%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : ALG397-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 11:56:02 AM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.11s 0.53s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.11s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 3
% Number of leaves : 2
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 6 ( 6 unt; 0 nHn; 6 RR)
% Number of literals : 6 ( 0 equ; 3 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 3 ( 3 usr; 2 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 0 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_CHAINED_0,axiom,
~ c_Fundamental__Theorem__Algebra__Mirabelle_Oconstant(c_Polynomial_Opoly(v_q____,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_CHAINED_0) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_0,negated_conjecture,
c_Fundamental__Theorem__Algebra__Mirabelle_Oconstant(c_Polynomial_Opoly(v_q____,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).
cnf(c_0_2,plain,
~ c_Fundamental__Theorem__Algebra__Mirabelle_Oconstant(c_Polynomial_Opoly(v_q____,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_CHAINED_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_3,plain,
~ c_Fundamental__Theorem__Algebra__Mirabelle_Oconstant(c_Polynomial_Opoly(v_q____,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
c_0_2 ).
cnf(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
c_Fundamental__Theorem__Algebra__Mirabelle_Oconstant(c_Polynomial_Opoly(v_q____,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
cls_conjecture_0 ).
cnf(c_0_5,plain,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_3,c_0_4])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : ALG397-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.37 % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.37 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.37 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.37 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/0.37 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/0.37 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.37 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.11/0.37 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 13:21:15 UTC 2026
% 0.11/0.37 % CPUTime :
% 0.11/0.37 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.42 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.11/0.42 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.11/0.53 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.11/0.53 % Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.11/0.53 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.11/0.53 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2S with 1200s (4) cores
% 0.11/0.53 % Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.11/0.53 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.53 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.53 % new_bool_3 with pid 1983301 completed with status 0
% 0.11/0.53 % Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.11/0.53 % Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.11/0.53 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.11/0.53 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2S with 1200s (4) cores
% 0.11/0.53 % Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.11/0.53 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.11/0.53 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.11/0.53 % Search class: FGHSM-FFLM31-DFFFFFNN
% 0.11/0.53 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 2 cores with 600 seconds (600 total)
% 0.11/0.53 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 61s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.53 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 139s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.53 % SubtermCWHack with pid 1983304 completed with status 0
% 0.11/0.53 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.11/0.53 % Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.11/0.53 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.11/0.53 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2S with 1200s (4) cores
% 0.11/0.53 % Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.11/0.53 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.11/0.53 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.11/0.53 % Search class: FGHSM-FFLM31-DFFFFFNN
% 0.11/0.53 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 2 cores with 600 seconds (600 total)
% 0.11/0.53 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 61s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.53 % Preprocessing time : 0.005 s
% 0.11/0.53
% 0.11/0.53 % Proof found!
% 0.11/0.53 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.11/0.53 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.11/0.53 % Parsed axioms : 713
% 0.11/0.53 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 550
% 0.11/0.53 % Initial clauses : 163
% 0.11/0.53 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.11/0.53 % Initial clauses in saturation : 163
% 0.11/0.53 % Processed clauses : 31
% 0.11/0.53 % ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.11/0.53 % ...subsumed : 4
% 0.11/0.53 % ...remaining for further processing : 26
% 0.11/0.53 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.11/0.53 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.11/0.53 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.11/0.53 % Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.11/0.53 % Generated clauses : 0
% 0.11/0.53 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 0
% 0.11/0.53 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.11/0.53 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.11/0.53 % Paramodulations : 0
% 0.11/0.53 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.11/0.53 % NegExts : 0
% 0.11/0.53 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.11/0.53 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.11/0.53 % Total rewrite steps : 1
% 0.11/0.53 % ...of those cached : 0
% 0.11/0.53 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.11/0.53 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.11/0.53 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.11/0.53 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.11/0.53 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.11/0.53 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.11/0.53 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.11/0.53 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.11/0.53 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.11/0.53 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.11/0.53 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.11/0.53 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.11/0.53 % Current number of processed clauses : 26
% 0.11/0.53 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 18
% 0.11/0.53 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.11/0.53 % Negative unit clauses : 3
% 0.11/0.53 % Non-unit-clauses : 5
% 0.11/0.53 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 132
% 0.11/0.53 % ...number of literals in the above : 284
% 0.11/0.53 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.11/0.53 % Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 0.11/0.53 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 2
% 0.11/0.53 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2
% 0.11/0.53 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.11/0.53 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.11/0.53 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.11/0.53 % BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.11/0.53 % BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.11/0.53 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.11/0.53 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.11/0.53 % Termbank termtop insertions : 10479
% 0.11/0.53 % Search garbage collected termcells : 1996
% 0.11/0.53
% 0.11/0.53 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.11/0.53 % User time : 0.010 s
% 0.11/0.53 % System time : 0.007 s
% 0.11/0.53 % Total time : 0.018 s
% 0.11/0.53 % Maximum resident set size: 4376 pages
% 0.11/0.53
% 0.11/0.53 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.11/0.53 % User time : 0.050 s
% 0.11/0.53 % System time : 0.014 s
% 0.11/0.53 % Total time : 0.063 s
% 0.11/0.53 % Maximum resident set size: 5120 pages
% 0.11/0.53 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------