%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.5.1
% Problem : ALG412-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:02:06 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 4.66s 1.17s
% Output : CNFRefutation 4.66s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 8
% Number of leaves : 13
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 43 ( 18 unt; 8 nHn; 31 RR)
% Number of literals : 74 ( 53 equ; 27 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 6 ( 4 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 10 ( 10 usr; 3 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 36 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_class__semiring_Oadd__0_0,axiom,
( ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__1(X1)
| c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(X1),X2,X1) = X2 ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_class__semiring_Oadd__0_0) ).
cnf(cls_pCons_Oprems_0,axiom,
( X1 = c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Complex_Ocomplex)
| c_Polynomial_Opoly(c_Polynomial_OpCons(v_d____,v_ds____,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),X1,tc_Complex_Ocomplex) = c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Complex_Ocomplex) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_pCons_Oprems_0) ).
cnf(cls_CHAINED_0_02,axiom,
v_d____ = c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_CHAINED_0_02) ).
cnf(cls_poly__pCons_0,axiom,
( ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__0(X1)
| c_Polynomial_Opoly(c_Polynomial_OpCons(X2,X3,X1),X4,X1) = c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(X2,c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(X4,c_Polynomial_Opoly(X3,X4,X1),X1),X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_poly__pCons_0) ).
cnf(clsarity_Complex__Ocomplex__Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__1,axiom,
class_Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__1(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clsarity_Complex__Ocomplex__Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__1) ).
cnf(cls_CHAINED_1,axiom,
( c_Polynomial_Opoly(v_ds____,v_sko__CHAINED__1(v_ds____),tc_Complex_Ocomplex) != c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Complex_Ocomplex)
| v_ds____ = c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_CHAINED_1) ).
cnf(cls_mult__eq__0__iff_0,axiom,
( c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(X2,X3,X1) != c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(X1)
| ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Oring__no__zero__divisors(X1)
| X2 = c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(X1)
| X3 = c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_mult__eq__0__iff_0) ).
cnf(clsarity_Complex__Ocomplex__Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__0,axiom,
class_Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__0(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clsarity_Complex__Ocomplex__Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__0) ).
cnf(cls_CHAINED_0,axiom,
( v_sko__CHAINED__1(v_ds____) != c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Complex_Ocomplex)
| v_ds____ = c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_CHAINED_0) ).
cnf(clsarity_Complex__Ocomplex__Ring__and__Field_Oring__no__zero__divisors,axiom,
class_Ring__and__Field_Oring__no__zero__divisors(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clsarity_Complex__Ocomplex__Ring__and__Field_Oring__no__zero__divisors) ).
cnf(cls_pCons__0__0_0,axiom,
( ~ class_HOL_Ozero(X1)
| c_Polynomial_OpCons(c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(X1),c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(X1)),X1) = c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(X1)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_pCons__0__0_0) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_0,negated_conjecture,
c_Polynomial_OpCons(v_d____,v_ds____,tc_Complex_Ocomplex) != c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).
cnf(clsarity_Complex__Ocomplex__HOL_Ozero,axiom,
class_HOL_Ozero(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clsarity_Complex__Ocomplex__HOL_Ozero) ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
( ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__1(X1)
| c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(X1),X2,X1) = X2 ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_class__semiring_Oadd__0_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,axiom,
( X1 = c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Complex_Ocomplex)
| c_Polynomial_Opoly(c_Polynomial_OpCons(v_d____,v_ds____,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),X1,tc_Complex_Ocomplex) = c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Complex_Ocomplex) ),
cls_pCons_Oprems_0 ).
cnf(c_0_15,axiom,
v_d____ = c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
cls_CHAINED_0_02 ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
( ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__0(X1)
| c_Polynomial_Opoly(c_Polynomial_OpCons(X2,X3,X1),X4,X1) = c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(X2,c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(X4,c_Polynomial_Opoly(X3,X4,X1),X1),X1) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_poly__pCons_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
( ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__1(X1)
| c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(X1),X2,X1) = X2 ),
c_0_13 ).
cnf(c_0_18,axiom,
class_Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__1(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
clsarity_Complex__Ocomplex__Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__1 ).
cnf(c_0_19,plain,
( c_Polynomial_Opoly(v_ds____,v_sko__CHAINED__1(v_ds____),tc_Complex_Ocomplex) != c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Complex_Ocomplex)
| v_ds____ = c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex)) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_CHAINED_1]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,plain,
( c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(X2,X3,X1) != c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(X1)
| ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Oring__no__zero__divisors(X1)
| X2 = c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(X1)
| X3 = c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(X1) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_mult__eq__0__iff_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,plain,
( X1 = v_d____
| c_Polynomial_Opoly(c_Polynomial_OpCons(v_d____,v_ds____,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),X1,tc_Complex_Ocomplex) = v_d____ ),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]),c_0_15]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,plain,
( ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__0(X1)
| c_Polynomial_Opoly(c_Polynomial_OpCons(X2,X3,X1),X4,X1) = c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(X2,c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(X4,c_Polynomial_Opoly(X3,X4,X1),X1),X1) ),
c_0_16 ).
cnf(c_0_23,plain,
c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(v_d____,X1,tc_Complex_Ocomplex) = X1,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]),c_0_15]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,axiom,
class_Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__0(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
clsarity_Complex__Ocomplex__Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__0 ).
cnf(c_0_25,plain,
( v_sko__CHAINED__1(v_ds____) != c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Complex_Ocomplex)
| v_ds____ = c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex)) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_CHAINED_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,plain,
( c_Polynomial_Opoly(v_ds____,v_sko__CHAINED__1(v_ds____),tc_Complex_Ocomplex) != c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Complex_Ocomplex)
| v_ds____ = c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex)) ),
c_0_19 ).
cnf(c_0_27,plain,
( c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(X2,X3,X1) != c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(X1)
| ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Oring__no__zero__divisors(X1)
| X2 = c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(X1)
| X3 = c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(X1) ),
c_0_20 ).
cnf(c_0_28,plain,
( X1 = v_d____
| c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(X1,c_Polynomial_Opoly(v_ds____,X1,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex) = v_d____ ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]),c_0_23]),c_0_24])]) ).
cnf(c_0_29,axiom,
class_Ring__and__Field_Oring__no__zero__divisors(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
clsarity_Complex__Ocomplex__Ring__and__Field_Oring__no__zero__divisors ).
cnf(c_0_30,plain,
( v_sko__CHAINED__1(v_ds____) != c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Complex_Ocomplex)
| v_ds____ = c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex)) ),
c_0_25 ).
cnf(c_0_31,plain,
( ~ class_HOL_Ozero(X1)
| c_Polynomial_OpCons(c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(X1),c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(X1)),X1) = c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(X1)) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_pCons__0__0_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_32,negated_conjecture,
c_Polynomial_OpCons(v_d____,v_ds____,tc_Complex_Ocomplex) != c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex)),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_33,plain,
( c_Polynomial_Opoly(v_ds____,v_sko__CHAINED__1(v_ds____),tc_Complex_Ocomplex) != v_d____
| c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex)) = v_ds____ ),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_15]) ).
cnf(c_0_34,plain,
( X1 = v_d____
| c_Polynomial_Opoly(v_ds____,X1,tc_Complex_Ocomplex) = v_d____ ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_28]),c_0_15]),c_0_15]),c_0_15]),c_0_29])]) ).
cnf(c_0_35,plain,
( v_sko__CHAINED__1(v_ds____) != v_d____
| c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex)) = v_ds____ ),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_15]) ).
cnf(c_0_36,plain,
( ~ class_HOL_Ozero(X1)
| c_Polynomial_OpCons(c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(X1),c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(X1)),X1) = c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(X1)) ),
c_0_31 ).
cnf(c_0_37,axiom,
class_HOL_Ozero(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
clsarity_Complex__Ocomplex__HOL_Ozero ).
cnf(c_0_38,negated_conjecture,
c_Polynomial_OpCons(v_d____,v_ds____,tc_Complex_Ocomplex) != c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex)),
c_0_32 ).
cnf(c_0_39,plain,
c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex)) = v_ds____,
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_33,c_0_34]),c_0_35]) ).
cnf(c_0_40,plain,
c_Polynomial_OpCons(v_d____,c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex)),tc_Complex_Ocomplex) = c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex)),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_36,c_0_37]),c_0_15]) ).
cnf(c_0_41,negated_conjecture,
c_Polynomial_OpCons(v_d____,v_ds____,tc_Complex_Ocomplex) != v_ds____,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_38,c_0_39]) ).
cnf(c_0_42,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_40,c_0_39]),c_0_39]),c_0_41]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : ALG412-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.13/0.37 % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.37 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.37 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.37 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.13/0.37 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.13/0.37 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.37 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.37 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 13:21:43 UTC 2026
% 0.13/0.38 % CPUTime :
% 0.13/0.38 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.15/0.42 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.15/0.42 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 4.66/1.17 % Version: 3.5.1
% 4.66/1.17 % Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 4.66/1.17 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 4.66/1.17 % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_S5PRR_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 900s (3) cores
% 4.66/1.17 % Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 4.66/1.17 % Starting new_bool_1 with 600s (2) cores
% 4.66/1.17 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 4.66/1.17 % G-E--_208_B07_F1_S5PRR_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with pid 1984483 completed with status 0
% 4.66/1.17 % Result found by G-E--_208_B07_F1_S5PRR_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y
% 4.66/1.17 % Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 4.66/1.17 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 4.66/1.17 % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_S5PRR_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 900s (3) cores
% 4.66/1.17 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 4.66/1.17 % No SInE strategy applied
% 4.66/1.17 % Search class: FGHSF-FSLM32-DFFFFFNN
% 4.66/1.17 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 3 cores with 900 seconds (900 total)
% 4.66/1.17 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 82s (1) cores
% 4.66/1.17 % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_S5PRR_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 91s (1) cores
% 4.66/1.17 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y with 82s (1) cores
% 4.66/1.17 % G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y with pid 1984493 completed with status 0
% 4.66/1.17 % Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y
% 4.66/1.17 % Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 4.66/1.17 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 4.66/1.17 % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_S5PRR_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 900s (3) cores
% 4.66/1.17 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 4.66/1.17 % No SInE strategy applied
% 4.66/1.17 % Search class: FGHSF-FSLM32-DFFFFFNN
% 4.66/1.17 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 3 cores with 900 seconds (900 total)
% 4.66/1.17 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 82s (1) cores
% 4.66/1.17 % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_S5PRR_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 91s (1) cores
% 4.66/1.17 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y with 82s (1) cores
% 4.66/1.17 % Preprocessing time : 0.011 s
% 4.66/1.17 % Presaturation interreduction done
% 4.66/1.17
% 4.66/1.17 % Proof found!
% 4.66/1.17 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 4.66/1.17 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 4.66/1.17 % Parsed axioms : 836
% 4.66/1.17 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 4.66/1.17 % Initial clauses : 836
% 4.66/1.17 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 4.66/1.17 % Initial clauses in saturation : 836
% 4.66/1.17 % Processed clauses : 4955
% 4.66/1.17 % ...of these trivial : 69
% 4.66/1.17 % ...subsumed : 2611
% 4.66/1.17 % ...remaining for further processing : 2274
% 4.66/1.17 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 153
% 4.66/1.17 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 4.66/1.17 % Backward-subsumed : 32
% 4.66/1.17 % Backward-rewritten : 204
% 4.66/1.17 % Generated clauses : 14369
% 4.66/1.17 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 11995
% 4.66/1.17 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 4.66/1.17 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 9
% 4.66/1.17 % Paramodulations : 14206
% 4.66/1.17 % Factorizations : 0
% 4.66/1.17 % NegExts : 0
% 4.66/1.17 % Equation resolutions : 163
% 4.66/1.17 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 4.66/1.17 % Total rewrite steps : 14156
% 4.66/1.17 % ...of those cached : 13258
% 4.66/1.17 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 4.66/1.17 % Propositional check models : 0
% 4.66/1.17 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 4.66/1.17 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 4.66/1.17 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 4.66/1.17 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 4.66/1.17 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 4.66/1.17 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 4.66/1.17 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 4.66/1.17 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 4.66/1.17 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 4.66/1.17 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 4.66/1.17 % Current number of processed clauses : 1286
% 4.66/1.17 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 275
% 4.66/1.17 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 2
% 4.66/1.17 % Negative unit clauses : 45
% 4.66/1.17 % Non-unit-clauses : 964
% 4.66/1.17 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 8610
% 4.66/1.17 % ...number of literals in the above : 28257
% 4.66/1.17 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 4.66/1.17 % Current number of archived clauses : 988
% 4.66/1.17 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 253510
% 4.66/1.17 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 131648
% 4.66/1.17 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 2119
% 4.66/1.17 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 10951
% 4.66/1.17 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 3
% 4.66/1.17 % BW rewrite match attempts : 458
% 4.66/1.17 % BW rewrite match successes : 64
% 4.66/1.17 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 4.66/1.17 % Condensation successes : 0
% 4.66/1.17 % Termbank termtop insertions : 282908
% 4.66/1.17 % Search garbage collected termcells : 1506
% 4.66/1.17
% 4.66/1.17 % -------------------------------------------------
% 4.66/1.17 % User time : 0.622 s
% 4.66/1.17 % System time : 0.019 s
% 4.66/1.17 % Total time : 0.641 s
% 4.66/1.17 % Maximum resident set size: 5252 pages
% 4.66/1.17
% 4.66/1.17 % -------------------------------------------------
% 4.66/1.17 % User time : 1.722 s
% 4.66/1.17 % System time : 0.064 s
% 4.66/1.17 % Total time : 1.785 s
% 4.66/1.17 % Maximum resident set size: 5376 pages
% 4.66/1.17 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------