↑ Up

Duper---1.0.THM-Prf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Duper---1.0
% Problem  : ALG287^5 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : duper %s

% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Oct  3 07:44:16 PM UTC 2025

% Result   : Theorem 3.55s 3.75s
% Output   : Proof 3.55s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem    : ALG287^5 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.07/0.13  % Command    : duper %s
% 0.12/0.34  % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % DateTime   : Fri Oct  3 09:40:08 EDT 2025
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime    : 
% 3.55/3.75  SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 3.55/3.75  SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark.p
% 3.55/3.75  Clause #0 (by assumption #[]): Eq
% 3.55/3.75    (Not
% 3.55/3.75      (And
% 3.55/3.75          (And (And (And (Eq (cL cZ) cZ) (Eq (cR cZ) cZ)) (∀ (Xx0 Xy0 : a), Eq (cL (cP Xx0 Xy0)) Xx0))
% 3.55/3.75            (∀ (Xx0 Xy0 : a), Eq (cR (cP Xx0 Xy0)) Xy0))
% 3.55/3.75          (∀ (Xt : a), Iff (Ne Xt cZ) (Eq Xt (cP (cL Xt) (cR Xt)))) →
% 3.55/3.75        Eq (cP x u) (cP y v) → And (Eq x y) (Eq u v)))
% 3.55/3.75    True
% 3.55/3.75  Clause #1 (by clausification #[0]): Eq
% 3.55/3.75    (And
% 3.55/3.75        (And (And (And (Eq (cL cZ) cZ) (Eq (cR cZ) cZ)) (∀ (Xx0 Xy0 : a), Eq (cL (cP Xx0 Xy0)) Xx0))
% 3.55/3.75          (∀ (Xx0 Xy0 : a), Eq (cR (cP Xx0 Xy0)) Xy0))
% 3.55/3.75        (∀ (Xt : a), Iff (Ne Xt cZ) (Eq Xt (cP (cL Xt) (cR Xt)))) →
% 3.55/3.75      Eq (cP x u) (cP y v) → And (Eq x y) (Eq u v))
% 3.55/3.75    False
% 3.55/3.75  Clause #2 (by clausification #[1]): Eq
% 3.55/3.75    (And
% 3.55/3.75      (And (And (And (Eq (cL cZ) cZ) (Eq (cR cZ) cZ)) (∀ (Xx0 Xy0 : a), Eq (cL (cP Xx0 Xy0)) Xx0))
% 3.55/3.75        (∀ (Xx0 Xy0 : a), Eq (cR (cP Xx0 Xy0)) Xy0))
% 3.55/3.75      (∀ (Xt : a), Iff (Ne Xt cZ) (Eq Xt (cP (cL Xt) (cR Xt)))))
% 3.55/3.75    True
% 3.55/3.75  Clause #3 (by clausification #[1]): Eq (Eq (cP x u) (cP y v) → And (Eq x y) (Eq u v)) False
% 3.55/3.75  Clause #5 (by clausification #[2]): Eq
% 3.55/3.75    (And (And (And (Eq (cL cZ) cZ) (Eq (cR cZ) cZ)) (∀ (Xx0 Xy0 : a), Eq (cL (cP Xx0 Xy0)) Xx0))
% 3.55/3.75      (∀ (Xx0 Xy0 : a), Eq (cR (cP Xx0 Xy0)) Xy0))
% 3.55/3.75    True
% 3.55/3.75  Clause #12 (by clausification #[3]): Eq (Eq (cP x u) (cP y v)) True
% 3.55/3.75  Clause #13 (by clausification #[3]): Eq (And (Eq x y) (Eq u v)) False
% 3.55/3.75  Clause #14 (by clausification #[12]): Eq (cP x u) (cP y v)
% 3.55/3.75  Clause #15 (by clausification #[13]): Or (Eq (Eq x y) False) (Eq (Eq u v) False)
% 3.55/3.75  Clause #16 (by clausification #[15]): Or (Eq (Eq u v) False) (Ne x y)
% 3.55/3.75  Clause #17 (by clausification #[16]): Or (Ne x y) (Ne u v)
% 3.55/3.75  Clause #24 (by clausification #[5]): Eq (∀ (Xx0 Xy0 : a), Eq (cR (cP Xx0 Xy0)) Xy0) True
% 3.55/3.75  Clause #25 (by clausification #[5]): Eq (And (And (Eq (cL cZ) cZ) (Eq (cR cZ) cZ)) (∀ (Xx0 Xy0 : a), Eq (cL (cP Xx0 Xy0)) Xx0)) True
% 3.55/3.75  Clause #26 (by clausification #[24]): ∀ (a_1 : a), Eq (∀ (Xy0 : a), Eq (cR (cP a_1 Xy0)) Xy0) True
% 3.55/3.75  Clause #27 (by clausification #[26]): ∀ (a_1 a_2 : a), Eq (Eq (cR (cP a_1 a_2)) a_2) True
% 3.55/3.75  Clause #28 (by clausification #[27]): ∀ (a_1 a_2 : a), Eq (cR (cP a_1 a_2)) a_2
% 3.55/3.75  Clause #30 (by superposition #[28, 14]): Eq (cR (cP x u)) v
% 3.55/3.75  Clause #31 (by superposition #[30, 28]): Eq v u
% 3.55/3.75  Clause #33 (by backward demodulation #[31, 14]): Eq (cP x u) (cP y u)
% 3.55/3.75  Clause #36 (by backward contextual literal cutting #[31, 17]): Ne x y
% 3.55/3.75  Clause #98 (by clausification #[25]): Eq (∀ (Xx0 Xy0 : a), Eq (cL (cP Xx0 Xy0)) Xx0) True
% 3.55/3.75  Clause #100 (by clausification #[98]): ∀ (a_1 : a), Eq (∀ (Xy0 : a), Eq (cL (cP a_1 Xy0)) a_1) True
% 3.55/3.75  Clause #101 (by clausification #[100]): ∀ (a_1 a_2 : a), Eq (Eq (cL (cP a_1 a_2)) a_1) True
% 3.55/3.75  Clause #102 (by clausification #[101]): ∀ (a_1 a_2 : a), Eq (cL (cP a_1 a_2)) a_1
% 3.55/3.75  Clause #108 (by superposition #[102, 33]): Eq (cL (cP x u)) y
% 3.55/3.75  Clause #111 (by superposition #[108, 102]): Eq y x
% 3.55/3.75  Clause #122 (by forward contextual literal cutting #[111, 36]): False
% 3.55/3.75  SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark.p
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------