↑ Up

Lash---1.13.THM-Prf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Lash---1.13
% Problem  : ALG259^2 : TPTP v9.2.0. Bugfixed v5.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : lash -P picomus -M modes -p tstp -t %d %s

% Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Oct  9 01:11:35 PM UTC 2025

% Result   : Theorem 0.22s 0.48s
% Output   : Proof 0.22s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (MakeTreeStats fails)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(ty_subst,type,
    subst: $tType ).

thf(ty_term,type,
    term: $tType ).

thf(ty_eigen__1,type,
    eigen__1: term ).

thf(ty_id,type,
    id: subst ).

thf(ty_comp,type,
    comp: subst > subst > subst ).

thf(ty_lam,type,
    lam: term > term ).

thf(ty_eigen__2,type,
    eigen__2: term ).

thf(ty_sub,type,
    sub: term > subst > term ).

thf(ty_eigen__0,type,
    eigen__0: subst > term > term ).

thf(ty_one,type,
    one: term ).

thf(ty_sh,type,
    sh: subst ).

thf(ty_ap,type,
    ap: term > term > term ).

thf(sP1,plain,
    ( sP1
  <=> ! [X1: term] :
        ( ( lam @ ( eigen__0 @ sh @ one ) )
       != ( ap @ ( sub @ eigen__1 @ id ) @ X1 ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP1])]) ).

thf(sP2,plain,
    ( sP2
  <=> ! [X1: term,X2: term,X3: term] :
        ( ( lam @ X1 )
       != ( ap @ X2 @ X3 ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP2])]) ).

thf(sP3,plain,
    ( sP3
  <=> ( ( lam @ ( eigen__0 @ sh @ one ) )
      = ( ap @ ( sub @ eigen__1 @ id ) @ eigen__2 ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP3])]) ).

thf(sP4,plain,
    ( sP4
  <=> ! [X1: term,X2: term] :
        ( ( lam @ ( eigen__0 @ sh @ one ) )
       != ( ap @ X1 @ X2 ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP4])]) ).

thf(def_lamnotap,definition,
    ( lamnotap
    = ( ! [X1: term,X2: term,X3: term] :
          ( (~)
          @ ( ( lam @ X1 )
            = ( ap @ X2 @ X3 ) ) ) ) ) ).

thf(def_hoasap,definition,
    ( hoasap
    = ( ^ [X1: subst,X2: term,X3: subst,X4: term] : ( ap @ ( sub @ X2 @ X3 ) @ X4 ) ) ) ).

thf(def_hoaslam,definition,
    ( hoaslam
    = ( ^ [X1: subst,X2: subst > term > term] : ( lam @ ( X2 @ sh @ one ) ) ) ) ).

thf(def_hoaslamnotap,definition,
    ( hoaslamnotap
    = ( ! [X1: subst > term > term] :
          ( ^ [X2: $o,X3: $o] :
              ( X2
             => X3 )
          @ ! [X2: subst,X3: term,X4: subst] :
              ( ( sub @ ( X1 @ X2 @ X3 ) @ X4 )
              = ( X1 @ ( comp @ X2 @ X4 ) @ ( sub @ X3 @ X4 ) ) )
          @ ! [X2: term,X3: term] :
              ( (~)
              @ ( ( hoaslam @ id
                  @ ^ [X4: subst,X5: term] : ( X1 @ X4 @ X5 ) )
                = ( hoasap @ id @ X2 @ id @ X3 ) ) ) ) ) ) ).

thf(def_hoaslamnotap_lthm,definition,
    ( hoaslamnotap_lthm
    = ( ^ [X1: $o,X2: $o] :
          ( X1
         => X2 )
      @ lamnotap
      @ hoaslamnotap ) ) ).

thf(thm,conjecture,
    ( sP2
   => ! [X1: subst > term > term] :
        ( ! [X2: subst,X3: term,X4: subst] :
            ( ( sub @ ( X1 @ X2 @ X3 ) @ X4 )
            = ( X1 @ ( comp @ X2 @ X4 ) @ ( sub @ X3 @ X4 ) ) )
       => ! [X2: term,X3: term] :
            ( ( lam @ ( X1 @ sh @ one ) )
           != ( ap @ ( sub @ X2 @ id ) @ X3 ) ) ) ) ).

thf(h0,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( sP2
     => ! [X1: subst > term > term] :
          ( ! [X2: subst,X3: term,X4: subst] :
              ( ( sub @ ( X1 @ X2 @ X3 ) @ X4 )
              = ( X1 @ ( comp @ X2 @ X4 ) @ ( sub @ X3 @ X4 ) ) )
         => ! [X2: term,X3: term] :
              ( ( lam @ ( X1 @ sh @ one ) )
             != ( ap @ ( sub @ X2 @ id ) @ X3 ) ) ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[thm]) ).

thf(h1,assumption,
    sP2,
    introduced(assumption,[]) ).

thf(h2,assumption,
    ~ ! [X1: subst > term > term] :
        ( ! [X2: subst,X3: term,X4: subst] :
            ( ( sub @ ( X1 @ X2 @ X3 ) @ X4 )
            = ( X1 @ ( comp @ X2 @ X4 ) @ ( sub @ X3 @ X4 ) ) )
       => ! [X2: term,X3: term] :
            ( ( lam @ ( X1 @ sh @ one ) )
           != ( ap @ ( sub @ X2 @ id ) @ X3 ) ) ),
    introduced(assumption,[]) ).

thf(h3,assumption,
    ~ ( ! [X1: subst,X2: term,X3: subst] :
          ( ( sub @ ( eigen__0 @ X1 @ X2 ) @ X3 )
          = ( eigen__0 @ ( comp @ X1 @ X3 ) @ ( sub @ X2 @ X3 ) ) )
     => ! [X1: term,X2: term] :
          ( ( lam @ ( eigen__0 @ sh @ one ) )
         != ( ap @ ( sub @ X1 @ id ) @ X2 ) ) ),
    introduced(assumption,[]) ).

thf(h4,assumption,
    ! [X1: subst,X2: term,X3: subst] :
      ( ( sub @ ( eigen__0 @ X1 @ X2 ) @ X3 )
      = ( eigen__0 @ ( comp @ X1 @ X3 ) @ ( sub @ X2 @ X3 ) ) ),
    introduced(assumption,[]) ).

thf(h5,assumption,
    ~ ! [X1: term,X2: term] :
        ( ( lam @ ( eigen__0 @ sh @ one ) )
       != ( ap @ ( sub @ X1 @ id ) @ X2 ) ),
    introduced(assumption,[]) ).

thf(h6,assumption,
    ~ sP1,
    introduced(assumption,[]) ).

thf(h7,assumption,
    sP3,
    introduced(assumption,[]) ).

thf(1,plain,
    ( ~ sP1
    | ~ sP3 ),
    inference(all_rule,[status(thm)],[]) ).

thf(2,plain,
    ( ~ sP4
    | sP1 ),
    inference(all_rule,[status(thm)],[]) ).

thf(3,plain,
    ( ~ sP2
    | sP4 ),
    inference(all_rule,[status(thm)],[]) ).

thf(4,plain,
    $false,
    inference(prop_unsat,[status(thm),assumptions([h7,h6,h4,h5,h3,h1,h2,h0])],[1,2,3,h1,h7]) ).

thf(5,plain,
    $false,
    inference(tab_negall,[status(thm),assumptions([h6,h4,h5,h3,h1,h2,h0]),tab_negall(discharge,[h7]),tab_negall(eigenvar,eigen__2)],[h6,4,h7]) ).

thf(6,plain,
    $false,
    inference(tab_negall,[status(thm),assumptions([h4,h5,h3,h1,h2,h0]),tab_negall(discharge,[h6]),tab_negall(eigenvar,eigen__1)],[h5,5,h6]) ).

thf(7,plain,
    $false,
    inference(tab_negimp,[status(thm),assumptions([h3,h1,h2,h0]),tab_negimp(discharge,[h4,h5])],[h3,6,h4,h5]) ).

thf(8,plain,
    $false,
    inference(tab_negall,[status(thm),assumptions([h1,h2,h0]),tab_negall(discharge,[h3]),tab_negall(eigenvar,eigen__0)],[h2,7,h3]) ).

thf(9,plain,
    $false,
    inference(tab_negimp,[status(thm),assumptions([h0]),tab_negimp(discharge,[h1,h2])],[h0,8,h1,h2]) ).

thf(0,theorem,
    ( sP2
   => ! [X1: subst > term > term] :
        ( ! [X2: subst,X3: term,X4: subst] :
            ( ( sub @ ( X1 @ X2 @ X3 ) @ X4 )
            = ( X1 @ ( comp @ X2 @ X4 ) @ ( sub @ X3 @ X4 ) ) )
       => ! [X2: term,X3: term] :
            ( ( lam @ ( X1 @ sh @ one ) )
           != ( ap @ ( sub @ X2 @ id ) @ X3 ) ) ) ),
    inference(contra,[status(thm),contra(discharge,[h0])],[9,h0]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.13  % Problem  : ALG259^2 : TPTP v9.2.0. Bugfixed v5.2.0.
% 0.13/0.14  % Command  : lash -P picomus -M modes -p tstp -t %d %s
% 0.14/0.36  % Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.36  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.36  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.14/0.36  % DateTime : Wed Oct  8 23:26:53 EDT 2025
% 0.22/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.22/0.48  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.22/0.48  % Mode: cade22sinegrackle2x6978
% 0.22/0.48  % Steps: 611
% 0.22/0.48  % SZS output start Proof
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------