifeq2 ) ) ) )
      = B ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ifeq_axiom) ).

thf(27,plain,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( C @ ( B @ ( A @ ( A @ ifeq2 ) ) ) )
      = B ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[7]) ).

thf(11,axiom,
    ( ( sK1_ax3_V @ ( sK2_ax3_U @ op1 ) )
   != ( sK2_ax3_U @ ( sK1_ax3_V @ op1 ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax3_2) ).

thf(35,plain,
    ( ( sK1_ax3_V @ ( sK2_ax3_U @ op1 ) )
   != ( sK2_ax3_U @ ( sK1_ax3_V @ op1 ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[11]) ).

thf(2,negated_conjecture,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( A @ ( B @ op1 ) @ h @ ( A @ ( B @ op1 ) @ h @ ( A @ h @ ( B @ h @ op2 ) @ ( true @ ( B @ sorti1 @ ifeq2 ) ) ) @ ( true @ ( A @ sorti1 @ ifeq2 ) ) ) )
      = ( A @ ( B @ op1 ) @ h ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_1) ).

thf(18,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( A @ ( B @ op1 ) @ h @ ( A @ ( B @ op1 ) @ h @ ( A @ h @ ( B @ h @ op2 ) @ ( true @ ( B @ sorti1 @ ifeq2 ) ) ) @ ( true @ ( A @ sorti1 @ ifeq2 ) ) ) )
      = ( A @ ( B @ op1 ) @ h ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[2]) ).

thf(13,axiom,
    ( ( sK2_ax3_U @ sorti1 )
    = true ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax3) ).

thf(40,plain,
    ( ( sK2_ax3_U @ sorti1 )
    = true ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[13]) ).

thf(3,negated_conjecture,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( A @ ( A @ h @ j @ ( true @ ( A @ sorti1 @ ifeq2 ) ) ) )
      = A ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_2) ).

thf(19,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( A @ ( A @ h @ j @ ( true @ ( A @ sorti1 @ ifeq2 ) ) ) )
      = A ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[3]) ).

thf(5,negated_conjecture,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( A @ ( B @ op2 ) @ j @ ( A @ ( B @ op2 ) @ j @ ( A @ j @ ( B @ j @ op1 ) @ ( true @ ( B @ sorti2 @ ifeq2 ) ) ) @ ( true @ ( A @ sorti2 @ ifeq2 ) ) ) )
      = ( A @ ( B @ op2 ) @ j ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_4) ).

thf(15,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( A @ ( B @ op2 ) @ j @ ( A @ ( B @ op2 ) @ j @ ( A @ j @ ( B @ j @ op1 ) @ ( true @ ( B @ sorti2 @ ifeq2 ) ) ) @ ( true @ ( A @ sorti2 @ ifeq2 ) ) ) )
      = ( A @ ( B @ op2 ) @ j ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[5]) ).

thf(4,negated_conjecture,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( true @ ( A @ j @ sorti1 @ ( true @ ( A @ sorti2 @ ifeq ) ) ) )
      = true ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_3) ).

thf(20,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( true @ ( A @ j @ sorti1 @ ( true @ ( A @ sorti2 @ ifeq ) ) ) )
      = true ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[4]) ).

thf(8,axiom,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( C @ ( B @ ( A @ ( A @ ifeq ) ) ) )
      = B ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ifeq_axiom_001) ).

thf(29,plain,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( C @ ( B @ ( A @ ( A @ ifeq ) ) ) )
      = B ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[8]) ).

thf(12,axiom,
    ( ( sK1_ax3_V @ sorti1 )
    = true ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax3_1) ).

thf(38,plain,
    ( ( sK1_ax3_V @ sorti1 )
    = true ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[12]) ).

thf(10,axiom,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( true @ ( true @ ( A @ ( B @ op2 ) @ sorti2 @ ( true @ ( B @ sorti2 @ ifeq ) ) ) @ ( true @ ( A @ sorti2 @ ifeq ) ) ) )
      = true ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax2) ).

thf(33,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( true @ ( true @ ( A @ ( B @ op2 ) @ sorti2 @ ( true @ ( B @ sorti2 @ ifeq ) ) ) @ ( true @ ( A @ sorti2 @ ifeq ) ) ) )
      = true ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[10]) ).

thf(1,negated_conjecture,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( true @ ( A @ h @ sorti2 @ ( true @ ( A @ sorti1 @ ifeq ) ) ) )
      = true ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1) ).

thf(16,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( true @ ( A @ h @ sorti2 @ ( true @ ( A @ sorti1 @ ifeq ) ) ) )
      = true ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[1]) ).

thf(9,axiom,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( true @ ( true @ ( A @ ( B @ op1 ) @ sorti1 @ ( true @ ( B @ sorti1 @ ifeq ) ) ) @ ( true @ ( A @ sorti1 @ ifeq ) ) ) )
      = true ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax1) ).

thf(31,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( true @ ( true @ ( A @ ( B @ op1 ) @ sorti1 @ ( true @ ( B @ sorti1 @ ifeq ) ) ) @ ( true @ ( A @ sorti1 @ ifeq ) ) ) )
      = true ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[9]) ).

thf(48,plain,
    $false,
    inference(e,[status(thm)],[42,17,27,35,18,40,19,15,20,29,38,33,16,31]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : ALG030-10 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v7.3.0.
% 0.00/0.07  % Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.16/15.44  % Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% 0.16/15.44  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.16/15.44  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.16/15.44  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.16/15.44  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.16/15.44  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.16/15.44  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.16/15.44  % DateTime : Sat Sep 26 21:00:17 UTC 2026
% 0.16/15.45  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.16/15.45  Running java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 1.24/16.18  % [INFO] 	 Parsing problem /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ... 
% 1.67/16.45  % [INFO] 	 Parsing done (264ms). 
% 1.67/16.47  % [INFO] 	 Running in sequential loop mode. 
% 2.72/17.09  % [INFO] 	 eprover registered as external prover. 
% 2.72/17.10  % [INFO] 	 Scanning for conjecture ... 
% 2.94/17.21  % [INFO] 	 Found a conjecture (or negated_conjecture) and 8 axioms. Running axiom selection ... 
% 2.94/17.26  % [INFO] 	 Axiom selection finished. Selected 8 axioms (removed 0 axioms). 
% 2.94/17.28  % [INFO] 	 Problem is propositional (TPTP CNF). 
% 2.94/17.28  % [INFO] 	 Type checking passed. 
% 2.94/17.28  % [CONFIG] 	 Using configuration: timeout(300) with strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>.  Searching for refutation ... 
% 4.46/18.02  % External prover 'e' found a proof!
% 4.46/18.02  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
% 4.46/18.03  % Time passed: 2392ms (effective reasoning time: 1547ms)
% 4.46/18.03  % Axioms used in derivation (8): ax3_1, ax4, ifeq_axiom_001, ifeq_axiom, ax3_2, ax1, ax2, ax3
% 4.46/18.03  % No. of inferences in proof: 29
% 4.46/18.04  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : 2392 ms resp. 1547 ms w/o parsing
% 5.00/18.12  % SZS output start Refutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 5.00/18.12  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------