↑ Up

Zipperpin---2.1.9999.UNS-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Zipperpin---2.1.9999
% Problem  : ALG396-1 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.65Hd2PSwEk true

% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Oct  2 04:28:43 PM UTC 2025

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 1.59s 1.43s
% Output   : Refutation 1.59s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.20  % Problem  : ALG396-1 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.09/0.21  % Command  : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.65Hd2PSwEk true
% 0.09/0.40  % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.40  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.40  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.40  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.09/0.40  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.09/0.40  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.40  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.09/0.40  % DateTime : Wed Oct  1 17:03:38 EDT 2025
% 0.09/0.41  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.09/0.41  % Running portfolio for 300 s
% 0.09/0.41  % File         : /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.09/0.41  % Number of cores: 8
% 0.09/0.41  % Python version: Python 3.6.8
% 0.09/0.42  % Running in FO mode
% 0.28/0.74  % Total configuration time : 435
% 0.28/0.74  % Estimated wc time : 1092
% 0.28/0.74  % Estimated cpu time (7 cpus) : 156.0
% 0.28/1.00  % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo6_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.28/1.02  % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo3_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.28/1.04  % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo1_av.sh running for 75s
% 1.28/1.11  % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo13.sh running for 50s
% 1.35/1.12  % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo5.sh running for 50s
% 1.35/1.12  % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo7.sh running for 63s
% 1.35/1.14  % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo4.sh running for 50s
% 1.59/1.43  % Solved by fo/fo4.sh.
% 1.59/1.43  % done 6 iterations in 0.132s
% 1.59/1.43  % SZS status Theorem for '/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p'
% 1.59/1.43  % SZS output start Refutation
% 1.59/1.43  thf(tc_Complex_Ocomplex_type, type, tc_Complex_Ocomplex: $i).
% 1.59/1.43  thf(c_Polynomial_Opoly_type, type, c_Polynomial_Opoly: $i > $i > $i > $i).
% 1.59/1.43  thf(v_c_____type, type, v_c____: $i).
% 1.59/1.43  thf(v_q_____type, type, v_q____: $i).
% 1.59/1.43  thf(v_pa_____type, type, v_pa____: $i).
% 1.59/1.43  thf(v_x_____type, type, v_x____: $i).
% 1.59/1.43  thf(c_HOL_Ominus__class_Ominus_type, type, c_HOL_Ominus__class_Ominus: 
% 1.59/1.43      $i > $i > $i > $i).
% 1.59/1.43  thf(cls_conjecture_0, conjecture,
% 1.59/1.43    (( c_Polynomial_Opoly @ v_pa____ @ v_x____ @ tc_Complex_Ocomplex ) =
% 1.59/1.43     ( c_Polynomial_Opoly @
% 1.59/1.43       v_q____ @ 
% 1.59/1.43       ( c_HOL_Ominus__class_Ominus @ v_x____ @ v_c____ @ tc_Complex_Ocomplex ) @ 
% 1.59/1.43       tc_Complex_Ocomplex ))).
% 1.59/1.43  thf(zf_stmt_0, negated_conjecture,
% 1.59/1.43    (( c_Polynomial_Opoly @ v_pa____ @ v_x____ @ tc_Complex_Ocomplex ) !=
% 1.59/1.43     ( c_Polynomial_Opoly @
% 1.59/1.43       v_q____ @ 
% 1.59/1.43       ( c_HOL_Ominus__class_Ominus @ v_x____ @ v_c____ @ tc_Complex_Ocomplex ) @ 
% 1.59/1.43       tc_Complex_Ocomplex )),
% 1.59/1.43    inference('cnf.neg', [status(esa)], [cls_conjecture_0])).
% 1.59/1.43  thf(zip_derived_cl10, plain,
% 1.59/1.43      (((c_Polynomial_Opoly @ v_pa____ @ v_x____ @ tc_Complex_Ocomplex)
% 1.59/1.43         != (c_Polynomial_Opoly @ v_q____ @ 
% 1.59/1.43             (c_HOL_Ominus__class_Ominus @ v_x____ @ v_c____ @ 
% 1.59/1.43              tc_Complex_Ocomplex) @ 
% 1.59/1.43             tc_Complex_Ocomplex))),
% 1.59/1.43      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_0])).
% 1.59/1.43  thf(cls_th_0, axiom,
% 1.59/1.43    (( c_Polynomial_Opoly @
% 1.59/1.43       v_q____ @ 
% 1.59/1.43       ( c_HOL_Ominus__class_Ominus @ V_x @ v_c____ @ tc_Complex_Ocomplex ) @ 
% 1.59/1.43       tc_Complex_Ocomplex ) =
% 1.59/1.43     ( c_Polynomial_Opoly @ v_pa____ @ V_x @ tc_Complex_Ocomplex ))).
% 1.59/1.43  thf(zip_derived_cl0, plain,
% 1.59/1.43      (![X0 : $i]:
% 1.59/1.43         ((c_Polynomial_Opoly @ v_q____ @ 
% 1.59/1.43           (c_HOL_Ominus__class_Ominus @ X0 @ v_c____ @ tc_Complex_Ocomplex) @ 
% 1.59/1.43           tc_Complex_Ocomplex)
% 1.59/1.43           = (c_Polynomial_Opoly @ v_pa____ @ X0 @ tc_Complex_Ocomplex))),
% 1.59/1.43      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [cls_th_0])).
% 1.59/1.43  thf(zip_derived_cl11, plain,
% 1.59/1.43      (((c_Polynomial_Opoly @ v_pa____ @ v_x____ @ tc_Complex_Ocomplex)
% 1.59/1.43         != (c_Polynomial_Opoly @ v_pa____ @ v_x____ @ tc_Complex_Ocomplex))),
% 1.59/1.43      inference('demod', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl10, zip_derived_cl0])).
% 1.59/1.43  thf(zip_derived_cl12, plain, ($false),
% 1.59/1.43      inference('simplify', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl11])).
% 1.59/1.43  
% 1.59/1.43  % SZS output end Refutation
% 1.59/1.43  
% 1.59/1.43  
% 1.59/1.43  % Terminating...
% 2.20/1.71  % Runner terminated.
% 2.24/1.75  % Zipperpin 1.5 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------