↑ Up

SRASS---0.1.THM-Sol.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SRASS---0.1
% Problem  : ALG176+1 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v2.7.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : SRASS -q2 -a 0 10 10 10 -i3 -n60 %s

% Computer : art09.cs.miami.edu
% Model    : i686 i686
% CPU      : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory   : 2018MB
% OS       : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Dec 28 21:00:58 EST 2010

% Result   : Theorem 0.90s
% Output   : Solution 0.90s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    : 0

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ERROR: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Reading problem from /tmp/SystemOnTPTP3378/ALG176+1.tptp
% Adding relevance values
% Extracting the conjecture
% Sorting axioms by relevance
% Looking for THM       ... found
% SZS status THM for /tmp/SystemOnTPTP3378/ALG176+1.tptp
% SZS output start Solution for /tmp/SystemOnTPTP3378/ALG176+1.tptp
% TreeLimitedRun: ----------------------------------------------------------
% TreeLimitedRun: /home/graph/tptp/Systems/EP---1.2/eproof --print-statistics -xAuto -tAuto --cpu-limit=60 --proof-time-unlimited --memory-limit=Auto --tstp-in --tstp-out /tmp/SRASS.s.p 
% TreeLimitedRun: CPU time limit is 60s
% TreeLimitedRun: WC  time limit is 120s
% TreeLimitedRun: PID is 3474
% TreeLimitedRun: ----------------------------------------------------------
% PrfWatch: 0.00 CPU 0.00 WC
% # Preprocessing time     : 0.010 s
% # Problem is unsatisfiable (or provable), constructing proof object
% # SZS status Theorem
% # SZS output start CNFRefutation.
% fof(3, axiom,?[X1]:(sorti1(X1)&![X2]:(sorti1(X2)=>~(op1(X2,X1)=X2))),file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', ax3)).
% fof(4, axiom,~(?[X1]:(sorti2(X1)&![X2]:(sorti2(X2)=>~(op2(X2,X1)=X2)))),file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', ax4)).
% fof(5, conjecture,((![X1]:(sorti1(X1)=>sorti2(h(X1)))&![X2]:(sorti2(X2)=>sorti1(j(X2))))=>~((((![X3]:(sorti1(X3)=>![X4]:(sorti1(X4)=>h(op1(X3,X4))=op2(h(X3),h(X4))))&![X5]:(sorti2(X5)=>![X6]:(sorti2(X6)=>j(op2(X5,X6))=op1(j(X5),j(X6)))))&![X7]:(sorti2(X7)=>h(j(X7))=X7))&![X8]:(sorti1(X8)=>j(h(X8))=X8)))),file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', co1)).
% fof(6, negated_conjecture,~(((![X1]:(sorti1(X1)=>sorti2(h(X1)))&![X2]:(sorti2(X2)=>sorti1(j(X2))))=>~((((![X3]:(sorti1(X3)=>![X4]:(sorti1(X4)=>h(op1(X3,X4))=op2(h(X3),h(X4))))&![X5]:(sorti2(X5)=>![X6]:(sorti2(X6)=>j(op2(X5,X6))=op1(j(X5),j(X6)))))&![X7]:(sorti2(X7)=>h(j(X7))=X7))&![X8]:(sorti1(X8)=>j(h(X8))=X8))))),inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[5])).
% fof(15, plain,?[X1]:(sorti1(X1)&![X2]:(~(sorti1(X2))|~(op1(X2,X1)=X2))),inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[3])).
% fof(16, plain,?[X3]:(sorti1(X3)&![X4]:(~(sorti1(X4))|~(op1(X4,X3)=X4))),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[15])).
% fof(17, plain,(sorti1(esk1_0)&![X4]:(~(sorti1(X4))|~(op1(X4,esk1_0)=X4))),inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[16])).
% fof(18, plain,![X4]:((~(sorti1(X4))|~(op1(X4,esk1_0)=X4))&sorti1(esk1_0)),inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[17])).
% cnf(19,plain,(sorti1(esk1_0)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[18])).
% cnf(20,plain,(op1(X1,esk1_0)!=X1|~sorti1(X1)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[18])).
% fof(21, plain,![X1]:(~(sorti2(X1))|?[X2]:(sorti2(X2)&op2(X2,X1)=X2)),inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[4])).
% fof(22, plain,![X3]:(~(sorti2(X3))|?[X4]:(sorti2(X4)&op2(X4,X3)=X4)),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[21])).
% fof(23, plain,![X3]:(~(sorti2(X3))|(sorti2(esk2_1(X3))&op2(esk2_1(X3),X3)=esk2_1(X3))),inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[22])).
% fof(24, plain,![X3]:((sorti2(esk2_1(X3))|~(sorti2(X3)))&(op2(esk2_1(X3),X3)=esk2_1(X3)|~(sorti2(X3)))),inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[23])).
% cnf(25,plain,(op2(esk2_1(X1),X1)=esk2_1(X1)|~sorti2(X1)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[24])).
% cnf(26,plain,(sorti2(esk2_1(X1))|~sorti2(X1)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[24])).
% fof(27, negated_conjecture,((![X1]:(~(sorti1(X1))|sorti2(h(X1)))&![X2]:(~(sorti2(X2))|sorti1(j(X2))))&(((![X3]:(~(sorti1(X3))|![X4]:(~(sorti1(X4))|h(op1(X3,X4))=op2(h(X3),h(X4))))&![X5]:(~(sorti2(X5))|![X6]:(~(sorti2(X6))|j(op2(X5,X6))=op1(j(X5),j(X6)))))&![X7]:(~(sorti2(X7))|h(j(X7))=X7))&![X8]:(~(sorti1(X8))|j(h(X8))=X8))),inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[6])).
% fof(28, negated_conjecture,((![X9]:(~(sorti1(X9))|sorti2(h(X9)))&![X10]:(~(sorti2(X10))|sorti1(j(X10))))&(((![X11]:(~(sorti1(X11))|![X12]:(~(sorti1(X12))|h(op1(X11,X12))=op2(h(X11),h(X12))))&![X13]:(~(sorti2(X13))|![X14]:(~(sorti2(X14))|j(op2(X13,X14))=op1(j(X13),j(X14)))))&![X15]:(~(sorti2(X15))|h(j(X15))=X15))&![X16]:(~(sorti1(X16))|j(h(X16))=X16))),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[27])).
% fof(29, negated_conjecture,![X9]:![X10]:![X11]:![X12]:![X13]:![X14]:![X15]:![X16]:(((~(sorti1(X16))|j(h(X16))=X16)&((~(sorti2(X15))|h(j(X15))=X15)&(((~(sorti2(X14))|j(op2(X13,X14))=op1(j(X13),j(X14)))|~(sorti2(X13)))&((~(sorti1(X12))|h(op1(X11,X12))=op2(h(X11),h(X12)))|~(sorti1(X11))))))&((~(sorti2(X10))|sorti1(j(X10)))&(~(sorti1(X9))|sorti2(h(X9))))),inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[28])).
% cnf(30,negated_conjecture,(sorti2(h(X1))|~sorti1(X1)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[29])).
% cnf(31,negated_conjecture,(sorti1(j(X1))|~sorti2(X1)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[29])).
% cnf(33,negated_conjecture,(j(op2(X1,X2))=op1(j(X1),j(X2))|~sorti2(X1)|~sorti2(X2)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[29])).
% cnf(35,negated_conjecture,(j(h(X1))=X1|~sorti1(X1)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[29])).
% cnf(40,negated_conjecture,(op1(j(X1),X2)=j(op2(X1,h(X2)))|~sorti2(h(X2))|~sorti2(X1)|~sorti1(X2)),inference(spm,[status(thm)],[33,35,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(50,negated_conjecture,(j(op2(X1,h(X2)))=op1(j(X1),X2)|~sorti2(X1)|~sorti1(X2)),inference(csr,[status(thm)],[40,30])).
% cnf(57,negated_conjecture,(j(esk2_1(h(X1)))=op1(j(esk2_1(h(X1))),X1)|~sorti2(esk2_1(h(X1)))|~sorti1(X1)|~sorti2(h(X1))),inference(spm,[status(thm)],[50,25,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(302,negated_conjecture,(op1(j(esk2_1(h(X1))),X1)=j(esk2_1(h(X1)))|~sorti2(esk2_1(h(X1)))|~sorti1(X1)),inference(csr,[status(thm)],[57,30])).
% cnf(303,negated_conjecture,(~sorti1(j(esk2_1(h(esk1_0))))|~sorti2(esk2_1(h(esk1_0)))|~sorti1(esk1_0)),inference(spm,[status(thm)],[20,302,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(322,negated_conjecture,(~sorti1(j(esk2_1(h(esk1_0))))|~sorti2(esk2_1(h(esk1_0)))|$false),inference(rw,[status(thm)],[303,19,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(323,negated_conjecture,(~sorti1(j(esk2_1(h(esk1_0))))|~sorti2(esk2_1(h(esk1_0)))),inference(cn,[status(thm)],[322,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(351,negated_conjecture,(~sorti2(esk2_1(h(esk1_0)))),inference(csr,[status(thm)],[323,31])).
% cnf(352,negated_conjecture,(~sorti2(h(esk1_0))),inference(spm,[status(thm)],[351,26,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(363,negated_conjecture,(~sorti1(esk1_0)),inference(spm,[status(thm)],[352,30,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(364,negated_conjecture,($false),inference(rw,[status(thm)],[363,19,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(365,negated_conjecture,($false),inference(cn,[status(thm)],[364,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(366,negated_conjecture,($false),365,['proof']).
% # SZS output end CNFRefutation
% # Processed clauses                  : 100
% # ...of these trivial                : 0
% # ...subsumed                        : 43
% # ...remaining for further processing: 57
% # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% # Backward-subsumed                  : 1
% # Backward-rewritten                 : 0
% # Generated clauses                  : 247
% # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 235
% # Contextual simplify-reflections    : 69
% # Paramodulations                    : 247
% # Factorizations                     : 0
% # Equation resolutions               : 0
% # Current number of processed clauses: 44
% #    Positive orientable unit clauses: 1
% #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% #    Negative unit clauses           : 2
% #    Non-unit-clauses                : 41
% # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 154
% # ...number of literals in the above : 756
% # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 667
% # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 526
% # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1
% # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound  : 0
% # Indexed BW rewrite attempts        : 0
% # Indexed BW rewrite successes       : 0
% # Backwards rewriting index:    64 leaves,   1.36+/-0.670 terms/leaf
% # Paramod-from index:           30 leaves,   1.30+/-0.640 terms/leaf
% # Paramod-into index:           57 leaves,   1.26+/-0.578 terms/leaf
% # -------------------------------------------------
% # User time              : 0.021 s
% # System time            : 0.001 s
% # Total time             : 0.022 s
% # Maximum resident set size: 0 pages
% PrfWatch: 0.11 CPU 0.19 WC
% FINAL PrfWatch: 0.11 CPU 0.19 WC
% SZS output end Solution for /tmp/SystemOnTPTP3378/ALG176+1.tptp
% 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------