↑ Up

E---3.5.1.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : ALG401-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 11:56:02 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.14s 10.81s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.14s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :   12
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   36 (  24 unt;   0 nHn;  19 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   51 (  30 equ;  18 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    7 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    6 (   4 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   17 (  17 usr;   6 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   46 (   5 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_smult__eq__0__iff_2,axiom,
    ( ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Oidom(X1)
    | c_Polynomial_Osmult(X2,c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(X1)),X1) = c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(X1)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_smult__eq__0__iff_2) ).

cnf(cls_add__poly__code_I2_J_0,axiom,
    ( ~ class_OrderedGroup_Ocomm__monoid__add(X1)
    | c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(X2,c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(X1)),tc_Polynomial_Opoly(X1)) = X2 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_add__poly__code_I2_J_0) ).

cnf(cls_synthetic__div__unique_0,axiom,
    ( c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(X2,c_Polynomial_Osmult(X3,X4,X1),tc_Polynomial_Opoly(X1)) != c_Polynomial_OpCons(X5,X4,X1)
    | ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__0(X1)
    | X5 = c_Polynomial_Opoly(X2,X3,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_synthetic__div__unique_0) ).

cnf(clsarity_Complex__Ocomplex__Ring__and__Field_Oidom,axiom,
    class_Ring__and__Field_Oidom(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clsarity_Complex__Ocomplex__Ring__and__Field_Oidom) ).

cnf(cls_CHAINED_0_01,axiom,
    v_s____ = c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_CHAINED_0_01) ).

cnf(clsarity_Complex__Ocomplex__OrderedGroup_Ocomm__monoid__add,axiom,
    class_OrderedGroup_Ocomm__monoid__add(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clsarity_Complex__Ocomplex__OrderedGroup_Ocomm__monoid__add) ).

cnf(cls_class__semiring_Omul__c_0,axiom,
    ( ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__1(X1)
    | c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(X2,X3,X1) = c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(X3,X2,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_class__semiring_Omul__c_0) ).

cnf(cls_kas_I4_J_0,axiom,
    c_Polynomial_Opoly(c_Polynomial_Osmult(c_HOL_Oinverse__class_Oinverse(c_Polynomial_Opoly(v_q____,c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),v_q____,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),X1,tc_Complex_Ocomplex) = c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(c_Polynomial_Opoly(c_Polynomial_Osmult(c_HOL_Oinverse__class_Oinverse(c_Polynomial_Opoly(v_q____,c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),v_q____,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(c_Power_Opower__class_Opower(X1,v_k____,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),c_Polynomial_Opoly(c_Polynomial_OpCons(v_a____,v_s____,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),X1,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_kas_I4_J_0) ).

cnf(cls_r01_0,axiom,
    c_Polynomial_Opoly(c_Polynomial_Osmult(c_HOL_Oinverse__class_Oinverse(c_Polynomial_Opoly(v_q____,c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),v_q____,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex) = c_HOL_Oone__class_Oone(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_r01_0) ).

cnf(clsarity_Complex__Ocomplex__Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__0,axiom,
    class_Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__0(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clsarity_Complex__Ocomplex__Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__0) ).

cnf(clsarity_Complex__Ocomplex__Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__1,axiom,
    class_Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__1(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clsarity_Complex__Ocomplex__Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__1) ).

cnf(cls_conjecture_0,negated_conjecture,
    c_RealVector_Onorm__class_Onorm(c_Polynomial_Opoly(c_Polynomial_Osmult(c_HOL_Oinverse__class_Oinverse(c_Polynomial_Opoly(v_q____,c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),v_q____,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),v_w____,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex) != c_RealVector_Onorm__class_Onorm(c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(c_HOL_Oone__class_Oone(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(v_a____,c_Power_Opower__class_Opower(v_w____,v_k____,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    ( ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Oidom(X1)
    | c_Polynomial_Osmult(X2,c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(X1)),X1) = c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(X1)) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_smult__eq__0__iff_2]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    ( ~ class_OrderedGroup_Ocomm__monoid__add(X1)
    | c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(X2,c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(X1)),tc_Polynomial_Opoly(X1)) = X2 ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_add__poly__code_I2_J_0]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    ( c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(X2,c_Polynomial_Osmult(X3,X4,X1),tc_Polynomial_Opoly(X1)) != c_Polynomial_OpCons(X5,X4,X1)
    | ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__0(X1)
    | X5 = c_Polynomial_Opoly(X2,X3,X1) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_synthetic__div__unique_0]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    ( ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Oidom(X1)
    | c_Polynomial_Osmult(X2,c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(X1)),X1) = c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(X1)) ),
    c_0_12 ).

cnf(c_0_16,axiom,
    class_Ring__and__Field_Oidom(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
    clsarity_Complex__Ocomplex__Ring__and__Field_Oidom ).

cnf(c_0_17,axiom,
    v_s____ = c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex)),
    cls_CHAINED_0_01 ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    ( ~ class_OrderedGroup_Ocomm__monoid__add(X1)
    | c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(X2,c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(X1)),tc_Polynomial_Opoly(X1)) = X2 ),
    c_0_13 ).

cnf(c_0_19,axiom,
    class_OrderedGroup_Ocomm__monoid__add(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
    clsarity_Complex__Ocomplex__OrderedGroup_Ocomm__monoid__add ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    ( ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__1(X1)
    | c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(X2,X3,X1) = c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(X3,X2,X1) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_class__semiring_Omul__c_0]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,axiom,
    c_Polynomial_Opoly(c_Polynomial_Osmult(c_HOL_Oinverse__class_Oinverse(c_Polynomial_Opoly(v_q____,c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),v_q____,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),X1,tc_Complex_Ocomplex) = c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(c_Polynomial_Opoly(c_Polynomial_Osmult(c_HOL_Oinverse__class_Oinverse(c_Polynomial_Opoly(v_q____,c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),v_q____,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(c_Power_Opower__class_Opower(X1,v_k____,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),c_Polynomial_Opoly(c_Polynomial_OpCons(v_a____,v_s____,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),X1,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
    cls_kas_I4_J_0 ).

cnf(c_0_22,axiom,
    c_Polynomial_Opoly(c_Polynomial_Osmult(c_HOL_Oinverse__class_Oinverse(c_Polynomial_Opoly(v_q____,c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),v_q____,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex) = c_HOL_Oone__class_Oone(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
    cls_r01_0 ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    ( c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(X2,c_Polynomial_Osmult(X3,X4,X1),tc_Polynomial_Opoly(X1)) != c_Polynomial_OpCons(X5,X4,X1)
    | ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__0(X1)
    | X5 = c_Polynomial_Opoly(X2,X3,X1) ),
    c_0_14 ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    c_Polynomial_Osmult(X1,v_s____,tc_Complex_Ocomplex) = v_s____,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]),c_0_17]),c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(X1,v_s____,tc_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex)) = X1,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]),c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,axiom,
    class_Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__0(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
    clsarity_Complex__Ocomplex__Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__0 ).

cnf(c_0_27,plain,
    ( ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__1(X1)
    | c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(X2,X3,X1) = c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(X3,X2,X1) ),
    c_0_20 ).

cnf(c_0_28,axiom,
    class_Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__1(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
    clsarity_Complex__Ocomplex__Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__1 ).

cnf(c_0_29,negated_conjecture,
    c_RealVector_Onorm__class_Onorm(c_Polynomial_Opoly(c_Polynomial_Osmult(c_HOL_Oinverse__class_Oinverse(c_Polynomial_Opoly(v_q____,c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),v_q____,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),v_w____,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex) != c_RealVector_Onorm__class_Onorm(c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(c_HOL_Oone__class_Oone(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(v_a____,c_Power_Opower__class_Opower(v_w____,v_k____,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_0]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,plain,
    c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(c_HOL_Oone__class_Oone(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(c_Power_Opower__class_Opower(X1,v_k____,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),c_Polynomial_Opoly(c_Polynomial_OpCons(v_a____,v_s____,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),X1,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex) = c_Polynomial_Opoly(c_Polynomial_Osmult(c_HOL_Oinverse__class_Oinverse(c_Polynomial_Opoly(v_q____,c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),v_q____,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),X1,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,plain,
    c_Polynomial_Opoly(c_Polynomial_OpCons(X1,v_s____,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),X2,tc_Complex_Ocomplex) = X1,
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24]),c_0_25]),c_0_26])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,plain,
    c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(X1,X2,tc_Complex_Ocomplex) = c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(X2,X1,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_28]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,negated_conjecture,
    c_RealVector_Onorm__class_Onorm(c_Polynomial_Opoly(c_Polynomial_Osmult(c_HOL_Oinverse__class_Oinverse(c_Polynomial_Opoly(v_q____,c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),v_q____,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),v_w____,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex) != c_RealVector_Onorm__class_Onorm(c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(c_HOL_Oone__class_Oone(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(v_a____,c_Power_Opower__class_Opower(v_w____,v_k____,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
    c_0_29 ).

cnf(c_0_34,plain,
    c_Polynomial_Opoly(c_Polynomial_Osmult(c_HOL_Oinverse__class_Oinverse(c_Polynomial_Opoly(v_q____,c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),v_q____,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),X1,tc_Complex_Ocomplex) = c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(c_HOL_Oone__class_Oone(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(v_a____,c_Power_Opower__class_Opower(X1,v_k____,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_31]),c_0_32]) ).

cnf(c_0_35,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_33,c_0_34])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : ALG401-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/10.39  % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.11/10.39  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/10.39  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/10.39  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/10.39  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/10.39  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/10.39  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.11/10.39  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 13:19:45 UTC 2026
% 0.11/10.39  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.11/10.39  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.14/10.44  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.14/10.44  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.14/10.81  % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.14/10.81  % Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.14/10.81  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.14/10.81  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.14/10.81  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/10.81  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/10.81  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/10.81  % G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 2666000 completed with status 0
% 0.14/10.81  % Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.14/10.81  % Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.14/10.81  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.14/10.81  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.14/10.81  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.14/10.81  % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.14/10.81  % Search class: FGHSM-SSLM32-DFFFFFNN
% 0.14/10.81  % Scheduled 13 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.14/10.81  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.14/10.81  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.14/10.81  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S2mI with 113s (1) cores
% 0.14/10.81  % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S4d with 113s (1) cores
% 0.14/10.81  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AI with 113s (1) cores
% 0.14/10.81  % G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S2mI with pid 2666009 completed with status 0
% 0.14/10.81  % Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S2mI
% 0.14/10.81  % Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.14/10.81  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.14/10.81  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.14/10.81  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.14/10.81  % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.14/10.81  % Search class: FGHSM-SSLM32-DFFFFFNN
% 0.14/10.81  % Scheduled 13 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.14/10.81  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.14/10.81  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.14/10.81  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S2mI with 113s (1) cores
% 0.14/10.81  % Preprocessing time       : 0.013 s
% 0.14/10.81  % Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.14/10.81  
% 0.14/10.81  % Proof found!
% 0.14/10.81  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.14/10.81  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.14/10.81  % Parsed axioms                        : 1068
% 0.14/10.81  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.14/10.81  % Initial clauses                      : 1068
% 0.14/10.81  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.14/10.81  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 1068
% 0.14/10.81  % Processed clauses                    : 3380
% 0.14/10.81  % ...of these trivial                  : 127
% 0.14/10.81  % ...subsumed                          : 1096
% 0.14/10.81  % ...remaining for further processing  : 2157
% 0.14/10.81  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 112
% 0.14/10.81  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.14/10.81  % Backward-subsumed                    : 17
% 0.14/10.81  % Backward-rewritten                   : 59
% 0.14/10.81  % Generated clauses                    : 6440
% 0.14/10.81  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 4987
% 0.14/10.81  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.14/10.81  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 3
% 0.14/10.81  % Paramodulations                      : 6299
% 0.14/10.81  % Factorizations                       : 4
% 0.14/10.81  % NegExts                              : 0
% 0.14/10.81  % Equation resolutions                 : 137
% 0.14/10.81  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.14/10.81  % Total rewrite steps                  : 5690
% 0.14/10.81  % ...of those cached                   : 5170
% 0.14/10.81  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.14/10.81  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.14/10.81  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.14/10.81  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.14/10.81  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.14/10.81  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.14/10.81  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.14/10.81  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.14/10.81  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.14/10.81  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.14/10.81  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.14/10.81  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.14/10.81  % Current number of processed clauses  : 1124
% 0.14/10.81  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 325
% 0.14/10.81  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 6
% 0.14/10.81  %    Negative unit clauses             : 52
% 0.14/10.81  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 741
% 0.14/10.81  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 3592
% 0.14/10.81  % ...number of literals in the above   : 8417
% 0.14/10.81  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.14/10.81  % Current number of archived clauses   : 1033
% 0.14/10.81  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 157937
% 0.14/10.81  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 77672
% 0.14/10.81  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 830
% 0.14/10.81  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2365
% 0.14/10.81  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.14/10.81  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 937
% 0.14/10.81  % BW rewrite match successes           : 206
% 0.14/10.81  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.14/10.81  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.14/10.81  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 155627
% 0.14/10.81  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 2068
% 0.14/10.81  
% 0.14/10.81  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.14/10.81  % User time                : 0.298 s
% 0.14/10.81  % System time              : 0.021 s
% 0.14/10.81  % Total time               : 0.320 s
% 0.14/10.81  % Maximum resident set size: 5672 pages
% 0.14/10.81  
% 0.14/10.81  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.14/10.81  % User time                : 1.485 s
% 0.14/10.81  % System time              : 0.077 s
% 0.14/10.81  % Total time               : 1.562 s
% 0.14/10.81  % Maximum resident set size: 5376 pages
% 0.14/10.81  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------