↑ Up

E---3.5.1.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : ALG210+2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 11:55:36 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.11s 0.44s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.11s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   10
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   33 (  23 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   56 (  34 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    7 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   36 (  13   ~;  10   |;  10   &)
%                                         (   1 <=>;   2  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    9 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   33 (   0 sgn  16   !;   1   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(conjecture_1,conjecture,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( ( X3 = times(X1,X2)
        & element(X2)
        & element(X1) )
     => element(X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',conjecture_1) ).

fof(axiom_2,axiom,
    ! [X2] :
      ( element(X2)
    <=> ? [X3] :
          ( times(X2,X2) = X3
          & times(X2,X3) = X2 ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_2) ).

fof(axiom_1,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] : times(times(X1,X2),X3) = times(X2,times(X3,X1)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_1) ).

fof(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1,X2,X3] :
        ( ( X3 = times(X1,X2)
          & element(X2)
          & element(X1) )
       => element(X3) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[conjecture_1]) ).

fof(c_0_4,plain,
    ! [X7,X9,X10] :
      ( ( element(X9)
        | times(X9,X9) != X10
        | times(X9,X10) != X9 )
      & ( ~ element(X7)
        | times(X7,X7) = esk1_1(X7) )
      & ( ~ element(X7)
        | times(X7,esk1_1(X7)) = X7 ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[axiom_2])])])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ element(esk4_0)
    & esk4_0 = times(esk2_0,esk3_0)
    & element(esk3_0)
    & element(esk2_0) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_6,plain,
    ! [X4,X5,X6] : times(times(X4,X5),X6) = times(X5,times(X6,X4)),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[axiom_1]) ).

cnf(c_0_7,plain,
    ( ~ element(X1)
    | times(X1,X1) = esk1_1(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
    element(esk2_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,plain,
    ( ~ element(X1)
    | times(X1,esk1_1(X1)) = X1 ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
    element(esk3_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    times(times(X1,X2),X3) = times(X2,times(X3,X1)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
    times(esk2_0,esk2_0) = esk1_1(esk2_0),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
    times(esk3_0,esk1_1(esk3_0)) = esk3_0,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
    esk1_1(esk3_0) = times(esk3_0,esk3_0),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
    esk4_0 = times(esk2_0,esk3_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
    times(esk2_0,times(X1,esk2_0)) = times(esk1_1(esk2_0),X1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
    times(esk2_0,esk1_1(esk2_0)) = esk2_0,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
    times(esk3_0,times(esk3_0,esk3_0)) = esk3_0,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
    times(esk3_0,times(X1,esk2_0)) = times(esk4_0,X1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
    times(esk1_1(esk2_0),esk2_0) = esk2_0,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_12]),c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    ( times(X1,X1) != X2
    | times(X1,X2) != X1
    | element(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
    times(esk3_0,times(esk3_0,times(esk3_0,X1))) = times(esk3_0,X1),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_18]),c_0_11]),c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
    times(esk3_0,esk1_1(esk2_0)) = times(esk4_0,esk2_0),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
    times(esk2_0,times(X1,esk1_1(esk2_0))) = times(esk2_0,X1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    ( times(X1,times(X1,X1)) != X1
    | element(X1) ),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
    times(esk2_0,times(esk3_0,times(X1,X2))) = times(X1,times(X2,esk4_0)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_19]),c_0_11]),c_0_11]),c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
    times(esk3_0,times(esk4_0,esk4_0)) = times(esk4_0,esk2_0),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23]),c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
    times(esk1_1(esk2_0),esk4_0) = esk4_0,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_23]),c_0_16]),c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,plain,
    ( times(X2,times(X1,times(X1,times(X2,times(X2,X1))))) != times(X1,X2)
    | element(times(X1,X2)) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_11]),c_0_11]),c_0_11]),c_0_11]),c_0_11]),c_0_11]),c_0_11]),c_0_11]),c_0_11]),c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,negated_conjecture,
    times(esk4_0,times(esk4_0,esk4_0)) = esk4_0,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_27]),c_0_16]),c_0_28]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,negated_conjecture,
    ~ element(esk4_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_30]),c_0_11]),c_0_30]),c_0_11]),c_0_11]),c_0_30]),c_0_11]),c_0_11]),c_0_30]),c_0_30]),c_0_11]),c_0_30])]),c_0_31]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : ALG210+2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.37  % Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.37  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/0.37  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/0.37  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.37  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.11/0.37  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 13:02:11 UTC 2026
% 0.11/0.38  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.11/0.38  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.42  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.11/0.42  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.11/0.44  % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.11/0.44  % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.11/0.44  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.11/0.44  % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.11/0.44  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.44  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.44  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.44  % G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with pid 928002 completed with status 0
% 0.11/0.44  % Result found by G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN
% 0.11/0.44  % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.11/0.44  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.11/0.44  % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.11/0.44  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.11/0.44  % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.11/0.44  % Search class: FHUSF-FFSS21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.11/0.44  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.11/0.44  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.44  % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.44  % Starting G-E--_208_C12_11_nc_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 136s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.44  % Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.44  % Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.44  % G-E--_208_C12_11_nc_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 928009 completed with status 0
% 0.11/0.44  % Result found by G-E--_208_C12_11_nc_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.11/0.44  % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.11/0.44  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.11/0.44  % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.11/0.44  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.11/0.44  % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.11/0.44  % Search class: FHUSF-FFSS21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.11/0.44  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.11/0.44  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.44  % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.44  % Starting G-E--_208_C12_11_nc_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 136s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.44  % Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 0.11/0.44  % Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.11/0.44  
% 0.11/0.44  % Proof found!
% 0.11/0.44  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.11/0.44  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.11/0.44  % Parsed axioms                        : 3
% 0.11/0.44  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.11/0.44  % Initial clauses                      : 8
% 0.11/0.44  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.11/0.44  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 8
% 0.11/0.44  % Processed clauses                    : 64
% 0.11/0.44  % ...of these trivial                  : 5
% 0.11/0.44  % ...subsumed                          : 3
% 0.11/0.44  % ...remaining for further processing  : 56
% 0.11/0.44  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 1
% 0.11/0.44  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.11/0.44  % Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.11/0.44  % Backward-rewritten                   : 5
% 0.11/0.44  % Generated clauses                    : 238
% 0.11/0.44  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 215
% 0.11/0.44  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.11/0.44  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.11/0.44  % Paramodulations                      : 237
% 0.11/0.44  % Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.11/0.44  % NegExts                              : 0
% 0.11/0.44  % Equation resolutions                 : 1
% 0.11/0.44  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.11/0.44  % Total rewrite steps                  : 2333
% 0.11/0.44  % ...of those cached                   : 1313
% 0.11/0.44  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.11/0.44  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.11/0.44  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.11/0.44  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.11/0.44  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.11/0.44  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.11/0.44  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.11/0.44  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.11/0.44  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.11/0.44  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.11/0.44  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.11/0.44  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.11/0.44  % Current number of processed clauses  : 42
% 0.11/0.44  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 28
% 0.11/0.44  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 1
% 0.11/0.44  %    Negative unit clauses             : 3
% 0.11/0.44  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 10
% 0.11/0.44  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 160
% 0.11/0.44  % ...number of literals in the above   : 198
% 0.11/0.44  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.11/0.44  % Current number of archived clauses   : 13
% 0.11/0.44  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 23
% 0.11/0.44  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 23
% 0.11/0.44  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 3
% 0.11/0.44  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 11
% 0.11/0.44  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.11/0.44  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 24
% 0.11/0.44  % BW rewrite match successes           : 24
% 0.11/0.44  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.11/0.44  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.11/0.44  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 6722
% 0.11/0.44  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 108
% 0.11/0.44  
% 0.11/0.44  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.11/0.44  % User time                : 0.008 s
% 0.11/0.44  % System time              : 0.002 s
% 0.11/0.44  % Total time               : 0.010 s
% 0.11/0.44  % Maximum resident set size: 3628 pages
% 0.11/0.44  
% 0.11/0.44  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.11/0.44  % User time                : 0.023 s
% 0.11/0.44  % System time              : 0.016 s
% 0.11/0.44  % Total time               : 0.039 s
% 0.11/0.44  % Maximum resident set size: 4608 pages
% 0.11/0.44  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------