%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : ALG398-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 11:56:02 AM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 9.02s 1.66s
% Output : CNFRefutation 9.02s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 7
% Number of leaves : 12
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 37 ( 22 unt; 3 nHn; 21 RR)
% Number of literals : 55 ( 31 equ; 25 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 7 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 6 ( 4 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 11 ( 11 usr; 5 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 49 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_conjecture_0,negated_conjecture,
c_Polynomial_Opoly(v_q____,v_x,tc_Complex_Ocomplex) != c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(c_Polynomial_Opoly(c_Polynomial_Osmult(c_HOL_Oinverse__class_Oinverse(c_Polynomial_Opoly(v_q____,c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),v_q____,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),v_x,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),c_Polynomial_Opoly(v_q____,c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).
cnf(cls_pqc0_0,axiom,
c_Polynomial_Opoly(v_pa____,v_c____,tc_Complex_Ocomplex) = c_Polynomial_Opoly(v_q____,c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_pqc0_0) ).
cnf(cls_poly__smult_0,axiom,
( ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__0(X1)
| c_Polynomial_Opoly(c_Polynomial_Osmult(X2,X3,X1),X4,X1) = c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(X2,c_Polynomial_Opoly(X3,X4,X1),X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_poly__smult_0) ).
cnf(clsarity_Complex__Ocomplex__Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__0,axiom,
class_Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__0(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clsarity_Complex__Ocomplex__Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__0) ).
cnf(cls_class__semiring_Omul__a_0,axiom,
( ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__1(X1)
| c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(X2,c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(X3,X4,X1),X1) = c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(X2,X3,X1),X4,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_class__semiring_Omul__a_0) ).
cnf(clsarity_Complex__Ocomplex__Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__1,axiom,
class_Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__1(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clsarity_Complex__Ocomplex__Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__1) ).
cnf(cls_class__semiring_Osemiring__rules_I19_J_0,axiom,
( ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__1(X1)
| c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(X2,c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(X3,X4,X1),X1) = c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(X3,c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(X2,X4,X1),X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_class__semiring_Osemiring__rules_I19_J_0) ).
cnf(cls_mult__1__right_0,axiom,
( ~ class_OrderedGroup_Omonoid__mult(X1)
| c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(X2,c_HOL_Oone__class_Oone(X1),X1) = X2 ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_mult__1__right_0) ).
cnf(cls_field__inverse_0,axiom,
( ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Ofield(X1)
| X2 = c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(X1)
| c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(c_HOL_Oinverse__class_Oinverse(X2,X1),X2,X1) = c_HOL_Oone__class_Oone(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_field__inverse_0) ).
cnf(clsarity_Complex__Ocomplex__OrderedGroup_Omonoid__mult,axiom,
class_OrderedGroup_Omonoid__mult(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clsarity_Complex__Ocomplex__OrderedGroup_Omonoid__mult) ).
cnf(cls_pc0_0,axiom,
c_Polynomial_Opoly(v_pa____,v_c____,tc_Complex_Ocomplex) != c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_pc0_0) ).
cnf(clsarity_Complex__Ocomplex__Ring__and__Field_Ofield,axiom,
class_Ring__and__Field_Ofield(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clsarity_Complex__Ocomplex__Ring__and__Field_Ofield) ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
c_Polynomial_Opoly(v_q____,v_x,tc_Complex_Ocomplex) != c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(c_Polynomial_Opoly(c_Polynomial_Osmult(c_HOL_Oinverse__class_Oinverse(c_Polynomial_Opoly(v_q____,c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),v_q____,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),v_x,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),c_Polynomial_Opoly(v_q____,c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
c_Polynomial_Opoly(v_q____,v_x,tc_Complex_Ocomplex) != c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(c_Polynomial_Opoly(c_Polynomial_Osmult(c_HOL_Oinverse__class_Oinverse(c_Polynomial_Opoly(v_q____,c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),v_q____,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),v_x,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),c_Polynomial_Opoly(v_q____,c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
c_0_12 ).
cnf(c_0_14,axiom,
c_Polynomial_Opoly(v_pa____,v_c____,tc_Complex_Ocomplex) = c_Polynomial_Opoly(v_q____,c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
cls_pqc0_0 ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
( ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__0(X1)
| c_Polynomial_Opoly(c_Polynomial_Osmult(X2,X3,X1),X4,X1) = c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(X2,c_Polynomial_Opoly(X3,X4,X1),X1) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_poly__smult_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(c_Polynomial_Opoly(c_Polynomial_Osmult(c_HOL_Oinverse__class_Oinverse(c_Polynomial_Opoly(v_pa____,v_c____,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),v_q____,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),v_x,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),c_Polynomial_Opoly(v_pa____,v_c____,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex) != c_Polynomial_Opoly(v_q____,v_x,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]),c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
( ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__0(X1)
| c_Polynomial_Opoly(c_Polynomial_Osmult(X2,X3,X1),X4,X1) = c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(X2,c_Polynomial_Opoly(X3,X4,X1),X1) ),
c_0_15 ).
cnf(c_0_18,axiom,
class_Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__0(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
clsarity_Complex__Ocomplex__Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__0 ).
cnf(c_0_19,plain,
( ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__1(X1)
| c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(X2,c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(X3,X4,X1),X1) = c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(X2,X3,X1),X4,X1) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_class__semiring_Omul__a_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(c_HOL_Oinverse__class_Oinverse(c_Polynomial_Opoly(v_pa____,v_c____,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),c_Polynomial_Opoly(v_q____,v_x,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),c_Polynomial_Opoly(v_pa____,v_c____,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex) != c_Polynomial_Opoly(v_q____,v_x,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]),c_0_18])]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,plain,
( ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__1(X1)
| c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(X2,c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(X3,X4,X1),X1) = c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(X2,X3,X1),X4,X1) ),
c_0_19 ).
cnf(c_0_22,axiom,
class_Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__1(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
clsarity_Complex__Ocomplex__Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__1 ).
cnf(c_0_23,plain,
( ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__1(X1)
| c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(X2,c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(X3,X4,X1),X1) = c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(X3,c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(X2,X4,X1),X1) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_class__semiring_Osemiring__rules_I19_J_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,plain,
( ~ class_OrderedGroup_Omonoid__mult(X1)
| c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(X2,c_HOL_Oone__class_Oone(X1),X1) = X2 ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_mult__1__right_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(c_HOL_Oinverse__class_Oinverse(c_Polynomial_Opoly(v_pa____,v_c____,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(c_Polynomial_Opoly(v_q____,v_x,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),c_Polynomial_Opoly(v_pa____,v_c____,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex) != c_Polynomial_Opoly(v_q____,v_x,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]),c_0_22])]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,plain,
( ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__1(X1)
| c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(X2,c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(X3,X4,X1),X1) = c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(X3,c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(X2,X4,X1),X1) ),
c_0_23 ).
cnf(c_0_27,plain,
( ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Ofield(X1)
| X2 = c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(X1)
| c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(c_HOL_Oinverse__class_Oinverse(X2,X1),X2,X1) = c_HOL_Oone__class_Oone(X1) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_field__inverse_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_28,plain,
( ~ class_OrderedGroup_Omonoid__mult(X1)
| c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(X2,c_HOL_Oone__class_Oone(X1),X1) = X2 ),
c_0_24 ).
cnf(c_0_29,axiom,
class_OrderedGroup_Omonoid__mult(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
clsarity_Complex__Ocomplex__OrderedGroup_Omonoid__mult ).
cnf(c_0_30,plain,
c_Polynomial_Opoly(v_pa____,v_c____,tc_Complex_Ocomplex) != c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_pc0_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_31,negated_conjecture,
c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(c_Polynomial_Opoly(v_q____,v_x,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(c_HOL_Oinverse__class_Oinverse(c_Polynomial_Opoly(v_pa____,v_c____,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),c_Polynomial_Opoly(v_pa____,v_c____,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex) != c_Polynomial_Opoly(v_q____,v_x,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_26]),c_0_22])]) ).
cnf(c_0_32,plain,
( ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Ofield(X1)
| X2 = c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(X1)
| c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(c_HOL_Oinverse__class_Oinverse(X2,X1),X2,X1) = c_HOL_Oone__class_Oone(X1) ),
c_0_27 ).
cnf(c_0_33,plain,
c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(X1,c_HOL_Oone__class_Oone(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex) = X1,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_29]) ).
cnf(c_0_34,axiom,
class_Ring__and__Field_Ofield(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
clsarity_Complex__Ocomplex__Ring__and__Field_Ofield ).
cnf(c_0_35,plain,
c_Polynomial_Opoly(v_pa____,v_c____,tc_Complex_Ocomplex) != c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
c_0_30 ).
cnf(c_0_36,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_32]),c_0_33]),c_0_34])]),c_0_35]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : ALG398-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.10/0.36 % Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.36 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.36 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.36 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.10/0.36 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 13:19:55 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.37 % CPUTime :
% 0.10/0.37 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.10/0.41 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.10/0.41 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 9.02/1.66 % Version: 3.5.1
% 9.02/1.66 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 9.02/1.66 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 9.02/1.66 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 9.02/1.66 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 9.02/1.66 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 9.02/1.66 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 9.02/1.66 % G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with pid 955691 completed with status 0
% 9.02/1.66 % Result found by G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S
% 9.02/1.66 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 9.02/1.66 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 9.02/1.66 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 9.02/1.66 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 9.02/1.66 % No SInE strategy applied
% 9.02/1.66 % Search class: FGHSF-FSLM32-DFFFFFNN
% 9.02/1.66 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 9.02/1.66 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 9.02/1.66 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 151s (1) cores
% 9.02/1.66 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 9.02/1.66 % Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 9.02/1.66 % Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 9.02/1.66 % G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with pid 955699 completed with status 0
% 9.02/1.66 % Result found by G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S
% 9.02/1.66 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 9.02/1.66 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 9.02/1.66 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 9.02/1.66 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 9.02/1.66 % No SInE strategy applied
% 9.02/1.66 % Search class: FGHSF-FSLM32-DFFFFFNN
% 9.02/1.66 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 9.02/1.66 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 9.02/1.66 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 151s (1) cores
% 9.02/1.66 % Preprocessing time : 0.013 s
% 9.02/1.66 % Presaturation interreduction done
% 9.02/1.66
% 9.02/1.66 % Proof found!
% 9.02/1.66 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 9.02/1.66 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 9.02/1.67 % Parsed axioms : 959
% 9.02/1.67 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 9.02/1.67 % Initial clauses : 959
% 9.02/1.67 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 9.02/1.67 % Initial clauses in saturation : 959
% 9.02/1.67 % Processed clauses : 2565
% 9.02/1.67 % ...of these trivial : 144
% 9.02/1.67 % ...subsumed : 539
% 9.02/1.67 % ...remaining for further processing : 1882
% 9.02/1.67 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 415
% 9.02/1.67 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 9.02/1.67 % Backward-subsumed : 3
% 9.02/1.67 % Backward-rewritten : 11
% 9.02/1.67 % Generated clauses : 29144
% 9.02/1.67 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 27179
% 9.02/1.67 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 9.02/1.67 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 1
% 9.02/1.67 % Paramodulations : 28697
% 9.02/1.67 % Factorizations : 6
% 9.02/1.67 % NegExts : 0
% 9.02/1.67 % Equation resolutions : 441
% 9.02/1.67 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 9.02/1.67 % Total rewrite steps : 5504
% 9.02/1.67 % ...of those cached : 5088
% 9.02/1.67 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 9.02/1.67 % Propositional check models : 0
% 9.02/1.67 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 9.02/1.67 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 9.02/1.67 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 9.02/1.67 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 9.02/1.67 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 9.02/1.67 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 9.02/1.67 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 9.02/1.67 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 9.02/1.67 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 9.02/1.67 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 9.02/1.67 % Current number of processed clauses : 1015
% 9.02/1.67 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 116
% 9.02/1.67 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 1
% 9.02/1.67 % Negative unit clauses : 10
% 9.02/1.67 % Non-unit-clauses : 888
% 9.02/1.67 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 26411
% 9.02/1.67 % ...number of literals in the above : 100852
% 9.02/1.67 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 9.02/1.67 % Current number of archived clauses : 867
% 9.02/1.67 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 300671
% 9.02/1.67 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 118856
% 9.02/1.67 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 507
% 9.02/1.67 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2717
% 9.02/1.67 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 9.02/1.67 % BW rewrite match attempts : 620
% 9.02/1.67 % BW rewrite match successes : 18
% 9.02/1.67 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 9.02/1.67 % Condensation successes : 0
% 9.02/1.67 % Termbank termtop insertions : 448297
% 9.02/1.67 % Search garbage collected termcells : 2050
% 9.02/1.67
% 9.02/1.67 % -------------------------------------------------
% 9.02/1.67 % User time : 1.120 s
% 9.02/1.67 % System time : 0.054 s
% 9.02/1.67 % Total time : 1.174 s
% 9.02/1.67 % Maximum resident set size: 5600 pages
% 9.02/1.67
% 9.02/1.67 % -------------------------------------------------
% 9.02/1.67 % User time : 5.379 s
% 9.02/1.67 % System time : 0.219 s
% 9.02/1.67 % Total time : 5.598 s
% 9.02/1.67 % Maximum resident set size: 5632 pages
% 9.02/1.67 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------