%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : ALG365-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 11:55:58 AM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.20s 0.54s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.20s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 10 ( 7 unt; 0 nHn; 10 RR)
% Number of literals : 13 ( 0 equ; 7 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 2 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 9 ( 9 usr; 7 con; 0-5 aty)
% Number of variables : 4 ( 4 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_that_0,axiom,
( ~ c_SEQ_OLIMSEQ(c_COMBB(c_Complex_OIm,c_COMBB(v_s,c_COMBB(v_f____,v_ga____,tc_nat,tc_nat,tc_nat),tc_nat,tc_Complex_Ocomplex,tc_nat),tc_Complex_Ocomplex,tc_RealDef_Oreal,tc_nat),X1,tc_RealDef_Oreal)
| v_thesis____ ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_that_0) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_0,negated_conjecture,
~ v_thesis____,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).
cnf(cls_CHAINED_0,axiom,
c_SEQ_OLIMSEQ(c_COMBB(c_Complex_OIm,c_COMBB(v_s,c_COMBB(v_f____,v_ga____,tc_nat,tc_nat,tc_nat),tc_nat,tc_Complex_Ocomplex,tc_nat),tc_Complex_Ocomplex,tc_RealDef_Oreal,tc_nat),v_sko__CHAINED__1(v_f____,v_ga____,v_s),tc_RealDef_Oreal),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_CHAINED_0) ).
cnf(c_0_3,plain,
( ~ c_SEQ_OLIMSEQ(c_COMBB(c_Complex_OIm,c_COMBB(v_s,c_COMBB(v_f____,v_ga____,tc_nat,tc_nat,tc_nat),tc_nat,tc_Complex_Ocomplex,tc_nat),tc_Complex_Ocomplex,tc_RealDef_Oreal,tc_nat),X1,tc_RealDef_Oreal)
| v_thesis____ ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_that_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
~ v_thesis____,
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_5,plain,
( ~ c_SEQ_OLIMSEQ(c_COMBB(c_Complex_OIm,c_COMBB(v_s,c_COMBB(v_f____,v_ga____,tc_nat,tc_nat,tc_nat),tc_nat,tc_Complex_Ocomplex,tc_nat),tc_Complex_Ocomplex,tc_RealDef_Oreal,tc_nat),X1,tc_RealDef_Oreal)
| v_thesis____ ),
c_0_3 ).
cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
~ v_thesis____,
c_0_4 ).
cnf(c_0_7,axiom,
c_SEQ_OLIMSEQ(c_COMBB(c_Complex_OIm,c_COMBB(v_s,c_COMBB(v_f____,v_ga____,tc_nat,tc_nat,tc_nat),tc_nat,tc_Complex_Ocomplex,tc_nat),tc_Complex_Ocomplex,tc_RealDef_Oreal,tc_nat),v_sko__CHAINED__1(v_f____,v_ga____,v_s),tc_RealDef_Oreal),
cls_CHAINED_0 ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
~ c_SEQ_OLIMSEQ(c_COMBB(c_Complex_OIm,c_COMBB(v_s,c_COMBB(v_f____,v_ga____,tc_nat,tc_nat,tc_nat),tc_nat,tc_Complex_Ocomplex,tc_nat),tc_Complex_Ocomplex,tc_RealDef_Oreal,tc_nat),X1,tc_RealDef_Oreal),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : ALG365-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.36 % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.36 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/0.36 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/0.37 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.37 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.11/0.37 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 13:13:12 UTC 2026
% 0.11/0.37 % CPUTime :
% 0.11/0.37 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.44 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.11/0.44 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.20/0.54 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.20/0.54 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.54 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.54 % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.54 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.54 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.54 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.54 % C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with pid 2392439 completed with status 0
% 0.20/0.54 % Result found by C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr
% 0.20/0.54 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.54 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.54 % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.54 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.20/0.54 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.20/0.54 % Search class: FGUSM-FSLM32-DFFFFFNN
% 0.20/0.54 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.20/0.54 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.54 % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 151s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.54 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 136s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.54 % Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.54 % Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.54 % C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with pid 2392446 completed with status 0
% 0.20/0.54 % Result found by C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr
% 0.20/0.54 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.54 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.54 % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.54 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.20/0.54 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.20/0.54 % Search class: FGUSM-FSLM32-DFFFFFNN
% 0.20/0.54 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.20/0.54 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.54 % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 151s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.54 % Preprocessing time : 0.011 s
% 0.20/0.54 % Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.20/0.54
% 0.20/0.54 % Proof found!
% 0.20/0.54 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.20/0.54 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.20/0.54 % Parsed axioms : 477
% 0.20/0.54 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.20/0.54 % Initial clauses : 477
% 0.20/0.54 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.20/0.54 % Initial clauses in saturation : 477
% 0.20/0.54 % Processed clauses : 112
% 0.20/0.54 % ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.20/0.54 % ...subsumed : 3
% 0.20/0.54 % ...remaining for further processing : 108
% 0.20/0.54 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.20/0.54 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.20/0.54 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.20/0.54 % Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.20/0.54 % Generated clauses : 0
% 0.20/0.54 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 0
% 0.20/0.54 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.20/0.54 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.20/0.54 % Paramodulations : 0
% 0.20/0.54 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.20/0.54 % NegExts : 0
% 0.20/0.54 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.20/0.54 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.20/0.54 % Total rewrite steps : 0
% 0.20/0.54 % ...of those cached : 0
% 0.20/0.54 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.20/0.54 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.20/0.54 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.20/0.54 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.20/0.54 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.20/0.54 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.20/0.54 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.54 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.54 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.54 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.54 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.54 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.54 % Current number of processed clauses : 108
% 0.20/0.54 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 97
% 0.20/0.54 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.20/0.54 % Negative unit clauses : 3
% 0.20/0.54 % Non-unit-clauses : 8
% 0.20/0.54 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 365
% 0.20/0.54 % ...number of literals in the above : 1021
% 0.20/0.54 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.20/0.54 % Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 0.20/0.54 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 31
% 0.20/0.54 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 29
% 0.20/0.54 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 1
% 0.20/0.54 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 4
% 0.20/0.54 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.20/0.54 % BW rewrite match attempts : 1
% 0.20/0.54 % BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.20/0.54 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.20/0.54 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.20/0.54 % Termbank termtop insertions : 15468
% 0.20/0.54 % Search garbage collected termcells : 893
% 0.20/0.54
% 0.20/0.54 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.54 % User time : 0.028 s
% 0.20/0.54 % System time : 0.009 s
% 0.20/0.54 % Total time : 0.036 s
% 0.20/0.54 % Maximum resident set size: 4464 pages
% 0.20/0.54
% 0.20/0.54 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.54 % User time : 0.096 s
% 0.20/0.54 % System time : 0.035 s
% 0.20/0.54 % Total time : 0.131 s
% 0.20/0.54 % Maximum resident set size: 5120 pages
% 0.20/0.54 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------