↑ Up

Prover9---2026-6A.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---2026-6A
% Problem  : ALG348-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 06:50:03 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 19.86s 2.97s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 19.86s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    3
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :    8 (   6 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   10 (   5 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :    6 (   4   ~;   2   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    7 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   4 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   11 (   0 sgn   4   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(clsarity_Complex__Ocomplex__Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__0,axiom,
    class_Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__0(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
    file('theBenchmark.p',clsarity_Complex__Ocomplex__Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__0) ).

cnf(c_1564,plain,
    class_Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__0(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[clsarity_Complex__Ocomplex__Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__0]) ).

fof(cls_conjecture_0,axiom,
    c_Polynomial_Opoly(c_Fundamental__Theorem__Algebra__Mirabelle_Ooffset__poly(v_p,v_a,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),v_x,tc_Complex_Ocomplex) != c_Polynomial_Opoly(v_p,c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(v_a,v_x,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
    file('theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).

cnf(c_1587,plain,
    c_Polynomial_Opoly(c_Fundamental__Theorem__Algebra__Mirabelle_Ooffset__poly(v_p,v_a,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),v_x,tc_Complex_Ocomplex) != c_Polynomial_Opoly(v_p,c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(v_a,v_x,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_0]) ).

fof(cls_poly__offset__poly_0,axiom,
    ! [VAR_0,VAR_1,VAR_2,VAR_3] :
      ( c_Polynomial_Opoly(c_Fundamental__Theorem__Algebra__Mirabelle_Ooffset__poly(VAR_1,VAR_2,VAR_0),VAR_3,VAR_0) = c_Polynomial_Opoly(VAR_1,c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(VAR_2,VAR_3,VAR_0),VAR_0)
      | ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__0(VAR_0) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',cls_poly__offset__poly_0) ).

cnf(c_1596,plain,
    ( c_Polynomial_Opoly(c_Fundamental__Theorem__Algebra__Mirabelle_Ooffset__poly(B,C,A),D,A) = c_Polynomial_Opoly(B,c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(C,D,A),A)
    | ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__0(A) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[cls_poly__offset__poly_0]) ).

cnf(c_7163,plain,
    c_Polynomial_Opoly(c_Fundamental__Theorem__Algebra__Mirabelle_Ooffset__poly(A,B,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),C,tc_Complex_Ocomplex) = c_Polynomial_Opoly(A,c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(B,C,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_1596,c_1564]) ).

cnf(c_7164,plain,
    $false,
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_7163,c_1587]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : ALG348-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.10/0.37  % Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.37  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.37  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.37  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.37  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/0.37  % DateTime : Sat Sep 26 21:53:50 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.37  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.10/0.38  % Prover9 (64) version 2026-6A, July 2026, CASC-J13.
% 0.10/0.38  % Process 2197184 was started by sandbox2 on n006,
% 0.10/0.38  % Sat Sep 26 21:53:50 2026
% 0.10/0.38  % The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p".
% 0.10/0.41  
% 0.10/0.41  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 19.86/2.97  
% 19.86/2.97  % given #500 (I,wt=29): 1506 c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(A,B,tc_RealDef_Oreal),c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(C,B,tc_RealDef_Oreal),tc_RealDef_Oreal) | -c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(A,C,tc_RealDef_Oreal) | -c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_RealDef_Oreal),B,tc_RealDef_Oreal).  [resolve(42,a,56,a)].
% 19.86/2.97  
% 19.86/2.97  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 19.86/2.97  
% 19.86/2.97  % Proof 1 at 2.46 (+ 0.09) seconds.
% 19.86/2.97  % Length of proof is 5.
% 19.86/2.97  % Level of proof is 2.
% 19.86/2.97  % Maximum clause weight is 32.000.
% 19.86/2.97  % Given clauses 587.
% 19.86/2.97  
% 19.86/2.97  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------