↑ Up

Leo-III---1.8.0.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Leo-III---1.8.0
% Problem  : ALG072+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.7.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39

% Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 06:46:03 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 37.61s 13.49s
% Output   : Refutation 32.32s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   19
%            Number of leaves      :   12
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   91 (  25 unt;   0 typ;   3 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  340 ( 133 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   14 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  795 ( 124   ~; 100   |;  49   &; 473   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;  49  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   17 (   5 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :   14 (  11 usr;   7 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :  124 (   0   ^; 113   !;   8   ?; 124   :)
%                                         (   0  !>;   0  ?*;   0  @-;   3  @+)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(sorti1_decl,type,
    sorti1: $i > $o ).

thf(sorti2_decl,type,
    sorti2: $i > $o ).

thf(h_decl,type,
    h: $i > $i ).

thf(j_decl,type,
    j: $i > $i ).

thf(op1_decl,type,
    op1: $i > $i > $i ).

thf(op2_decl,type,
    op2: $i > $i > $i ).

thf(unit1_decl,type,
    unit1: $i ).

thf(unit2_decl,type,
    unit2: $i ).

thf(sk1_decl,type,
    sk1: $i ).

thf(sk2_decl,type,
    sk2: $i ).

thf(sk3_decl,type,
    sk3: $i ).

thf(sk1_def,definition,
    ( sk1
    = ( @+[A: $i] :
          ( ( unit1 = A )
          & ( A @ sorti1 ) ) ) ) ).

thf(sk2_def,definition,
    ( sk2
    = ( @+[A: $i] :
          ( ( unit2 = A )
          & ( A @ sorti2 ) ) ) ) ).

thf(sk3_def,definition,
    ( sk3
    = ( @+[A: $i] :
          ( ! [B: $i] :
              ( ( B @ sorti1 )
             => ! [C: $i] :
                  ( ( C @ sorti1 )
                 => ( ( ( A != unit1 )
                      & ( ( A @ ( B @ op1 ) )
                        = C ) )
                    | ( ( C @ ( B @ op1 ) )
                     != A ) ) ) )
          & ( A @ sorti1 ) ) ) ) ).

thf(5,axiom,
    unit2 @ sorti2,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax3) ).

thf(38,plain,
    unit2 @ sorti2,
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[5]) ).

thf(1,conjecture,
    ( ( ! [A: $i] :
          ( ( A @ sorti2 )
         => ( A @ j @ sorti1 ) )
      & ! [A: $i] :
          ( ( A @ sorti1 )
         => ( A @ h @ sorti2 ) ) )
   => ~ ( ! [A: $i] :
            ( ( A @ sorti1 )
           => ( ( A @ h @ j )
              = A ) )
        & ! [A: $i] :
            ( ( A @ sorti2 )
           => ( ( A @ j @ h )
              = A ) )
        & ! [A: $i] :
            ( ( A @ sorti2 )
           => ! [B: $i] :
                ( ( B @ sorti2 )
               => ( ( B @ ( A @ op2 ) @ j )
                  = ( B @ j @ ( A @ j @ op1 ) ) ) ) )
        & ! [A: $i] :
            ( ( A @ sorti1 )
           => ! [B: $i] :
                ( ( B @ sorti1 )
               => ( ( B @ ( A @ op1 ) @ h )
                  = ( B @ h @ ( A @ h @ op2 ) ) ) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1) ).

thf(2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( ( ! [A: $i] :
            ( ( A @ sorti2 )
           => ( A @ j @ sorti1 ) )
        & ! [A: $i] :
            ( ( A @ sorti1 )
           => ( A @ h @ sorti2 ) ) )
     => ~ ( ! [A: $i] :
              ( ( A @ sorti1 )
             => ( ( A @ h @ j )
                = A ) )
          & ! [A: $i] :
              ( ( A @ sorti2 )
             => ( ( A @ j @ h )
                = A ) )
          & ! [A: $i] :
              ( ( A @ sorti2 )
             => ! [B: $i] :
                  ( ( B @ sorti2 )
                 => ( ( B @ ( A @ op2 ) @ j )
                    = ( B @ j @ ( A @ j @ op1 ) ) ) ) )
          & ! [A: $i] :
              ( ( A @ sorti1 )
             => ! [B: $i] :
                  ( ( B @ sorti1 )
                 => ( ( B @ ( A @ op1 ) @ h )
                    = ( B @ h @ ( A @ h @ op2 ) ) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(neg_conjecture,[status(cth)],[1]) ).

thf(11,plain,
    ~ ( ( ! [A: $i] :
            ( ( A @ sorti2 )
           => ( A @ j @ sorti1 ) )
        & ! [A: $i] :
            ( ( A @ sorti1 )
           => ( A @ h @ sorti2 ) ) )
     => ~ ( ! [A: $i] :
              ( ( A @ sorti1 )
             => ( ( A @ h @ j )
                = A ) )
          & ! [A: $i] :
              ( ( A @ sorti2 )
             => ( ( A @ j @ h )
                = A ) )
          & ! [A: $i] :
              ( ( A @ sorti2 )
             => ! [B: $i] :
                  ( ( B @ sorti2 )
                 => ( ( B @ ( A @ op2 ) @ j )
                    = ( B @ j @ ( A @ j @ op1 ) ) ) ) )
          & ! [A: $i] :
              ( ( A @ sorti1 )
             => ! [B: $i] :
                  ( ( B @ sorti1 )
                 => ( ( B @ ( A @ op1 ) @ h )
                    = ( B @ h @ ( A @ h @ op2 ) ) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[2]) ).

thf(12,plain,
    ! [H: $i,G: $i,F: $i,E: $i,D: $i,C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( ( ( H @ h @ j )
          = H )
        | ~ ( H @ sorti1 ) )
      & ( ( ( G @ j @ h )
          = G )
        | ~ ( G @ sorti2 ) )
      & ( ( ( F @ ( E @ op2 ) @ j )
          = ( F @ j @ ( E @ j @ op1 ) ) )
        | ~ ( F @ sorti2 )
        | ~ ( E @ sorti2 ) )
      & ( ( ( D @ ( C @ op1 ) @ h )
          = ( D @ h @ ( C @ h @ op2 ) ) )
        | ~ ( D @ sorti1 )
        | ~ ( C @ sorti1 ) )
      & ( ( B @ j @ sorti1 )
        | ~ ( B @ sorti2 ) )
      & ( ( A @ h @ sorti2 )
        | ~ ( A @ sorti1 ) ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[11]) ).

thf(18,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( A @ j @ sorti1 )
      | ~ ( A @ sorti2 ) ),
    inference(cnfConj,[status(thm)],[12]) ).

thf(25,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( A @ j @ sorti1 )
      | ~ ( A @ sorti2 ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[18]) ).

thf(168,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( ( unit2 @ sorti2 )
       != ( A @ sorti2 ) )
      | ( A @ j @ sorti1 )
      | ~ $true ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[38,25]) ).

thf(169,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( ( unit2 @ sorti2 )
       != ( A @ sorti2 ) )
      | ( A @ j @ sorti1 ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[168]) ).

thf(170,plain,
    unit2 @ j @ sorti1,
    inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[169:[bind(A,$thf( unit2 ))]]) ).

thf(9,axiom,
    ? [A: $i] :
      ( ! [B: $i] :
          ( ( B @ sorti1 )
         => ! [C: $i] :
              ( ( C @ sorti1 )
             => ( ( ( A != unit1 )
                  & ( ( A @ ( B @ op1 ) )
                    = C ) )
                | ( ( C @ ( B @ op1 ) )
                 != A ) ) ) )
      & ( A @ sorti1 ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax7) ).

thf(52,plain,
    ? [A: $i] :
      ( ! [B: $i] :
          ( ( B @ sorti1 )
         => ! [C: $i] :
              ( ( C @ sorti1 )
             => ( ( ( A != unit1 )
                  & ( ( A @ ( B @ op1 ) )
                    = C ) )
                | ( ( C @ ( B @ op1 ) )
                 != A ) ) ) )
      & ( A @ sorti1 ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[9]) ).

thf(17,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( ( A @ j @ h )
        = A )
      | ~ ( A @ sorti2 ) ),
    inference(cnfConj,[status(thm)],[12]) ).

thf(23,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( A @ sorti2 )
      | ( ( A @ j @ h )
        = A ) ),
    inference(lifteq,[status(thm)],[17]) ).

thf(24,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( A @ sorti2 )
      | ( ( A @ j @ h )
        = A ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[23]) ).

thf(401,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( ( unit2 @ sorti2 )
       != ( A @ sorti2 ) )
      | ~ $true
      | ( ( A @ j @ h )
        = A ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[38,24]) ).

thf(402,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( ( unit2 @ sorti2 )
       != ( A @ sorti2 ) )
      | ( ( A @ j @ h )
        = A ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[401]) ).

thf(403,plain,
    ( ( unit2 @ j @ h )
    = unit2 ),
    inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[402:[bind(A,$thf( unit2 ))]]) ).

thf(53,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( ( sk3 != unit1 )
        | ( ( B @ ( A @ op1 ) )
         != sk3 )
        | ~ ( B @ sorti1 )
        | ~ ( A @ sorti1 ) )
      & ( ( ( sk3 @ ( A @ op1 ) )
          = B )
        | ( ( B @ ( A @ op1 ) )
         != sk3 )
        | ~ ( B @ sorti1 )
        | ~ ( A @ sorti1 ) )
      & ( sk3 @ sorti1 ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[52]) ).

thf(54,plain,
    sk3 @ sorti1,
    inference(cnfConj,[status(thm)],[53]) ).

thf(3,axiom,
    unit1 @ sorti1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax1) ).

thf(28,plain,
    unit1 @ sorti1,
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[3]) ).

thf(56,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( sk3 != unit1 )
      | ( ( B @ ( A @ op1 ) )
       != sk3 )
      | ~ ( B @ sorti1 )
      | ~ ( A @ sorti1 ) ),
    inference(cnfConj,[status(thm)],[53]) ).

thf(58,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( B @ sorti1 )
      | ~ ( A @ sorti1 )
      | ( sk3 != unit1 )
      | ( ( B @ ( A @ op1 ) )
       != sk3 ) ),
    inference(lifteq,[status(thm)],[56]) ).

thf(69,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( ( unit1 @ sorti1 )
       != ( A @ sorti1 ) )
      | ~ ( B @ sorti1 )
      | ~ $true
      | ( sk3 != unit1 )
      | ( ( B @ ( A @ op1 ) )
       != sk3 ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[28,58]) ).

thf(70,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( ( unit1 @ sorti1 )
       != ( A @ sorti1 ) )
      | ~ ( B @ sorti1 )
      | ( sk3 != unit1 )
      | ( ( B @ ( A @ op1 ) )
       != sk3 ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[69]) ).

thf(71,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( A @ sorti1 )
      | ( sk3 != unit1 )
      | ( ( A @ ( unit1 @ op1 ) )
       != sk3 ) ),
    inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[70:[bind(A,$thf( unit1 ))]]) ).

thf(75,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( A @ sorti1 )
      | ( sk3 != unit1 )
      | ( ( A @ ( unit1 @ op1 ) )
       != sk3 ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[71]) ).

thf(148,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( ( sk3 @ sorti1 )
       != ( A @ sorti1 ) )
      | ~ $true
      | ( sk3 != unit1 )
      | ( ( A @ ( unit1 @ op1 ) )
       != sk3 ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[54,75]) ).

thf(149,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( ( sk3 @ sorti1 )
       != ( A @ sorti1 ) )
      | ( sk3 != unit1 )
      | ( ( A @ ( unit1 @ op1 ) )
       != sk3 ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[148]) ).

thf(150,plain,
    ( ( sk3 != unit1 )
    | ( ( sk3 @ ( unit1 @ op1 ) )
     != sk3 ) ),
    inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[149:[bind(A,$thf( sk3 ))]]) ).

thf(4,axiom,
    ( ? [A: $i] :
        ( ( unit1 = A )
        & ( A @ sorti1 ) )
    & ! [A: $i] :
        ( ( A @ sorti1 )
       => ( ( ( unit1 @ ( A @ op1 ) )
            = A )
          & ( ( A @ ( unit1 @ op1 ) )
            = A ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax2) ).

thf(29,plain,
    ( ? [A: $i] :
        ( ( unit1 = A )
        & ( A @ sorti1 ) )
    & ! [A: $i] :
        ( ( A @ sorti1 )
       => ( ( ( unit1 @ ( A @ op1 ) )
            = A )
          & ( ( A @ ( unit1 @ op1 ) )
            = A ) ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[4]) ).

thf(30,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( unit1 = sk1 )
      & ( sk1 @ sorti1 )
      & ( ( ( unit1 @ ( A @ op1 ) )
          = A )
        | ~ ( A @ sorti1 ) )
      & ( ( ( A @ ( unit1 @ op1 ) )
          = A )
        | ~ ( A @ sorti1 ) ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[29]) ).

thf(31,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( ( A @ ( unit1 @ op1 ) )
        = A )
      | ~ ( A @ sorti1 ) ),
    inference(cnfConj,[status(thm)],[30]) ).

thf(35,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( A @ sorti1 )
      | ( ( A @ ( unit1 @ op1 ) )
        = A ) ),
    inference(lifteq,[status(thm)],[31]) ).

thf(561,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( ( sk3 @ sorti1 )
       != ( A @ sorti1 ) )
      | ~ $true
      | ( ( A @ ( unit1 @ op1 ) )
        = A ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[54,35]) ).

thf(562,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( ( sk3 @ sorti1 )
       != ( A @ sorti1 ) )
      | ( ( A @ ( unit1 @ op1 ) )
        = A ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[561]) ).

thf(563,plain,
    ( ( sk3 @ ( unit1 @ op1 ) )
    = sk3 ),
    inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[562:[bind(A,$thf( sk3 ))]]) ).

thf(600,plain,
    ( ( sk3 != unit1 )
    | ( sk3 != sk3 ) ),
    inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[150,563]) ).

thf(601,plain,
    sk3 != unit1,
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[600]) ).

thf(7,axiom,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( A @ sorti1 )
     => ! [B: $i] :
          ( ( B @ sorti1 )
         => ( B @ ( A @ op1 ) @ sorti1 ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax5) ).

thf(48,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( A @ sorti1 )
     => ! [B: $i] :
          ( ( B @ sorti1 )
         => ( B @ ( A @ op1 ) @ sorti1 ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[7]) ).

thf(8,axiom,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( A @ sorti2 )
     => ! [B: $i] :
          ( ( B @ sorti2 )
         => ( B @ ( A @ op2 ) @ sorti2 ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax6) ).

thf(50,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( A @ sorti2 )
     => ! [B: $i] :
          ( ( B @ sorti2 )
         => ( B @ ( A @ op2 ) @ sorti2 ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[8]) ).

thf(13,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( ( A @ h @ j )
        = A )
      | ~ ( A @ sorti1 ) ),
    inference(cnfConj,[status(thm)],[12]) ).

thf(21,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( A @ sorti1 )
      | ( ( A @ h @ j )
        = A ) ),
    inference(lifteq,[status(thm)],[13]) ).

thf(22,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( A @ sorti1 )
      | ( ( A @ h @ j )
        = A ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[21]) ).

thf(233,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( ( sk3 @ sorti1 )
       != ( A @ sorti1 ) )
      | ~ $true
      | ( ( A @ h @ j )
        = A ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[54,22]) ).

thf(234,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( ( sk3 @ sorti1 )
       != ( A @ sorti1 ) )
      | ( ( A @ h @ j )
        = A ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[233]) ).

thf(235,plain,
    ( ( sk3 @ h @ j )
    = sk3 ),
    inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[234:[bind(A,$thf( sk3 ))]]) ).

thf(252,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( ( unit1 @ sorti1 )
       != ( A @ sorti1 ) )
      | ~ $true
      | ( ( A @ h @ j )
        = A ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[28,22]) ).

thf(253,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( ( unit1 @ sorti1 )
       != ( A @ sorti1 ) )
      | ( ( A @ h @ j )
        = A ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[252]) ).

thf(254,plain,
    ( ( unit1 @ h @ j )
    = unit1 ),
    inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[253:[bind(A,$thf( unit1 ))]]) ).

thf(34,plain,
    unit1 = sk1,
    inference(cnfConj,[status(thm)],[30]) ).

thf(37,plain,
    sk1 = unit1,
    inference(lifteq,[status(thm)],[34]) ).

thf(14,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( ( B @ ( A @ op2 ) @ j )
        = ( B @ j @ ( A @ j @ op1 ) ) )
      | ~ ( B @ sorti2 )
      | ~ ( A @ sorti2 ) ),
    inference(cnfConj,[status(thm)],[12]) ).

thf(19,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( B @ sorti2 )
      | ~ ( A @ sorti2 )
      | ( ( B @ ( A @ op2 ) @ j )
        = ( B @ j @ ( A @ j @ op1 ) ) ) ),
    inference(lifteq,[status(thm)],[14]) ).

thf(20,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( B @ sorti2 )
      | ~ ( A @ sorti2 )
      | ( ( B @ ( A @ op2 ) @ j )
        = ( B @ j @ ( A @ j @ op1 ) ) ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[19]) ).

thf(10,axiom,
    ~ ? [A: $i] :
        ( ! [B: $i] :
            ( ( B @ sorti2 )
           => ! [C: $i] :
                ( ( C @ sorti2 )
               => ( ( ( A != unit2 )
                    & ( ( A @ ( B @ op2 ) )
                      = C ) )
                  | ( ( C @ ( B @ op2 ) )
                   != A ) ) ) )
        & ( A @ sorti2 ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax8) ).

thf(59,plain,
    ~ ? [A: $i] :
        ( ! [B: $i] :
            ( ( B @ sorti2 )
           => ! [C: $i] :
                ( ( C @ sorti2 )
               => ( ( ( A != unit2 )
                    & ( ( A @ ( B @ op2 ) )
                      = C ) )
                  | ( ( C @ ( B @ op2 ) )
                   != A ) ) ) )
        & ( A @ sorti2 ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[10]) ).

thf(16,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( ( B @ ( A @ op1 ) @ h )
        = ( B @ h @ ( A @ h @ op2 ) ) )
      | ~ ( B @ sorti1 )
      | ~ ( A @ sorti1 ) ),
    inference(cnfConj,[status(thm)],[12]) ).

thf(26,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( B @ sorti1 )
      | ~ ( A @ sorti1 )
      | ( ( B @ h @ ( A @ h @ op2 ) )
        = ( B @ ( A @ op1 ) @ h ) ) ),
    inference(lifteq,[status(thm)],[16]) ).

thf(27,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( B @ sorti1 )
      | ~ ( A @ sorti1 )
      | ( ( B @ h @ ( A @ h @ op2 ) )
        = ( B @ ( A @ op1 ) @ h ) ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[26]) ).

thf(15,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( A @ h @ sorti2 )
      | ~ ( A @ sorti1 ) ),
    inference(cnfConj,[status(thm)],[12]) ).

thf(79,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( ( unit1 @ sorti1 )
       != ( A @ sorti1 ) )
      | ( A @ h @ sorti2 )
      | ~ $true ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[28,15]) ).

thf(80,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( ( unit1 @ sorti1 )
       != ( A @ sorti1 ) )
      | ( A @ h @ sorti2 ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[79]) ).

thf(81,plain,
    unit1 @ h @ sorti2,
    inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[80:[bind(A,$thf( unit1 ))]]) ).

thf(6,axiom,
    ( ? [A: $i] :
        ( ( unit2 = A )
        & ( A @ sorti2 ) )
    & ! [A: $i] :
        ( ( A @ sorti2 )
       => ( ( ( unit2 @ ( A @ op2 ) )
            = A )
          & ( ( A @ ( unit2 @ op2 ) )
            = A ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax4) ).

thf(39,plain,
    ( ? [A: $i] :
        ( ( unit2 = A )
        & ( A @ sorti2 ) )
    & ! [A: $i] :
        ( ( A @ sorti2 )
       => ( ( ( unit2 @ ( A @ op2 ) )
            = A )
          & ( ( A @ ( unit2 @ op2 ) )
            = A ) ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[6]) ).

thf(133,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( ( sk3 @ sorti1 )
       != ( A @ sorti1 ) )
      | ( A @ h @ sorti2 )
      | ~ $true ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[54,15]) ).

thf(134,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( ( sk3 @ sorti1 )
       != ( A @ sorti1 ) )
      | ( A @ h @ sorti2 ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[133]) ).

thf(135,plain,
    sk3 @ h @ sorti2,
    inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[134:[bind(A,$thf( sk3 ))]]) ).

thf(206,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( ( unit2 @ j @ sorti1 )
       != ( A @ sorti1 ) )
      | ( A @ h @ sorti2 )
      | ~ $true ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[170,15]) ).

thf(207,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( ( unit2 @ j @ sorti1 )
       != ( A @ sorti1 ) )
      | ( A @ h @ sorti2 ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[206]) ).

thf(208,plain,
    unit2 @ j @ h @ sorti2,
    inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[207:[bind(A,$thf( unit2 @ j ))]]) ).

thf(284,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( ( unit2 @ j @ h @ sorti2 )
       != ( A @ sorti2 ) )
      | ( A @ j @ sorti1 )
      | ~ $true ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[208,25]) ).

thf(285,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( ( unit2 @ j @ h @ sorti2 )
       != ( A @ sorti2 ) )
      | ( A @ j @ sorti1 ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[284]) ).

thf(286,plain,
    unit2 @ j @ h @ j @ sorti1,
    inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[285:[bind(A,$thf( unit2 @ j @ h ))]]) ).

thf(381,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( ( unit2 @ j @ h @ j @ sorti1 )
       != ( A @ sorti1 ) )
      | ( A @ h @ sorti2 )
      | ~ $true ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[286,15]) ).

thf(382,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( ( unit2 @ j @ h @ j @ sorti1 )
       != ( A @ sorti1 ) )
      | ( A @ h @ sorti2 ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[381]) ).

thf(383,plain,
    unit2 @ j @ h @ j @ h @ sorti2,
    inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[382:[bind(A,$thf( unit2 @ j @ h @ j ))]]) ).

thf(459,plain,
    unit2 @ j @ h @ sorti2,
    inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[383,403]) ).

thf(40,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( unit2 = sk2 )
      & ( sk2 @ sorti2 )
      & ( ( ( unit2 @ ( A @ op2 ) )
          = A )
        | ~ ( A @ sorti2 ) )
      & ( ( ( A @ ( unit2 @ op2 ) )
          = A )
        | ~ ( A @ sorti2 ) ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[39]) ).

thf(44,plain,
    unit2 = sk2,
    inference(cnfConj,[status(thm)],[40]) ).

thf(47,plain,
    sk2 = unit2,
    inference(lifteq,[status(thm)],[44]) ).

thf(13428,plain,
    $false,
    inference(e,[status(thm)],[170,52,403,601,54,48,50,11,235,254,24,37,25,20,29,28,38,22,59,27,81,39,35,135,563,459,47,15]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : ALG072+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.7.0.
% 0.00/0.06  % Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.14/5.40  % Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% 0.14/5.40  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/5.40  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/5.40  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.14/5.40  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.06/5.40  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.06/5.40  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.06/5.40  % DateTime : Sat Sep 26 21:10:51 UTC 2026
% 0.06/5.40  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.06/5.40  Running java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.16/5.99  % [INFO] 	 Parsing problem /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ... 
% 1.36/6.27  % [INFO] 	 Parsing done (277ms). 
% 1.36/6.29  % [INFO] 	 Running in sequential loop mode. 
% 2.16/6.77  % [INFO] 	 eprover registered as external prover. 
% 2.16/6.79  % [INFO] 	 Scanning for conjecture ... 
% 2.56/6.95  % [INFO] 	 Found a conjecture (or negated_conjecture) and 8 axioms. Running axiom selection ... 
% 2.56/7.02  % [INFO] 	 Axiom selection finished. Selected 8 axioms (removed 0 axioms). 
% 2.56/7.05  % [INFO] 	 Problem is first-order (TPTP FOF). 
% 2.85/7.07  % [INFO] 	 Type checking passed. 
% 2.85/7.08  % [CONFIG] 	 Using configuration: timeout(300) with strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>.  Searching for refutation ... 
% 37.61/13.48  % External prover 'e' found a proof!
% 37.61/13.48  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
% 37.61/13.49  % Time passed: 7941ms (effective reasoning time: 7184ms)
% 37.61/13.49  % Solved by strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>
% 37.61/13.49  % Axioms used in derivation (8): ax4, ax6, ax8, ax2, ax1, ax7, ax3, ax5
% 37.61/13.49  % No. of inferences in proof: 88
% 37.61/13.49  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : 7941 ms resp. 7184 ms w/o parsing
% 32.32/13.56  % SZS output start Refutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 32.32/13.56  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------