↑ Up

Leo-III---1.8.0.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Leo-III---1.8.0
% Problem  : ALG074+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.7.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39

% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 06:46:04 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 8.58s 3.43s
% Output   : Refutation 8.58s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    3
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   12 (   1 unt;   0 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   75 (  24 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   14 (   6 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  244 (  15   ~;   0   |;  28   &; 166   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;  35  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   11 (   8 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :    8 (   6 usr;   1 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   40 (   0   ^;  32   !;   8   ?;  40   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(sorti1_decl,type,
    sorti1: $i > $o ).

thf(sorti2_decl,type,
    sorti2: $i > $o ).

thf(h_decl,type,
    h: $i > $i ).

thf(j_decl,type,
    j: $i > $i ).

thf(op1_decl,type,
    op1: $i > $i > $i ).

thf(op2_decl,type,
    op2: $i > $i > $i ).

thf(3,axiom,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( A @ sorti1 )
     => ! [B: $i] :
          ( ( B @ sorti1 )
         => ( B @ ( A @ op1 ) @ sorti1 ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax1) ).

thf(24,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( A @ sorti1 )
     => ! [B: $i] :
          ( ( B @ sorti1 )
         => ( B @ ( A @ op1 ) @ sorti1 ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[3]) ).

thf(1,conjecture,
    ( ( ! [A: $i] :
          ( ( A @ sorti2 )
         => ( A @ j @ sorti1 ) )
      & ! [A: $i] :
          ( ( A @ sorti1 )
         => ( A @ h @ sorti2 ) ) )
   => ~ ( ! [A: $i] :
            ( ( A @ sorti1 )
           => ( ( A @ h @ j )
              = A ) )
        & ! [A: $i] :
            ( ( A @ sorti2 )
           => ( ( A @ j @ h )
              = A ) )
        & ! [A: $i] :
            ( ( A @ sorti2 )
           => ! [B: $i] :
                ( ( B @ sorti2 )
               => ( ( B @ ( A @ op2 ) @ j )
                  = ( B @ j @ ( A @ j @ op1 ) ) ) ) )
        & ! [A: $i] :
            ( ( A @ sorti1 )
           => ! [B: $i] :
                ( ( B @ sorti1 )
               => ( ( B @ ( A @ op1 ) @ h )
                  = ( B @ h @ ( A @ h @ op2 ) ) ) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1) ).

thf(2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( ( ! [A: $i] :
            ( ( A @ sorti2 )
           => ( A @ j @ sorti1 ) )
        & ! [A: $i] :
            ( ( A @ sorti1 )
           => ( A @ h @ sorti2 ) ) )
     => ~ ( ! [A: $i] :
              ( ( A @ sorti1 )
             => ( ( A @ h @ j )
                = A ) )
          & ! [A: $i] :
              ( ( A @ sorti2 )
             => ( ( A @ j @ h )
                = A ) )
          & ! [A: $i] :
              ( ( A @ sorti2 )
             => ! [B: $i] :
                  ( ( B @ sorti2 )
                 => ( ( B @ ( A @ op2 ) @ j )
                    = ( B @ j @ ( A @ j @ op1 ) ) ) ) )
          & ! [A: $i] :
              ( ( A @ sorti1 )
             => ! [B: $i] :
                  ( ( B @ sorti1 )
                 => ( ( B @ ( A @ op1 ) @ h )
                    = ( B @ h @ ( A @ h @ op2 ) ) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(neg_conjecture,[status(cth)],[1]) ).

thf(7,plain,
    ~ ( ( ! [A: $i] :
            ( ( A @ sorti2 )
           => ( A @ j @ sorti1 ) )
        & ! [A: $i] :
            ( ( A @ sorti1 )
           => ( A @ h @ sorti2 ) ) )
     => ~ ( ! [A: $i] :
              ( ( A @ sorti1 )
             => ( ( A @ h @ j )
                = A ) )
          & ! [A: $i] :
              ( ( A @ sorti2 )
             => ( ( A @ j @ h )
                = A ) )
          & ! [A: $i] :
              ( ( A @ sorti2 )
             => ! [B: $i] :
                  ( ( B @ sorti2 )
                 => ( ( B @ ( A @ op2 ) @ j )
                    = ( B @ j @ ( A @ j @ op1 ) ) ) ) )
          & ! [A: $i] :
              ( ( A @ sorti1 )
             => ! [B: $i] :
                  ( ( B @ sorti1 )
                 => ( ( B @ ( A @ op1 ) @ h )
                    = ( B @ h @ ( A @ h @ op2 ) ) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[2]) ).

thf(4,axiom,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( A @ sorti2 )
     => ! [B: $i] :
          ( ( B @ sorti2 )
         => ( B @ ( A @ op2 ) @ sorti2 ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax2) ).

thf(26,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( A @ sorti2 )
     => ! [B: $i] :
          ( ( B @ sorti2 )
         => ( B @ ( A @ op2 ) @ sorti2 ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[4]) ).

thf(5,axiom,
    ? [A: $i] :
      ( ? [B: $i] :
          ( ( ( A @ ( B @ ( A @ op1 ) @ op1 ) )
           != B )
          & ( ( B @ ( B @ ( A @ op1 ) @ op1 ) )
            = A )
          & ( ( A @ ( B @ op1 ) )
           != ( B @ ( A @ op1 ) ) )
          & ( B @ sorti1 ) )
      & ( A @ sorti1 ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax3) ).

thf(28,plain,
    ? [A: $i] :
      ( ? [B: $i] :
          ( ( ( A @ ( B @ ( A @ op1 ) @ op1 ) )
           != B )
          & ( ( B @ ( B @ ( A @ op1 ) @ op1 ) )
            = A )
          & ( ( A @ ( B @ op1 ) )
           != ( B @ ( A @ op1 ) ) )
          & ( B @ sorti1 ) )
      & ( A @ sorti1 ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[5]) ).

thf(6,axiom,
    ~ ? [A: $i] :
        ( ? [B: $i] :
            ( ( ( A @ ( B @ ( A @ op2 ) @ op2 ) )
             != B )
            & ( ( B @ ( B @ ( A @ op2 ) @ op2 ) )
              = A )
            & ( ( A @ ( B @ op2 ) )
             != ( B @ ( A @ op2 ) ) )
            & ( B @ sorti2 ) )
        & ( A @ sorti2 ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax4) ).

thf(38,plain,
    ~ ? [A: $i] :
        ( ? [B: $i] :
            ( ( ( A @ ( B @ ( A @ op2 ) @ op2 ) )
             != B )
            & ( ( B @ ( B @ ( A @ op2 ) @ op2 ) )
              = A )
            & ( ( A @ ( B @ op2 ) )
             != ( B @ ( A @ op2 ) ) )
            & ( B @ sorti2 ) )
        & ( A @ sorti2 ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[6]) ).

thf(868,plain,
    $false,
    inference(e,[status(thm)],[24,7,26,28,38]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : ALG074+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.7.0.
% 0.00/0.07  % Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.12/0.38  % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.38  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.38  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.38  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.12/0.38  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.12/0.38  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.38  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.12/0.38  % DateTime : Sat Sep 26 21:02:04 UTC 2026
% 0.12/0.39  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.12/0.39  Running java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.89/0.97  % [INFO] 	 Parsing problem /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ... 
% 1.30/1.16  % [INFO] 	 Parsing done (186ms). 
% 1.30/1.17  % [INFO] 	 Running in sequential loop mode. 
% 1.88/1.58  % [INFO] 	 eprover registered as external prover. 
% 1.88/1.59  % [INFO] 	 Scanning for conjecture ... 
% 2.27/1.70  % [INFO] 	 Found a conjecture (or negated_conjecture) and 4 axioms. Running axiom selection ... 
% 2.27/1.75  % [INFO] 	 Axiom selection finished. Selected 4 axioms (removed 0 axioms). 
% 2.27/1.77  % [INFO] 	 Problem is first-order (TPTP FOF). 
% 2.27/1.78  % [INFO] 	 Type checking passed. 
% 2.27/1.78  % [CONFIG] 	 Using configuration: timeout(300) with strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>.  Searching for refutation ... 
% 8.58/3.43  % External prover 'e' found a proof!
% 8.58/3.43  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
% 8.58/3.43  % Time passed: 2900ms (effective reasoning time: 2248ms)
% 8.58/3.43  % Solved by strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>
% 8.58/3.43  % Axioms used in derivation (4): ax1, ax2, ax3, ax4
% 8.58/3.43  % No. of inferences in proof: 12
% 8.58/3.43  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : 2900 ms resp. 2248 ms w/o parsing
% 8.58/3.45  % SZS output start Refutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 8.58/3.45  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------