↑ Up

E---3.5.1.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : ALG405-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 11:56:03 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.58s 0.63s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.58s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    3
%            Number of leaves      :    2
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :    6 (   6 unt;   0 nHn;   6 RR)
%            Number of literals    :    6 (   5 equ;   3 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    9 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   15 (  15 usr;   7 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    0 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_conjecture_1,negated_conjecture,
    c_RealVector_Onorm__class_Onorm(c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(c_HOL_Oone__class_Oone(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(c_Power_Opower__class_Opower(c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(c_RealVector_Oof__real(v_t____,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),v_w____,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),v_k____,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(v_a____,c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(c_RealVector_Oof__real(v_t____,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),v_w____,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),c_Polynomial_Opoly(v_s____,c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(c_RealVector_Oof__real(v_t____,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),v_w____,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex) != c_RealVector_Onorm__class_Onorm(c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(c_RealVector_Oof__real(c_HOL_Ominus__class_Ominus(c_HOL_Oone__class_Oone(tc_RealDef_Oreal),c_Power_Opower__class_Opower(v_t____,v_k____,tc_RealDef_Oreal),tc_RealDef_Oreal),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(c_Power_Opower__class_Opower(c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(c_RealVector_Oof__real(v_t____,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),v_w____,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),v_k____,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(c_RealVector_Oof__real(v_t____,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),v_w____,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),c_Polynomial_Opoly(v_s____,c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(c_RealVector_Oof__real(v_t____,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),v_w____,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_1) ).

cnf(cls_conjecture_0,negated_conjecture,
    c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(c_HOL_Oone__class_Oone(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(c_Power_Opower__class_Opower(c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(c_RealVector_Oof__real(v_t____,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),v_w____,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),v_k____,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(v_a____,c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(c_RealVector_Oof__real(v_t____,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),v_w____,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),c_Polynomial_Opoly(v_s____,c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(c_RealVector_Oof__real(v_t____,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),v_w____,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex) = c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(c_RealVector_Oof__real(c_HOL_Ominus__class_Ominus(c_HOL_Oone__class_Oone(tc_RealDef_Oreal),c_Power_Opower__class_Opower(v_t____,v_k____,tc_RealDef_Oreal),tc_RealDef_Oreal),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(c_Power_Opower__class_Opower(c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(c_RealVector_Oof__real(v_t____,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),v_w____,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),v_k____,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(c_RealVector_Oof__real(v_t____,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),v_w____,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),c_Polynomial_Opoly(v_s____,c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(c_RealVector_Oof__real(v_t____,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),v_w____,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).

cnf(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
    c_RealVector_Onorm__class_Onorm(c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(c_HOL_Oone__class_Oone(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(c_Power_Opower__class_Opower(c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(c_RealVector_Oof__real(v_t____,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),v_w____,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),v_k____,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(v_a____,c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(c_RealVector_Oof__real(v_t____,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),v_w____,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),c_Polynomial_Opoly(v_s____,c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(c_RealVector_Oof__real(v_t____,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),v_w____,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex) != c_RealVector_Onorm__class_Onorm(c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(c_RealVector_Oof__real(c_HOL_Ominus__class_Ominus(c_HOL_Oone__class_Oone(tc_RealDef_Oreal),c_Power_Opower__class_Opower(v_t____,v_k____,tc_RealDef_Oreal),tc_RealDef_Oreal),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(c_Power_Opower__class_Opower(c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(c_RealVector_Oof__real(v_t____,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),v_w____,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),v_k____,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(c_RealVector_Oof__real(v_t____,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),v_w____,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),c_Polynomial_Opoly(v_s____,c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(c_RealVector_Oof__real(v_t____,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),v_w____,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_1]) ).

cnf(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
    c_RealVector_Onorm__class_Onorm(c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(c_HOL_Oone__class_Oone(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(c_Power_Opower__class_Opower(c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(c_RealVector_Oof__real(v_t____,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),v_w____,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),v_k____,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(v_a____,c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(c_RealVector_Oof__real(v_t____,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),v_w____,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),c_Polynomial_Opoly(v_s____,c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(c_RealVector_Oof__real(v_t____,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),v_w____,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex) != c_RealVector_Onorm__class_Onorm(c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(c_RealVector_Oof__real(c_HOL_Ominus__class_Ominus(c_HOL_Oone__class_Oone(tc_RealDef_Oreal),c_Power_Opower__class_Opower(v_t____,v_k____,tc_RealDef_Oreal),tc_RealDef_Oreal),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(c_Power_Opower__class_Opower(c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(c_RealVector_Oof__real(v_t____,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),v_w____,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),v_k____,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(c_RealVector_Oof__real(v_t____,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),v_w____,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),c_Polynomial_Opoly(v_s____,c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(c_RealVector_Oof__real(v_t____,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),v_w____,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
    c_0_2 ).

cnf(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
    c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(c_HOL_Oone__class_Oone(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(c_Power_Opower__class_Opower(c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(c_RealVector_Oof__real(v_t____,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),v_w____,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),v_k____,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(v_a____,c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(c_RealVector_Oof__real(v_t____,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),v_w____,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),c_Polynomial_Opoly(v_s____,c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(c_RealVector_Oof__real(v_t____,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),v_w____,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex) = c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(c_RealVector_Oof__real(c_HOL_Ominus__class_Ominus(c_HOL_Oone__class_Oone(tc_RealDef_Oreal),c_Power_Opower__class_Opower(v_t____,v_k____,tc_RealDef_Oreal),tc_RealDef_Oreal),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(c_Power_Opower__class_Opower(c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(c_RealVector_Oof__real(v_t____,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),v_w____,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),v_k____,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(c_RealVector_Oof__real(v_t____,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),v_w____,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),c_Polynomial_Opoly(v_s____,c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(c_RealVector_Oof__real(v_t____,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),v_w____,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
    cls_conjecture_0 ).

cnf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_3,c_0_4])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : ALG405-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.12/0.37  % Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.37  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.12/0.37  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.12/0.37  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.37  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.12/0.37  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 13:24:45 UTC 2026
% 0.12/0.38  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.12/0.38  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.16/0.46  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.16/0.46  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.58/0.63  % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.58/0.63  % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.58/0.63  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.58/0.63  % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.58/0.63  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.58/0.63  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.58/0.63  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.58/0.63  % C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with pid 3220330 completed with status 0
% 0.58/0.63  % Result found by C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr
% 0.58/0.63  % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.58/0.63  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.58/0.63  % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.58/0.63  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.58/0.63  % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.58/0.63  % Search class: FGHSS-FSLM32-DFFFFFNN
% 0.58/0.63  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.58/0.63  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.58/0.63  % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 151s (1) cores
% 0.58/0.63  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 0.58/0.63  % Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.58/0.63  % Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.58/0.63  % new_bool_3 with pid 3220339 completed with status 0
% 0.58/0.63  % Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.58/0.63  % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.58/0.63  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.58/0.63  % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.58/0.63  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.58/0.63  % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.58/0.63  % Search class: FGHSS-FSLM32-DFFFFFNN
% 0.58/0.63  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.58/0.63  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.58/0.63  % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 151s (1) cores
% 0.58/0.63  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 0.58/0.63  % Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.58/0.63  % Preprocessing time       : 0.009 s
% 0.58/0.63  % Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.58/0.63  
% 0.58/0.63  % Proof found!
% 0.58/0.63  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.58/0.63  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.58/0.64  % Parsed axioms                        : 804
% 0.58/0.64  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.58/0.64  % Initial clauses                      : 804
% 0.58/0.64  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.58/0.64  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 804
% 0.58/0.64  % Processed clauses                    : 235
% 0.58/0.64  % ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 0.58/0.64  % ...subsumed                          : 7
% 0.58/0.64  % ...remaining for further processing  : 228
% 0.58/0.64  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.58/0.64  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.58/0.64  % Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.58/0.64  % Backward-rewritten                   : 1
% 0.58/0.64  % Generated clauses                    : 0
% 0.58/0.64  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 0
% 0.58/0.64  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.58/0.64  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.58/0.64  % Paramodulations                      : 0
% 0.58/0.64  % Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.58/0.64  % NegExts                              : 0
% 0.58/0.64  % Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.58/0.64  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.58/0.64  % Total rewrite steps                  : 2
% 0.58/0.64  % ...of those cached                   : 0
% 0.58/0.64  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.58/0.64  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.58/0.64  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.58/0.64  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.58/0.64  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.58/0.64  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.58/0.64  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.58/0.64  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.58/0.64  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.58/0.64  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.58/0.64  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.58/0.64  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.58/0.64  % Current number of processed clauses  : 227
% 0.58/0.64  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 141
% 0.58/0.64  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.58/0.64  %    Negative unit clauses             : 2
% 0.58/0.64  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 84
% 0.58/0.64  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 569
% 0.58/0.64  % ...number of literals in the above   : 1934
% 0.58/0.64  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.58/0.64  % Current number of archived clauses   : 1
% 0.58/0.64  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 1630
% 0.58/0.64  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1491
% 0.58/0.64  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 7
% 0.58/0.64  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1
% 0.58/0.64  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.58/0.64  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 1
% 0.58/0.64  % BW rewrite match successes           : 1
% 0.58/0.64  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.58/0.64  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.58/0.64  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 26966
% 0.58/0.64  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 1571
% 0.58/0.64  
% 0.58/0.64  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.58/0.64  % User time                : 0.038 s
% 0.58/0.64  % System time              : 0.007 s
% 0.58/0.64  % Total time               : 0.045 s
% 0.58/0.64  % Maximum resident set size: 5212 pages
% 0.58/0.64  
% 0.58/0.64  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.58/0.64  % User time                : 0.140 s
% 0.58/0.64  % System time              : 0.028 s
% 0.58/0.64  % Total time               : 0.168 s
% 0.58/0.64  % Maximum resident set size: 5120 pages
% 0.58/0.64  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------