↑ Up

Princess---230619.THM-Prf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Princess---230619
% Problem  : ALG200+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.7.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : princess -inputFormat=tptp +threads -portfolio=casc +printProof -timeoutSec=%d %s

% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 30 16:39:52 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 18.03s 3.20s
% Output   : Proof 21.43s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem  : ALG200+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.7.0.
% 0.00/0.13  % Command  : princess -inputFormat=tptp +threads -portfolio=casc +printProof -timeoutSec=%d %s
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Mon Aug 28 03:18:16 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.20/0.61  ________       _____
% 0.20/0.61  ___  __ \_________(_)________________________________
% 0.20/0.61  __  /_/ /_  ___/_  /__  __ \  ___/  _ \_  ___/_  ___/
% 0.20/0.61  _  ____/_  /   _  / _  / / / /__ /  __/(__  )_(__  )
% 0.20/0.61  /_/     /_/    /_/  /_/ /_/\___/ \___//____/ /____/
% 0.20/0.61  
% 0.20/0.61  A Theorem Prover for First-Order Logic modulo Linear Integer Arithmetic
% 0.20/0.61  (2023-06-19)
% 0.20/0.61  
% 0.20/0.61  (c) Philipp Rümmer, 2009-2023
% 0.20/0.61  Contributors: Peter Backeman, Peter Baumgartner, Angelo Brillout, Zafer Esen,
% 0.20/0.61                Amanda Stjerna.
% 0.20/0.61  Free software under BSD-3-Clause.
% 0.20/0.61  
% 0.20/0.61  For more information, visit http://www.philipp.ruemmer.org/princess.shtml
% 0.20/0.61  
% 0.20/0.61  Loading /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ...
% 0.20/0.62  Running up to 7 provers in parallel.
% 0.20/0.64  Prover 1: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1571432423
% 0.20/0.64  Prover 0: Options:  +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=0 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1042961893
% 0.20/0.64  Prover 3: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1922548996
% 0.20/0.64  Prover 2: Options:  +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMinimalAndEmpty -realRatSaturationRounds=1 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1065072994
% 0.20/0.64  Prover 4: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1868514696
% 0.20/0.64  Prover 5: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMaximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=complete -randomSeed=1259561288
% 0.20/0.64  Prover 6: Options:  -triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximalOutermost -realRatSaturationRounds=0 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1399714365
% 9.60/2.06  Prover 2: Preprocessing ...
% 9.60/2.06  Prover 0: Preprocessing ...
% 9.60/2.23  Prover 3: Preprocessing ...
% 9.60/2.24  Prover 6: Preprocessing ...
% 10.90/2.27  Prover 1: Preprocessing ...
% 10.90/2.27  Prover 5: Preprocessing ...
% 10.90/2.28  Prover 4: Preprocessing ...
% 18.03/3.16  Prover 3: Constructing countermodel ...
% 18.03/3.16  Prover 0: Constructing countermodel ...
% 18.03/3.17  Prover 4: Constructing countermodel ...
% 18.03/3.19  Prover 1: Constructing countermodel ...
% 18.03/3.19  Prover 6: Constructing countermodel ...
% 18.03/3.19  Prover 6: proved (2556ms)
% 18.03/3.19  Prover 0: proved (2565ms)
% 18.03/3.19  
% 18.03/3.20  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 18.03/3.20  
% 18.03/3.20  
% 18.03/3.20  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 18.03/3.20  
% 18.41/3.21  Prover 4: Found proof (size 1)
% 18.41/3.21  Prover 4: proved (2562ms)
% 18.41/3.21  Prover 3: proved (2566ms)
% 18.41/3.21  Prover 1: Found proof (size 1)
% 18.41/3.21  Prover 1: proved (2568ms)
% 18.41/3.21  Prover 7: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-236303470
% 18.41/3.21  Prover 2: Constructing countermodel ...
% 18.41/3.21  Prover 2: stopped
% 18.41/3.21  Prover 8: Options:  +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-200781089
% 20.15/3.53  Prover 5: Constructing countermodel ...
% 20.15/3.53  Prover 5: stopped
% 20.15/3.55  Prover 7: Preprocessing ...
% 20.15/3.55  Prover 8: Preprocessing ...
% 20.75/3.65  Prover 7: stopped
% 20.75/3.68  Prover 8: Constructing countermodel ...
% 20.75/3.68  Prover 8: stopped
% 21.43/3.68  
% 21.43/3.68  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 21.43/3.68  
% 21.43/3.68  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% 21.43/3.68  Assumptions after simplification:
% 21.43/3.68  ---------------------------------
% 21.43/3.68  
% 21.43/3.68    (co1)
% 21.43/3.69    $false
% 21.43/3.69  
% 21.43/3.69  Further assumptions not needed in the proof:
% 21.43/3.69  --------------------------------------------
% 21.43/3.69  ax1, ax2, ax3, ax4, ax5, ax6
% 21.43/3.69  
% 21.43/3.69  Those formulas are unsatisfiable:
% 21.43/3.69  ---------------------------------
% 21.43/3.69  
% 21.43/3.69  Begin of proof
% 21.43/3.69  | 
% 21.43/3.69  | CLOSE: (co1) is inconsistent.
% 21.43/3.69  | 
% 21.43/3.69  End of proof
% 21.43/3.69  % SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark
% 21.43/3.69  
% 21.43/3.69  3081ms
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------