↑ Up

SNARK---20120808r022.UNS-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SNARK---20120808r022
% Problem  : ALG385-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run-snark %s %d

% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 14 18:00:41 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 1.35s 1.53s
% Output   : Refutation 1.35s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    4
%            Number of leaves      :   14
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   25 (  18 unt;   0 nHn;  12 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   32 (  16 equ;   8 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    7 (   5 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   16 (  16 usr;   7 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   29 (   4 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_diff__0__right_0,axiom,
    ( ~ class_OrderedGroup_Ogroup__add(X)
    | c_HOL_Ominus__class_Ominus(Y,c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(X),X) = Y ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_diff__0__right_0) ).

cnf(cls_order__root_1,axiom,
    ( ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Oidom(X)
    | c_Polynomial_Opoly(c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(X)),Y,X) = c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(X) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_order__root_1) ).

cnf(cls_class__semiring_Osemiring__rules_I24_J_0,axiom,
    ( ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__1(X)
    | c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(Y,Z,X) = c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(Z,Y,X) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_class__semiring_Osemiring__rules_I24_J_0) ).

cnf(cls_class__semiring_Osemiring__rules_I10_J_0,axiom,
    ( ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__1(X)
    | c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(Y,c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(X),X) = c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(X) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_class__semiring_Osemiring__rules_I10_J_0) ).

cnf(cls_diff__minus__eq__add_0,axiom,
    ( ~ class_OrderedGroup_Ogroup__add(X)
    | c_HOL_Ominus__class_Ominus(Y,c_HOL_Ouminus__class_Ouminus(Z,X),X) = c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(Y,Z,X) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_diff__minus__eq__add_0) ).

cnf(cls_neg__0__equal__iff__equal_1,axiom,
    ( ~ class_OrderedGroup_Ogroup__add(X)
    | c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(X) = c_HOL_Ouminus__class_Ouminus(c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(X),X) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_neg__0__equal__iff__equal_1) ).

cnf(cls_poly__pCons_0,axiom,
    ( ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__0(X)
    | c_Polynomial_Opoly(c_Polynomial_OpCons(Y,Z,X),U,X) = c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(Y,c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(U,c_Polynomial_Opoly(Z,U,X),X),X) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_poly__pCons_0) ).

cnf(cls_cs0_0,axiom,
    v_cs____ = c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_cs0_0) ).

cnf(cls_CHAINED_0_01,axiom,
    c_lessequals(v_da____,c_RealVector_Onorm__class_Onorm(c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(v_aa____,c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(v_z____,v_c____,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_RealDef_Oreal),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_CHAINED_0_01) ).

cnf(cls_conjecture_0,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_lessequals(v_da____,c_RealVector_Onorm__class_Onorm(c_Polynomial_Opoly(c_Polynomial_OpCons(v_aa____,c_Polynomial_OpCons(v_c____,v_cs____,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),v_z____,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_RealDef_Oreal),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).

cnf(clsarity_Complex__Ocomplex__Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__1,axiom,
    class_Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__1(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clsarity_Complex__Ocomplex__Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__1) ).

cnf(clsarity_Complex__Ocomplex__Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__0,axiom,
    class_Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__0(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clsarity_Complex__Ocomplex__Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__0) ).

cnf(clsarity_Complex__Ocomplex__OrderedGroup_Ogroup__add,axiom,
    class_OrderedGroup_Ogroup__add(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clsarity_Complex__Ocomplex__OrderedGroup_Ogroup__add) ).

cnf(clsarity_Complex__Ocomplex__Ring__and__Field_Oidom,axiom,
    class_Ring__and__Field_Oidom(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clsarity_Complex__Ocomplex__Ring__and__Field_Oidom) ).

cnf(1148,plain,
    c_HOL_Ominus__class_Ominus(X,c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex) = X,
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[cls_diff__0__right_0,clsarity_Complex__Ocomplex__OrderedGroup_Ogroup__add]) ).

cnf(1167,plain,
    c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Complex_Ocomplex) = c_HOL_Ouminus__class_Ouminus(c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[cls_neg__0__equal__iff__equal_1,clsarity_Complex__Ocomplex__OrderedGroup_Ogroup__add]) ).

cnf(1207,plain,
    c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(X,Y,tc_Complex_Ocomplex) = c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(Y,X,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[cls_class__semiring_Osemiring__rules_I24_J_0,clsarity_Complex__Ocomplex__Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__1]) ).

cnf(1211,plain,
    c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(X,c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex) = c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[cls_class__semiring_Osemiring__rules_I10_J_0,clsarity_Complex__Ocomplex__Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__1]) ).

cnf(1306,plain,
    c_Polynomial_Opoly(v_cs____,X,tc_Complex_Ocomplex) = c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[cls_order__root_1,clsarity_Complex__Ocomplex__Ring__and__Field_Oidom]),cls_cs0_0,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(1436,plain,
    c_HOL_Ominus__class_Ominus(X,c_HOL_Ouminus__class_Ouminus(Y,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex) = c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(X,Y,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[cls_diff__minus__eq__add_0,clsarity_Complex__Ocomplex__OrderedGroup_Ogroup__add]) ).

cnf(1443,plain,
    c_lessequals(v_da____,c_RealVector_Onorm__class_Onorm(c_HOL_Ominus__class_Ominus(v_aa____,c_HOL_Ouminus__class_Ouminus(c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(v_z____,v_c____,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_RealDef_Oreal),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[cls_CHAINED_0_01,1436,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(1461,plain,
    c_HOL_Ominus__class_Ominus(X,c_HOL_Ouminus__class_Ouminus(Y,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex) = c_HOL_Ominus__class_Ominus(Y,c_HOL_Ouminus__class_Ouminus(X,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[1207,1436,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(1462,plain,
    c_lessequals(v_da____,c_RealVector_Onorm__class_Onorm(c_HOL_Ominus__class_Ominus(c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(v_z____,v_c____,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),c_HOL_Ouminus__class_Ouminus(v_aa____,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_RealDef_Oreal),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[1443,1461,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(2883,plain,
    c_Polynomial_Opoly(c_Polynomial_OpCons(X,Y,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),Z,tc_Complex_Ocomplex) = c_HOL_Ominus__class_Ominus(X,c_HOL_Ouminus__class_Ouminus(c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(Z,c_Polynomial_Opoly(Y,Z,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[cls_poly__pCons_0,clsarity_Complex__Ocomplex__Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__0]),1436,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(2884,plain,
    $false,
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_0,1462,1461,1148,1167,1211,1306,2883,theory(equality)]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.11  % Problem  : ALG385-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.06/0.12  % Command  : run-snark %s %d
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Tue Jun  7 22:08:31 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.18/0.44  /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.18/0.45  * 
% 0.18/0.45  * 
% 0.18/0.45  #<PACKAGE "SNARK-USER">
% 0.18/0.45  * 
% 0.18/0.45  SNARK-TPTP-OPTIONS
% 0.18/0.45  * 
% 0.18/0.45  ((AGENDA-LENGTH-LIMIT NIL) (AGENDA-LENGTH-BEFORE-SIMPLIFICATION-LIMIT NIL)
% 0.18/0.45   (USE-HYPERRESOLUTION T) (USE-UR-RESOLUTION T) (USE-PARAMODULATION T)
% 0.18/0.45   (USE-FACTORING :POS)
% 0.18/0.45   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-HYPERRESOLUTION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.18/0.45   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-PARAMODULATION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.18/0.45   (ORDERING-FUNCTIONS>CONSTANTS T) (ASSERT-CONTEXT :CURRENT)
% 0.18/0.45   (RUN-TIME-LIMIT 300) (LISTEN-FOR-COMMANDS NIL)
% 0.18/0.45   (USE-CLOSURE-WHEN-SATISFIABLE T) (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-GIVEN NIL)
% 0.18/0.45   (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-DERIVED NIL) (PRINT-UNORIENTABLE-ROWS NIL)
% 0.18/0.45   (PRINT-ROW-WFFS-PRETTILY NIL) (PRINT-FINAL-ROWS :TPTP)
% 0.18/0.45   (PRINT-OPTIONS-WHEN-STARTING NIL) (USE-VARIABLE-NAME-SORTS NIL)
% 0.18/0.45   (USE-PURITY-TEST T) (USE-RELEVANCE-TEST T) (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS1)
% 0.18/0.46   (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS2))
% 0.18/0.46  * 
% 0.18/0.46  "."
% 0.18/0.46  * 
% 0.18/0.46  ; Begin refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-06-07T22:08:31
% 0.18/0.46  ; Running SNARK from /davis/home/graph/tptp/Systems/SNARK---20120808r022/Source/snark-system.lisp in SBCL 1.0.12 on n026.cluster.edu at 2022-06-07T22:08:31
% 0.45/0.68  WARNING:
% 0.45/0.68     |class_Orderings_Obot| is a 1-ary relation that occurs only negatively; disabling rows that contain it.
% 0.45/0.68  WARNING:
% 0.45/0.68     |class_Lattices_Obounded__lattice| is a 1-ary relation that occurs only negatively; disabling rows that contain it.
% 0.45/0.68  WARNING:
% 0.45/0.68     |class_Lattices_Oboolean__algebra| is a 1-ary relation that occurs only negatively; disabling rows that contain it.
% 0.45/0.68  WARNING:
% 0.45/0.68     |class_OrderedGroup_Oab__semigroup__idem__mult| is a 1-ary relation that occurs only negatively; disabling rows that contain it.
% 1.35/1.53  
% 1.35/1.53  
% 1.35/1.53  #||
% 1.35/1.53  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 1.35/1.53  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 1.35/1.53  ||#
% 1.35/1.53  
% 1.35/1.53  ; Summary of computation:
% 1.35/1.53  ;      6546 formulas have been input or derived (from 662 formulas).
% 1.35/1.53  ;      2884 (44%) were retained.  Of these,
% 1.35/1.53  ;          299 (10%) were simplified or subsumed later,
% 1.35/1.53  ;         2585 (90%) are still being kept.
% 1.35/1.53  ; 
% 1.35/1.53  ; Run time in seconds excluding printing time:
% 1.35/1.53  ;     0.187  17%   Read assertion file          (1 call)
% 1.35/1.53  ;     0.020   2%   Assert                       (1,034 calls)
% 1.35/1.53  ;     0.230  21%   Process new row              (5,762 calls)
% 1.35/1.53  ;     0.144  13%   Resolution                   (1,322 calls)
% 1.35/1.53  ;     0.010   1%   Paramodulation               (661 calls)
% 1.35/1.53  ;     0.000   0%   Factoring                    (3 calls)
% 1.35/1.53  ;     0.029   3%   Condensing                   (2,174 calls)
% 1.35/1.53  ;     0.095   9%   Forward subsumption          (2,174 calls)
% 1.35/1.53  ;     0.053   5%   Backward subsumption         (1,477 calls)
% 1.35/1.53  ;     0.012   1%   Clause clause subsumption    (3,509 calls)
% 1.35/1.53  ;     0.152  14%   Forward simplification       (5,752 calls)
% 1.35/1.53  ;     0.059   5%   Backward simplification      (2,851 calls)
% 1.35/1.53  ;     0.025   2%   Ordering                     (8,139 calls)
% 1.35/1.53  ;     0.000   0%   Sortal reasoning             (32 calls)
% 1.35/1.53  ;     0.002   0%   Purity testing               (1 call)
% 1.35/1.53  ;     0.055   5%   Other
% 1.35/1.53  ;     1.073        Total
% 1.35/1.53  ;     1.076        Real time
% 1.35/1.53  ; 
% 1.35/1.53  ; Term-hash-array has 5,053 terms in all.
% 1.35/1.53  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 1,386 entries (1,386 at peak, 1,477 added, 91 deleted).
% 1.35/1.53  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 7,185 nodes (7,185 at peak, 7,848 added, 663 deleted).
% 1.35/1.53  ;  Retrieved 4,856 possibly forward subsuming rows in 2,174 calls.
% 1.35/1.53  ;  Retrieved 1,094 possibly backward subsumed rows in 1,477 calls.
% 1.35/1.53  ; Path-index has 4,559 entries (4,623 at peak, 5,194 added, 635 deleted).
% 1.35/1.53  ; Path-index has 20,299 nodes (20,612 at peak, 22,712 added, 2,413 deleted).
% 1.35/1.53  ; Trie-index has 4,559 entries (4,623 at peak, 5,194 added, 635 deleted).
% 1.35/1.53  ; Trie-index has 28,122 nodes (28,968 at peak, 34,360 added, 6,238 deleted).
% 1.35/1.53  ; Retrieved 21,320 generalization terms in 39,317 calls.
% 1.35/1.53  ; Retrieved 1,908 instance terms in 1,475 calls.
% 1.35/1.53  ; Retrieved 227,038 unifiable terms in 6,353 calls.
% 1.35/1.53  ; 
% 1.35/1.53  ; The agenda of backward simplifiable rows to process has 38 entries:
% 1.35/1.53  ;    38 with value 0
% 1.35/1.53  ; The agenda of rows to process has 3 entries:
% 1.35/1.53  ;     3 with value 23
% 1.35/1.53  ; The agenda of input rows to give has 252 entries:
% 1.35/1.53  ;     4 with value 25              4 with value 32              18 with value 39
% 1.35/1.53  ;    20 with value 26              1 with value 33               9 with value 40
% 1.35/1.53  ;    86 with value 27              4 with value 34               1 with value 44
% 1.35/1.53  ;     8 with value 28              5 with value 35               2 with value 46
% 1.35/1.53  ;     9 with value 29             12 with value 36               1 with value 47
% 1.35/1.53  ;    35 with value 30              6 with value 37               1 with value 57
% 1.35/1.53  ;     8 with value 31             18 with value 38
% 1.35/1.53  ; The agenda of rows to give has 1678 entries:
% 1.35/1.53  ;    81 with value (4 6)          76 with value (4 24)           5 with value (4 41)
% 1.35/1.53  ;     8 with value (4 8)          80 with value (4 25)           6 with value (4 42)
% 1.35/1.53  ;    16 with value (4 9)          82 with value (4 26)           9 with value (4 43)
% 1.35/1.53  ;    23 with value (4 10)         51 with value (4 27)           5 with value (4 44)
% 1.35/1.53  ;    17 with value (4 11)         70 with value (4 28)           7 with value (4 45)
% 1.35/1.53  ;    30 with value (4 12)         45 with value (4 29)           5 with value (4 46)
% 1.35/1.53  ;    38 with value (4 13)         55 with value (4 30)           4 with value (4 47)
% 1.35/1.53  ;    42 with value (4 14)         58 with value (4 31)           7 with value (4 48)
% 1.35/1.53  ;    60 with value (4 15)         30 with value (4 32)           2 with value (4 49)
% 1.35/1.53  ;    53 with value (4 16)         38 with value (4 33)           2 with value (4 50)
% 1.35/1.53  ;    76 with value (4 17)         22 with value (4 34)           1 with value (4 52)
% 1.35/1.53  ;    44 with value (4 18)         27 with value (4 35)           1 with value (4 54)
% 1.35/1.53  ;    90 with value (4 19)         36 with value (4 36)           1 with value (4 55)
% 1.35/1.53  ;    71 with value (4 20)         24 with value (4 37)           1 with value (4 62)
% 1.35/1.53  ;    70 with value (4 21)         23 with value (4 38)           1 with value (4 73)
% 1.35/1.53  ;    87 with value (4 22)         25 with value (4 39)           4 with value (4 75)
% 1.35/1.53  ;    43 with value (4 23)         22 with value (4 40)           4 with value (4 109)
% 1.35/1.53  Evaluation took:
% 1.35/1.53    1.077 seconds of real time
% 1.35/1.53    1.004719 seconds of user run time
% 1.35/1.53    0.072141 seconds of system run time
% 1.35/1.53    [Run times include 0.077 seconds GC run time.]
% 1.35/1.53    0 calls to %EVAL
% 1.35/1.53    0 page faults and
% 1.35/1.53    81,832,488 bytes consed.
% 1.35/1.53  :PROOF-FOUND
% 1.35/1.53  ; End refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-06-07T22:08:33
% 1.35/1.53  :PROOF-FOUND
% 1.35/1.53  * 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------