↑ Up

iProver---3.9.4.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem  : ALG395-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM

% Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 12:54:10 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 7.92s 1.74s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 7.92s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    3
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :    8 (   6 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   10 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :    7 (   5   ~;   2   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    4 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   2 usr;   2 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    8 (   8 usr;   4 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    7 (   0 sgn   7   !;   0   ?;   4   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f900,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] : c_lessequals(c_RealVector_Onorm__class_Onorm(c_Polynomial_Opoly(X0,v_sko__Fundamental__Theorem__Algebra__Mirabelle__Xpoly__minimum__modulus__1(X0),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),c_RealVector_Onorm__class_Onorm(c_Polynomial_Opoly(X0,X1,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_RealDef_Oreal),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_poly__minimum__modulus_0) ).

fof(f915,negated_conjecture,
    ~ v_thesis____,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).

fof(f916,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ c_lessequals(c_RealVector_Onorm__class_Onorm(c_Polynomial_Opoly(v_pa____,X0,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),c_RealVector_Onorm__class_Onorm(c_Polynomial_Opoly(v_pa____,hAPP(v_x,X0),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_RealDef_Oreal)
      | v_thesis____ ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_1) ).

tcf(c_1654,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : c_lessequals(c_RealVector_Onorm__class_Onorm(c_Polynomial_Opoly(X0,v_sko__Fundamental__Theorem__Algebra__Mirabelle__Xpoly__minimum__modulus__1(X0),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),c_RealVector_Onorm__class_Onorm(c_Polynomial_Opoly(X0,X1,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_RealDef_Oreal),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f900]) ).

tcf(c_1669,negated_conjecture,
    ~ v_thesis____,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f915]) ).

tcf(c_1670,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( v_thesis____
      | ~ c_lessequals(c_RealVector_Onorm__class_Onorm(c_Polynomial_Opoly(v_pa____,X0,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),c_RealVector_Onorm__class_Onorm(c_Polynomial_Opoly(v_pa____,hAPP(v_x,X0),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_RealDef_Oreal) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f916]) ).

tcf(c_1981,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X0: $i] : ~ c_lessequals(c_RealVector_Onorm__class_Onorm(c_Polynomial_Opoly(v_pa____,X0,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),c_RealVector_Onorm__class_Onorm(c_Polynomial_Opoly(v_pa____,hAPP(v_x,X0),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_RealDef_Oreal),
    inference(global_subsumption_just,[status(thm)],[c_1670,c_1669,c_1670]) ).

tcf(c_1986,plain,
    $false,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1654,c_1981]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : ALG395-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.10/0.36  % Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.36  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.36  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.03/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.03/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.03/0.36  % DateTime : Fri Sep 25 05:35:08 UTC 2026
% 0.03/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.03/0.36  Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.03/0.39  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.03/0.39  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s fof_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.03/0.40  
% 0.03/0.40  % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.03/0.40  
% 0.03/0.40  % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.03/0.42  % Proving...
% 7.92/1.74  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 7.92/1.74  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 7.92/1.74  
% 7.92/1.74  %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 7.92/1.74  
% 7.92/1.74  % ------  iProver source info
% 7.92/1.74  
% 7.92/1.74  % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 7.92/1.74  % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 7.92/1.74  % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 7.92/1.74  
% 7.92/1.74  % ------ Parsing...% successful
% 7.92/1.74  
% 7.92/1.74  
% 7.92/1.74  % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel  & Parsing by iProver...
% 7.92/1.74  % ------ Proving...
% 7.92/1.74  % ------ Problem Properties 
% 7.92/1.74  
% 7.92/1.74  % 
% 7.92/1.74  % clauses                               871
% 7.92/1.74  % conjectures                           2
% 7.92/1.74  % EPR                                   151
% 7.92/1.74  % Horn                                  808
% 7.92/1.74  % unary                                 144
% 7.92/1.74  % binary                                342
% 7.92/1.74  % lits                                  2173
% 7.92/1.74  % lits eq                               403
% 7.92/1.74  % fd_pure                               0
% 7.92/1.74  % fd_pseudo                             0
% 7.92/1.74  % fd_cond                               11
% 7.92/1.74  % fd_pseudo_cond                        78
% 7.92/1.74  % AC symbols                            0
% 7.92/1.74  
% 7.92/1.74  % ------ Input Options Time Limit: Unbounded
% 7.92/1.74  
% 7.92/1.74  
% 7.92/1.74  % ------ 
% 7.92/1.74  % Current options:
% 7.92/1.74  % ------ 
% 7.92/1.74  
% 7.92/1.74  
% 7.92/1.74  % 
% 7.92/1.74  
% 7.92/1.74  % ------ Proving...
% 7.92/1.74  % 
% 7.92/1.74  
% 7.92/1.74  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 7.92/1.74  
% 7.92/1.74  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 7.92/1.74  
% 7.92/1.74  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------