↑ Up

iProver---3.9.4.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem  : ALG069-10 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v7.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM

% Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 12:53:20 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 1.77s 6.29s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 1.77s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   12
%            Number of leaves      :   12
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   58 (  58 unt;   2 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   99 (  57 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :    4 (   4   ~;   0   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    7 (   2 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   3 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   12 (  12 usr;   2 con; 0-4 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   54 (   0 sgn  54   !;   0   ?;  35   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f1,axiom,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] : ifeq2(X0,X0,X1,X2) = X1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ifeq_axiom) ).

fof(f2,axiom,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] : ifeq(X0,X0,X1,X2) = X1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ifeq_axiom_001) ).

fof(f7,axiom,
    ! [X0] : ifeq(sorti1(X0),true,sorti1(sK2_ax3_V(X0)),true) = true,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax3_1) ).

fof(f8,plain,
    ! [X0] : true = ifeq(sorti1(X0),true,sorti1(sK2_ax3_V(X0)),true),
    inference(reorient_equations,[],[f7]) ).

fof(f9,axiom,
    ! [X0] : ifeq2(sorti1(X0),true,op1(sK2_ax3_V(X0),sK2_ax3_V(X0)),X0) = X0,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax3) ).

fof(f10,axiom,
    ! [X0] : tuple(op2(X0,X0),sorti2(X0)) != tuple(sK1_ax4_U,true),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax4_1) ).

fof(f11,axiom,
    sorti2(sK1_ax4_U) = true,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax4) ).

fof(f12,plain,
    true = sorti2(sK1_ax4_U),
    inference(reorient_equations,[],[f11]) ).

fof(f13,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X0] : ifeq(sorti1(X0),true,sorti2(h(X0)),true) = true,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1) ).

fof(f14,plain,
    ! [X0] : true = ifeq(sorti1(X0),true,sorti2(h(X0)),true),
    inference(reorient_equations,[],[f13]) ).

fof(f15,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X0,X1] : ifeq2(sorti1(X0),true,ifeq2(sorti1(X1),true,op2(h(X1),h(X0)),h(op1(X1,X0))),h(op1(X1,X0))) = h(op1(X1,X0)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_1) ).

fof(f16,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] : h(op1(X1,X0)) = ifeq2(sorti1(X0),true,ifeq2(sorti1(X1),true,op2(h(X1),h(X0)),h(op1(X1,X0))),h(op1(X1,X0))),
    inference(reorient_equations,[],[f15]) ).

fof(f18,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X0] : ifeq(sorti2(X0),true,sorti1(j(X0)),true) = true,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_3) ).

fof(f19,plain,
    ! [X0] : true = ifeq(sorti2(X0),true,sorti1(j(X0)),true),
    inference(reorient_equations,[],[f18]) ).

fof(f22,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X0] : ifeq2(sorti2(X0),true,h(j(X0)),X0) = X0,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_5) ).

tcf(c_63,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : ifeq2(X0,X0,X1,X2) = X1,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1]) ).

tcf(c_64,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : ifeq(X0,X0,X1,X2) = X1,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f2]) ).

tcf(c_67,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : ifeq(sorti1(X0),true,sorti1(sK2_ax3_V(X0)),true) = true,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f8]) ).

tcf(c_68,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : ifeq2(sorti1(X0),true,op1(sK2_ax3_V(X0),sK2_ax3_V(X0)),X0) = X0,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f9]) ).

tcf(c_69,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : tuple(op2(X0,X0),sorti2(X0)) != tuple(sK1_ax4_U,true),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f10]) ).

tcf(c_70,plain,
    sorti2(sK1_ax4_U) = true,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f12]) ).

tcf(c_71,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X0: $i] : ifeq(sorti1(X0),true,sorti2(h(X0)),true) = true,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f14]) ).

tcf(c_72,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : ifeq2(sorti1(X0),true,ifeq2(sorti1(X1),true,op2(h(X1),h(X0)),h(op1(X1,X0))),h(op1(X1,X0))) = h(op1(X1,X0)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f16]) ).

tcf(c_74,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X0: $i] : ifeq(sorti2(X0),true,sorti1(j(X0)),true) = true,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f19]) ).

tcf(c_76,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X0: $i] : ifeq2(sorti2(X0),true,h(j(X0)),X0) = X0,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f22]) ).

tcf(c_129,definition,
    iPr_def_10 = sorti2(sK1_ax4_U),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_10])],[]) ).

tcf(c_130,definition,
    iPr_def_11 = tuple(sK1_ax4_U,true),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_11])],[]) ).

tcf(c_131,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X0: $i] : ifeq2(sorti2(X0),true,h(j(X0)),X0) = X0,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_76]) ).

tcf(c_133,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X0: $i] : ifeq(sorti2(X0),true,sorti1(j(X0)),true) = true,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_74]) ).

tcf(c_135,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : ifeq2(sorti1(X0),true,ifeq2(sorti1(X1),true,op2(h(X1),h(X0)),h(op1(X1,X0))),h(op1(X1,X0))) = h(op1(X1,X0)),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_72]) ).

tcf(c_136,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X0: $i] : ifeq(sorti1(X0),true,sorti2(h(X0)),true) = true,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_71]) ).

tcf(c_137,plain,
    iPr_def_10 = true,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_70,c_129]) ).

tcf(c_138,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : tuple(op2(X0,X0),sorti2(X0)) != iPr_def_11,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_69,c_130]) ).

tcf(c_139,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : ifeq2(sorti1(X0),true,op1(sK2_ax3_V(X0),sK2_ax3_V(X0)),X0) = X0,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_68]) ).

tcf(c_140,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : ifeq(sorti1(X0),true,sorti1(sK2_ax3_V(X0)),true) = true,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_67]) ).

tcf(c_143,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : ifeq(X0,X0,X1,X2) = X1,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_64]) ).

tcf(c_144,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : ifeq2(X0,X0,X1,X2) = X1,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_63]) ).

tcf(c_261,plain,
    tuple(sK1_ax4_U,iPr_def_10) = iPr_def_11,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_130,c_137]) ).

tcf(c_262,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : ifeq(sorti1(X0),iPr_def_10,sorti1(sK2_ax3_V(X0)),iPr_def_10) = iPr_def_10,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_140,c_137]) ).

tcf(c_263,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : ifeq(sorti1(X0),iPr_def_10,sorti2(h(X0)),iPr_def_10) = iPr_def_10,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_136,c_137]) ).

tcf(c_265,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : ifeq(sorti2(X0),iPr_def_10,sorti1(j(X0)),iPr_def_10) = iPr_def_10,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_133,c_137]) ).

tcf(c_266,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : ifeq2(sorti2(X0),iPr_def_10,h(j(X0)),X0) = X0,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_131,c_137]) ).

tcf(c_267,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : ifeq2(sorti1(X0),iPr_def_10,op1(sK2_ax3_V(X0),sK2_ax3_V(X0)),X0) = X0,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_139,c_137]) ).

tcf(c_270,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : ifeq2(sorti1(X0),iPr_def_10,ifeq2(sorti1(X1),iPr_def_10,op2(h(X1),h(X0)),h(op1(X1,X0))),h(op1(X1,X0))) = h(op1(X1,X0)),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_135,c_137]) ).

tcf(c_294,plain,
    ifeq(iPr_def_10,iPr_def_10,sorti1(j(sK1_ax4_U)),iPr_def_10) = iPr_def_10,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_129,c_265]) ).

tcf(c_295,plain,
    ifeq2(iPr_def_10,iPr_def_10,h(j(sK1_ax4_U)),sK1_ax4_U) = sK1_ax4_U,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_129,c_266]) ).

tcf(c_300,plain,
    h(j(sK1_ax4_U)) = sK1_ax4_U,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_295,c_144]) ).

tcf(c_301,plain,
    sorti1(j(sK1_ax4_U)) = iPr_def_10,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_294,c_143]) ).

tcf(c_324,plain,
    ifeq2(iPr_def_10,iPr_def_10,op1(sK2_ax3_V(j(sK1_ax4_U)),sK2_ax3_V(j(sK1_ax4_U))),j(sK1_ax4_U)) = j(sK1_ax4_U),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_301,c_267]) ).

tcf(c_326,plain,
    ifeq(iPr_def_10,iPr_def_10,sorti1(sK2_ax3_V(j(sK1_ax4_U))),iPr_def_10) = iPr_def_10,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_301,c_262]) ).

tcf(c_351,plain,
    sorti1(sK2_ax3_V(j(sK1_ax4_U))) = iPr_def_10,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_326,c_143]) ).

tcf(c_352,plain,
    op1(sK2_ax3_V(j(sK1_ax4_U)),sK2_ax3_V(j(sK1_ax4_U))) = j(sK1_ax4_U),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_324,c_144]) ).

tcf(c_383,plain,
    ifeq(iPr_def_10,iPr_def_10,sorti2(h(sK2_ax3_V(j(sK1_ax4_U)))),iPr_def_10) = iPr_def_10,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_351,c_263]) ).

tcf(c_396,plain,
    ifeq2(sorti1(sK2_ax3_V(j(sK1_ax4_U))),iPr_def_10,ifeq2(sorti1(sK2_ax3_V(j(sK1_ax4_U))),iPr_def_10,op2(h(sK2_ax3_V(j(sK1_ax4_U))),h(sK2_ax3_V(j(sK1_ax4_U)))),h(j(sK1_ax4_U))),h(j(sK1_ax4_U))) = h(j(sK1_ax4_U)),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_352,c_270]) ).

tcf(c_452,plain,
    sorti2(h(sK2_ax3_V(j(sK1_ax4_U)))) = iPr_def_10,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_383,c_143]) ).

tcf(c_479,plain,
    op2(h(sK2_ax3_V(j(sK1_ax4_U))),h(sK2_ax3_V(j(sK1_ax4_U)))) = sK1_ax4_U,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_396,c_144,c_300,c_351]) ).

tcf(c_664,plain,
    tuple(sK1_ax4_U,sorti2(h(sK2_ax3_V(j(sK1_ax4_U))))) != iPr_def_11,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_479,c_138]) ).

tcf(c_950,plain,
    $false,
    inference(ground_joinability,[status(thm)],[c_664,c_261,c_452]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : ALG069-10 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v7.3.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.11/5.38  % Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% 0.11/5.38  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/5.38  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/5.38  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/5.38  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/5.38  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/5.38  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.11/5.38  % DateTime : Fri Sep 25 04:44:13 UTC 2026
% 0.11/5.39  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.11/5.39  Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.15/5.42  Running UEQ theorem proving
% 0.15/5.42  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s ueq_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.15/5.43  
% 0.15/5.43  % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.15/5.43  
% 0.15/5.43  % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.15/5.45  % Proving...
% 1.77/6.29  WARNING - Clausifier option not provided in the heuristic config "heur/vip2_118404", setting default options.
% 1.77/6.29  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 1.77/6.29  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 1.77/6.29  
% 1.77/6.29  %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 1.77/6.29  
% 1.77/6.29  % ------  iProver source info
% 1.77/6.29  
% 1.77/6.29  % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 1.77/6.29  % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 1.77/6.29  % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 1.77/6.29  
% 1.77/6.29  % ------ Parsing...% successful
% 1.77/6.29  
% 1.77/6.29  
% 1.77/6.29  % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel  & Parsing by iProver...% 
% 1.77/6.29  
% 1.77/6.29  % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e % 
% 1.77/6.29  
% 1.77/6.29  % ------ Preprocessing... gs_s  sp: 0 0s  gs_e  snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e % 
% 1.77/6.29  
% 1.77/6.29  % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e 
% 1.77/6.29  % ------ Proving...
% 1.77/6.29  % ------ Problem Properties 
% 1.77/6.29  
% 1.77/6.29  % 
% 1.77/6.29  % clauses                               16
% 1.77/6.29  % conjectures                           6
% 1.77/6.29  % EPR                                   1
% 1.77/6.29  % Horn                                  16
% 1.77/6.29  % unary                                 16
% 1.77/6.29  % binary                                0
% 1.77/6.29  % lits                                  16
% 1.77/6.29  % lits eq                               16
% 1.77/6.29  % fd_pure                               0
% 1.77/6.29  % fd_pseudo                             0
% 1.77/6.29  % fd_cond                               0
% 1.77/6.29  % fd_pseudo_cond                        0
% 1.77/6.29  % AC symbols                            0
% 1.77/6.29  
% 1.77/6.29  % ------ Input Options Time Limit: Unbounded
% 1.77/6.29  
% 1.77/6.29  
% 1.77/6.29  % ------ 
% 1.77/6.29  % Current options:
% 1.77/6.29  % ------ 
% 1.77/6.29  
% 1.77/6.29  
% 1.77/6.29  % 
% 1.77/6.29  
% 1.77/6.29  % ------ Proving...
% 1.77/6.29  % 
% 1.77/6.29  
% 1.77/6.29  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 1.77/6.29  
% 1.77/6.29  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 1.77/6.29  
% 1.77/6.29  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------