%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : Princess---230619 % Problem : ALG224+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.4.0. % Transfm : none % Format : tptp % Command : princess -inputFormat=tptp +threads -portfolio=casc +printProof -timeoutSec=%d %s % Computer : n020.cluster.edu % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz % Memory : 8042.1875MB % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % CPULimit : 300s % WCLimit : 300s % DateTime : Wed Aug 30 16:40:03 EDT 2023 % Result : Theorem 16.83s 3.04s % Output : Proof 22.05s % Verified : % SZS Type : - % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % 0.00/0.12 % Problem : ALG224+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.4.0. % 0.00/0.13 % Command : princess -inputFormat=tptp +threads -portfolio=casc +printProof -timeoutSec=%d %s % 0.16/0.34 % Computer : n020.cluster.edu % 0.16/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % 0.16/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz % 0.16/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB % 0.16/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % 0.16/0.34 % CPULimit : 300 % 0.16/0.34 % WCLimit : 300 % 0.16/0.34 % DateTime : Mon Aug 28 03:14:29 EDT 2023 % 0.16/0.34 % CPUTime : % 0.20/0.61 ________ _____ % 0.20/0.61 ___ __ \_________(_)________________________________ % 0.20/0.61 __ /_/ /_ ___/_ /__ __ \ ___/ _ \_ ___/_ ___/ % 0.20/0.61 _ ____/_ / _ / _ / / / /__ / __/(__ )_(__ ) % 0.20/0.61 /_/ /_/ /_/ /_/ /_/\___/ \___//____/ /____/ % 0.20/0.61 % 0.20/0.61 A Theorem Prover for First-Order Logic modulo Linear Integer Arithmetic % 0.20/0.61 (2023-06-19) % 0.20/0.61 % 0.20/0.61 (c) Philipp Rümmer, 2009-2023 % 0.20/0.61 Contributors: Peter Backeman, Peter Baumgartner, Angelo Brillout, Zafer Esen, % 0.20/0.61 Amanda Stjerna. % 0.20/0.61 Free software under BSD-3-Clause. % 0.20/0.61 % 0.20/0.61 For more information, visit http://www.philipp.ruemmer.org/princess.shtml % 0.20/0.61 % 0.20/0.61 Loading /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ... % 0.20/0.62 Running up to 7 provers in parallel. % 0.20/0.63 Prover 0: Options: +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=0 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1042961893 % 0.20/0.63 Prover 1: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1571432423 % 0.20/0.63 Prover 2: Options: +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMinimalAndEmpty -realRatSaturationRounds=1 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1065072994 % 0.20/0.63 Prover 4: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1868514696 % 0.20/0.63 Prover 3: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1922548996 % 0.20/0.63 Prover 5: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMaximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=complete -randomSeed=1259561288 % 0.20/0.63 Prover 6: Options: -triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximalOutermost -realRatSaturationRounds=0 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1399714365 % 2.93/1.09 Prover 4: Preprocessing ... % 2.93/1.09 Prover 1: Preprocessing ... % 2.93/1.13 Prover 2: Preprocessing ... % 2.93/1.13 Prover 3: Preprocessing ... % 2.93/1.13 Prover 6: Preprocessing ... % 2.93/1.13 Prover 5: Preprocessing ... % 2.93/1.13 Prover 0: Preprocessing ... % 5.64/1.62 Prover 2: Proving ... % 5.64/1.62 Prover 5: Proving ... % 6.73/1.63 Prover 1: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers % 6.73/1.67 Prover 1: Constructing countermodel ... % 7.39/1.75 Prover 3: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers % 7.39/1.77 Prover 3: Constructing countermodel ... % 7.39/1.78 Prover 6: Proving ... % 8.00/1.85 Prover 4: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers % 8.59/1.91 Prover 4: Constructing countermodel ... % 8.59/1.92 Prover 0: Proving ... % 16.83/3.04 Prover 5: proved (2409ms) % 16.83/3.04 % 16.83/3.04 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 16.83/3.04 % 16.83/3.05 Prover 3: stopped % 16.83/3.05 Prover 6: stopped % 16.83/3.05 Prover 7: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-236303470 % 16.83/3.05 Prover 8: Options: +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-200781089 % 16.83/3.05 Prover 10: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=919308125 % 16.83/3.05 Prover 2: stopped % 16.83/3.05 Prover 0: stopped % 16.83/3.05 Prover 11: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1509710984 % 16.83/3.05 Prover 13: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=complete -randomSeed=1138197443 % 17.56/3.14 Prover 11: Preprocessing ... % 17.78/3.15 Prover 8: Preprocessing ... % 17.78/3.15 Prover 10: Preprocessing ... % 17.78/3.16 Prover 13: Preprocessing ... % 17.78/3.17 Prover 7: Preprocessing ... % 18.47/3.24 Prover 10: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers % 18.47/3.24 Prover 10: Constructing countermodel ... % 18.47/3.25 Prover 7: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers % 18.47/3.25 Prover 7: Constructing countermodel ... % 18.47/3.26 Prover 8: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers % 18.47/3.26 Prover 8: Constructing countermodel ... % 18.47/3.27 Prover 13: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers % 18.89/3.29 Prover 13: Constructing countermodel ... % 18.89/3.35 Prover 11: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers % 19.44/3.36 Prover 11: Constructing countermodel ... % 20.10/3.66 Prover 10: Found proof (size 77) % 20.10/3.66 Prover 10: proved (614ms) % 20.10/3.66 Prover 8: stopped % 20.10/3.66 Prover 7: stopped % 20.10/3.66 Prover 11: stopped % 20.10/3.66 Prover 4: stopped % 20.10/3.67 Prover 1: stopped % 20.10/3.67 Prover 13: stopped % 20.10/3.67 % 20.10/3.67 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 20.10/3.67 % 21.68/3.68 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark % 21.68/3.68 Assumptions after simplification: % 21.68/3.68 --------------------------------- % 21.68/3.68 % 21.68/3.68 (d2_closure3) % 21.68/3.71 ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i] : ! [v2: $i] : ( ~ (k1_closure2(v0, v1) = v2) | ~ % 21.68/3.71 $i(v1) | ~ $i(v0) | ~ m1_pboole(v1, v0) | ? [v3: $i] : (k1_zfmisc_1(v2) = % 21.68/3.71 v3 & $i(v3) & ! [v4: $i] : ! [v5: $i] : ! [v6: $i] : ( ~ $i(v6) | ~ % 21.68/3.71 $i(v5) | ~ $i(v4) | ~ r2_hidden(v6, v4) | ~ r2_closure3(v0, v1, v4, % 21.68/3.71 v5) | ~ m1_subset_1(v5, v3) | ~ m1_subset_1(v4, v3) | ? [v7: $i] : % 21.68/3.71 ($i(v7) & r1_tarski(v7, v6) & r2_hidden(v7, v5))) & ! [v4: $i] : ! % 21.68/3.71 [v5: $i] : ( ~ $i(v5) | ~ $i(v4) | ~ m1_subset_1(v5, v3) | ~ % 21.68/3.71 m1_subset_1(v4, v3) | r2_closure3(v0, v1, v4, v5) | ? [v6: $i] : % 21.68/3.71 ($i(v6) & r2_hidden(v6, v4) & ! [v7: $i] : ( ~ $i(v7) | ~ % 21.68/3.71 r1_tarski(v7, v6) | ~ r2_hidden(v7, v5)))))) % 21.68/3.71 % 21.68/3.71 (fc1_subset_1) % 21.68/3.71 ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i] : ( ~ (k1_zfmisc_1(v0) = v1) | ~ $i(v0) | ~ % 21.68/3.71 v1_xboole_0(v1)) % 21.68/3.71 % 21.68/3.71 (fc2_closure2) % 21.68/3.71 ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i] : ! [v2: $i] : ( ~ (k1_closure2(v0, v1) = v2) | ~ % 21.68/3.71 $i(v1) | ~ $i(v0) | ~ v1_xboole_0(v2) | ~ m1_pboole(v1, v0)) & ! [v0: % 21.68/3.71 $i] : ! [v1: $i] : ! [v2: $i] : ( ~ (k1_closure2(v0, v1) = v2) | ~ $i(v1) % 21.68/3.71 | ~ $i(v0) | ~ m1_pboole(v1, v0) | v1_pralg_2(v2)) & ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: % 21.68/3.71 $i] : ! [v2: $i] : ( ~ (k1_closure2(v0, v1) = v2) | ~ $i(v1) | ~ $i(v0) | % 21.68/3.71 ~ m1_pboole(v1, v0) | v1_fraenkel(v2)) % 21.68/3.71 % 21.68/3.71 (rc1_subset_1) % 21.68/3.71 ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i] : ( ~ (k1_zfmisc_1(v0) = v1) | ~ $i(v0) | % 21.68/3.71 v1_xboole_0(v0) | ? [v2: $i] : ($i(v2) & m1_subset_1(v2, v1) & ~ % 21.68/3.72 v1_xboole_0(v2))) % 21.68/3.72 % 21.68/3.72 (rc2_closure2) % 21.68/3.72 ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i] : ! [v2: $i] : ( ~ (k1_closure2(v0, v1) = v2) | ~ % 21.68/3.72 $i(v1) | ~ $i(v0) | ~ m1_pboole(v1, v0) | ? [v3: $i] : ? [v4: $i] : % 21.68/3.72 (k1_zfmisc_1(v2) = v3 & $i(v4) & $i(v3) & v1_pralg_2(v4) & v1_fraenkel(v4) & % 21.68/3.72 m1_subset_1(v4, v3) & ~ v1_xboole_0(v4))) % 21.68/3.72 % 21.68/3.72 (rc3_closure2) % 21.68/3.72 ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i] : ! [v2: $i] : ( ~ (k1_closure2(v0, v1) = v2) | ~ % 21.68/3.72 $i(v1) | ~ $i(v0) | ~ m1_pboole(v1, v0) | ? [v3: $i] : ? [v4: $i] : % 21.68/3.72 (k1_zfmisc_1(v2) = v3 & $i(v4) & $i(v3) & v2_funct_1(v4) & v1_relat_1(v4) & % 21.68/3.72 v1_funct_1(v4) & v1_finset_1(v4) & v1_fraenkel(v4) & v1_xboole_0(v4) & % 21.68/3.72 m1_subset_1(v4, v3))) % 21.68/3.72 % 21.68/3.72 (t1_xboole_1) % 21.68/3.72 ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i] : ! [v2: $i] : ( ~ $i(v2) | ~ $i(v1) | ~ $i(v0) | % 21.68/3.72 ~ r1_tarski(v1, v2) | ~ r1_tarski(v0, v1) | r1_tarski(v0, v2)) % 21.68/3.72 % 21.68/3.72 (t2_subset) % 21.68/3.72 ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i] : ( ~ $i(v1) | ~ $i(v0) | ~ m1_subset_1(v0, v1) | % 21.68/3.72 v1_xboole_0(v1) | r2_hidden(v0, v1)) % 21.68/3.72 % 21.68/3.72 (t5_closure3) % 21.68/3.72 ? [v0: $i] : ? [v1: $i] : ? [v2: $i] : ? [v3: $i] : ? [v4: $i] : ? [v5: % 21.68/3.72 $i] : ? [v6: $i] : (k1_closure2(v0, v1) = v2 & k1_zfmisc_1(v2) = v3 & % 21.68/3.72 $i(v6) & $i(v5) & $i(v4) & $i(v3) & $i(v2) & $i(v1) & $i(v0) & % 21.68/3.72 r2_closure3(v0, v1, v5, v6) & r2_closure3(v0, v1, v4, v5) & m1_subset_1(v6, % 21.68/3.72 v3) & m1_subset_1(v5, v3) & m1_subset_1(v4, v3) & m1_pboole(v1, v0) & ~ % 21.68/3.72 r2_closure3(v0, v1, v4, v6)) % 21.68/3.72 % 21.68/3.72 (function-axioms) % 21.68/3.72 ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i] : ! [v2: $i] : ! [v3: $i] : (v1 = v0 | ~ % 21.68/3.72 (k1_closure2(v3, v2) = v1) | ~ (k1_closure2(v3, v2) = v0)) & ! [v0: $i] : % 21.68/3.72 ! [v1: $i] : ! [v2: $i] : (v1 = v0 | ~ (k1_zfmisc_1(v2) = v1) | ~ % 21.68/3.72 (k1_zfmisc_1(v2) = v0)) % 21.68/3.72 % 21.68/3.72 Further assumptions not needed in the proof: % 21.68/3.72 -------------------------------------------- % 21.68/3.72 antisymmetry_r2_hidden, cc1_closure2, cc1_finset_1, cc1_funct_1, cc2_finset_1, % 21.68/3.72 cc2_funct_1, dt_k1_closure2, dt_k1_xboole_0, dt_k1_zfmisc_1, dt_m1_pboole, % 21.68/3.72 dt_m1_subset_1, existence_m1_pboole, existence_m1_subset_1, fc1_xboole_0, % 21.68/3.72 rc1_closure2, rc1_finset_1, rc1_funct_1, rc1_xboole_0, rc2_funct_1, % 21.68/3.72 rc2_subset_1, rc2_xboole_0, rc3_finset_1, rc3_funct_1, rc4_finset_1, % 21.68/3.72 reflexivity_r1_tarski, reflexivity_r2_closure3, t1_subset, t3_subset, t4_subset, % 21.68/3.72 t5_subset, t6_boole, t7_boole, t8_boole % 21.68/3.72 % 21.68/3.72 Those formulas are unsatisfiable: % 21.68/3.72 --------------------------------- % 21.68/3.72 % 21.68/3.72 Begin of proof % 21.68/3.72 | % 21.68/3.72 | ALPHA: (fc2_closure2) implies: % 21.68/3.72 | (1) ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i] : ! [v2: $i] : ( ~ (k1_closure2(v0, v1) = % 21.68/3.72 | v2) | ~ $i(v1) | ~ $i(v0) | ~ v1_xboole_0(v2) | ~ m1_pboole(v1, % 21.68/3.72 | v0)) % 21.68/3.72 | % 21.68/3.72 | ALPHA: (function-axioms) implies: % 21.68/3.72 | (2) ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i] : ! [v2: $i] : (v1 = v0 | ~ % 21.68/3.72 | (k1_zfmisc_1(v2) = v1) | ~ (k1_zfmisc_1(v2) = v0)) % 21.68/3.72 | % 21.68/3.72 | DELTA: instantiating (t5_closure3) with fresh symbols all_48_0, all_48_1, % 21.68/3.72 | all_48_2, all_48_3, all_48_4, all_48_5, all_48_6 gives: % 21.68/3.73 | (3) k1_closure2(all_48_6, all_48_5) = all_48_4 & k1_zfmisc_1(all_48_4) = % 21.68/3.73 | all_48_3 & $i(all_48_0) & $i(all_48_1) & $i(all_48_2) & $i(all_48_3) & % 21.68/3.73 | $i(all_48_4) & $i(all_48_5) & $i(all_48_6) & r2_closure3(all_48_6, % 21.68/3.73 | all_48_5, all_48_1, all_48_0) & r2_closure3(all_48_6, all_48_5, % 21.68/3.73 | all_48_2, all_48_1) & m1_subset_1(all_48_0, all_48_3) & % 21.68/3.73 | m1_subset_1(all_48_1, all_48_3) & m1_subset_1(all_48_2, all_48_3) & % 21.68/3.73 | m1_pboole(all_48_5, all_48_6) & ~ r2_closure3(all_48_6, all_48_5, % 21.68/3.73 | all_48_2, all_48_0) % 21.68/3.73 | % 21.68/3.73 | ALPHA: (3) implies: % 21.68/3.73 | (4) ~ r2_closure3(all_48_6, all_48_5, all_48_2, all_48_0) % 21.68/3.73 | (5) m1_pboole(all_48_5, all_48_6) % 21.68/3.73 | (6) m1_subset_1(all_48_2, all_48_3) % 21.68/3.73 | (7) m1_subset_1(all_48_1, all_48_3) % 21.68/3.73 | (8) m1_subset_1(all_48_0, all_48_3) % 21.68/3.73 | (9) r2_closure3(all_48_6, all_48_5, all_48_2, all_48_1) % 21.68/3.73 | (10) r2_closure3(all_48_6, all_48_5, all_48_1, all_48_0) % 21.68/3.73 | (11) $i(all_48_6) % 21.68/3.73 | (12) $i(all_48_5) % 21.68/3.73 | (13) $i(all_48_4) % 21.68/3.73 | (14) $i(all_48_2) % 21.68/3.73 | (15) $i(all_48_1) % 21.68/3.73 | (16) $i(all_48_0) % 21.68/3.73 | (17) k1_zfmisc_1(all_48_4) = all_48_3 % 21.68/3.73 | (18) k1_closure2(all_48_6, all_48_5) = all_48_4 % 21.68/3.73 | % 21.68/3.73 | GROUND_INST: instantiating (rc1_subset_1) with all_48_4, all_48_3, simplifying % 21.68/3.73 | with (13), (17) gives: % 21.68/3.73 | (19) v1_xboole_0(all_48_4) | ? [v0: $i] : ($i(v0) & m1_subset_1(v0, % 21.68/3.73 | all_48_3) & ~ v1_xboole_0(v0)) % 21.68/3.73 | % 21.68/3.73 | GROUND_INST: instantiating (rc2_closure2) with all_48_6, all_48_5, all_48_4, % 21.68/3.73 | simplifying with (5), (11), (12), (18) gives: % 21.68/3.73 | (20) ? [v0: $i] : ? [v1: $i] : (k1_zfmisc_1(all_48_4) = v0 & $i(v1) & % 21.68/3.73 | $i(v0) & v1_pralg_2(v1) & v1_fraenkel(v1) & m1_subset_1(v1, v0) & ~ % 21.68/3.73 | v1_xboole_0(v1)) % 21.68/3.73 | % 21.68/3.73 | GROUND_INST: instantiating (rc3_closure2) with all_48_6, all_48_5, all_48_4, % 21.68/3.73 | simplifying with (5), (11), (12), (18) gives: % 21.68/3.73 | (21) ? [v0: $i] : ? [v1: $i] : (k1_zfmisc_1(all_48_4) = v0 & $i(v1) & % 21.68/3.73 | $i(v0) & v2_funct_1(v1) & v1_relat_1(v1) & v1_funct_1(v1) & % 21.68/3.73 | v1_finset_1(v1) & v1_fraenkel(v1) & v1_xboole_0(v1) & % 21.68/3.73 | m1_subset_1(v1, v0)) % 21.68/3.73 | % 21.68/3.73 | GROUND_INST: instantiating (d2_closure3) with all_48_6, all_48_5, all_48_4, % 21.68/3.73 | simplifying with (5), (11), (12), (18) gives: % 21.68/3.73 | (22) ? [v0: $i] : (k1_zfmisc_1(all_48_4) = v0 & $i(v0) & ! [v1: $i] : ! % 21.68/3.73 | [v2: $i] : ! [v3: $i] : ( ~ $i(v3) | ~ $i(v2) | ~ $i(v1) | ~ % 21.68/3.73 | r2_hidden(v3, v1) | ~ r2_closure3(all_48_6, all_48_5, v1, v2) | % 21.68/3.73 | ~ m1_subset_1(v2, v0) | ~ m1_subset_1(v1, v0) | ? [v4: $i] : % 21.68/3.73 | ($i(v4) & r1_tarski(v4, v3) & r2_hidden(v4, v2))) & ! [v1: $i] : % 21.68/3.73 | ! [v2: $i] : ( ~ $i(v2) | ~ $i(v1) | ~ m1_subset_1(v2, v0) | ~ % 21.68/3.73 | m1_subset_1(v1, v0) | r2_closure3(all_48_6, all_48_5, v1, v2) | ? % 21.68/3.73 | [v3: $i] : ($i(v3) & r2_hidden(v3, v1) & ! [v4: $i] : ( ~ $i(v4) % 21.68/3.73 | | ~ r1_tarski(v4, v3) | ~ r2_hidden(v4, v2))))) % 21.68/3.73 | % 21.68/3.73 | DELTA: instantiating (20) with fresh symbols all_58_0, all_58_1 gives: % 21.68/3.73 | (23) k1_zfmisc_1(all_48_4) = all_58_1 & $i(all_58_0) & $i(all_58_1) & % 21.68/3.73 | v1_pralg_2(all_58_0) & v1_fraenkel(all_58_0) & m1_subset_1(all_58_0, % 21.68/3.73 | all_58_1) & ~ v1_xboole_0(all_58_0) % 21.68/3.73 | % 21.68/3.73 | ALPHA: (23) implies: % 21.68/3.73 | (24) $i(all_58_1) % 21.68/3.73 | (25) k1_zfmisc_1(all_48_4) = all_58_1 % 21.68/3.73 | % 21.68/3.73 | DELTA: instantiating (21) with fresh symbols all_60_0, all_60_1 gives: % 21.68/3.73 | (26) k1_zfmisc_1(all_48_4) = all_60_1 & $i(all_60_0) & $i(all_60_1) & % 21.68/3.73 | v2_funct_1(all_60_0) & v1_relat_1(all_60_0) & v1_funct_1(all_60_0) & % 21.68/3.73 | v1_finset_1(all_60_0) & v1_fraenkel(all_60_0) & v1_xboole_0(all_60_0) % 21.68/3.73 | & m1_subset_1(all_60_0, all_60_1) % 21.68/3.73 | % 21.68/3.73 | ALPHA: (26) implies: % 21.68/3.73 | (27) k1_zfmisc_1(all_48_4) = all_60_1 % 21.68/3.73 | % 21.68/3.73 | DELTA: instantiating (22) with fresh symbol all_62_0 gives: % 22.05/3.74 | (28) k1_zfmisc_1(all_48_4) = all_62_0 & $i(all_62_0) & ! [v0: $i] : ! % 22.05/3.74 | [v1: $i] : ! [v2: $i] : ( ~ $i(v2) | ~ $i(v1) | ~ $i(v0) | ~ % 22.05/3.74 | r2_hidden(v2, v0) | ~ r2_closure3(all_48_6, all_48_5, v0, v1) | ~ % 22.05/3.74 | m1_subset_1(v1, all_62_0) | ~ m1_subset_1(v0, all_62_0) | ? [v3: % 22.05/3.74 | $i] : ($i(v3) & r1_tarski(v3, v2) & r2_hidden(v3, v1))) & ! [v0: % 22.05/3.74 | $i] : ! [v1: $i] : ( ~ $i(v1) | ~ $i(v0) | ~ m1_subset_1(v1, % 22.05/3.74 | all_62_0) | ~ m1_subset_1(v0, all_62_0) | r2_closure3(all_48_6, % 22.05/3.74 | all_48_5, v0, v1) | ? [v2: $i] : ($i(v2) & r2_hidden(v2, v0) & ! % 22.05/3.74 | [v3: $i] : ( ~ $i(v3) | ~ r1_tarski(v3, v2) | ~ r2_hidden(v3, % 22.05/3.74 | v1)))) % 22.05/3.74 | % 22.05/3.74 | ALPHA: (28) implies: % 22.05/3.74 | (29) k1_zfmisc_1(all_48_4) = all_62_0 % 22.05/3.74 | (30) ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i] : ( ~ $i(v1) | ~ $i(v0) | ~ % 22.05/3.74 | m1_subset_1(v1, all_62_0) | ~ m1_subset_1(v0, all_62_0) | % 22.05/3.74 | r2_closure3(all_48_6, all_48_5, v0, v1) | ? [v2: $i] : ($i(v2) & % 22.05/3.74 | r2_hidden(v2, v0) & ! [v3: $i] : ( ~ $i(v3) | ~ r1_tarski(v3, % 22.05/3.74 | v2) | ~ r2_hidden(v3, v1)))) % 22.05/3.74 | (31) ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i] : ! [v2: $i] : ( ~ $i(v2) | ~ $i(v1) | ~ % 22.05/3.74 | $i(v0) | ~ r2_hidden(v2, v0) | ~ r2_closure3(all_48_6, all_48_5, % 22.05/3.74 | v0, v1) | ~ m1_subset_1(v1, all_62_0) | ~ m1_subset_1(v0, % 22.05/3.74 | all_62_0) | ? [v3: $i] : ($i(v3) & r1_tarski(v3, v2) & % 22.05/3.74 | r2_hidden(v3, v1))) % 22.05/3.74 | % 22.05/3.74 | GROUND_INST: instantiating (2) with all_48_3, all_60_1, all_48_4, simplifying % 22.05/3.74 | with (17), (27) gives: % 22.05/3.74 | (32) all_60_1 = all_48_3 % 22.05/3.74 | % 22.05/3.74 | GROUND_INST: instantiating (2) with all_60_1, all_62_0, all_48_4, simplifying % 22.05/3.74 | with (27), (29) gives: % 22.05/3.74 | (33) all_62_0 = all_60_1 % 22.05/3.74 | % 22.05/3.74 | GROUND_INST: instantiating (2) with all_58_1, all_62_0, all_48_4, simplifying % 22.05/3.74 | with (25), (29) gives: % 22.05/3.74 | (34) all_62_0 = all_58_1 % 22.05/3.74 | % 22.05/3.74 | COMBINE_EQS: (33), (34) imply: % 22.05/3.74 | (35) all_60_1 = all_58_1 % 22.05/3.74 | % 22.05/3.74 | SIMP: (35) implies: % 22.05/3.74 | (36) all_60_1 = all_58_1 % 22.05/3.74 | % 22.05/3.74 | COMBINE_EQS: (32), (36) imply: % 22.05/3.74 | (37) all_58_1 = all_48_3 % 22.05/3.74 | % 22.05/3.74 | SIMP: (37) implies: % 22.05/3.74 | (38) all_58_1 = all_48_3 % 22.05/3.74 | % 22.05/3.74 | COMBINE_EQS: (34), (38) imply: % 22.05/3.74 | (39) all_62_0 = all_48_3 % 22.05/3.74 | % 22.05/3.74 | REDUCE: (24), (38) imply: % 22.05/3.74 | (40) $i(all_48_3) % 22.05/3.74 | % 22.05/3.74 | BETA: splitting (19) gives: % 22.05/3.74 | % 22.05/3.74 | Case 1: % 22.05/3.74 | | % 22.05/3.74 | | (41) v1_xboole_0(all_48_4) % 22.05/3.74 | | % 22.05/3.74 | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (1) with all_48_6, all_48_5, all_48_4, % 22.05/3.74 | | simplifying with (5), (11), (12), (18), (41) gives: % 22.05/3.74 | | (42) $false % 22.05/3.74 | | % 22.05/3.74 | | CLOSE: (42) is inconsistent. % 22.05/3.74 | | % 22.05/3.74 | Case 2: % 22.05/3.74 | | % 22.05/3.74 | | (43) ? [v0: $i] : ($i(v0) & m1_subset_1(v0, all_48_3) & ~ % 22.05/3.74 | | v1_xboole_0(v0)) % 22.05/3.74 | | % 22.05/3.74 | | DELTA: instantiating (43) with fresh symbol all_109_0 gives: % 22.05/3.74 | | (44) $i(all_109_0) & m1_subset_1(all_109_0, all_48_3) & ~ % 22.05/3.74 | | v1_xboole_0(all_109_0) % 22.05/3.74 | | % 22.05/3.74 | | ALPHA: (44) implies: % 22.05/3.74 | | (45) m1_subset_1(all_109_0, all_48_3) % 22.05/3.74 | | (46) $i(all_109_0) % 22.05/3.74 | | % 22.05/3.74 | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (t2_subset) with all_109_0, all_48_3, simplifying % 22.05/3.74 | | with (40), (45), (46) gives: % 22.05/3.74 | | (47) v1_xboole_0(all_48_3) | r2_hidden(all_109_0, all_48_3) % 22.05/3.74 | | % 22.05/3.74 | | BETA: splitting (47) gives: % 22.05/3.74 | | % 22.05/3.74 | | Case 1: % 22.05/3.74 | | | % 22.05/3.74 | | | (48) v1_xboole_0(all_48_3) % 22.05/3.74 | | | % 22.05/3.74 | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (fc1_subset_1) with all_48_4, all_48_3, % 22.05/3.74 | | | simplifying with (13), (17), (48) gives: % 22.05/3.74 | | | (49) $false % 22.05/3.74 | | | % 22.05/3.74 | | | CLOSE: (49) is inconsistent. % 22.05/3.74 | | | % 22.05/3.74 | | Case 2: % 22.05/3.74 | | | % 22.05/3.74 | | | % 22.05/3.74 | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (30) with all_48_2, all_48_0, simplifying with % 22.05/3.74 | | | (4), (14), (16) gives: % 22.05/3.75 | | | (50) ~ m1_subset_1(all_48_0, all_62_0) | ~ m1_subset_1(all_48_2, % 22.05/3.75 | | | all_62_0) | ? [v0: $i] : ($i(v0) & r2_hidden(v0, all_48_2) & ! % 22.05/3.75 | | | [v1: $i] : ( ~ $i(v1) | ~ r1_tarski(v1, v0) | ~ r2_hidden(v1, % 22.05/3.75 | | | all_48_0))) % 22.05/3.75 | | | % 22.05/3.75 | | | BETA: splitting (50) gives: % 22.05/3.75 | | | % 22.05/3.75 | | | Case 1: % 22.05/3.75 | | | | % 22.05/3.75 | | | | (51) ~ m1_subset_1(all_48_0, all_62_0) % 22.05/3.75 | | | | % 22.05/3.75 | | | | REDUCE: (39), (51) imply: % 22.05/3.75 | | | | (52) ~ m1_subset_1(all_48_0, all_48_3) % 22.05/3.75 | | | | % 22.05/3.75 | | | | PRED_UNIFY: (8), (52) imply: % 22.05/3.75 | | | | (53) $false % 22.05/3.75 | | | | % 22.05/3.75 | | | | CLOSE: (53) is inconsistent. % 22.05/3.75 | | | | % 22.05/3.75 | | | Case 2: % 22.05/3.75 | | | | % 22.05/3.75 | | | | (54) m1_subset_1(all_48_0, all_62_0) % 22.05/3.75 | | | | (55) ~ m1_subset_1(all_48_2, all_62_0) | ? [v0: $i] : ($i(v0) & % 22.05/3.75 | | | | r2_hidden(v0, all_48_2) & ! [v1: $i] : ( ~ $i(v1) | ~ % 22.05/3.75 | | | | r1_tarski(v1, v0) | ~ r2_hidden(v1, all_48_0))) % 22.05/3.75 | | | | % 22.05/3.75 | | | | BETA: splitting (55) gives: % 22.05/3.75 | | | | % 22.05/3.75 | | | | Case 1: % 22.05/3.75 | | | | | % 22.05/3.75 | | | | | (56) ~ m1_subset_1(all_48_2, all_62_0) % 22.05/3.75 | | | | | % 22.05/3.75 | | | | | REDUCE: (39), (56) imply: % 22.05/3.75 | | | | | (57) ~ m1_subset_1(all_48_2, all_48_3) % 22.05/3.75 | | | | | % 22.05/3.75 | | | | | PRED_UNIFY: (6), (57) imply: % 22.05/3.75 | | | | | (58) $false % 22.05/3.75 | | | | | % 22.05/3.75 | | | | | CLOSE: (58) is inconsistent. % 22.05/3.75 | | | | | % 22.05/3.75 | | | | Case 2: % 22.05/3.75 | | | | | % 22.05/3.75 | | | | | (59) m1_subset_1(all_48_2, all_62_0) % 22.05/3.75 | | | | | (60) ? [v0: $i] : ($i(v0) & r2_hidden(v0, all_48_2) & ! [v1: $i] % 22.05/3.75 | | | | | : ( ~ $i(v1) | ~ r1_tarski(v1, v0) | ~ r2_hidden(v1, % 22.05/3.75 | | | | | all_48_0))) % 22.05/3.75 | | | | | % 22.05/3.75 | | | | | DELTA: instantiating (60) with fresh symbol all_179_0 gives: % 22.05/3.75 | | | | | (61) $i(all_179_0) & r2_hidden(all_179_0, all_48_2) & ! [v0: $i] : % 22.05/3.75 | | | | | ( ~ $i(v0) | ~ r1_tarski(v0, all_179_0) | ~ r2_hidden(v0, % 22.05/3.75 | | | | | all_48_0)) % 22.05/3.75 | | | | | % 22.05/3.75 | | | | | ALPHA: (61) implies: % 22.05/3.75 | | | | | (62) r2_hidden(all_179_0, all_48_2) % 22.05/3.75 | | | | | (63) $i(all_179_0) % 22.05/3.75 | | | | | (64) ! [v0: $i] : ( ~ $i(v0) | ~ r1_tarski(v0, all_179_0) | ~ % 22.05/3.75 | | | | | r2_hidden(v0, all_48_0)) % 22.05/3.75 | | | | | % 22.05/3.75 | | | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (31) with all_48_2, all_48_1, all_179_0, % 22.05/3.75 | | | | | simplifying with (9), (14), (15), (62), (63) gives: % 22.05/3.75 | | | | | (65) ~ m1_subset_1(all_48_1, all_62_0) | ~ m1_subset_1(all_48_2, % 22.05/3.75 | | | | | all_62_0) | ? [v0: $i] : ($i(v0) & r1_tarski(v0, all_179_0) % 22.05/3.75 | | | | | & r2_hidden(v0, all_48_1)) % 22.05/3.75 | | | | | % 22.05/3.75 | | | | | BETA: splitting (65) gives: % 22.05/3.75 | | | | | % 22.05/3.75 | | | | | Case 1: % 22.05/3.75 | | | | | | % 22.05/3.75 | | | | | | (66) ~ m1_subset_1(all_48_1, all_62_0) % 22.05/3.75 | | | | | | % 22.05/3.75 | | | | | | REDUCE: (39), (66) imply: % 22.05/3.75 | | | | | | (67) ~ m1_subset_1(all_48_1, all_48_3) % 22.05/3.75 | | | | | | % 22.05/3.75 | | | | | | PRED_UNIFY: (7), (67) imply: % 22.05/3.75 | | | | | | (68) $false % 22.05/3.75 | | | | | | % 22.05/3.75 | | | | | | CLOSE: (68) is inconsistent. % 22.05/3.75 | | | | | | % 22.05/3.75 | | | | | Case 2: % 22.05/3.75 | | | | | | % 22.05/3.75 | | | | | | (69) m1_subset_1(all_48_1, all_62_0) % 22.05/3.75 | | | | | | (70) ~ m1_subset_1(all_48_2, all_62_0) | ? [v0: $i] : ($i(v0) & % 22.05/3.75 | | | | | | r1_tarski(v0, all_179_0) & r2_hidden(v0, all_48_1)) % 22.05/3.75 | | | | | | % 22.05/3.75 | | | | | | BETA: splitting (70) gives: % 22.05/3.75 | | | | | | % 22.05/3.75 | | | | | | Case 1: % 22.05/3.75 | | | | | | | % 22.05/3.75 | | | | | | | (71) ~ m1_subset_1(all_48_2, all_62_0) % 22.05/3.75 | | | | | | | % 22.05/3.75 | | | | | | | REDUCE: (39), (71) imply: % 22.05/3.75 | | | | | | | (72) ~ m1_subset_1(all_48_2, all_48_3) % 22.05/3.75 | | | | | | | % 22.05/3.75 | | | | | | | PRED_UNIFY: (6), (72) imply: % 22.05/3.75 | | | | | | | (73) $false % 22.05/3.75 | | | | | | | % 22.05/3.75 | | | | | | | CLOSE: (73) is inconsistent. % 22.05/3.75 | | | | | | | % 22.05/3.75 | | | | | | Case 2: % 22.05/3.75 | | | | | | | % 22.05/3.75 | | | | | | | (74) ? [v0: $i] : ($i(v0) & r1_tarski(v0, all_179_0) & % 22.05/3.75 | | | | | | | r2_hidden(v0, all_48_1)) % 22.05/3.75 | | | | | | | % 22.05/3.75 | | | | | | | DELTA: instantiating (74) with fresh symbol all_196_0 gives: % 22.05/3.75 | | | | | | | (75) $i(all_196_0) & r1_tarski(all_196_0, all_179_0) & % 22.05/3.75 | | | | | | | r2_hidden(all_196_0, all_48_1) % 22.05/3.75 | | | | | | | % 22.05/3.75 | | | | | | | ALPHA: (75) implies: % 22.05/3.75 | | | | | | | (76) r2_hidden(all_196_0, all_48_1) % 22.05/3.75 | | | | | | | (77) r1_tarski(all_196_0, all_179_0) % 22.05/3.75 | | | | | | | (78) $i(all_196_0) % 22.05/3.75 | | | | | | | % 22.05/3.75 | | | | | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (31) with all_48_1, all_48_0, % 22.05/3.75 | | | | | | | all_196_0, simplifying with (10), (15), (16), (76), % 22.05/3.75 | | | | | | | (78) gives: % 22.05/3.75 | | | | | | | (79) ~ m1_subset_1(all_48_0, all_62_0) | ~ % 22.05/3.75 | | | | | | | m1_subset_1(all_48_1, all_62_0) | ? [v0: $i] : ($i(v0) & % 22.05/3.75 | | | | | | | r1_tarski(v0, all_196_0) & r2_hidden(v0, all_48_0)) % 22.05/3.75 | | | | | | | % 22.05/3.75 | | | | | | | BETA: splitting (79) gives: % 22.05/3.75 | | | | | | | % 22.05/3.75 | | | | | | | Case 1: % 22.05/3.75 | | | | | | | | % 22.05/3.75 | | | | | | | | (80) ~ m1_subset_1(all_48_0, all_62_0) % 22.05/3.75 | | | | | | | | % 22.05/3.75 | | | | | | | | REDUCE: (39), (80) imply: % 22.05/3.75 | | | | | | | | (81) ~ m1_subset_1(all_48_0, all_48_3) % 22.05/3.75 | | | | | | | | % 22.05/3.76 | | | | | | | | PRED_UNIFY: (8), (81) imply: % 22.05/3.76 | | | | | | | | (82) $false % 22.05/3.76 | | | | | | | | % 22.05/3.76 | | | | | | | | CLOSE: (82) is inconsistent. % 22.05/3.76 | | | | | | | | % 22.05/3.76 | | | | | | | Case 2: % 22.05/3.76 | | | | | | | | % 22.05/3.76 | | | | | | | | (83) ~ m1_subset_1(all_48_1, all_62_0) | ? [v0: $i] : % 22.05/3.76 | | | | | | | | ($i(v0) & r1_tarski(v0, all_196_0) & r2_hidden(v0, % 22.05/3.76 | | | | | | | | all_48_0)) % 22.05/3.76 | | | | | | | | % 22.05/3.76 | | | | | | | | BETA: splitting (83) gives: % 22.05/3.76 | | | | | | | | % 22.05/3.76 | | | | | | | | Case 1: % 22.05/3.76 | | | | | | | | | % 22.05/3.76 | | | | | | | | | (84) ~ m1_subset_1(all_48_1, all_62_0) % 22.05/3.76 | | | | | | | | | % 22.05/3.76 | | | | | | | | | REDUCE: (39), (84) imply: % 22.05/3.76 | | | | | | | | | (85) ~ m1_subset_1(all_48_1, all_48_3) % 22.05/3.76 | | | | | | | | | % 22.05/3.76 | | | | | | | | | PRED_UNIFY: (7), (85) imply: % 22.05/3.76 | | | | | | | | | (86) $false % 22.05/3.76 | | | | | | | | | % 22.05/3.76 | | | | | | | | | CLOSE: (86) is inconsistent. % 22.05/3.76 | | | | | | | | | % 22.05/3.76 | | | | | | | | Case 2: % 22.05/3.76 | | | | | | | | | % 22.05/3.76 | | | | | | | | | (87) ? [v0: $i] : ($i(v0) & r1_tarski(v0, all_196_0) & % 22.05/3.76 | | | | | | | | | r2_hidden(v0, all_48_0)) % 22.05/3.76 | | | | | | | | | % 22.05/3.76 | | | | | | | | | DELTA: instantiating (87) with fresh symbol all_212_0 gives: % 22.05/3.76 | | | | | | | | | (88) $i(all_212_0) & r1_tarski(all_212_0, all_196_0) & % 22.05/3.76 | | | | | | | | | r2_hidden(all_212_0, all_48_0) % 22.05/3.76 | | | | | | | | | % 22.05/3.76 | | | | | | | | | ALPHA: (88) implies: % 22.05/3.76 | | | | | | | | | (89) r2_hidden(all_212_0, all_48_0) % 22.05/3.76 | | | | | | | | | (90) r1_tarski(all_212_0, all_196_0) % 22.05/3.76 | | | | | | | | | (91) $i(all_212_0) % 22.05/3.76 | | | | | | | | | % 22.05/3.76 | | | | | | | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (t1_xboole_1) with all_212_0, % 22.05/3.76 | | | | | | | | | all_196_0, all_179_0, simplifying with (63), (77), % 22.05/3.76 | | | | | | | | | (78), (90), (91) gives: % 22.05/3.76 | | | | | | | | | (92) r1_tarski(all_212_0, all_179_0) % 22.05/3.76 | | | | | | | | | % 22.05/3.76 | | | | | | | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (64) with all_212_0, simplifying % 22.05/3.76 | | | | | | | | | with (89), (91), (92) gives: % 22.05/3.76 | | | | | | | | | (93) $false % 22.05/3.76 | | | | | | | | | % 22.05/3.76 | | | | | | | | | CLOSE: (93) is inconsistent. % 22.05/3.76 | | | | | | | | | % 22.05/3.76 | | | | | | | | End of split % 22.05/3.76 | | | | | | | | % 22.05/3.76 | | | | | | | End of split % 22.05/3.76 | | | | | | | % 22.05/3.76 | | | | | | End of split % 22.05/3.76 | | | | | | % 22.05/3.76 | | | | | End of split % 22.05/3.76 | | | | | % 22.05/3.76 | | | | End of split % 22.05/3.76 | | | | % 22.05/3.76 | | | End of split % 22.05/3.76 | | | % 22.05/3.76 | | End of split % 22.05/3.76 | | % 22.05/3.76 | End of split % 22.05/3.76 | % 22.05/3.76 End of proof % 22.05/3.76 % SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark % 22.05/3.76 % 22.05/3.76 3152ms %------------------------------------------------------------------------------