↑ Up

Drodi-SAT---4.1.1.UNS-Ass.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Drodi-SAT---4.1.1
% Problem  : ALG417-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : drodi -satmode(on) -timeout(300) /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 11:50:09 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 165.36s 21.72s
% Output   : Assurance 0s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.05  % Problem  : ALG417-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.00/0.07  % Command  : drodi -satmode(on) -timeout(300) /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.44  % Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% 0.19/0.44  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.19/0.44  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.19/0.44  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.19/0.44  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.19/0.44  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.19/0.45  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.19/0.45  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 13:20:02 UTC 2026
% 0.19/0.45  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.19/0.54  % Drodi V4.1.1
% 165.36/21.72  % Refutation found
% 165.36/21.72  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark: Theory is unsatisfiable
% 165.36/21.72  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark
% 165.36/21.72  fof(f227,axiom,(
% 165.36/21.72    (![T_a]: (( ~ class_HOL_Ozero(T_a)| c_Polynomial_OpCons(c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(T_a),c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(T_a)),T_a) = c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(T_a)) ) ))),
% 165.36/21.72    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p')).
% 165.36/21.72  fof(f299,axiom,(
% 165.36/21.72    v_s____ != c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex)) ),
% 165.36/21.72    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p')).
% 165.36/21.72  fof(f356,axiom,(
% 165.36/21.72    v_s____ = c_Polynomial_OpCons(v_k____,c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex)),tc_Complex_Ocomplex) ),
% 165.36/21.72    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p')).
% 165.36/21.72  fof(f410,negated_conjecture,(
% 165.36/21.72    v_k____ = c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Complex_Ocomplex) ),
% 165.36/21.72    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p')).
% 165.36/21.72  fof(f504,axiom,(
% 165.36/21.72    class_HOL_Ozero(tc_Complex_Ocomplex) ),
% 165.36/21.72    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p')).
% 165.36/21.72  fof(f968,plain,(
% 165.36/21.72    ![X0]: (~class_HOL_Ozero(X0)|c_Polynomial_OpCons(c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(X0),c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(X0)),X0)=c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(X0)))),
% 165.36/21.72    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f227])).
% 165.36/21.72  fof(f1092,plain,(
% 165.36/21.72    ~v_s____=c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex))),
% 165.36/21.72    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f299])).
% 165.36/21.72  fof(f1186,plain,(
% 165.36/21.72    v_s____=c_Polynomial_OpCons(v_k____,c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex)),tc_Complex_Ocomplex)),
% 165.36/21.72    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f356])).
% 165.36/21.72  fof(f1273,plain,(
% 165.36/21.72    v_k____=c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Complex_Ocomplex)),
% 165.36/21.72    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f410])).
% 165.36/21.72  fof(f1367,plain,(
% 165.36/21.72    class_HOL_Ozero(tc_Complex_Ocomplex)),
% 165.36/21.72    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f504])).
% 165.36/21.72  fof(f64249,plain,(
% 165.36/21.72    c_Polynomial_OpCons(c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex)),tc_Complex_Ocomplex)=c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex))),
% 165.36/21.72    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[f968,f1367])).
% 165.36/21.72  fof(f64251,plain,(
% 165.36/21.72    c_Polynomial_OpCons(v_k____,c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex)),tc_Complex_Ocomplex)=c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex))),
% 165.36/21.72    inference(forward_demodulation,[status(thm)],[f1273,f64249])).
% 165.36/21.72  fof(f64252,plain,(
% 165.36/21.72    v_s____=c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex))),
% 165.36/21.72    inference(forward_demodulation,[status(thm)],[f1186,f64251])).
% 165.36/21.72  fof(f64253,plain,(
% 165.36/21.72    $false),
% 165.36/21.72    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[f64252,f1092])).
% 165.36/21.72  % SZS output end CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% 11.13/21.84  % Elapsed time: 21.371833 seconds
% 11.13/21.84  % CPU time: 167.822077 seconds
% 11.13/21.84  % Total memory used: 789.156 MB
% 11.13/21.84  % Net memory used: 774.131 MB
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------