↑ Up

SOS---2.0.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SOS---2.0
% Problem  : ALG074+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.7.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : sos-script %s

% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 14 18:01:00 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 1.35s 1.62s
% Output   : Refutation 1.44s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.11  % Problem  : ALG074+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.7.0.
% 0.12/0.12  % Command  : sos-script %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Thu Jun  9 04:18:21 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.18/0.35  ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.18/0.35  The process was started by sandbox on n020.cluster.edu,
% 0.18/0.35  Thu Jun  9 04:18:21 2022
% 0.18/0.35  The command was "./sos".  The process ID is 12650.
% 0.18/0.35  
% 0.18/0.35  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.18/0.35  set(auto).
% 0.18/0.35     dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.18/0.35     dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.18/0.35     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.18/0.35     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.18/0.35     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.18/0.35     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.18/0.35     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.18/0.35     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.18/0.35     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.18/0.35     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.18/0.35     dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.18/0.35     dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.18/0.35     dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.18/0.35  clear(print_given).
% 0.18/0.35  
% 0.18/0.35  formula_list(usable).
% 0.18/0.35  
% 0.18/0.35  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=5.
% 0.18/0.35  
% 0.18/0.35  This ia a non-Horn set with equality.  The strategy will be
% 0.18/0.35  Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, ur_res, factoring, and
% 0.18/0.35  unit deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 0.18/0.35  clauses in usable.
% 0.18/0.35  
% 0.18/0.35     dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.18/0.35     dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.18/0.35     dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.18/0.35     dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.18/0.35     dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.18/0.35     dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.18/0.35     dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.18/0.35     dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.18/0.35     dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.18/0.35     dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.18/0.35     dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.18/0.35     dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.18/0.35     dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.18/0.35     dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.18/0.35     dependent: set(factor).
% 0.18/0.35  
% 0.18/0.35  ------------> process usable:
% 0.18/0.35  
% 0.18/0.35  ------------> process sos:
% 0.18/0.35    Following clause subsumed by 21 during input processing: 0 [copy,21,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.18/0.35  
% 0.18/0.35  ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.18/0.38  
% 0.18/0.38  Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.18/0.38  
% 0.18/0.38  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.18/0.38  
% 0.18/0.38  
% 0.18/0.38  -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.18/0.38  
% 0.18/0.38  UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.18/0.38  SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.18/0.38  SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.18/0.38  number of clauses in intial UL: 15
% 0.18/0.38  number of clauses initially in problem: 20
% 0.18/0.38  percentage of clauses intially in UL: 75
% 0.18/0.38  percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 100
% 0.18/0.38  percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.18/0.38  absolute distinct symbol count: 9
% 0.18/0.38     distinct predicate count: 3
% 0.18/0.38     distinct function count: 4
% 0.18/0.38     distinct constant count: 2
% 0.18/0.38  
% 0.18/0.38  ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.18/0.38  
% 0.18/0.38  
% 0.18/0.38  
% 0.18/0.38  =========== start of search ===========
% 1.35/1.62  
% 1.35/1.62  -------- PROOF -------- 
% 1.35/1.62  % SZS status Theorem
% 1.35/1.62  % SZS output start Refutation
% 1.35/1.62  
% 1.35/1.62  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.35/1.62  
% 1.35/1.62  Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 1.35/1.62  
% 1.35/1.62  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 1.35/1.62  
% 1.35/1.62  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.35/1.62  
% 1.35/1.62  Model 3 [ 1 1 93 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.35/1.62  
% 1.35/1.62  Model 4 (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.35/1.62  
% 1.35/1.62  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 1.35/1.62  
% 1.35/1.62  Model 5 (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.35/1.62  
% 1.35/1.62  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 1.35/1.62  
% 1.35/1.62  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.35/1.62  
% 1.35/1.62  Model 6 [ 1 0 172 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.35/1.62  
% 1.35/1.62  Model 7 (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.35/1.62  
% 1.35/1.62  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 1.35/1.62  
% 1.35/1.62  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.35/1.62  
% 1.35/1.62  Model 8 [ 7 0 58 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.35/1.62  
% 1.35/1.62  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.35/1.62  
% 1.35/1.62  Model 9 [ 3 0 54 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.35/1.62  
% 1.35/1.62  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.35/1.62  
% 1.35/1.62  Model 10 [ 3 1 52 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.35/1.62  
% 1.35/1.62  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.35/1.62  
% 1.35/1.62  Model 11 [ 4 1 49 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.35/1.62  
% 1.35/1.62  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.35/1.62  
% 1.35/1.62  Model 12 [ 4 1 55 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.35/1.62  
% 1.35/1.62  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.35/1.62  
% 1.35/1.62  Model 13 [ 1 1 9999 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.35/1.62  
% 1.35/1.62  ----> UNIT CONFLICT at   1.25 sec ----> 1534 [binary,1532.1,5.1] {-} $F.
% 1.35/1.62  
% 1.35/1.62  Length of proof is 14.  Level of proof is 4.
% 1.35/1.62  
% 1.35/1.62  ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 1.35/1.62  % SZS status Theorem
% 1.35/1.62  % SZS output start Refutation
% 1.35/1.62  
% 1.35/1.62  1 [] {+} -sorti1(A)| -sorti1(B)|sorti1(op1(A,B)).
% 1.35/1.62  2 [] {+} -sorti2(A)| -sorti2(B)|sorti2(op2(A,B)).
% 1.35/1.62  3 [] {-} op1($c1,$c2)!=op1($c2,$c1).
% 1.35/1.62  4 [copy,3,flip.1] {+} op1($c2,$c1)!=op1($c1,$c2).
% 1.35/1.62  5 [] {+} op1(op1($c2,$c1),$c2)!=$c1.
% 1.35/1.62  6 [] {+} -sorti2(A)| -sorti2(B)|op2(B,A)=op2(A,B)|op2(op2(A,B),B)!=A|op2(op2(A,B),A)=B.
% 1.35/1.62  7 [] {+} -sorti1(A)|sorti2(h(A)).
% 1.44/1.62  9 [] {+} -sorti1(A)| -sorti1(B)|h(op1(A,B))=op2(h(A),h(B)).
% 1.44/1.62  10 [] {+} -sorti2(A)| -sorti2(B)|j(op2(A,B))=op1(j(A),j(B)).
% 1.44/1.62  12 [] {+} -sorti1(A)|j(h(A))=A.
% 1.44/1.62  17 [] {+} sorti1($c2).
% 1.44/1.62  18 [] {-} sorti1($c1).
% 1.44/1.62  19 [] {-} op1(op1($c2,$c1),$c1)=$c2.
% 1.44/1.62  21 [] {+} A=A.
% 1.44/1.62  26,25 [hyper,17,12] {+} j(h($c2))=$c2.
% 1.44/1.62  27 [hyper,17,7] {+} sorti2(h($c2)).
% 1.44/1.62  32,31 [hyper,18,12] {+} j(h($c1))=$c1.
% 1.44/1.62  34,33 [hyper,18,9,17] {+} h(op1($c2,$c1))=op2(h($c2),h($c1)).
% 1.44/1.62  37 [hyper,18,7] {+} sorti2(h($c1)).
% 1.44/1.62  38 [hyper,18,1,17] {+} sorti1(op1($c2,$c1)).
% 1.44/1.62  46 [hyper,27,10,37,demod,32,26] {-} j(op2(h($c1),h($c2)))=op1($c1,$c2).
% 1.44/1.62  49,48 [hyper,27,10,37,demod,26,32] {-} j(op2(h($c2),h($c1)))=op1($c2,$c1).
% 1.44/1.62  51 [hyper,27,2,37] {-} sorti2(op2(h($c2),h($c1))).
% 1.44/1.62  53,52 [para_from,19.1.1,9.3.1.1,demod,34,unit_del,38,18,flip.1] {+} op2(op2(h($c2),h($c1)),h($c1))=h($c2).
% 1.44/1.62  317 [hyper,51,10,27,demod,49,26] {+} j(op2(op2(h($c2),h($c1)),h($c2)))=op1(op1($c2,$c1),$c2).
% 1.44/1.62  1531,1530 [para_into,46.1.1.1,6.3.1,demod,49,53,unit_del,4,27,37,21] {-} op2(op2(h($c2),h($c1)),h($c2))=h($c1).
% 1.44/1.62  1532 [back_demod,317,demod,1531,32,flip.1] {-} op1(op1($c2,$c1),$c2)=$c1.
% 1.44/1.62  1534 [binary,1532.1,5.1] {-} $F.
% 1.44/1.62  
% 1.44/1.62  % SZS output end Refutation
% 1.44/1.62  ------------ end of proof -------------
% 1.44/1.62  
% 1.44/1.62  
% 1.44/1.62  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 1.44/1.62  
% 1.44/1.62  
% 1.44/1.62  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 1.44/1.62  
% 1.44/1.62  ============ end of search ============
% 1.44/1.62  
% 1.44/1.62  ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 1.44/1.62  
% 1.44/1.62  true clauses given           9      (22.0%)
% 1.44/1.62  false clauses given         32
% 1.44/1.62  
% 1.44/1.62        FALSE     TRUE
% 1.44/1.62     6  0         5
% 1.44/1.62     8  0         52
% 1.44/1.62     9  2         9
% 1.44/1.62    10  2         95
% 1.44/1.62    11  0         1
% 1.44/1.62    12  22        144
% 1.44/1.62    14  9         71
% 1.44/1.62    15  30        32
% 1.44/1.62    16  0         16
% 1.44/1.62    18  0         16
% 1.44/1.62    20  54        36
% 1.44/1.62    25  91        37
% 1.44/1.62    30  101       47
% 1.44/1.62    35  47        33
% 1.44/1.62    40  11        5
% 1.44/1.62  tot:  369       599      (61.9% true)
% 1.44/1.62  
% 1.44/1.62  
% 1.44/1.62  Model 13 [ 1 1 9999 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.44/1.62  
% 1.44/1.62  That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 1.44/1.62  
% 1.44/1.62  Process 12650 finished Thu Jun  9 04:18:22 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------