↑ Up

SNARK---20120808r022.UNS-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SNARK---20120808r022
% Problem  : ALG361-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run-snark %s %d

% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 14 18:00:38 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.59s 0.76s
% Output   : Refutation 0.59s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    2
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :    6 (   4 unt;   0 nHn;   6 RR)
%            Number of literals    :    9 (   0 equ;   5 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   3 usr;   2 prp; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   5 con; 0-5 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    2 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_that_0,axiom,
    ( v_thesis____
    | ~ c_SEQ_Omonoseq(c_COMBB(c_Complex_ORe,c_COMBB(v_s,X,tc_nat,tc_Complex_Ocomplex,tc_nat),tc_Complex_Ocomplex,tc_RealDef_Oreal,tc_nat))
    | ~ c_SEQ_Osubseq(X) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_that_0) ).

cnf(cls_CHAINED_1,axiom,
    c_SEQ_Omonoseq(c_COMBB(c_Complex_ORe,c_COMBB(v_s,v_sko__CHAINED__1(v_s),tc_nat,tc_Complex_Ocomplex,tc_nat),tc_Complex_Ocomplex,tc_RealDef_Oreal,tc_nat)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_CHAINED_1) ).

cnf(cls_CHAINED_0,axiom,
    c_SEQ_Osubseq(v_sko__CHAINED__1(v_s)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_CHAINED_0) ).

cnf(cls_conjecture_0,negated_conjecture,
    ~ v_thesis____,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).

cnf(521,plain,
    ( ~ c_SEQ_Omonoseq(c_COMBB(c_Complex_ORe,c_COMBB(v_s,X,tc_nat,tc_Complex_Ocomplex,tc_nat),tc_Complex_Ocomplex,tc_RealDef_Oreal,tc_nat))
    | ~ c_SEQ_Osubseq(X) ),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[cls_that_0,cls_conjecture_0]) ).

cnf(715,plain,
    $false,
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[521,cls_CHAINED_1,cls_CHAINED_0]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12  % Problem  : ALG361-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.06/0.13  % Command  : run-snark %s %d
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Thu Jun  9 03:43:36 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.19/0.44  /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.45  * 
% 0.19/0.45  * 
% 0.19/0.46  #<PACKAGE "SNARK-USER">
% 0.19/0.46  * 
% 0.19/0.46  SNARK-TPTP-OPTIONS
% 0.19/0.46  * 
% 0.19/0.46  ((AGENDA-LENGTH-LIMIT NIL) (AGENDA-LENGTH-BEFORE-SIMPLIFICATION-LIMIT NIL)
% 0.19/0.46   (USE-HYPERRESOLUTION T) (USE-UR-RESOLUTION T) (USE-PARAMODULATION T)
% 0.19/0.46   (USE-FACTORING :POS)
% 0.19/0.46   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-HYPERRESOLUTION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.19/0.46   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-PARAMODULATION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.19/0.46   (ORDERING-FUNCTIONS>CONSTANTS T) (ASSERT-CONTEXT :CURRENT)
% 0.19/0.46   (RUN-TIME-LIMIT 300) (LISTEN-FOR-COMMANDS NIL)
% 0.19/0.46   (USE-CLOSURE-WHEN-SATISFIABLE T) (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-GIVEN NIL)
% 0.19/0.46   (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-DERIVED NIL) (PRINT-UNORIENTABLE-ROWS NIL)
% 0.19/0.46   (PRINT-ROW-WFFS-PRETTILY NIL) (PRINT-FINAL-ROWS :TPTP)
% 0.19/0.46   (PRINT-OPTIONS-WHEN-STARTING NIL) (USE-VARIABLE-NAME-SORTS NIL)
% 0.19/0.46   (USE-PURITY-TEST T) (USE-RELEVANCE-TEST T) (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS1)
% 0.19/0.46   (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS2))
% 0.19/0.46  * 
% 0.19/0.46  "."
% 0.19/0.46  * 
% 0.19/0.46  ; Begin refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-06-09T03:43:36
% 0.19/0.46  ; Running SNARK from /davis/home/graph/tptp/Systems/SNARK---20120808r022/Source/snark-system.lisp in SBCL 1.0.12 on n020.cluster.edu at 2022-06-09T03:43:36
% 0.36/0.61  WARNING:
% 0.36/0.61     |class_OrderedGroup_Oab__semigroup__idem__mult| is a 1-ary relation that occurs only negatively; disabling rows that contain it.
% 0.36/0.61  WARNING:
% 0.36/0.61     |hBOOL| is a 1-ary relation that occurs only positively; disabling rows that contain it.
% 0.59/0.76  
% 0.59/0.76  
% 0.59/0.76  #||
% 0.59/0.76  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.59/0.76  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.59/0.76  ||#
% 0.59/0.76  
% 0.59/0.76  ; Summary of computation:
% 0.59/0.76  ;      1277 formulas have been input or derived (from 239 formulas).
% 0.59/0.76  ;       715 (56%) were retained.  Of these,
% 0.59/0.76  ;           21 ( 3%) were simplified or subsumed later,
% 0.59/0.76  ;          694 (97%) are still being kept.
% 0.59/0.76  ; 
% 0.59/0.76  ; Run time in seconds excluding printing time:
% 0.59/0.76  ;     0.124  42%   Read assertion file          (1 call)
% 0.59/0.76  ;     0.011   4%   Assert                       (595 calls)
% 0.59/0.76  ;     0.054  18%   Process new row              (1,171 calls)
% 0.59/0.76  ;     0.016   5%   Resolution                   (476 calls)
% 0.59/0.76  ;     0.006   2%   Paramodulation               (238 calls)
% 0.59/0.76  ;     0.000   0%   Factoring                    (3 calls)
% 0.59/0.76  ;     0.016   5%   Condensing                   (618 calls)
% 0.59/0.76  ;     0.013   4%   Forward subsumption          (618 calls)
% 0.59/0.76  ;     0.006   2%   Backward subsumption         (436 calls)
% 0.59/0.76  ;     0.003   1%   Clause clause subsumption    (510 calls)
% 0.59/0.76  ;     0.019   6%   Forward simplification       (1,168 calls)
% 0.59/0.76  ;     0.003   1%   Backward simplification      (712 calls)
% 0.59/0.76  ;     0.002   1%   Ordering                     (999 calls)
% 0.59/0.76  ;     0.000   0%   Sortal reasoning             (32 calls)
% 0.59/0.76  ;     0.001   0%   Purity testing               (1 call)
% 0.59/0.76  ;     0.021   7%   Other
% 0.59/0.76  ;     0.295        Total
% 0.59/0.76  ;     0.297        Real time
% 0.59/0.76  ; 
% 0.59/0.76  ; Term-hash-array has 1,355 terms in all.
% 0.59/0.76  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 430 entries (430 at peak, 436 added, 6 deleted).
% 0.59/0.76  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 2,352 nodes (2,352 at peak, 2,422 added, 70 deleted).
% 0.59/0.76  ;  Retrieved 483 possibly forward subsuming rows in 618 calls.
% 0.59/0.76  ;  Retrieved 209 possibly backward subsumed rows in 436 calls.
% 0.59/0.76  ; Path-index has 1,331 entries (1,331 at peak, 1,383 added, 52 deleted).
% 0.59/0.76  ; Path-index has 2,771 nodes (2,771 at peak, 2,797 added, 26 deleted).
% 0.59/0.76  ; Trie-index has 1,331 entries (1,331 at peak, 1,383 added, 52 deleted).
% 0.59/0.76  ; Trie-index has 5,489 nodes (5,489 at peak, 5,736 added, 247 deleted).
% 0.59/0.76  ; Retrieved 755 generalization terms in 2,681 calls.
% 0.59/0.76  ; Retrieved 391 instance terms in 328 calls.
% 0.59/0.76  ; Retrieved 18,818 unifiable terms in 1,570 calls.
% 0.59/0.76  ; 
% 0.59/0.76  ; The agenda of rows to process has 3 entries:
% 0.59/0.76  ;     1 with value 6               2 with value 18
% 0.59/0.76  ; The agenda of input rows to give has 274 entries:
% 0.59/0.76  ;    19 with value 19             12 with value 27               1 with value 35
% 0.59/0.76  ;    22 with value 20             10 with value 28               4 with value 36
% 0.59/0.76  ;    22 with value 21             33 with value 29               2 with value 37
% 0.59/0.76  ;    18 with value 22             34 with value 30               1 with value 40
% 0.59/0.76  ;    11 with value 23              7 with value 31               2 with value 41
% 0.59/0.76  ;    14 with value 24              6 with value 32              10 with value 42
% 0.59/0.76  ;    16 with value 25              4 with value 33               1 with value 46
% 0.59/0.76  ;    20 with value 26              5 with value 34
% 0.59/0.76  ; The agenda of rows to give has 182 entries:
% 0.59/0.76  ;     3 with value (4 6)          10 with value (4 15)          12 with value (4 23)
% 0.59/0.76  ;     7 with value (4 7)          10 with value (4 16)           5 with value (4 24)
% 0.59/0.76  ;     8 with value (4 9)           3 with value (4 17)           9 with value (4 25)
% 0.59/0.76  ;     4 with value (4 10)          8 with value (4 18)          16 with value (4 26)
% 0.59/0.76  ;     9 with value (4 11)          9 with value (4 19)           6 with value (4 28)
% 0.59/0.76  ;    10 with value (4 12)          4 with value (4 20)           6 with value (4 29)
% 0.59/0.76  ;     8 with value (4 13)         17 with value (4 21)           2 with value (4 30)
% 0.59/0.76  ;    11 with value (4 14)          3 with value (4 22)           2 with value (4 32)
% 0.59/0.76  Evaluation took:
% 0.59/0.76    0.297 seconds of real time
% 0.59/0.76    0.278282 seconds of user run time
% 0.59/0.76    0.018809 seconds of system run time
% 0.59/0.76    [Run times include 0.008 seconds GC run time.]
% 0.59/0.76    0 calls to %EVAL
% 0.59/0.76    0 page faults and
% 0.59/0.76    18,801,696 bytes consed.
% 0.59/0.76  :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.59/0.76  ; End refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-06-09T03:43:36
% 0.59/0.76  :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.59/0.76  * 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------