↑ Up

Duper---1.0.THM-Prf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Duper---1.0
% Problem  : ALG281^5 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : duper %s

% Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Oct  3 07:44:16 PM UTC 2025

% Result   : Theorem 6.05s 6.29s
% Output   : Proof 6.05s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.09  % Problem    : ALG281^5 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.03/0.10  % Command    : duper %s
% 0.10/0.30  % Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.30  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.30  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.30  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.10/0.30  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.10/0.30  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.10/0.30  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.10/0.30  % DateTime   : Fri Oct  3 09:09:08 EDT 2025
% 0.10/0.30  % CPUTime    : 
% 6.05/6.29  SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 6.05/6.29  SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark.p
% 6.05/6.29  Clause #0 (by assumption #[]): Eq
% 6.05/6.29    (Not
% 6.05/6.29      (And (And (∀ (Xx Xy Xz : Iota), Eq (cP (cP Xx Xy) Xz) (cP Xx (cP Xy Xz))) (∀ (Xx : Iota), Eq (cP cE Xx) Xx))
% 6.05/6.29          (∀ (Xy : Iota), Eq (cP (cJ Xy) Xy) cE) →
% 6.05/6.29        ∀ (X : Iota), Eq (cP X (cJ X)) cE))
% 6.05/6.29    True
% 6.05/6.29  Clause #1 (by clausification #[0]): Eq
% 6.05/6.29    (And (And (∀ (Xx Xy Xz : Iota), Eq (cP (cP Xx Xy) Xz) (cP Xx (cP Xy Xz))) (∀ (Xx : Iota), Eq (cP cE Xx) Xx))
% 6.05/6.29        (∀ (Xy : Iota), Eq (cP (cJ Xy) Xy) cE) →
% 6.05/6.29      ∀ (X : Iota), Eq (cP X (cJ X)) cE)
% 6.05/6.29    False
% 6.05/6.29  Clause #2 (by clausification #[1]): Eq
% 6.05/6.29    (And (And (∀ (Xx Xy Xz : Iota), Eq (cP (cP Xx Xy) Xz) (cP Xx (cP Xy Xz))) (∀ (Xx : Iota), Eq (cP cE Xx) Xx))
% 6.05/6.29      (∀ (Xy : Iota), Eq (cP (cJ Xy) Xy) cE))
% 6.05/6.29    True
% 6.05/6.29  Clause #3 (by clausification #[1]): Eq (∀ (X : Iota), Eq (cP X (cJ X)) cE) False
% 6.05/6.29  Clause #4 (by clausification #[2]): Eq (∀ (Xy : Iota), Eq (cP (cJ Xy) Xy) cE) True
% 6.05/6.29  Clause #5 (by clausification #[2]): Eq (And (∀ (Xx Xy Xz : Iota), Eq (cP (cP Xx Xy) Xz) (cP Xx (cP Xy Xz))) (∀ (Xx : Iota), Eq (cP cE Xx) Xx)) True
% 6.05/6.29  Clause #6 (by clausification #[4]): ∀ (a : Iota), Eq (Eq (cP (cJ a) a) cE) True
% 6.05/6.29  Clause #7 (by clausification #[6]): ∀ (a : Iota), Eq (cP (cJ a) a) cE
% 6.05/6.29  Clause #8 (by clausification #[3]): ∀ (a : Iota), Eq (Not (Eq (cP (skS.0 0 a) (cJ (skS.0 0 a))) cE)) True
% 6.05/6.29  Clause #9 (by clausification #[8]): ∀ (a : Iota), Eq (Eq (cP (skS.0 0 a) (cJ (skS.0 0 a))) cE) False
% 6.05/6.29  Clause #10 (by clausification #[9]): ∀ (a : Iota), Ne (cP (skS.0 0 a) (cJ (skS.0 0 a))) cE
% 6.05/6.29  Clause #11 (by clausification #[5]): Eq (∀ (Xx : Iota), Eq (cP cE Xx) Xx) True
% 6.05/6.29  Clause #12 (by clausification #[5]): Eq (∀ (Xx Xy Xz : Iota), Eq (cP (cP Xx Xy) Xz) (cP Xx (cP Xy Xz))) True
% 6.05/6.29  Clause #13 (by clausification #[11]): ∀ (a : Iota), Eq (Eq (cP cE a) a) True
% 6.05/6.29  Clause #14 (by clausification #[13]): ∀ (a : Iota), Eq (cP cE a) a
% 6.05/6.29  Clause #15 (by clausification #[12]): ∀ (a : Iota), Eq (∀ (Xy Xz : Iota), Eq (cP (cP a Xy) Xz) (cP a (cP Xy Xz))) True
% 6.05/6.29  Clause #16 (by clausification #[15]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota), Eq (∀ (Xz : Iota), Eq (cP (cP a a_1) Xz) (cP a (cP a_1 Xz))) True
% 6.05/6.29  Clause #17 (by clausification #[16]): ∀ (a a_1 a_2 : Iota), Eq (Eq (cP (cP a a_1) a_2) (cP a (cP a_1 a_2))) True
% 6.05/6.29  Clause #18 (by clausification #[17]): ∀ (a a_1 a_2 : Iota), Eq (cP (cP a a_1) a_2) (cP a (cP a_1 a_2))
% 6.05/6.29  Clause #20 (by superposition #[18, 7]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota), Eq (cP cE a) (cP (cJ a_1) (cP a_1 a))
% 6.05/6.29  Clause #33 (by forward demodulation #[20, 14]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota), Eq a (cP (cJ a_1) (cP a_1 a))
% 6.05/6.29  Clause #38 (by superposition #[33, 7]): ∀ (a : Iota), Eq a (cP (cJ (cJ a)) cE)
% 6.05/6.29  Clause #49 (by superposition #[38, 33]): ∀ (a : Iota), Eq cE (cP (cJ (cJ (cJ a))) a)
% 6.05/6.29  Clause #107 (by superposition #[49, 33]): ∀ (a : Iota), Eq a (cP (cJ (cJ (cJ (cJ a)))) cE)
% 6.05/6.29  Clause #110 (by superposition #[107, 38]): ∀ (a : Iota), Eq (cJ (cJ a)) a
% 6.05/6.29  Clause #118 (by superposition #[110, 7]): ∀ (a : Iota), Eq (cP a (cJ a)) cE
% 6.05/6.29  Clause #161 (by backward contextual literal cutting #[118, 10]): False
% 6.05/6.29  SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark.p
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------