%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : ALG300-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 11:55:53 AM UTC 2026
% Result : Satisfiable 0.28s 0.54s
% Output : Saturation 0.28s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (Could not find formula named c_0_2ERROR: Could not build tree for root c_0_4ERROR: MakeTreeStats fails)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(c_0_3,axiom,
product(product(product(product(X1,X1),X1),X2),product(X1,X3)) = X2,
sos01,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_4,plain,
tptp1 != tptp0,
c_0_2,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_5,plain,
product(product(product(product(product(product(product(X1,X1),X1),X2),product(product(product(X1,X1),X1),X2)),product(product(product(X1,X1),X1),X2)),X3),X2) = X3,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3,c_0_3]),
[final] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : ALG300-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.16/0.40 % Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% 0.16/0.40 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.16/0.40 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.16/0.40 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.16/0.40 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.16/0.40 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.16/0.40 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.16/0.40 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 13:10:35 UTC 2026
% 0.16/0.40 % CPUTime :
% 0.16/0.40 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.19/0.49 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.19/0.49 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.28/0.54 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.28/0.54 % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.28/0.54 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.28/0.54 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.28/0.54 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.28/0.54 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.28/0.54 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.28/0.54 % G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with pid 1163256 completed with status 1
% 0.28/0.54 % Result found by G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN
% 0.28/0.54 % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.28/0.54 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.28/0.54 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.28/0.54 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.28/0.54 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.28/0.54 % Search class: FUUPF-FFSF22-MFFFFFNN
% 0.28/0.54 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.28/0.54 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.28/0.54 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.28/0.54 % Starting U----_102_C09_12_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 234s (1) cores
% 0.28/0.54 % Starting new_bool_3 with 234s (1) cores
% 0.28/0.54 % Starting new_bool_1 with 234s (1) cores
% 0.28/0.54 % SubtermCWHack with pid 1163259 completed with status 1
% 0.28/0.54 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.28/0.54 % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.28/0.54 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.28/0.54 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.28/0.54 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.28/0.54 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.28/0.54 % Search class: FUUPF-FFSF22-MFFFFFNN
% 0.28/0.54 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.28/0.54 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.28/0.54 % Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.28/0.54
% 0.28/0.54 % No proof found!
% 0.28/0.54 % SZS status Satisfiable
% 0.28/0.54 % SZS output start Saturation
% See solution above
% 0.28/0.54 % Parsed axioms : 2
% 0.28/0.54 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.28/0.54 % Initial clauses : 2
% 0.28/0.54 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.28/0.54 % Initial clauses in saturation : 2
% 0.28/0.54 % Processed clauses : 3
% 0.28/0.54 % ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.28/0.54 % ...subsumed : 0
% 0.28/0.54 % ...remaining for further processing : 3
% 0.28/0.54 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.28/0.54 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.28/0.54 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.28/0.54 % Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.28/0.54 % Generated clauses : 2
% 0.28/0.54 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 1
% 0.28/0.54 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.28/0.54 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.28/0.54 % Paramodulations : 2
% 0.28/0.54 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.28/0.54 % NegExts : 0
% 0.28/0.54 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.28/0.54 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.28/0.54 % Total rewrite steps : 1
% 0.28/0.54 % ...of those cached : 0
% 0.28/0.54 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.28/0.54 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.28/0.54 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.28/0.54 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.28/0.54 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.28/0.54 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.28/0.54 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.28/0.54 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.28/0.54 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.28/0.54 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.28/0.54 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.28/0.54 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.28/0.54 % Current number of processed clauses : 3
% 0.28/0.54 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 2
% 0.28/0.54 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.28/0.54 % Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.28/0.54 % Non-unit-clauses : 0
% 0.28/0.54 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.28/0.54 % ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.28/0.54 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.28/0.54 % Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 0.28/0.54 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.28/0.54 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.28/0.54 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.28/0.54 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.28/0.54 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.28/0.54 % BW rewrite match attempts : 2
% 0.28/0.54 % BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.28/0.54 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.28/0.54 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.28/0.54 % Termbank termtop insertions : 112
% 0.28/0.54 % Search garbage collected termcells : 2
% 0.28/0.54
% 0.28/0.54 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.28/0.54 % User time : 0.005 s
% 0.28/0.54 % System time : 0.001 s
% 0.28/0.54 % Total time : 0.006 s
% 0.28/0.54 % Maximum resident set size: 3576 pages
% 0.28/0.54
% 0.28/0.54 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.28/0.54 % User time : 0.010 s
% 0.28/0.54 % System time : 0.011 s
% 0.28/0.54 % Total time : 0.021 s
% 0.28/0.54 % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 0.28/0.54 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------