↑ Up

Leo-III---1.8.0.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Leo-III---1.8.0
% Problem  : ALG261^2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v5.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39

% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Sep 30 07:45:04 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 4.84s 1.67s
% Output   : Refutation 4.84s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    3
%            Number of leaves      :    7
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   10 (   9 unt;   0 typ;   6 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   24 (   8 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   40 (   6   ~;   0   |;   0   &;  30   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   4  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   14 (   2 avg)
%            Number of types       :    3 (   2 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :   12 (  10 usr;   6 con; 0-4 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   16 (   6   ^;  10   !;   0   ?;  16   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(term_type,type,
    term: $tType ).

thf(subst_type,type,
    subst: $tType ).

thf(ap_decl,type,
    ap: term > term > term ).

thf(sub_decl,type,
    sub: term > subst > term ).

thf(id_decl,type,
    id: subst ).

thf(var_decl,type,
    var: term > $o ).

thf(hoasap_decl,type,
    hoasap: subst > term > subst > term > term ).

thf(apnotvar_decl,type,
    apnotvar: $o ).

thf(hoasapnotvar_decl,type,
    hoasapnotvar: $o ).

thf(hoasvar_decl,type,
    hoasvar: subst > term > subst > $o ).

thf(hoasapnotvar_lthm_decl,type,
    hoasapnotvar_lthm: $o ).

thf(axvarid_decl,type,
    axvarid: $o ).

thf(hoasap_def,definition,
    ( hoasap
    = ( ^ [A: subst,B: term,C: subst] : ( ap @ ( sub @ B @ C ) ) ) ) ).

thf(apnotvar_def,definition,
    ( apnotvar
    = ( ! [A: term,B: term] :
          ~ ( var @ ( ap @ A @ B ) ) ) ) ).

thf(hoasapnotvar_def,definition,
    ( hoasapnotvar
    = ( ! [A: term,B: term] :
          ~ ( hoasvar @ id @ ( hoasap @ id @ A @ id @ B ) @ id ) ) ) ).

thf(hoasvar_def,definition,
    ( hoasvar
    = ( ^ [A: subst,B: term,C: subst] : ( var @ ( sub @ B @ C ) ) ) ) ).

thf(hoasapnotvar_lthm_def,definition,
    ( hoasapnotvar_lthm
    = ( axvarid
     => ( apnotvar
       => hoasapnotvar ) ) ) ).

thf(axvarid_def,definition,
    ( axvarid
    = ( ! [A: term] :
          ( ( sub @ A @ id )
          = A ) ) ) ).

thf(1,conjecture,
    hoasapnotvar_lthm,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',thm) ).

thf(2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ hoasapnotvar_lthm,
    inference(neg_conjecture,[status(cth)],[1]) ).

thf(3,plain,
    ~ ( ! [A: term] :
          ( ( sub @ A @ id )
          = A )
     => ( ! [A: term,B: term] :
            ~ ( var @ ( ap @ A @ B ) )
       => ! [A: term,B: term] :
            ~ ( var @ ( sub @ ( ap @ ( sub @ A @ id ) @ B ) @ id ) ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[2]) ).

thf(12,plain,
    $false,
    inference(e,[status(thm)],[3]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : ALG261^2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v5.2.0.
% 0.00/0.08  % Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.11/0.21  % Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.21  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.21  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.21  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/0.21  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/0.21  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.21  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.11/0.21  % DateTime : Tue Sep 29 17:34:42 UTC 2026
% 0.11/0.22  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.11/0.22  Running java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.64/0.55  % [INFO] 	 Parsing problem /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ... 
% 1.75/0.83  % [INFO] 	 Parsing done (275ms). 
% 1.75/0.83  % [INFO] 	 Running in sequential loop mode. 
% 2.67/1.08  % [INFO] 	 eprover registered as external prover. 
% 2.67/1.08  % [INFO] 	 Scanning for conjecture ... 
% 3.75/1.36  % [INFO] 	 Found a conjecture (or negated_conjecture) and 0 axioms. Running axiom selection ... 
% 3.75/1.38  % [INFO] 	 Axiom selection finished. Selected 0 axioms (removed 0 axioms). 
% 3.75/1.38  % [INFO] 	 Problem is higher-order (TPTP THF). 
% 3.75/1.38  % [INFO] 	 Type checking passed. 
% 3.75/1.38  % [CONFIG] 	 Using configuration: timeout(300) with strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>.  Searching for refutation ... 
% 4.84/1.67  % External prover 'e' found a proof!
% 4.84/1.67  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
% 4.84/1.67  % Time passed: 1353ms (effective reasoning time: 832ms)
% 4.84/1.67  % Solved by strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>
% 4.84/1.67  % Axioms used in derivation (0): 
% 4.84/1.67  % No. of inferences in proof: 4
% 4.84/1.67  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : 1353 ms resp. 832 ms w/o parsing
% 4.84/1.70  % SZS output start Refutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 4.84/1.70  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------