%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : ET---2.0
% Problem : ALG200+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.7.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_ET %s %d
% Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 14 16:50:16 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.26s 1.44s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.26s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 1
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 12 ( 8 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 78 ( 77 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 21 ( 6 avg)
% Number of connectives : 97 ( 31 ~; 42 |; 24 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 18 ( 6 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 0 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 8 ( 8 usr; 7 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 0 ( 0 sgn 0 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(co1,conjecture,
~ ( op(e0,e0) = e0
& op(e1,e1) = e1
& op(e2,e2) = e2
& op(e3,e3) = e3
& op(e4,e4) = e4
& op(e5,e5) = e5
& op(e6,e6) = e6
& ( op(e0,e0) = e0
| op(e1,e1) = e1
| op(e2,e2) = e2
| op(e3,e3) = e3
| op(e4,e4) = e4
| op(e5,e5) = e5
| op(e6,e6) = e6 )
& ( op(e0,e0) != e0
| op(e1,e1) != e1
| op(e2,e2) != e2
| op(e3,e3) != e3
| op(e4,e4) != e4
| op(e5,e5) != e5
| op(e6,e6) != e6 ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',co1) ).
fof(c_0_1,negated_conjecture,
~ ~ ( op(e0,e0) = e0
& op(e1,e1) = e1
& op(e2,e2) = e2
& op(e3,e3) = e3
& op(e4,e4) = e4
& op(e5,e5) = e5
& op(e6,e6) = e6
& ( op(e0,e0) = e0
| op(e1,e1) = e1
| op(e2,e2) = e2
| op(e3,e3) = e3
| op(e4,e4) = e4
| op(e5,e5) = e5
| op(e6,e6) = e6 )
& ( op(e0,e0) != e0
| op(e1,e1) != e1
| op(e2,e2) != e2
| op(e3,e3) != e3
| op(e4,e4) != e4
| op(e5,e5) != e5
| op(e6,e6) != e6 ) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[co1]) ).
fof(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
( op(e0,e0) = e0
& op(e1,e1) = e1
& op(e2,e2) = e2
& op(e3,e3) = e3
& op(e4,e4) = e4
& op(e5,e5) = e5
& op(e6,e6) = e6
& ( op(e0,e0) = e0
| op(e1,e1) = e1
| op(e2,e2) = e2
| op(e3,e3) = e3
| op(e4,e4) = e4
| op(e5,e5) = e5
| op(e6,e6) = e6 )
& ( op(e0,e0) != e0
| op(e1,e1) != e1
| op(e2,e2) != e2
| op(e3,e3) != e3
| op(e4,e4) != e4
| op(e5,e5) != e5
| op(e6,e6) != e6 ) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_1]) ).
cnf(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
( op(e6,e6) != e6
| op(e5,e5) != e5
| op(e4,e4) != e4
| op(e3,e3) != e3
| op(e2,e2) != e2
| op(e1,e1) != e1
| op(e0,e0) != e0 ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).
cnf(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
op(e0,e0) = e0,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).
cnf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
op(e1,e1) = e1,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
op(e2,e2) = e2,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
op(e3,e3) = e3,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
op(e4,e4) = e4,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
op(e5,e5) = e5,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
op(e6,e6) = e6,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_3,c_0_4]),c_0_5]),c_0_6]),c_0_7]),c_0_8]),c_0_9]),c_0_10])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : ALG200+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.7.0.
% 0.03/0.13 % Command : run_ET %s %d
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Wed Jun 8 05:45:36 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.26/1.44 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_4a02c828a8cc55752123edbcc1ad40e453c11447 for 23 seconds:
% 0.26/1.44 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.4,,04,100,1.0)
% 0.26/1.44 # Preprocessing time : 0.034 s
% 0.26/1.44
% 0.26/1.44 # Proof found!
% 0.26/1.44 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.26/1.44 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.26/1.44 # Proof object total steps : 12
% 0.26/1.44 # Proof object clause steps : 9
% 0.26/1.44 # Proof object formula steps : 3
% 0.26/1.44 # Proof object conjectures : 12
% 0.26/1.44 # Proof object clause conjectures : 9
% 0.26/1.44 # Proof object formula conjectures : 3
% 0.26/1.44 # Proof object initial clauses used : 8
% 0.26/1.44 # Proof object initial formulas used : 1
% 0.26/1.44 # Proof object generating inferences : 0
% 0.26/1.44 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 8
% 0.26/1.44 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.26/1.44 # Parsed axioms : 7
% 0.26/1.44 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.26/1.44 # Initial clauses : 525
% 0.26/1.44 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.26/1.44 # Initial clauses in saturation : 525
% 0.26/1.44 # Processed clauses : 83
% 0.26/1.44 # ...of these trivial : 12
% 0.26/1.44 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.26/1.44 # ...remaining for further processing : 70
% 0.26/1.44 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.26/1.44 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.26/1.44 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.26/1.44 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.26/1.44 # Generated clauses : 0
% 0.26/1.44 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 0
% 0.26/1.44 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.26/1.44 # Paramodulations : 0
% 0.26/1.44 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.26/1.44 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.26/1.44 # Current number of processed clauses : 70
% 0.26/1.44 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 37
% 0.26/1.44 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.26/1.44 # Negative unit clauses : 33
% 0.26/1.44 # Non-unit-clauses : 0
% 0.26/1.44 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 442
% 0.26/1.44 # ...number of literals in the above : 1282
% 0.26/1.44 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.26/1.44 # Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 0.26/1.44 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.26/1.44 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.26/1.44 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.26/1.44 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 30
% 0.26/1.44 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.26/1.44 # BW rewrite match attempts : 52
% 0.26/1.44 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.26/1.44 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.26/1.44 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.26/1.44 # Termbank termtop insertions : 32898
% 0.26/1.44
% 0.26/1.44 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.26/1.44 # User time : 0.031 s
% 0.26/1.44 # System time : 0.005 s
% 0.26/1.44 # Total time : 0.036 s
% 0.26/1.44 # Maximum resident set size: 3856 pages
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------