%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Zipperpin---2.1.9999
% Problem : ALG201+1 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v2.7.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.w7Lt7IOxVT true
% Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Oct 2 04:28:16 PM UTC 2025
% Result : Theorem 0.55s 0.79s
% Output : Refutation 0.55s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 8
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 17 ( 8 unt; 0 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 52 ( 16 equ; 0 cnn)
% Maximal formula atoms : 14 ( 3 avg)
% Number of connectives : 157 ( 17 ~; 7 |; 8 &; 105 @)
% ( 0 <=>; 20 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 11 ( 4 avg)
% Number of types : 2 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 0 ( 0 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of symbols : 9 ( 7 usr; 2 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 22 ( 0 ^; 22 !; 0 ?; 22 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(sorti1_type,type,
sorti1: $i > $o ).
thf(sorti2_type,type,
sorti2: $i > $o ).
thf(op2_type,type,
op2: $i > $i > $i ).
thf(h_type,type,
h: $i > $i ).
thf(sk__type,type,
sk_: $i ).
thf(op1_type,type,
op1: $i > $i > $i ).
thf(j_type,type,
j: $i > $i ).
thf(co1,conjecture,
( ( ! [U: $i] :
( ( sorti1 @ U )
=> ( sorti2 @ ( h @ U ) ) )
& ! [V: $i] :
( ( sorti2 @ V )
=> ( sorti1 @ ( j @ V ) ) ) )
=> ~ ( ! [W: $i] :
( ( sorti1 @ W )
=> ! [X: $i] :
( ( sorti1 @ X )
=> ( ( h @ ( op1 @ W @ X ) )
= ( op2 @ ( h @ W ) @ ( h @ X ) ) ) ) )
& ! [Y: $i] :
( ( sorti2 @ Y )
=> ! [Z: $i] :
( ( sorti2 @ Z )
=> ( ( j @ ( op2 @ Y @ Z ) )
= ( op1 @ ( j @ Y ) @ ( j @ Z ) ) ) ) )
& ! [X1: $i] :
( ( sorti2 @ X1 )
=> ( ( h @ ( j @ X1 ) )
= X1 ) )
& ! [X2: $i] :
( ( sorti1 @ X2 )
=> ( ( j @ ( h @ X2 ) )
= X2 ) ) ) ) ).
thf(zf_stmt_0,negated_conjecture,
~ ( ( ! [U: $i] :
( ( sorti1 @ U )
=> ( sorti2 @ ( h @ U ) ) )
& ! [V: $i] :
( ( sorti2 @ V )
=> ( sorti1 @ ( j @ V ) ) ) )
=> ~ ( ! [W: $i] :
( ( sorti1 @ W )
=> ! [X: $i] :
( ( sorti1 @ X )
=> ( ( h @ ( op1 @ W @ X ) )
= ( op2 @ ( h @ W ) @ ( h @ X ) ) ) ) )
& ! [Y: $i] :
( ( sorti2 @ Y )
=> ! [Z: $i] :
( ( sorti2 @ Z )
=> ( ( j @ ( op2 @ Y @ Z ) )
= ( op1 @ ( j @ Y ) @ ( j @ Z ) ) ) ) )
& ! [X1: $i] :
( ( sorti2 @ X1 )
=> ( ( h @ ( j @ X1 ) )
= X1 ) )
& ! [X2: $i] :
( ( sorti1 @ X2 )
=> ( ( j @ ( h @ X2 ) )
= X2 ) ) ) ),
inference('cnf.neg',[status(esa)],[co1]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl6,plain,
! [X1: $i] :
( ( sorti1 @ ( j @ X1 ) )
| ~ ( sorti2 @ X1 ) ),
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[zf_stmt_0]) ).
thf(ax4,axiom,
~ ! [U: $i] :
( ( sorti2 @ U )
=> ( ( op2 @ U @ U )
!= U ) ) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl4,plain,
( ( op2 @ sk_ @ sk_ )
= sk_ ),
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[ax4]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl8,plain,
! [X4: $i,X5: $i] :
( ~ ( sorti2 @ X4 )
| ( ( j @ ( op2 @ X5 @ X4 ) )
= ( op1 @ ( j @ X5 ) @ ( j @ X4 ) ) )
| ~ ( sorti2 @ X5 ) ),
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[zf_stmt_0]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl55,plain,
( ( ( j @ sk_ )
= ( op1 @ ( j @ sk_ ) @ ( j @ sk_ ) ) )
| ~ ( sorti2 @ sk_ )
| ~ ( sorti2 @ sk_ ) ),
inference('sup+',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl4,zip_derived_cl8]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl3,plain,
sorti2 @ sk_,
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[ax4]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl3_001,plain,
sorti2 @ sk_,
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[ax4]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl56,plain,
( ( j @ sk_ )
= ( op1 @ ( j @ sk_ ) @ ( j @ sk_ ) ) ),
inference(demod,[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl55,zip_derived_cl3,zip_derived_cl3]) ).
thf(ax3,axiom,
! [U: $i] :
( ( sorti1 @ U )
=> ( ( op1 @ U @ U )
!= U ) ) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl2,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( ( ( op1 @ X0 @ X0 )
!= X0 )
| ~ ( sorti1 @ X0 ) ),
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[ax3]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl58,plain,
( ( ( j @ sk_ )
!= ( j @ sk_ ) )
| ~ ( sorti1 @ ( j @ sk_ ) ) ),
inference('sup-',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl56,zip_derived_cl2]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl60,plain,
~ ( sorti1 @ ( j @ sk_ ) ),
inference(simplify,[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl58]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl62,plain,
~ ( sorti2 @ sk_ ),
inference('sup-',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl6,zip_derived_cl60]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl3_002,plain,
sorti2 @ sk_,
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[ax4]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl63,plain,
$false,
inference(demod,[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl62,zip_derived_cl3]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.12 % Problem : ALG201+1 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v2.7.0.
% 0.04/0.13 % Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.w7Lt7IOxVT true
% 0.13/0.35 % Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % DateTime : Wed Oct 1 17:01:38 EDT 2025
% 0.13/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.13/0.35 % Running portfolio for 300 s
% 0.13/0.35 % File : /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.13/0.35 % Number of cores: 8
% 0.13/0.35 % Python version: Python 3.6.8
% 0.13/0.36 % Running in FO mode
% 0.55/0.65 % Total configuration time : 435
% 0.55/0.65 % Estimated wc time : 1092
% 0.55/0.65 % Estimated cpu time (7 cpus) : 156.0
% 0.55/0.75 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo3_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.55/0.75 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo1_av.sh running for 75s
% 0.55/0.76 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo6_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.55/0.76 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo7.sh running for 63s
% 0.55/0.76 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo5.sh running for 50s
% 0.55/0.76 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo13.sh running for 50s
% 0.55/0.79 % Solved by fo/fo3_bce.sh.
% 0.55/0.79 % BCE start: 11
% 0.55/0.79 % BCE eliminated: 0
% 0.55/0.79 % PE start: 11
% 0.55/0.79 logic: eq
% 0.55/0.79 % PE eliminated: 0
% 0.55/0.79 % done 11 iterations in 0.016s
% 0.55/0.79 % SZS status Theorem for '/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p'
% 0.55/0.79 % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.55/0.79
% 0.55/0.79
% 0.55/0.79 % Terminating...
% 0.59/0.87 % Runner terminated.
% 1.80/0.88 % Zipperpin 1.5 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------