%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SInE---0.4
% Problem : ALG039+1 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v2.7.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : Source/sine.py -e eprover -t %d %s
% Computer : art03.cs.miami.edu
% Model : i686 i686
% CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory : 2018MB
% OS : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sat Dec 25 03:40:48 EST 2010
% Result : Theorem 0.24s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.24s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 9
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 16 ( 6 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 128 ( 112 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 32 ( 8 avg)
% Number of connectives : 138 ( 26 ~; 29 |; 82 &)
% ( 1 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 11 ( 5 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 1 usr; 2 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 4 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 0 ( 0 sgn 0 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(4,axiom,
( e0 = op(e1,e1)
& e2 = op(e3,e1) ),
file('/tmp/tmpKsPNKn/sel_ALG039+1.p_1',ax6) ).
fof(6,axiom,
( e0 != e1
& e0 != e2
& e0 != e3
& e1 != e2
& e1 != e3
& e2 != e3 ),
file('/tmp/tmpKsPNKn/sel_ALG039+1.p_1',ax5) ).
fof(7,conjecture,
~ ( ( ( op(e0,e0) = e0
& op(e1,e1) = e0
& op(e2,e2) = e0
& op(e3,e3) = e0 )
| ( op(e0,e0) = e1
& op(e1,e1) = e1
& op(e2,e2) = e1
& op(e3,e3) = e1 )
| ( op(e0,e0) = e2
& op(e1,e1) = e2
& op(e2,e2) = e2
& op(e3,e3) = e2 )
| ( op(e0,e0) = e3
& op(e1,e1) = e3
& op(e2,e2) = e3
& op(e3,e3) = e3 ) )
& ~ ( ( op(e0,e0) = e0
& op(e1,e1) = e0
& op(e2,e2) = e0
& op(e3,e3) = e0 )
| ( op(e0,e0) = e1
& op(e1,e1) = e1
& op(e2,e2) = e1
& op(e3,e3) = e1 )
| ( op(e0,e0) = e2
& op(e1,e1) = e2
& op(e2,e2) = e2
& op(e3,e3) = e2 )
| ( op(e0,e0) = e3
& op(e1,e1) = e3
& op(e2,e2) = e3
& op(e3,e3) = e3 ) ) ),
file('/tmp/tmpKsPNKn/sel_ALG039+1.p_1',co1) ).
fof(8,negated_conjecture,
~ ~ ( ( ( op(e0,e0) = e0
& op(e1,e1) = e0
& op(e2,e2) = e0
& op(e3,e3) = e0 )
| ( op(e0,e0) = e1
& op(e1,e1) = e1
& op(e2,e2) = e1
& op(e3,e3) = e1 )
| ( op(e0,e0) = e2
& op(e1,e1) = e2
& op(e2,e2) = e2
& op(e3,e3) = e2 )
| ( op(e0,e0) = e3
& op(e1,e1) = e3
& op(e2,e2) = e3
& op(e3,e3) = e3 ) )
& ~ ( ( op(e0,e0) = e0
& op(e1,e1) = e0
& op(e2,e2) = e0
& op(e3,e3) = e0 )
| ( op(e0,e0) = e1
& op(e1,e1) = e1
& op(e2,e2) = e1
& op(e3,e3) = e1 )
| ( op(e0,e0) = e2
& op(e1,e1) = e2
& op(e2,e2) = e2
& op(e3,e3) = e2 )
| ( op(e0,e0) = e3
& op(e1,e1) = e3
& op(e2,e2) = e3
& op(e3,e3) = e3 ) ) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[7]) ).
fof(9,plain,
( epred1_0
<=> ( ( op(e0,e0) = e0
& op(e1,e1) = e0
& op(e2,e2) = e0
& op(e3,e3) = e0 )
| ( op(e0,e0) = e1
& op(e1,e1) = e1
& op(e2,e2) = e1
& op(e3,e3) = e1 )
| ( op(e0,e0) = e2
& op(e1,e1) = e2
& op(e2,e2) = e2
& op(e3,e3) = e2 ) ) ),
introduced(definition) ).
fof(10,negated_conjecture,
~ ~ ( ( epred1_0
| ( op(e0,e0) = e3
& op(e1,e1) = e3
& op(e2,e2) = e3
& op(e3,e3) = e3 ) )
& ~ ( epred1_0
| ( op(e0,e0) = e3
& op(e1,e1) = e3
& op(e2,e2) = e3
& op(e3,e3) = e3 ) ) ),
inference(apply_def,[status(esa)],[inference(apply_def,[status(esa)],[8,9,theory(equality)]),9,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(69,plain,
e0 = op(e1,e1),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[4]) ).
cnf(121,plain,
e0 != e3,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[6]) ).
fof(124,negated_conjecture,
( ( epred1_0
| ( op(e0,e0) = e3
& op(e1,e1) = e3
& op(e2,e2) = e3
& op(e3,e3) = e3 ) )
& ~ epred1_0
& ( op(e0,e0) != e3
| op(e1,e1) != e3
| op(e2,e2) != e3
| op(e3,e3) != e3 ) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[10]) ).
fof(125,negated_conjecture,
( ( op(e0,e0) = e3
| epred1_0 )
& ( op(e1,e1) = e3
| epred1_0 )
& ( op(e2,e2) = e3
| epred1_0 )
& ( op(e3,e3) = e3
| epred1_0 )
& ~ epred1_0
& ( op(e0,e0) != e3
| op(e1,e1) != e3
| op(e2,e2) != e3
| op(e3,e3) != e3 ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[124]) ).
cnf(127,negated_conjecture,
~ epred1_0,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[125]) ).
cnf(130,negated_conjecture,
( epred1_0
| op(e1,e1) = e3 ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[125]) ).
cnf(202,negated_conjecture,
( e0 = e3
| epred1_0 ),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[130,69,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(203,negated_conjecture,
epred1_0,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[202,121,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(204,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[203,127,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(205,negated_conjecture,
$false,
204,
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% % SZS status Started for /home/graph/tptp/TPTP/Problems/ALG/ALG039+1.p
% --creating new selector for []
% -running prover on /tmp/tmpKsPNKn/sel_ALG039+1.p_1 with time limit 29
% -prover status Theorem
% Problem ALG039+1.p solved in phase 0.
% % SZS status Theorem for /home/graph/tptp/TPTP/Problems/ALG/ALG039+1.p
% % SZS status Ended for /home/graph/tptp/TPTP/Problems/ALG/ALG039+1.p
% Solved 1 out of 1.
% # Problem is unsatisfiable (or provable), constructing proof object
% # SZS status Theorem
% # SZS output start CNFRefutation.
% See solution above
% # SZS output end CNFRefutation
%
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------