%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : ALG412-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 11:56:04 AM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 5.94s 1.35s
% Output : CNFRefutation 5.94s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 7
% Number of leaves : 13
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 41 ( 18 unt; 8 nHn; 29 RR)
% Number of literals : 70 ( 49 equ; 25 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 6 ( 4 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 10 ( 10 usr; 3 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 36 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_class__semiring_Oadd__0_0,axiom,
( ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__1(X1)
| c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(X1),X2,X1) = X2 ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_class__semiring_Oadd__0_0) ).
cnf(cls_pCons_Oprems_0,axiom,
( X1 = c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Complex_Ocomplex)
| c_Polynomial_Opoly(c_Polynomial_OpCons(v_d____,v_ds____,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),X1,tc_Complex_Ocomplex) = c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Complex_Ocomplex) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_pCons_Oprems_0) ).
cnf(cls_CHAINED_0_02,axiom,
v_d____ = c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_CHAINED_0_02) ).
cnf(cls_poly__pCons_0,axiom,
( ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__0(X1)
| c_Polynomial_Opoly(c_Polynomial_OpCons(X2,X3,X1),X4,X1) = c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(X2,c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(X4,c_Polynomial_Opoly(X3,X4,X1),X1),X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_poly__pCons_0) ).
cnf(clsarity_Complex__Ocomplex__Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__1,axiom,
class_Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__1(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clsarity_Complex__Ocomplex__Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__1) ).
cnf(cls_mult__eq__0__iff_0,axiom,
( c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(X2,X3,X1) != c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(X1)
| ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Oring__no__zero__divisors(X1)
| X2 = c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(X1)
| X3 = c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_mult__eq__0__iff_0) ).
cnf(clsarity_Complex__Ocomplex__Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__0,axiom,
class_Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__0(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clsarity_Complex__Ocomplex__Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__0) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_0,negated_conjecture,
c_Polynomial_OpCons(v_d____,v_ds____,tc_Complex_Ocomplex) != c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).
cnf(cls_CHAINED_1,axiom,
( c_Polynomial_Opoly(v_ds____,v_sko__CHAINED__1(v_ds____),tc_Complex_Ocomplex) != c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Complex_Ocomplex)
| v_ds____ = c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_CHAINED_1) ).
cnf(clsarity_Complex__Ocomplex__Ring__and__Field_Oring__no__zero__divisors,axiom,
class_Ring__and__Field_Oring__no__zero__divisors(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clsarity_Complex__Ocomplex__Ring__and__Field_Oring__no__zero__divisors) ).
cnf(cls_CHAINED_0,axiom,
( v_sko__CHAINED__1(v_ds____) != c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Complex_Ocomplex)
| v_ds____ = c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_CHAINED_0) ).
cnf(cls_pCons__0__0_0,axiom,
( ~ class_HOL_Ozero(X1)
| c_Polynomial_OpCons(c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(X1),c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(X1)),X1) = c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(X1)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_pCons__0__0_0) ).
cnf(clsarity_Complex__Ocomplex__HOL_Ozero,axiom,
class_HOL_Ozero(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clsarity_Complex__Ocomplex__HOL_Ozero) ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
( ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__1(X1)
| c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(X1),X2,X1) = X2 ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_class__semiring_Oadd__0_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,axiom,
( X1 = c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Complex_Ocomplex)
| c_Polynomial_Opoly(c_Polynomial_OpCons(v_d____,v_ds____,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),X1,tc_Complex_Ocomplex) = c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Complex_Ocomplex) ),
cls_pCons_Oprems_0 ).
cnf(c_0_15,axiom,
v_d____ = c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
cls_CHAINED_0_02 ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
( ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__0(X1)
| c_Polynomial_Opoly(c_Polynomial_OpCons(X2,X3,X1),X4,X1) = c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(X2,c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(X4,c_Polynomial_Opoly(X3,X4,X1),X1),X1) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_poly__pCons_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
( ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__1(X1)
| c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(X1),X2,X1) = X2 ),
c_0_13 ).
cnf(c_0_18,axiom,
class_Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__1(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
clsarity_Complex__Ocomplex__Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__1 ).
cnf(c_0_19,plain,
( c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(X2,X3,X1) != c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(X1)
| ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Oring__no__zero__divisors(X1)
| X2 = c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(X1)
| X3 = c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(X1) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_mult__eq__0__iff_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,plain,
( X1 = c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Complex_Ocomplex)
| c_Polynomial_Opoly(c_Polynomial_OpCons(c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),v_ds____,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),X1,tc_Complex_Ocomplex) = c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Complex_Ocomplex) ),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,plain,
( ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__0(X1)
| c_Polynomial_Opoly(c_Polynomial_OpCons(X2,X3,X1),X4,X1) = c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(X2,c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(X4,c_Polynomial_Opoly(X3,X4,X1),X1),X1) ),
c_0_16 ).
cnf(c_0_22,plain,
c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),X1,tc_Complex_Ocomplex) = X1,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,axiom,
class_Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__0(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
clsarity_Complex__Ocomplex__Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__0 ).
cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
c_Polynomial_OpCons(v_d____,v_ds____,tc_Complex_Ocomplex) != c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex)),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,plain,
( c_Polynomial_Opoly(v_ds____,v_sko__CHAINED__1(v_ds____),tc_Complex_Ocomplex) != c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Complex_Ocomplex)
| v_ds____ = c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex)) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_CHAINED_1]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,plain,
( c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(X2,X3,X1) != c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(X1)
| ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Oring__no__zero__divisors(X1)
| X2 = c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(X1)
| X3 = c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(X1) ),
c_0_19 ).
cnf(c_0_27,plain,
( X1 = c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Complex_Ocomplex)
| c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(X1,c_Polynomial_Opoly(v_ds____,X1,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex) = c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Complex_Ocomplex) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]),c_0_22]),c_0_23])]) ).
cnf(c_0_28,axiom,
class_Ring__and__Field_Oring__no__zero__divisors(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
clsarity_Complex__Ocomplex__Ring__and__Field_Oring__no__zero__divisors ).
cnf(c_0_29,plain,
( v_sko__CHAINED__1(v_ds____) != c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Complex_Ocomplex)
| v_ds____ = c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex)) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_CHAINED_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_30,plain,
( ~ class_HOL_Ozero(X1)
| c_Polynomial_OpCons(c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(X1),c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(X1)),X1) = c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(X1)) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_pCons__0__0_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_31,negated_conjecture,
c_Polynomial_OpCons(v_d____,v_ds____,tc_Complex_Ocomplex) != c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex)),
c_0_24 ).
cnf(c_0_32,plain,
( c_Polynomial_Opoly(v_ds____,v_sko__CHAINED__1(v_ds____),tc_Complex_Ocomplex) != c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Complex_Ocomplex)
| v_ds____ = c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex)) ),
c_0_25 ).
cnf(c_0_33,plain,
( X1 = c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Complex_Ocomplex)
| c_Polynomial_Opoly(v_ds____,X1,tc_Complex_Ocomplex) = c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Complex_Ocomplex) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_27]),c_0_28])]) ).
cnf(c_0_34,plain,
( v_sko__CHAINED__1(v_ds____) != c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Complex_Ocomplex)
| v_ds____ = c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex)) ),
c_0_29 ).
cnf(c_0_35,plain,
( ~ class_HOL_Ozero(X1)
| c_Polynomial_OpCons(c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(X1),c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(X1)),X1) = c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(X1)) ),
c_0_30 ).
cnf(c_0_36,axiom,
class_HOL_Ozero(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
clsarity_Complex__Ocomplex__HOL_Ozero ).
cnf(c_0_37,negated_conjecture,
c_Polynomial_OpCons(c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),v_ds____,tc_Complex_Ocomplex) != c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex)),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_15]) ).
cnf(c_0_38,plain,
v_ds____ = c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex)),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_32,c_0_33]),c_0_34]) ).
cnf(c_0_39,plain,
c_Polynomial_OpCons(c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex)),tc_Complex_Ocomplex) = c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_35,c_0_36]) ).
cnf(c_0_40,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_37,c_0_38]),c_0_39])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : ALG412-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.10/0.37 % Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.37 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.37 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.37 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.37 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.37 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.37 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.10/0.37 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 13:25:14 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.37 % CPUTime :
% 0.10/0.37 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.15/0.42 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.15/0.42 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 5.94/1.35 % Version: 3.5.1
% 5.94/1.35 % Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 5.94/1.35 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 5.94/1.35 % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_S5PRR_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 900s (3) cores
% 5.94/1.35 % Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 5.94/1.35 % Starting new_bool_1 with 600s (2) cores
% 5.94/1.35 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 5.94/1.35 % G-E--_208_B07_F1_S5PRR_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with pid 3221913 completed with status 0
% 5.94/1.35 % Result found by G-E--_208_B07_F1_S5PRR_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y
% 5.94/1.35 % Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 5.94/1.35 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 5.94/1.35 % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_S5PRR_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 900s (3) cores
% 5.94/1.35 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 5.94/1.35 % No SInE strategy applied
% 5.94/1.35 % Search class: FGHSF-FSLM32-DFFFFFNN
% 5.94/1.35 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 3 cores with 900 seconds (900 total)
% 5.94/1.35 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 82s (1) cores
% 5.94/1.35 % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_S5PRR_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 91s (1) cores
% 5.94/1.35 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y with 82s (1) cores
% 5.94/1.35 % G-E--_208_B07_F1_S5PRR_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with pid 3221923 completed with status 0
% 5.94/1.35 % Result found by G-E--_208_B07_F1_S5PRR_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y
% 5.94/1.35 % Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 5.94/1.35 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 5.94/1.35 % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_S5PRR_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 900s (3) cores
% 5.94/1.35 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 5.94/1.35 % No SInE strategy applied
% 5.94/1.35 % Search class: FGHSF-FSLM32-DFFFFFNN
% 5.94/1.35 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 3 cores with 900 seconds (900 total)
% 5.94/1.35 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 82s (1) cores
% 5.94/1.35 % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_S5PRR_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 91s (1) cores
% 5.94/1.35 % Preprocessing time : 0.011 s
% 5.94/1.35 % Presaturation interreduction done
% 5.94/1.35
% 5.94/1.35 % Proof found!
% 5.94/1.35 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 5.94/1.35 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 5.94/1.35 % Parsed axioms : 836
% 5.94/1.35 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 5.94/1.35 % Initial clauses : 836
% 5.94/1.35 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 5.94/1.35 % Initial clauses in saturation : 836
% 5.94/1.35 % Processed clauses : 4216
% 5.94/1.35 % ...of these trivial : 70
% 5.94/1.35 % ...subsumed : 1605
% 5.94/1.35 % ...remaining for further processing : 2541
% 5.94/1.35 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 136
% 5.94/1.35 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 5.94/1.35 % Backward-subsumed : 35
% 5.94/1.35 % Backward-rewritten : 154
% 5.94/1.35 % Generated clauses : 8386
% 5.94/1.35 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 6657
% 5.94/1.35 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 5.94/1.35 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 4
% 5.94/1.35 % Paramodulations : 8240
% 5.94/1.35 % Factorizations : 0
% 5.94/1.35 % NegExts : 0
% 5.94/1.35 % Equation resolutions : 146
% 5.94/1.35 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 5.94/1.35 % Total rewrite steps : 5497
% 5.94/1.35 % ...of those cached : 4815
% 5.94/1.35 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 5.94/1.35 % Propositional check models : 0
% 5.94/1.35 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 5.94/1.35 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 5.94/1.35 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 5.94/1.35 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 5.94/1.35 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 5.94/1.35 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 5.94/1.35 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 5.94/1.35 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 5.94/1.35 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 5.94/1.35 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 5.94/1.35 % Current number of processed clauses : 1600
% 5.94/1.35 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 393
% 5.94/1.35 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 3
% 5.94/1.35 % Negative unit clauses : 126
% 5.94/1.35 % Non-unit-clauses : 1078
% 5.94/1.35 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 4021
% 5.94/1.35 % ...number of literals in the above : 11548
% 5.94/1.35 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 5.94/1.35 % Current number of archived clauses : 941
% 5.94/1.35 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 242573
% 5.94/1.35 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 105518
% 5.94/1.35 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 1102
% 5.94/1.35 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 22451
% 5.94/1.35 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 2
% 5.94/1.35 % BW rewrite match attempts : 4223
% 5.94/1.35 % BW rewrite match successes : 85
% 5.94/1.35 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 5.94/1.35 % Condensation successes : 0
% 5.94/1.35 % Termbank termtop insertions : 234061
% 5.94/1.35 % Search garbage collected termcells : 1506
% 5.94/1.35
% 5.94/1.35 % -------------------------------------------------
% 5.94/1.35 % User time : 0.669 s
% 5.94/1.35 % System time : 0.027 s
% 5.94/1.35 % Total time : 0.697 s
% 5.94/1.35 % Maximum resident set size: 5252 pages
% 5.94/1.35
% 5.94/1.35 % -------------------------------------------------
% 5.94/1.35 % User time : 2.253 s
% 5.94/1.35 % System time : 0.087 s
% 5.94/1.35 % Total time : 2.339 s
% 5.94/1.35 % Maximum resident set size: 5376 pages
% 5.94/1.35 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------