↑ Up

Leo-III---1.8.0.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Leo-III---1.8.0
% Problem  : ALG254^2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v5.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39

% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Sep 30 07:45:03 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 5.40s 2.54s
% Output   : Refutation 5.40s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    3
%            Number of leaves      :    6
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :    9 (   8 unt;   0 typ;   5 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   29 (  17 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    6 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   60 (   2   ~;   0   |;   4   &;  48   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   6  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   10 (   2 avg)
%            Number of types       :    3 (   2 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :    9 (   7 usr;   7 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   20 (   0   ^;  20   !;   0   ?;  20   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(term_type,type,
    term: $tType ).

thf(subst_type,type,
    subst: $tType ).

thf(id_decl,type,
    id: subst ).

thf(comp_decl,type,
    comp: subst > subst > subst ).

thf(axassoc_decl,type,
    axassoc: $o ).

thf(axidr_decl,type,
    axidr: $o ).

thf(axidl_decl,type,
    axidl: $o ).

thf(substmonoid_lthm_decl,type,
    substmonoid_lthm: $o ).

thf(substmonoid_decl,type,
    substmonoid: $o ).

thf(axassoc_def,definition,
    ( axassoc
    = ( ! [A: subst,B: subst,C: subst] :
          ( ( comp @ ( comp @ A @ B ) @ C )
          = ( comp @ A @ ( comp @ B @ C ) ) ) ) ) ).

thf(axidr_def,definition,
    ( axidr
    = ( ! [A: subst] :
          ( ( comp @ A @ id )
          = A ) ) ) ).

thf(axidl_def,definition,
    ( axidl
    = ( ! [A: subst] :
          ( ( comp @ id @ A )
          = A ) ) ) ).

thf(substmonoid_lthm_def,definition,
    ( substmonoid_lthm
    = ( axidl
     => ( axassoc
       => ( axidr
         => substmonoid ) ) ) ) ).

thf(substmonoid_def,definition,
    ( substmonoid
    = ( ! [A: subst,B: subst,C: subst] :
          ( ( comp @ ( comp @ A @ B ) @ C )
          = ( comp @ A @ ( comp @ B @ C ) ) )
      & ! [A: subst] :
          ( ( comp @ id @ A )
          = A )
      & ! [A: subst] :
          ( ( comp @ A @ id )
          = A ) ) ) ).

thf(1,conjecture,
    substmonoid_lthm,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',thm) ).

thf(2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ substmonoid_lthm,
    inference(neg_conjecture,[status(cth)],[1]) ).

thf(3,plain,
    ~ ( ! [A: subst] :
          ( ( comp @ id @ A )
          = A )
     => ( ! [A: subst,B: subst,C: subst] :
            ( ( comp @ ( comp @ A @ B ) @ C )
            = ( comp @ A @ ( comp @ B @ C ) ) )
       => ( ! [A: subst] :
              ( ( comp @ A @ id )
              = A )
         => ( ! [A: subst,B: subst,C: subst] :
                ( ( comp @ ( comp @ A @ B ) @ C )
                = ( comp @ A @ ( comp @ B @ C ) ) )
            & ! [A: subst] :
                ( ( comp @ id @ A )
                = A )
            & ! [A: subst] :
                ( ( comp @ A @ id )
                = A ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[2]) ).

thf(19,plain,
    $false,
    inference(e,[status(thm)],[3]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : ALG254^2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v5.2.0.
% 0.00/0.07  % Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.10/0.20  % Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.20  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.20  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.20  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.20  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.20  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.20  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/0.20  % DateTime : Tue Sep 29 17:33:52 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.20  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.10/0.21  Running java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.83/0.77  % [INFO] 	 Parsing problem /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ... 
% 1.59/1.08  % [INFO] 	 Parsing done (312ms). 
% 1.59/1.10  % [INFO] 	 Running in sequential loop mode. 
% 2.57/1.47  % [INFO] 	 eprover registered as external prover. 
% 2.57/1.48  % [INFO] 	 Scanning for conjecture ... 
% 3.87/1.93  % [INFO] 	 Found a conjecture (or negated_conjecture) and 0 axioms. Running axiom selection ... 
% 3.87/1.96  % [INFO] 	 Axiom selection finished. Selected 0 axioms (removed 0 axioms). 
% 3.87/1.96  % [INFO] 	 Problem is higher-order (TPTP THF). 
% 3.87/1.96  % [INFO] 	 Type checking passed. 
% 3.87/1.97  % [CONFIG] 	 Using configuration: timeout(300) with strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>.  Searching for refutation ... 
% 5.40/2.54  % External prover 'e' found a proof!
% 5.40/2.54  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
% 5.40/2.54  % Time passed: 2202ms (effective reasoning time: 1439ms)
% 5.40/2.54  % Solved by strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>
% 5.40/2.54  % Axioms used in derivation (0): 
% 5.40/2.54  % No. of inferences in proof: 4
% 5.40/2.54  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : 2202 ms resp. 1439 ms w/o parsing
% 5.40/2.58  % SZS output start Refutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 5.40/2.58  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------