↑ Up

Otter---3.3.UNS-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Otter---3.3
% Problem  : ALG069-10 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v7.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : otter-tptp-script %s

% Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 27 12:46:00 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 1.95s 2.12s
% Output   : Refutation 1.95s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :   11
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   20 (  20 unt;   0 nHn;  11 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   20 (  19 equ;   3 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   12 (  12 usr;   2 con; 0-4 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   15 (   2 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(1,axiom,
    tuple(op2(A,A),sorti2(A)) != tuple(sK1_ax4_U,true),
    file('ALG069-10.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(2,axiom,
    A = A,
    file('ALG069-10.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(4,axiom,
    ife_q2(A,A,B,C) = B,
    file('ALG069-10.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(6,axiom,
    ife_q(A,A,B,C) = B,
    file('ALG069-10.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(11,axiom,
    ife_q(sorti1(A),true,sorti1(sK2_ax3_V(A)),true) = true,
    file('ALG069-10.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(13,axiom,
    ife_q2(sorti1(A),true,op1(sK2_ax3_V(A),sK2_ax3_V(A)),A) = A,
    file('ALG069-10.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(15,axiom,
    sorti2(sK1_ax4_U) = true,
    file('ALG069-10.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(17,axiom,
    ife_q(sorti1(A),true,sorti2(h(A)),true) = true,
    file('ALG069-10.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(19,axiom,
    ife_q2(sorti1(A),true,ife_q2(sorti1(B),true,op2(h(B),h(A)),h(op1(B,A))),h(op1(B,A))) = h(op1(B,A)),
    file('ALG069-10.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(23,axiom,
    ife_q(sorti2(A),true,sorti1(j(A)),true) = true,
    file('ALG069-10.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(27,axiom,
    ife_q2(sorti2(A),true,h(j(A)),A) = A,
    file('ALG069-10.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(30,plain,
    sorti1(j(sK1_ax4_U)) = true,
    inference(demod,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[inference(para_into,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[23,15]),6]),
    [iquote('para_into,23.1.1.1,15.1.1,demod,6')] ).

cnf(43,plain,
    sorti1(sK2_ax3_V(j(sK1_ax4_U))) = true,
    inference(demod,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[inference(para_from,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[30,11]),6]),
    [iquote('para_from,30.1.1,11.1.1.1,demod,6')] ).

cnf(55,plain,
    sorti2(h(sK2_ax3_V(j(sK1_ax4_U)))) = true,
    inference(demod,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[inference(para_from,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[43,17]),6]),
    [iquote('para_from,42.1.1,17.1.1.1,demod,6')] ).

cnf(64,plain,
    op1(sK2_ax3_V(j(sK1_ax4_U)),sK2_ax3_V(j(sK1_ax4_U))) = j(sK1_ax4_U),
    inference(demod,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[inference(para_into,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[13,30]),4]),
    [iquote('para_into,13.1.1.1,30.1.1,demod,4')] ).

cnf(69,plain,
    tuple(op2(h(sK2_ax3_V(j(sK1_ax4_U))),h(sK2_ax3_V(j(sK1_ax4_U)))),true) != tuple(sK1_ax4_U,true),
    inference(para_from,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[55,1]),
    [iquote('para_from,55.1.1,1.1.1.2')] ).

cnf(137,plain,
    h(j(sK1_ax4_U)) = sK1_ax4_U,
    inference(demod,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[inference(para_into,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[27,15]),4]),
    [iquote('para_into,27.1.1.1,15.1.1,demod,4')] ).

cnf(159,plain,
    op2(h(sK2_ax3_V(j(sK1_ax4_U))),h(sK2_ax3_V(j(sK1_ax4_U)))) = sK1_ax4_U,
    inference(demod,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[inference(para_from,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[64,19]),43,43,64,137,4,137,4,64,137]),
    [iquote('para_from,63.1.1,19.1.1.4.1,demod,43,43,64,137,4,137,4,64,137')] ).

cnf(160,plain,
    tuple(sK1_ax4_U,true) != tuple(sK1_ax4_U,true),
    inference(demod,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[inference(back_demod,[status(thm)],[69]),159]),
    [iquote('back_demod,69,demod,159')] ).

cnf(161,plain,
    $false,
    inference(binary,[status(thm)],[160,2]),
    [iquote('binary,160.1,2.1')] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.11  % Problem  : ALG069-10 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v7.3.0.
% 0.03/0.12  % Command  : otter-tptp-script %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Wed Jul 27 04:03:33 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 1.95/2.12  ----- Otter 3.3f, August 2004 -----
% 1.95/2.12  The process was started by sandbox2 on n023.cluster.edu,
% 1.95/2.12  Wed Jul 27 04:03:33 2022
% 1.95/2.12  The command was "./otter".  The process ID is 23182.
% 1.95/2.12  
% 1.95/2.12  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 1.95/2.12  set(auto).
% 1.95/2.12     dependent: set(auto1).
% 1.95/2.12     dependent: set(process_input).
% 1.95/2.12     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 1.95/2.12     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 1.95/2.12     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 1.95/2.12     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 1.95/2.12     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 1.95/2.12     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 1.95/2.12     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 1.95/2.12     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 1.95/2.12     dependent: assign(max_seconds, 10800).
% 1.95/2.12  clear(print_given).
% 1.95/2.12  
% 1.95/2.12  list(usable).
% 1.95/2.12  0 [] A=A.
% 1.95/2.12  0 [] ife_q2(A,A,B,C)=B.
% 1.95/2.12  0 [] ife_q(A,A,B,C)=B.
% 1.95/2.12  0 [] ife_q(sorti1(V),true,ife_q(sorti1(U),true,sorti1(op1(U,V)),true),true)=true.
% 1.95/2.12  0 [] ife_q(sorti2(V),true,ife_q(sorti2(U),true,sorti2(op2(U,V)),true),true)=true.
% 1.95/2.12  0 [] ife_q(sorti1(U),true,sorti1(sK2_ax3_V(U)),true)=true.
% 1.95/2.12  0 [] ife_q2(sorti1(U),true,op1(sK2_ax3_V(U),sK2_ax3_V(U)),U)=U.
% 1.95/2.12  0 [] tuple(op2(V,V),sorti2(V))!=tuple(sK1_ax4_U,true).
% 1.95/2.12  0 [] sorti2(sK1_ax4_U)=true.
% 1.95/2.12  0 [] ife_q(sorti1(U),true,sorti2(h(U)),true)=true.
% 1.95/2.12  0 [] ife_q2(sorti1(X),true,ife_q2(sorti1(W),true,op2(h(W),h(X)),h(op1(W,X))),h(op1(W,X)))=h(op1(W,X)).
% 1.95/2.12  0 [] ife_q2(sorti1(X2),true,j(h(X2)),X2)=X2.
% 1.95/2.12  0 [] ife_q(sorti2(V),true,sorti1(j(V)),true)=true.
% 1.95/2.12  0 [] ife_q2(sorti2(Z),true,ife_q2(sorti2(Y),true,op1(j(Y),j(Z)),j(op2(Y,Z))),j(op2(Y,Z)))=j(op2(Y,Z)).
% 1.95/2.12  0 [] ife_q2(sorti2(X1),true,h(j(X1)),X1)=X1.
% 1.95/2.12  end_of_list.
% 1.95/2.12  
% 1.95/2.12  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=1, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=1.
% 1.95/2.12  
% 1.95/2.12  All clauses are units, and equality is present; the
% 1.95/2.12  strategy will be Knuth-Bendix with positive clauses in sos.
% 1.95/2.12  
% 1.95/2.12     dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 1.95/2.12     dependent: set(anl_eq).
% 1.95/2.12     dependent: set(para_from).
% 1.95/2.12     dependent: set(para_into).
% 1.95/2.12     dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 1.95/2.12     dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 1.95/2.12     dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 1.95/2.12     dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 1.95/2.12     dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 1.95/2.12     dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 1.95/2.12     dependent: set(order_eq).
% 1.95/2.12     dependent: set(back_demod).
% 1.95/2.12     dependent: set(lrpo).
% 1.95/2.12  
% 1.95/2.12  ------------> process usable:
% 1.95/2.12  ** KEPT (pick-wt=10): 1 [] tuple(op2(A,A),sorti2(A))!=tuple(sK1_ax4_U,true).
% 1.95/2.12  
% 1.95/2.12  ------------> process sos:
% 1.95/2.12  ** KEPT (pick-wt=3): 2 [] A=A.
% 1.95/2.12  ** KEPT (pick-wt=7): 3 [] ife_q2(A,A,B,C)=B.
% 1.95/2.12  ---> New Demodulator: 4 [new_demod,3] ife_q2(A,A,B,C)=B.
% 1.95/2.12  ** KEPT (pick-wt=7): 5 [] ife_q(A,A,B,C)=B.
% 1.95/2.12  ---> New Demodulator: 6 [new_demod,5] ife_q(A,A,B,C)=B.
% 1.95/2.12  ** KEPT (pick-wt=16): 7 [] ife_q(sorti1(A),true,ife_q(sorti1(B),true,sorti1(op1(B,A)),true),true)=true.
% 1.95/2.12  ---> New Demodulator: 8 [new_demod,7] ife_q(sorti1(A),true,ife_q(sorti1(B),true,sorti1(op1(B,A)),true),true)=true.
% 1.95/2.12  ** KEPT (pick-wt=16): 9 [] ife_q(sorti2(A),true,ife_q(sorti2(B),true,sorti2(op2(B,A)),true),true)=true.
% 1.95/2.12  ---> New Demodulator: 10 [new_demod,9] ife_q(sorti2(A),true,ife_q(sorti2(B),true,sorti2(op2(B,A)),true),true)=true.
% 1.95/2.12  ** KEPT (pick-wt=10): 11 [] ife_q(sorti1(A),true,sorti1(sK2_ax3_V(A)),true)=true.
% 1.95/2.12  ---> New Demodulator: 12 [new_demod,11] ife_q(sorti1(A),true,sorti1(sK2_ax3_V(A)),true)=true.
% 1.95/2.12  ** KEPT (pick-wt=12): 13 [] ife_q2(sorti1(A),true,op1(sK2_ax3_V(A),sK2_ax3_V(A)),A)=A.
% 1.95/2.12  ---> New Demodulator: 14 [new_demod,13] ife_q2(sorti1(A),true,op1(sK2_ax3_V(A),sK2_ax3_V(A)),A)=A.
% 1.95/2.12  ** KEPT (pick-wt=4): 15 [] sorti2(sK1_ax4_U)=true.
% 1.95/2.12  ---> New Demodulator: 16 [new_demod,15] sorti2(sK1_ax4_U)=true.
% 1.95/2.12  ** KEPT (pick-wt=10): 17 [] ife_q(sorti1(A),true,sorti2(h(A)),true)=true.
% 1.95/2.12  ---> New Demodulator: 18 [new_demod,17] ife_q(sorti1(A),true,sorti2(h(A)),true)=true.
% 1.95/2.12  ** KEPT (pick-wt=26): 19 [] ife_q2(sorti1(A),true,ife_q2(sorti1(B),true,op2(h(B),h(A)),h(op1(B,A))),h(op1(B,A)))=h(op1(B,A)).
% 1.95/2.12  ---> New Demodulator: 20 [new_demod,19] ife_q2(sorti1(A),true,ife_q2(sorti1(B),true,op2(h(B),h(A)),h(op1(B,A))),h(op1(B,A)))=h(op1(B,A)).
% 1.95/2.12  ** KEPT (pick-wt=10): 21 [] ife_q2(sorti1(A),true,j(h(A)),A)=A.
% 1.95/2.12  ---> New Demodulator: 22 [new_demod,21] ife_q2(sorti1(A),true,j(h(A)),A)=A.
% 1.95/2.12  ** KEPT (pick-wt=10): 23 [] ife_q(sorti2(A),true,sorti1(j(A)),true)=true.
% 1.95/2.12  ---> New Demodulator: 24 [new_demod,23] ife_q(sorti2(A),true,sorti1(j(A)),true)=true.
% 1.95/2.12  ** KEPT (pick-wt=26): 25 [] ife_q2(sorti2(A),true,ife_q2(sorti2(B),true,op1(j(B),j(A)),j(op2(B,A))),j(op2(B,A)))=j(op2(B,A)).
% 1.95/2.12  ---> New Demodulator: 26 [new_demod,25] ife_q2(sorti2(A),true,ife_q2(sorti2(B),true,op1(j(B),j(A)),j(op2(B,A))),j(op2(B,A)))=j(op2(B,A)).
% 1.95/2.12  ** KEPT (pick-wt=10): 27 [] ife_q2(sorti2(A),true,h(j(A)),A)=A.
% 1.95/2.12  ---> New Demodulator: 28 [new_demod,27] ife_q2(sorti2(A),true,h(j(A)),A)=A.
% 1.95/2.12    Following clause subsumed by 2 during input processing: 0 [copy,2,flip.1] A=A.
% 1.95/2.12  >>>> Starting back demodulation with 4.
% 1.95/2.12  >>>> Starting back demodulation with 6.
% 1.95/2.12  >>>> Starting back demodulation with 8.
% 1.95/2.12  >>>> Starting back demodulation with 10.
% 1.95/2.12  >>>> Starting back demodulation with 12.
% 1.95/2.12  >>>> Starting back demodulation with 14.
% 1.95/2.12  >>>> Starting back demodulation with 16.
% 1.95/2.12  >>>> Starting back demodulation with 18.
% 1.95/2.12  >>>> Starting back demodulation with 20.
% 1.95/2.12  >>>> Starting back demodulation with 22.
% 1.95/2.12  >>>> Starting back demodulation with 24.
% 1.95/2.12  >>>> Starting back demodulation with 26.
% 1.95/2.12  >>>> Starting back demodulation with 28.
% 1.95/2.12  
% 1.95/2.12  ======= end of input processing =======
% 1.95/2.12  
% 1.95/2.12  =========== start of search ===========
% 1.95/2.12  
% 1.95/2.12  -------- PROOF -------- 
% 1.95/2.12  
% 1.95/2.12  ----> UNIT CONFLICT at   0.01 sec ----> 161 [binary,160.1,2.1] $F.
% 1.95/2.12  
% 1.95/2.12  Length of proof is 8.  Level of proof is 5.
% 1.95/2.12  
% 1.95/2.12  ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 1.95/2.12  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 1.95/2.12  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 1.95/2.12  ------------ end of proof -------------
% 1.95/2.12  
% 1.95/2.12  
% 1.95/2.12  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 1.95/2.12  
% 1.95/2.12  
% 1.95/2.12  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 1.95/2.12  
% 1.95/2.12  ============ end of search ============
% 1.95/2.12  
% 1.95/2.12  -------------- statistics -------------
% 1.95/2.12  clauses given                 28
% 1.95/2.12  clauses generated            151
% 1.95/2.12  clauses kept                  84
% 1.95/2.12  clauses forward subsumed      91
% 1.95/2.12  clauses back subsumed          0
% 1.95/2.12  Kbytes malloced             2929
% 1.95/2.12  
% 1.95/2.12  ----------- times (seconds) -----------
% 1.95/2.12  user CPU time          0.01          (0 hr, 0 min, 0 sec)
% 1.95/2.12  system CPU time        0.00          (0 hr, 0 min, 0 sec)
% 1.95/2.12  wall-clock time        2             (0 hr, 0 min, 2 sec)
% 1.95/2.12  
% 1.95/2.12  That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 1.95/2.12  
% 1.95/2.12  Process 23182 finished Wed Jul 27 04:03:35 2022
% 1.95/2.12  Otter interrupted
% 1.95/2.12  PROOF FOUND
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------