↑ Up

Etableau---0.67.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Etableau---0.67
% Problem  : ALG069-10 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v7.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s

% Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 14 16:51:25 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.19s 0.41s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.19s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.11  % Problem  : ALG069-10 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v7.3.0.
% 0.03/0.12  % Command  : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s
% 0.13/0.33  % Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.33  % DateTime : Wed Jun  8 08:23:11 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.19/0.38  # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.19/0.38  # Auto-Mode selected heuristic G_E___302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04BN
% 0.19/0.38  # and selection function PSelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn.
% 0.19/0.38  #
% 0.19/0.38  # Number of axioms: 14 Number of unprocessed: 14
% 0.19/0.38  # Tableaux proof search.
% 0.19/0.38  # APR header successfully linked.
% 0.19/0.38  # Hello from C++
% 0.19/0.38  # The folding up rule is enabled...
% 0.19/0.38  # Local unification is enabled...
% 0.19/0.38  # Any saturation attempts will use folding labels...
% 0.19/0.38  # 14 beginning clauses after preprocessing and clausification
% 0.19/0.38  # Creating start rules for all 6 conjectures.
% 0.19/0.38  # There are 6 start rule candidates:
% 0.19/0.38  # Found 14 unit axioms.
% 0.19/0.38  # Unsuccessfully attempted saturation on 1 start tableaux, moving on.
% 0.19/0.38  # 6 start rule tableaux created.
% 0.19/0.38  # 0 extension rule candidate clauses
% 0.19/0.38  # 14 unit axiom clauses
% 0.19/0.38  
% 0.19/0.38  # Requested 8, 32 cores available to the main process.
% 0.19/0.38  # There are not enough tableaux to fork, creating more from the initial 6
% 0.19/0.38  # Creating equality axioms
% 0.19/0.38  # Ran out of tableaux, making start rules for all clauses
% 0.19/0.38  # Returning from population with 35 new_tableaux and 0 remaining starting tableaux.
% 0.19/0.38  # We now have 35 tableaux to operate on
% 0.19/0.41  # There were 1 total branch saturation attempts.
% 0.19/0.41  # There were 0 of these attempts blocked.
% 0.19/0.41  # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts.
% 0.19/0.41  # There were 0 free duplicated saturations.
% 0.19/0.41  # There were 1 total successful branch saturations.
% 0.19/0.41  # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction.
% 0.19/0.41  # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch.
% 0.19/0.41  # There were 1 successful branch saturations after the branch.
% 0.19/0.41  # SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.41  # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.41  # Begin clausification derivation
% 0.19/0.41  
% 0.19/0.41  # End clausification derivation
% 0.19/0.41  # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion
% 0.19/0.41  cnf(i_0_22, plain, (sorti2(sK1_ax4_U)=true)).
% 0.19/0.41  cnf(i_0_21, plain, (tuple(op2(X1,X1),sorti2(X1))!=tuple(sK1_ax4_U,true))).
% 0.19/0.41  cnf(i_0_15, plain, (ifeq2(X1,X1,X2,X3)=X2)).
% 0.19/0.41  cnf(i_0_16, plain, (ifeq(X1,X1,X2,X3)=X2)).
% 0.19/0.41  cnf(i_0_19, plain, (ifeq(sorti1(X1),true,sorti1(sK2_ax3_V(X1)),true)=true)).
% 0.19/0.41  cnf(i_0_23, negated_conjecture, (ifeq(sorti1(X1),true,sorti2(h(X1)),true)=true)).
% 0.19/0.41  cnf(i_0_26, negated_conjecture, (ifeq(sorti2(X1),true,sorti1(j(X1)),true)=true)).
% 0.19/0.41  cnf(i_0_25, negated_conjecture, (ifeq2(sorti1(X1),true,j(h(X1)),X1)=X1)).
% 0.19/0.41  cnf(i_0_28, negated_conjecture, (ifeq2(sorti2(X1),true,h(j(X1)),X1)=X1)).
% 0.19/0.41  cnf(i_0_20, plain, (ifeq2(sorti1(X1),true,op1(sK2_ax3_V(X1),sK2_ax3_V(X1)),X1)=X1)).
% 0.19/0.41  cnf(i_0_17, plain, (ifeq(sorti1(X1),true,ifeq(sorti1(X2),true,sorti1(op1(X2,X1)),true),true)=true)).
% 0.19/0.41  cnf(i_0_18, plain, (ifeq(sorti2(X1),true,ifeq(sorti2(X2),true,sorti2(op2(X2,X1)),true),true)=true)).
% 0.19/0.41  cnf(i_0_24, negated_conjecture, (ifeq2(sorti1(X1),true,ifeq2(sorti1(X2),true,op2(h(X2),h(X1)),h(op1(X2,X1))),h(op1(X2,X1)))=h(op1(X2,X1)))).
% 0.19/0.41  cnf(i_0_27, negated_conjecture, (ifeq2(sorti2(X1),true,ifeq2(sorti2(X2),true,op1(j(X2),j(X1)),j(op2(X2,X1))),j(op2(X2,X1)))=j(op2(X2,X1)))).
% 0.19/0.41  cnf(i_0_35, plain, (X4=X4)).
% 0.19/0.41  # End listing active clauses.  There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification!
% 0.19/0.41  # Begin printing tableau
% 0.19/0.41  # Found 6 steps
% 0.19/0.41  cnf(i_0_22, plain, (sorti2(sK1_ax4_U)=true), inference(start_rule)).
% 0.19/0.41  cnf(i_0_49, plain, (sorti2(sK1_ax4_U)=true), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_46])).
% 0.19/0.41  cnf(i_0_94, plain, (sorti2(sK1_ax4_U)!=true), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_22])).
% 0.19/0.41  cnf(i_0_93, plain, (tuple(sorti2(sK1_ax4_U),sorti2(sK1_ax4_U))=tuple(true,true)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_38])).
% 0.19/0.41  cnf(i_0_106, plain, (tuple(true,true)!=ifeq2(sorti1(tuple(true,true)),true,j(h(tuple(true,true))),tuple(true,true))), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_25])).
% 0.19/0.41  cnf(i_0_104, plain, (tuple(sorti2(sK1_ax4_U),sorti2(sK1_ax4_U))=ifeq2(sorti1(tuple(true,true)),true,j(h(tuple(true,true))),tuple(true,true))), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_104, ...])).
% 0.19/0.41  # End printing tableau
% 0.19/0.41  # SZS output end
% 0.19/0.41  # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s"
% 0.19/0.42  # There were 1 total branch saturation attempts.
% 0.19/0.42  # There were 0 of these attempts blocked.
% 0.19/0.42  # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts.
% 0.19/0.42  # There were 0 free duplicated saturations.
% 0.19/0.42  # There were 1 total successful branch saturations.
% 0.19/0.42  # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction.
% 0.19/0.42  # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch.
% 0.19/0.42  # There were 1 successful branch saturations after the branch.
% 0.19/0.42  # There were 1 total branch saturation attempts.
% 0.19/0.42  # There were 0 of these attempts blocked.
% 0.19/0.42  # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts.
% 0.19/0.42  # There were 0 free duplicated saturations.
% 0.19/0.42  # There were 1 total successful branch saturations.
% 0.19/0.42  # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction.
% 0.19/0.42  # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch.
% 0.19/0.42  # There were 1 successful branch saturations after the branch.
% 0.19/0.42  # There were 1 total branch saturation attempts.
% 0.19/0.42  # There were 0 of these attempts blocked.
% 0.19/0.42  # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts.
% 0.19/0.42  # There were 0 free duplicated saturations.
% 0.19/0.42  # There were 1 total successful branch saturations.
% 0.19/0.42  # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction.
% 0.19/0.42  # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch.
% 0.19/0.42  # There were 1 successful branch saturations after the branch.
% 0.19/0.42  # SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.42  # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.42  # Begin clausification derivation
% 0.19/0.42  
% 0.19/0.42  # End clausification derivation
% 0.19/0.42  # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion
% 0.19/0.42  cnf(i_0_22, plain, (sorti2(sK1_ax4_U)=true)).
% 0.19/0.42  cnf(i_0_21, plain, (tuple(op2(X1,X1),sorti2(X1))!=tuple(sK1_ax4_U,true))).
% 0.19/0.42  cnf(i_0_15, plain, (ifeq2(X1,X1,X2,X3)=X2)).
% 0.19/0.42  cnf(i_0_16, plain, (ifeq(X1,X1,X2,X3)=X2)).
% 0.19/0.42  cnf(i_0_19, plain, (ifeq(sorti1(X1),true,sorti1(sK2_ax3_V(X1)),true)=true)).
% 0.19/0.42  cnf(i_0_23, negated_conjecture, (ifeq(sorti1(X1),true,sorti2(h(X1)),true)=true)).
% 0.19/0.42  cnf(i_0_26, negated_conjecture, (ifeq(sorti2(X1),true,sorti1(j(X1)),true)=true)).
% 0.19/0.42  cnf(i_0_25, negated_conjecture, (ifeq2(sorti1(X1),true,j(h(X1)),X1)=X1)).
% 0.19/0.42  cnf(i_0_28, negated_conjecture, (ifeq2(sorti2(X1),true,h(j(X1)),X1)=X1)).
% 0.19/0.42  cnf(i_0_20, plain, (ifeq2(sorti1(X1),true,op1(sK2_ax3_V(X1),sK2_ax3_V(X1)),X1)=X1)).
% 0.19/0.42  cnf(i_0_17, plain, (ifeq(sorti1(X1),true,ifeq(sorti1(X2),true,sorti1(op1(X2,X1)),true),true)=true)).
% 0.19/0.42  cnf(i_0_18, plain, (ifeq(sorti2(X1),true,ifeq(sorti2(X2),true,sorti2(op2(X2,X1)),true),true)=true)).
% 0.19/0.42  cnf(i_0_24, negated_conjecture, (ifeq2(sorti1(X1),true,ifeq2(sorti1(X2),true,op2(h(X2),h(X1)),h(op1(X2,X1))),h(op1(X2,X1)))=h(op1(X2,X1)))).
% 0.19/0.42  cnf(i_0_27, negated_conjecture, (ifeq2(sorti2(X1),true,ifeq2(sorti2(X2),true,op1(j(X2),j(X1)),j(op2(X2,X1))),j(op2(X2,X1)))=j(op2(X2,X1)))).
% 0.19/0.42  cnf(i_0_35, plain, (X4=X4)).
% 0.19/0.42  # End listing active clauses.  There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification!
% 0.19/0.42  # Begin printing tableau
% 0.19/0.42  # Found 6 steps
% 0.19/0.42  cnf(i_0_22, plain, (sorti2(sK1_ax4_U)=true), inference(start_rule)).
% 0.19/0.42  cnf(i_0_49, plain, (sorti2(sK1_ax4_U)=true), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_44])).
% 0.19/0.42  cnf(i_0_90, plain, (sorti2(sK1_ax4_U)!=true), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_22])).
% 0.19/0.42  cnf(i_0_88, plain, (op2(sorti2(sK1_ax4_U),sorti2(sK1_ax4_U))=op2(true,true)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_38])).
% 0.19/0.42  cnf(i_0_106, plain, (op2(true,true)!=ifeq2(sorti1(op2(true,true)),true,j(h(op2(true,true))),op2(true,true))), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_25])).
% 0.19/0.42  cnf(i_0_104, plain, (op2(sorti2(sK1_ax4_U),sorti2(sK1_ax4_U))=ifeq2(sorti1(op2(true,true)),true,j(h(op2(true,true))),op2(true,true))), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_104, ...])).
% 0.19/0.42  # End printing tableau
% 0.19/0.42  # SZS output end
% 0.19/0.42  # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s"
% 0.19/0.42  # SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.42  # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.42  # Begin clausification derivation
% 0.19/0.42  
% 0.19/0.42  # End clausification derivation
% 0.19/0.42  # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion
% 0.19/0.42  cnf(i_0_22, plain, (sorti2(sK1_ax4_U)=true)).
% 0.19/0.42  cnf(i_0_21, plain, (tuple(op2(X1,X1),sorti2(X1))!=tuple(sK1_ax4_U,true))).
% 0.19/0.42  cnf(i_0_15, plain, (ifeq2(X1,X1,X2,X3)=X2)).
% 0.19/0.42  cnf(i_0_16, plain, (ifeq(X1,X1,X2,X3)=X2)).
% 0.19/0.42  cnf(i_0_19, plain, (ifeq(sorti1(X1),true,sorti1(sK2_ax3_V(X1)),true)=true)).
% 0.19/0.42  cnf(i_0_23, negated_conjecture, (ifeq(sorti1(X1),true,sorti2(h(X1)),true)=true)).
% 0.19/0.42  cnf(i_0_26, negated_conjecture, (ifeq(sorti2(X1),true,sorti1(j(X1)),true)=true)).
% 0.19/0.42  cnf(i_0_25, negated_conjecture, (ifeq2(sorti1(X1),true,j(h(X1)),X1)=X1)).
% 0.19/0.42  cnf(i_0_28, negated_conjecture, (ifeq2(sorti2(X1),true,h(j(X1)),X1)=X1)).
% 0.19/0.42  cnf(i_0_20, plain, (ifeq2(sorti1(X1),true,op1(sK2_ax3_V(X1),sK2_ax3_V(X1)),X1)=X1)).
% 0.19/0.42  cnf(i_0_17, plain, (ifeq(sorti1(X1),true,ifeq(sorti1(X2),true,sorti1(op1(X2,X1)),true),true)=true)).
% 0.19/0.42  cnf(i_0_18, plain, (ifeq(sorti2(X1),true,ifeq(sorti2(X2),true,sorti2(op2(X2,X1)),true),true)=true)).
% 0.19/0.42  cnf(i_0_24, negated_conjecture, (ifeq2(sorti1(X1),true,ifeq2(sorti1(X2),true,op2(h(X2),h(X1)),h(op1(X2,X1))),h(op1(X2,X1)))=h(op1(X2,X1)))).
% 0.19/0.42  cnf(i_0_27, negated_conjecture, (ifeq2(sorti2(X1),true,ifeq2(sorti2(X2),true,op1(j(X2),j(X1)),j(op2(X2,X1))),j(op2(X2,X1)))=j(op2(X2,X1)))).
% 0.19/0.42  cnf(i_0_35, plain, (X4=X4)).
% 0.19/0.42  # End listing active clauses.  There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification!
% 0.19/0.42  # Begin printing tableau
% 0.19/0.42  # Found 5 steps
% 0.19/0.42  cnf(i_0_22, plain, (sorti2(sK1_ax4_U)=true), inference(start_rule)).
% 0.19/0.42  cnf(i_0_49, plain, (sorti2(sK1_ax4_U)=true), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_47])).
% 0.19/0.42  cnf(i_0_96, plain, (h(sorti2(sK1_ax4_U))=h(true)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_38])).
% 0.19/0.42  cnf(i_0_106, plain, (h(true)!=ifeq2(sorti1(h(true)),true,j(h(h(true))),h(true))), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_25])).
% 0.19/0.42  cnf(i_0_104, plain, (h(sorti2(sK1_ax4_U))=ifeq2(sorti1(h(true)),true,j(h(h(true))),h(true))), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_104, ...])).
% 0.19/0.42  # End printing tableau
% 0.19/0.42  # SZS output end
% 0.19/0.42  # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s"
% 0.19/0.42  # There were 1 total branch saturation attempts.
% 0.19/0.42  # There were 0 of these attempts blocked.
% 0.19/0.42  # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts.
% 0.19/0.42  # There were 0 free duplicated saturations.
% 0.19/0.42  # There were 1 total successful branch saturations.
% 0.19/0.42  # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction.
% 0.19/0.42  # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch.
% 0.19/0.42  # There were 1 successful branch saturations after the branch.
% 0.19/0.42  # SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.42  # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.42  # Begin clausification derivation
% 0.19/0.42  
% 0.19/0.42  # End clausification derivation
% 0.19/0.42  # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion
% 0.19/0.42  cnf(i_0_22, plain, (sorti2(sK1_ax4_U)=true)).
% 0.19/0.42  cnf(i_0_21, plain, (tuple(op2(X1,X1),sorti2(X1))!=tuple(sK1_ax4_U,true))).
% 0.19/0.42  cnf(i_0_15, plain, (ifeq2(X1,X1,X2,X3)=X2)).
% 0.19/0.42  cnf(i_0_16, plain, (ifeq(X1,X1,X2,X3)=X2)).
% 0.19/0.42  cnf(i_0_19, plain, (ifeq(sorti1(X1),true,sorti1(sK2_ax3_V(X1)),true)=true)).
% 0.19/0.42  cnf(i_0_23, negated_conjecture, (ifeq(sorti1(X1),true,sorti2(h(X1)),true)=true)).
% 0.19/0.42  cnf(i_0_26, negated_conjecture, (ifeq(sorti2(X1),true,sorti1(j(X1)),true)=true)).
% 0.19/0.42  cnf(i_0_25, negated_conjecture, (ifeq2(sorti1(X1),true,j(h(X1)),X1)=X1)).
% 0.19/0.42  cnf(i_0_28, negated_conjecture, (ifeq2(sorti2(X1),true,h(j(X1)),X1)=X1)).
% 0.19/0.42  cnf(i_0_20, plain, (ifeq2(sorti1(X1),true,op1(sK2_ax3_V(X1),sK2_ax3_V(X1)),X1)=X1)).
% 0.19/0.42  cnf(i_0_17, plain, (ifeq(sorti1(X1),true,ifeq(sorti1(X2),true,sorti1(op1(X2,X1)),true),true)=true)).
% 0.19/0.42  cnf(i_0_18, plain, (ifeq(sorti2(X1),true,ifeq(sorti2(X2),true,sorti2(op2(X2,X1)),true),true)=true)).
% 0.19/0.42  cnf(i_0_24, negated_conjecture, (ifeq2(sorti1(X1),true,ifeq2(sorti1(X2),true,op2(h(X2),h(X1)),h(op1(X2,X1))),h(op1(X2,X1)))=h(op1(X2,X1)))).
% 0.19/0.42  cnf(i_0_27, negated_conjecture, (ifeq2(sorti2(X1),true,ifeq2(sorti2(X2),true,op1(j(X2),j(X1)),j(op2(X2,X1))),j(op2(X2,X1)))=j(op2(X2,X1)))).
% 0.19/0.42  cnf(i_0_35, plain, (X4=X4)).
% 0.19/0.42  # End listing active clauses.  There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification!
% 0.19/0.42  # Begin printing tableau
% 0.19/0.42  # Found 6 steps
% 0.19/0.42  cnf(i_0_22, plain, (sorti2(sK1_ax4_U)=true), inference(start_rule)).
% 0.19/0.42  cnf(i_0_49, plain, (sorti2(sK1_ax4_U)=true), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_44])).
% 0.19/0.42  cnf(i_0_89, plain, (sorti2(sK1_ax4_U)!=true), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_22])).
% 0.19/0.42  cnf(i_0_88, plain, (op2(sorti2(sK1_ax4_U),sorti2(sK1_ax4_U))=op2(true,true)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_38])).
% 0.19/0.42  cnf(i_0_106, plain, (op2(true,true)!=ifeq2(sorti1(op2(true,true)),true,j(h(op2(true,true))),op2(true,true))), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_25])).
% 0.19/0.42  cnf(i_0_104, plain, (op2(sorti2(sK1_ax4_U),sorti2(sK1_ax4_U))=ifeq2(sorti1(op2(true,true)),true,j(h(op2(true,true))),op2(true,true))), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_104, ...])).
% 0.19/0.42  # End printing tableau
% 0.19/0.42  # SZS output end
% 0.19/0.42  # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s"
% 0.19/0.42  # SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.42  # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.42  # Begin clausification derivation
% 0.19/0.42  
% 0.19/0.42  # End clausification derivation
% 0.19/0.42  # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion
% 0.19/0.42  cnf(i_0_22, plain, (sorti2(sK1_ax4_U)=true)).
% 0.19/0.42  cnf(i_0_21, plain, (tuple(op2(X1,X1),sorti2(X1))!=tuple(sK1_ax4_U,true))).
% 0.19/0.42  cnf(i_0_15, plain, (ifeq2(X1,X1,X2,X3)=X2)).
% 0.19/0.42  cnf(i_0_16, plain, (ifeq(X1,X1,X2,X3)=X2)).
% 0.19/0.42  cnf(i_0_19, plain, (ifeq(sorti1(X1),true,sorti1(sK2_ax3_V(X1)),true)=true)).
% 0.19/0.42  cnf(i_0_23, negated_conjecture, (ifeq(sorti1(X1),true,sorti2(h(X1)),true)=true)).
% 0.19/0.42  cnf(i_0_26, negated_conjecture, (ifeq(sorti2(X1),true,sorti1(j(X1)),true)=true)).
% 0.19/0.42  cnf(i_0_25, negated_conjecture, (ifeq2(sorti1(X1),true,j(h(X1)),X1)=X1)).
% 0.19/0.42  cnf(i_0_28, negated_conjecture, (ifeq2(sorti2(X1),true,h(j(X1)),X1)=X1)).
% 0.19/0.42  cnf(i_0_20, plain, (ifeq2(sorti1(X1),true,op1(sK2_ax3_V(X1),sK2_ax3_V(X1)),X1)=X1)).
% 0.19/0.42  cnf(i_0_17, plain, (ifeq(sorti1(X1),true,ifeq(sorti1(X2),true,sorti1(op1(X2,X1)),true),true)=true)).
% 0.19/0.42  cnf(i_0_18, plain, (ifeq(sorti2(X1),true,ifeq(sorti2(X2),true,sorti2(op2(X2,X1)),true),true)=true)).
% 0.19/0.42  cnf(i_0_24, negated_conjecture, (ifeq2(sorti1(X1),true,ifeq2(sorti1(X2),true,op2(h(X2),h(X1)),h(op1(X2,X1))),h(op1(X2,X1)))=h(op1(X2,X1)))).
% 0.19/0.42  cnf(i_0_27, negated_conjecture, (ifeq2(sorti2(X1),true,ifeq2(sorti2(X2),true,op1(j(X2),j(X1)),j(op2(X2,X1))),j(op2(X2,X1)))=j(op2(X2,X1)))).
% 0.19/0.42  cnf(i_0_35, plain, (X4=X4)).
% 0.19/0.42  # End listing active clauses.  There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification!
% 0.19/0.42  # Begin printing tableau
% 0.19/0.42  # Found 5 steps
% 0.19/0.42  cnf(i_0_22, plain, (sorti2(sK1_ax4_U)=true), inference(start_rule)).
% 0.19/0.42  cnf(i_0_49, plain, (sorti2(sK1_ax4_U)=true), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_45])).
% 0.19/0.42  cnf(i_0_91, plain, (sK2_ax3_V(sorti2(sK1_ax4_U))=sK2_ax3_V(true)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_38])).
% 0.19/0.42  cnf(i_0_106, plain, (sK2_ax3_V(true)!=ifeq2(sorti1(sK2_ax3_V(true)),true,j(h(sK2_ax3_V(true))),sK2_ax3_V(true))), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_25])).
% 0.19/0.42  cnf(i_0_104, plain, (sK2_ax3_V(sorti2(sK1_ax4_U))=ifeq2(sorti1(sK2_ax3_V(true)),true,j(h(sK2_ax3_V(true))),sK2_ax3_V(true))), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_104, ...])).
% 0.19/0.42  # End printing tableau
% 0.19/0.42  # SZS output end
% 0.19/0.42  # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s"
% 0.19/0.42  # There were 1 total branch saturation attempts.
% 0.19/0.42  # There were 0 of these attempts blocked.
% 0.19/0.42  # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts.
% 0.19/0.42  # There were 0 free duplicated saturations.
% 0.19/0.42  # There were 1 total successful branch saturations.
% 0.19/0.42  # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction.
% 0.19/0.42  # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch.
% 0.19/0.42  # There were 1 successful branch saturations after the branch.
% 0.19/0.42  # SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.42  # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.42  # Begin clausification derivation
% 0.19/0.42  
% 0.19/0.42  # End clausification derivation
% 0.19/0.42  # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion
% 0.19/0.42  cnf(i_0_22, plain, (sorti2(sK1_ax4_U)=true)).
% 0.19/0.42  cnf(i_0_21, plain, (tuple(op2(X1,X1),sorti2(X1))!=tuple(sK1_ax4_U,true))).
% 0.19/0.42  cnf(i_0_15, plain, (ifeq2(X1,X1,X2,X3)=X2)).
% 0.19/0.42  cnf(i_0_16, plain, (ifeq(X1,X1,X2,X3)=X2)).
% 0.19/0.42  cnf(i_0_19, plain, (ifeq(sorti1(X1),true,sorti1(sK2_ax3_V(X1)),true)=true)).
% 0.19/0.42  cnf(i_0_23, negated_conjecture, (ifeq(sorti1(X1),true,sorti2(h(X1)),true)=true)).
% 0.19/0.42  cnf(i_0_26, negated_conjecture, (ifeq(sorti2(X1),true,sorti1(j(X1)),true)=true)).
% 0.19/0.42  cnf(i_0_25, negated_conjecture, (ifeq2(sorti1(X1),true,j(h(X1)),X1)=X1)).
% 0.19/0.42  cnf(i_0_28, negated_conjecture, (ifeq2(sorti2(X1),true,h(j(X1)),X1)=X1)).
% 0.19/0.42  cnf(i_0_20, plain, (ifeq2(sorti1(X1),true,op1(sK2_ax3_V(X1),sK2_ax3_V(X1)),X1)=X1)).
% 0.19/0.42  cnf(i_0_17, plain, (ifeq(sorti1(X1),true,ifeq(sorti1(X2),true,sorti1(op1(X2,X1)),true),true)=true)).
% 0.19/0.42  cnf(i_0_18, plain, (ifeq(sorti2(X1),true,ifeq(sorti2(X2),true,sorti2(op2(X2,X1)),true),true)=true)).
% 0.19/0.42  cnf(i_0_24, negated_conjecture, (ifeq2(sorti1(X1),true,ifeq2(sorti1(X2),true,op2(h(X2),h(X1)),h(op1(X2,X1))),h(op1(X2,X1)))=h(op1(X2,X1)))).
% 0.19/0.42  cnf(i_0_27, negated_conjecture, (ifeq2(sorti2(X1),true,ifeq2(sorti2(X2),true,op1(j(X2),j(X1)),j(op2(X2,X1))),j(op2(X2,X1)))=j(op2(X2,X1)))).
% 0.19/0.42  cnf(i_0_35, plain, (X4=X4)).
% 0.19/0.42  # End listing active clauses.  There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification!
% 0.19/0.42  # Begin printing tableau
% 0.19/0.42  # Found 5 steps
% 0.19/0.42  cnf(i_0_22, plain, (sorti2(sK1_ax4_U)=true), inference(start_rule)).
% 0.19/0.42  cnf(i_0_49, plain, (sorti2(sK1_ax4_U)=true), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_48])).
% 0.19/0.42  cnf(i_0_98, plain, (j(sorti2(sK1_ax4_U))=j(true)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_38])).
% 0.19/0.42  cnf(i_0_106, plain, (j(true)!=ifeq2(sorti1(j(true)),true,j(h(j(true))),j(true))), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_25])).
% 0.19/0.42  cnf(i_0_104, plain, (j(sorti2(sK1_ax4_U))=ifeq2(sorti1(j(true)),true,j(h(j(true))),j(true))), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_104, ...])).
% 0.19/0.42  # End printing tableau
% 0.19/0.42  # SZS output end
% 0.19/0.42  # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s"
% 0.19/0.42  # Child (2218) has found a proof.
% 0.19/0.42  
% 0.19/0.42  # Proof search is over...
% 0.19/0.42  # Freeing feature tree
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------