%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : ALG402-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 11:56:02 AM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.14s 10.65s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.14s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 14
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 41 ( 26 unt; 0 nHn; 21 RR)
% Number of literals : 68 ( 31 equ; 31 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 5 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 6 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 8 ( 6 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 10 ( 10 usr; 3 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 48 ( 13 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_conjecture_0,negated_conjecture,
c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(X1,c_Power_Opower__class_Opower(X1,c_HOL_Ominus__class_Ominus(v_k____,c_Suc(c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat)),tc_nat),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex) = c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(X2,c_Power_Opower__class_Opower(X2,c_HOL_Ominus__class_Ominus(v_k____,c_Suc(c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat)),tc_nat),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).
cnf(cls_Suc__eq__plus1_0,axiom,
c_Suc(X1) = c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(X1,c_HOL_Oone__class_Oone(tc_nat),tc_nat),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Suc__eq__plus1_0) ).
cnf(cls_class__semiring_Omul__1_0,axiom,
( ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__1(X1)
| c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(c_HOL_Oone__class_Oone(X1),X2,X1) = X2 ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_class__semiring_Omul__1_0) ).
cnf(cls_plus__nat_Oadd__0_0,axiom,
c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat),X1,tc_nat) = X1,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_plus__nat_Oadd__0_0) ).
cnf(cls_class__semiring_Omul__0_0,axiom,
( ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__1(X1)
| c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(X1),X2,X1) = c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_class__semiring_Omul__0_0) ).
cnf(cls_class__semiring_Opwr__0_0,axiom,
( ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__1(X1)
| c_Power_Opower__class_Opower(X2,c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat),X1) = c_HOL_Oone__class_Oone(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_class__semiring_Opwr__0_0) ).
cnf(clsarity_Complex__Ocomplex__Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__1,axiom,
class_Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__1(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clsarity_Complex__Ocomplex__Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__1) ).
cnf(cls_power__eq__0__iff_1,axiom,
( c_Power_Opower__class_Opower(X2,c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat),X1) != c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(X1)
| ~ class_Power_Opower(X1)
| ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Omult__zero(X1)
| ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Ono__zero__divisors(X1)
| ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Ozero__neq__one(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_power__eq__0__iff_1) ).
cnf(cls_field__power__not__zero_0,axiom,
( c_Power_Opower__class_Opower(X2,X3,X1) != c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(X1)
| ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Oring__1__no__zero__divisors(X1)
| X2 = c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_field__power__not__zero_0) ).
cnf(clsarity_Complex__Ocomplex__Ring__and__Field_Omult__zero,axiom,
class_Ring__and__Field_Omult__zero(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clsarity_Complex__Ocomplex__Ring__and__Field_Omult__zero) ).
cnf(clsarity_Complex__Ocomplex__Ring__and__Field_Ono__zero__divisors,axiom,
class_Ring__and__Field_Ono__zero__divisors(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clsarity_Complex__Ocomplex__Ring__and__Field_Ono__zero__divisors) ).
cnf(clsarity_Complex__Ocomplex__Power_Opower,axiom,
class_Power_Opower(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clsarity_Complex__Ocomplex__Power_Opower) ).
cnf(clsarity_Complex__Ocomplex__Ring__and__Field_Ozero__neq__one,axiom,
class_Ring__and__Field_Ozero__neq__one(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clsarity_Complex__Ocomplex__Ring__and__Field_Ozero__neq__one) ).
cnf(clsarity_Complex__Ocomplex__Ring__and__Field_Oring__1__no__zero__divisors,axiom,
class_Ring__and__Field_Oring__1__no__zero__divisors(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clsarity_Complex__Ocomplex__Ring__and__Field_Oring__1__no__zero__divisors) ).
cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(X1,c_Power_Opower__class_Opower(X1,c_HOL_Ominus__class_Ominus(v_k____,c_Suc(c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat)),tc_nat),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex) = c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(X2,c_Power_Opower__class_Opower(X2,c_HOL_Ominus__class_Ominus(v_k____,c_Suc(c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat)),tc_nat),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
cls_conjecture_0 ).
cnf(c_0_15,axiom,
c_Suc(X1) = c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(X1,c_HOL_Oone__class_Oone(tc_nat),tc_nat),
cls_Suc__eq__plus1_0 ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
( ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__1(X1)
| c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(c_HOL_Oone__class_Oone(X1),X2,X1) = X2 ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_class__semiring_Omul__1_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(X1,c_Power_Opower__class_Opower(X1,c_HOL_Ominus__class_Ominus(v_k____,c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat),c_HOL_Oone__class_Oone(tc_nat),tc_nat),tc_nat),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex) = c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(X2,c_Power_Opower__class_Opower(X2,c_HOL_Ominus__class_Ominus(v_k____,c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat),c_HOL_Oone__class_Oone(tc_nat),tc_nat),tc_nat),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]),c_0_15]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,axiom,
c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat),X1,tc_nat) = X1,
cls_plus__nat_Oadd__0_0 ).
cnf(c_0_19,plain,
( ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__1(X1)
| c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(X1),X2,X1) = c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(X1) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_class__semiring_Omul__0_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,plain,
( ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__1(X1)
| c_Power_Opower__class_Opower(X2,c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat),X1) = c_HOL_Oone__class_Oone(X1) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_class__semiring_Opwr__0_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,plain,
( ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__1(X1)
| c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(c_HOL_Oone__class_Oone(X1),X2,X1) = X2 ),
c_0_16 ).
cnf(c_0_22,axiom,
class_Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__1(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
clsarity_Complex__Ocomplex__Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__1 ).
cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(X1,c_Power_Opower__class_Opower(X1,c_HOL_Ominus__class_Ominus(v_k____,c_HOL_Oone__class_Oone(tc_nat),tc_nat),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex) = c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(X2,c_Power_Opower__class_Opower(X2,c_HOL_Ominus__class_Ominus(v_k____,c_HOL_Oone__class_Oone(tc_nat),tc_nat),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]),c_0_18]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,plain,
( ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__1(X1)
| c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(X1),X2,X1) = c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(X1) ),
c_0_19 ).
cnf(c_0_25,plain,
( c_Power_Opower__class_Opower(X2,c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat),X1) != c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(X1)
| ~ class_Power_Opower(X1)
| ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Omult__zero(X1)
| ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Ono__zero__divisors(X1)
| ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Ozero__neq__one(X1) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_power__eq__0__iff_1]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,plain,
( ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__1(X1)
| c_Power_Opower__class_Opower(X2,c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat),X1) = c_HOL_Oone__class_Oone(X1) ),
c_0_20 ).
cnf(c_0_27,plain,
( c_Power_Opower__class_Opower(X2,X3,X1) != c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(X1)
| ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Oring__1__no__zero__divisors(X1)
| X2 = c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(X1) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_field__power__not__zero_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_28,plain,
c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(c_HOL_Oone__class_Oone(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),X1,tc_Complex_Ocomplex) = X1,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]) ).
cnf(c_0_29,negated_conjecture,
c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(X1,c_Power_Opower__class_Opower(X1,c_HOL_Ominus__class_Ominus(v_k____,c_HOL_Oone__class_Oone(tc_nat),tc_nat),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex) = c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24]),c_0_22])]) ).
cnf(c_0_30,plain,
( c_Power_Opower__class_Opower(X2,c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat),X1) != c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(X1)
| ~ class_Power_Opower(X1)
| ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Omult__zero(X1)
| ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Ono__zero__divisors(X1)
| ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Ozero__neq__one(X1) ),
c_0_25 ).
cnf(c_0_31,plain,
c_Power_Opower__class_Opower(X1,c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat),tc_Complex_Ocomplex) = c_HOL_Oone__class_Oone(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_22]) ).
cnf(c_0_32,axiom,
class_Ring__and__Field_Omult__zero(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
clsarity_Complex__Ocomplex__Ring__and__Field_Omult__zero ).
cnf(c_0_33,axiom,
class_Ring__and__Field_Ono__zero__divisors(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
clsarity_Complex__Ocomplex__Ring__and__Field_Ono__zero__divisors ).
cnf(c_0_34,axiom,
class_Power_Opower(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
clsarity_Complex__Ocomplex__Power_Opower ).
cnf(c_0_35,axiom,
class_Ring__and__Field_Ozero__neq__one(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
clsarity_Complex__Ocomplex__Ring__and__Field_Ozero__neq__one ).
cnf(c_0_36,plain,
( c_Power_Opower__class_Opower(X2,X3,X1) != c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(X1)
| ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Oring__1__no__zero__divisors(X1)
| X2 = c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(X1) ),
c_0_27 ).
cnf(c_0_37,negated_conjecture,
c_Power_Opower__class_Opower(c_HOL_Oone__class_Oone(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),c_HOL_Ominus__class_Ominus(v_k____,c_HOL_Oone__class_Oone(tc_nat),tc_nat),tc_Complex_Ocomplex) = c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_29]) ).
cnf(c_0_38,axiom,
class_Ring__and__Field_Oring__1__no__zero__divisors(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
clsarity_Complex__Ocomplex__Ring__and__Field_Oring__1__no__zero__divisors ).
cnf(c_0_39,plain,
c_HOL_Oone__class_Oone(tc_Complex_Ocomplex) != c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_31]),c_0_32]),c_0_33]),c_0_34]),c_0_35])]) ).
cnf(c_0_40,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_36,c_0_37]),c_0_38])]),c_0_39]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02 % Problem : ALG402-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.00/0.04 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.09/10.37 % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.09/10.37 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/10.37 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/10.37 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/10.37 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/10.37 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/10.37 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.09/10.37 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 13:21:39 UTC 2026
% 0.09/10.37 % CPUTime :
% 0.09/10.37 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.14/10.42 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.14/10.42 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.14/10.65 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.14/10.65 % Preprocessing class: FMLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.14/10.65 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.14/10.65 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S4d with 900s (3) cores
% 0.14/10.65 % Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.14/10.65 % Starting new_bool_1 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.14/10.65 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/10.65 % G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S4d with pid 1983862 completed with status 0
% 0.14/10.65 % Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S4d
% 0.14/10.65 % Preprocessing class: FMLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.14/10.65 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.14/10.65 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S4d with 900s (3) cores
% 0.14/10.65 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.14/10.65 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.14/10.65 % Search class: FGHSM-SSLM32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.14/10.65 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 3 cores with 900 seconds (900 total)
% 0.14/10.65 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 82s (1) cores
% 0.14/10.65 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S4d with 91s (1) cores
% 0.14/10.65 % Starting G-E--_208_C12_11_nc_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 82s (1) cores
% 0.14/10.65 % G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S4d with pid 1983872 completed with status 0
% 0.14/10.65 % Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S4d
% 0.14/10.65 % Preprocessing class: FMLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.14/10.65 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.14/10.65 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S4d with 900s (3) cores
% 0.14/10.65 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.14/10.65 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.14/10.65 % Search class: FGHSM-SSLM32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.14/10.65 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 3 cores with 900 seconds (900 total)
% 0.14/10.65 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 82s (1) cores
% 0.14/10.65 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S4d with 91s (1) cores
% 0.14/10.65 % Preprocessing time : 0.015 s
% 0.14/10.65 % Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.14/10.65
% 0.14/10.65 % Proof found!
% 0.14/10.65 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.14/10.65 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.14/10.65 % Parsed axioms : 1046
% 0.14/10.65 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.14/10.65 % Initial clauses : 1046
% 0.14/10.65 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 1
% 0.14/10.65 % Initial clauses in saturation : 1045
% 0.14/10.65 % Processed clauses : 2040
% 0.14/10.65 % ...of these trivial : 33
% 0.14/10.65 % ...subsumed : 836
% 0.14/10.65 % ...remaining for further processing : 1171
% 0.14/10.65 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 56
% 0.14/10.65 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.14/10.65 % Backward-subsumed : 10
% 0.14/10.65 % Backward-rewritten : 9
% 0.14/10.65 % Generated clauses : 2026
% 0.14/10.65 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 1389
% 0.14/10.65 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.14/10.65 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 1
% 0.14/10.65 % Paramodulations : 1960
% 0.14/10.65 % Factorizations : 1
% 0.14/10.65 % NegExts : 0
% 0.14/10.65 % Equation resolutions : 65
% 0.14/10.65 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.14/10.65 % Total rewrite steps : 1506
% 0.14/10.65 % ...of those cached : 1277
% 0.14/10.65 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.14/10.65 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.14/10.65 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.14/10.65 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.14/10.65 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.14/10.65 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.14/10.65 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.14/10.65 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.14/10.65 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.14/10.65 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.14/10.65 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.14/10.65 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.14/10.65 % Current number of processed clauses : 386
% 0.14/10.65 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 184
% 0.14/10.65 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 2
% 0.14/10.65 % Negative unit clauses : 48
% 0.14/10.65 % Non-unit-clauses : 152
% 0.14/10.65 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 1160
% 0.14/10.65 % ...number of literals in the above : 3126
% 0.14/10.65 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.14/10.65 % Current number of archived clauses : 786
% 0.14/10.65 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 48070
% 0.14/10.65 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 15693
% 0.14/10.65 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 341
% 0.14/10.65 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 279
% 0.14/10.65 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 4
% 0.14/10.65 % BW rewrite match attempts : 151
% 0.14/10.65 % BW rewrite match successes : 61
% 0.14/10.65 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.14/10.65 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.14/10.65 % Termbank termtop insertions : 74436
% 0.14/10.65 % Search garbage collected termcells : 2378
% 0.14/10.65
% 0.14/10.65 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.14/10.65 % User time : 0.162 s
% 0.14/10.65 % System time : 0.013 s
% 0.14/10.65 % Total time : 0.175 s
% 0.14/10.65 % Maximum resident set size: 5652 pages
% 0.14/10.65
% 0.14/10.65 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.14/10.65 % User time : 0.475 s
% 0.14/10.65 % System time : 0.031 s
% 0.14/10.65 % Total time : 0.506 s
% 0.14/10.65 % Maximum resident set size: 5632 pages
% 0.14/10.65 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------