%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem : ALG399-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 12:54:10 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 3.19s 1.29s
% Output : CNFRefutation 3.19s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 3
% Number of leaves : 2
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 6 ( 6 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 6 ( 5 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 2 ( 2 ~; 0 |; 0 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 7 ( 2 avg)
% Number of types : 0 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 0 ( 0 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 0 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 8 ( 8 usr; 3 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 0 ( 0 sgn 0 !; 0 ?; 0 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f1062,axiom,
c_Polynomial_Opoly(v_q____,v_y____,tc_Complex_Ocomplex) = c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(c_Polynomial_Opoly(c_Polynomial_Osmult(c_HOL_Oinverse__class_Oinverse(c_Polynomial_Opoly(v_q____,c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),v_q____,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),v_y____,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),c_Polynomial_Opoly(v_q____,c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_CHAINED_0) ).
fof(f1063,plain,
c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(c_Polynomial_Opoly(c_Polynomial_Osmult(c_HOL_Oinverse__class_Oinverse(c_Polynomial_Opoly(v_q____,c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),v_q____,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),v_y____,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),c_Polynomial_Opoly(v_q____,c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex) = c_Polynomial_Opoly(v_q____,v_y____,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
inference(reorient_equations,[],[f1062]) ).
fof(f1064,negated_conjecture,
c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(c_Polynomial_Opoly(c_Polynomial_Osmult(c_HOL_Oinverse__class_Oinverse(c_Polynomial_Opoly(v_q____,c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),v_q____,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),v_y____,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),c_Polynomial_Opoly(v_q____,c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex) != c_Polynomial_Opoly(v_q____,v_y____,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).
tcf(c_1687,plain,
c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(c_Polynomial_Opoly(c_Polynomial_Osmult(c_HOL_Oinverse__class_Oinverse(c_Polynomial_Opoly(v_q____,c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),v_q____,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),v_y____,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),c_Polynomial_Opoly(v_q____,c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex) = c_Polynomial_Opoly(v_q____,v_y____,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1063]) ).
tcf(c_1688,negated_conjecture,
c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(c_Polynomial_Opoly(c_Polynomial_Osmult(c_HOL_Oinverse__class_Oinverse(c_Polynomial_Opoly(v_q____,c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),v_q____,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),v_y____,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),c_Polynomial_Opoly(v_q____,c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex) != c_Polynomial_Opoly(v_q____,v_y____,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1064]) ).
tcf(c_2296,plain,
$false,
inference(prop_impl_just,[status(thm)],[c_1688,c_1687]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02 % Problem : ALG399-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.00/0.03 % Command : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.09/0.37 % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.37 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.37 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.37 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.37 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.37 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.37 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.09/0.37 % DateTime : Fri Sep 25 05:34:34 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.38 % CPUTime :
% 0.09/0.38 Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.09/0.41 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.09/0.41 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s fof_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.09/0.43
% 0.09/0.43 % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.09/0.43
% 0.09/0.43 % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.09/0.44 % Proving...
% 3.19/1.29 % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 3.19/1.29 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 3.19/1.29
% 3.19/1.29 %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 3.19/1.29
% 3.19/1.29 % ------ iProver source info
% 3.19/1.29
% 3.19/1.29 % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 3.19/1.29 % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 3.19/1.29 % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 3.19/1.29
% 3.19/1.29 % ------ Parsing...% successful
% 3.19/1.29
% 3.19/1.29
% 3.19/1.29 % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel & Parsing by iProver...%
% 3.19/1.29
% 3.19/1.29 % ------ Preprocessing...%
% 3.19/1.29
% 3.19/1.29 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 3.19/1.29
% 3.19/1.29 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 3.19/1.29
% 3.19/1.29
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------