%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.5.1
% Problem : ALG427-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:02:08 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 54.83s 8.49s
% Output : CNFRefutation 54.83s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 14
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 45 ( 20 unt; 8 nHn; 32 RR)
% Number of literals : 83 ( 56 equ; 40 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 5 ( 3 usr; 2 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 12 ( 12 usr; 3 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 59 ( 17 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_that_0,axiom,
( v_p != c_Polynomial_OpCons(X1,c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex)),tc_Complex_Ocomplex)
| X1 = c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Complex_Ocomplex)
| v_thesis____ ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_that_0) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_0,negated_conjecture,
~ v_thesis____,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).
cnf(cls_synthetic__div__eq__0__iff_0,axiom,
( c_Polynomial_Osynthetic__div(X2,X3,X1) != c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(X1))
| ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__0(X1)
| c_Polynomial_Odegree(X2,X1) = c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_synthetic__div__eq__0__iff_0) ).
cnf(cls_synthetic__div__pCons_0,axiom,
( ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__0(X1)
| c_Polynomial_Osynthetic__div(c_Polynomial_OpCons(X2,X3,X1),X4,X1) = c_Polynomial_OpCons(c_Polynomial_Opoly(X3,X4,X1),c_Polynomial_Osynthetic__div(X3,X4,X1),X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_synthetic__div__pCons_0) ).
cnf(cls_fundamental__theorem__of__algebra__alt_0,axiom,
( v_sko__Fundamental__Theorem__Algebra__Mirabelle__Xfundamental__theorem__of__algebra__alt__1(X1) != c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Complex_Ocomplex)
| c_Polynomial_Opoly(X1,v_sko__Fundamental__Theorem__Algebra__Mirabelle__Xfundamental__theorem__of__algebra__alt__2(X1),tc_Complex_Ocomplex) = c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Complex_Ocomplex) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_fundamental__theorem__of__algebra__alt_0) ).
cnf(cls_degree__pCons__eq_0,axiom,
( ~ class_HOL_Ozero(X1)
| X3 = c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(X1))
| c_Polynomial_Odegree(c_Polynomial_OpCons(X2,X3,X1),X1) = c_Suc(c_Polynomial_Odegree(X3,X1)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_degree__pCons__eq_0) ).
cnf(cls_pe_0,axiom,
v_p != c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_pe_0) ).
cnf(cls_fundamental__theorem__of__algebra__alt_1,axiom,
( X1 = c_Polynomial_OpCons(v_sko__Fundamental__Theorem__Algebra__Mirabelle__Xfundamental__theorem__of__algebra__alt__1(X1),c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex)),tc_Complex_Ocomplex)
| c_Polynomial_Opoly(X1,v_sko__Fundamental__Theorem__Algebra__Mirabelle__Xfundamental__theorem__of__algebra__alt__2(X1),tc_Complex_Ocomplex) = c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Complex_Ocomplex) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_fundamental__theorem__of__algebra__alt_1) ).
cnf(cls_CHAINED_0_01,axiom,
c_Polynomial_Odegree(v_p,tc_Complex_Ocomplex) = c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_CHAINED_0_01) ).
cnf(clsarity_Complex__Ocomplex__HOL_Ozero,axiom,
class_HOL_Ozero(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clsarity_Complex__Ocomplex__HOL_Ozero) ).
cnf(cls_Suc__neq__Zero_0,axiom,
c_Suc(X1) != c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Suc__neq__Zero_0) ).
cnf(cls_pCons__0__0_0,axiom,
( ~ class_HOL_Ozero(X1)
| c_Polynomial_OpCons(c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(X1),c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(X1)),X1) = c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(X1)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_pCons__0__0_0) ).
cnf(clsarity_Complex__Ocomplex__Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__0,axiom,
class_Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__0(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clsarity_Complex__Ocomplex__Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__0) ).
cnf(cls_synthetic__div__eq__0__iff_1,axiom,
( c_Polynomial_Odegree(X2,X1) != c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat)
| ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__0(X1)
| c_Polynomial_Osynthetic__div(X2,X3,X1) = c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(X1)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_synthetic__div__eq__0__iff_1) ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
( v_p != c_Polynomial_OpCons(X1,c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex)),tc_Complex_Ocomplex)
| X1 = c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Complex_Ocomplex)
| v_thesis____ ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_that_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
~ v_thesis____,
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
( c_Polynomial_Osynthetic__div(X2,X3,X1) != c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(X1))
| ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__0(X1)
| c_Polynomial_Odegree(X2,X1) = c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_synthetic__div__eq__0__iff_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
( ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__0(X1)
| c_Polynomial_Osynthetic__div(c_Polynomial_OpCons(X2,X3,X1),X4,X1) = c_Polynomial_OpCons(c_Polynomial_Opoly(X3,X4,X1),c_Polynomial_Osynthetic__div(X3,X4,X1),X1) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_synthetic__div__pCons_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
( v_p != c_Polynomial_OpCons(X1,c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex)),tc_Complex_Ocomplex)
| X1 = c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Complex_Ocomplex)
| v_thesis____ ),
c_0_14 ).
cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
~ v_thesis____,
c_0_15 ).
cnf(c_0_20,plain,
( v_sko__Fundamental__Theorem__Algebra__Mirabelle__Xfundamental__theorem__of__algebra__alt__1(X1) != c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Complex_Ocomplex)
| c_Polynomial_Opoly(X1,v_sko__Fundamental__Theorem__Algebra__Mirabelle__Xfundamental__theorem__of__algebra__alt__2(X1),tc_Complex_Ocomplex) = c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Complex_Ocomplex) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_fundamental__theorem__of__algebra__alt_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,plain,
( ~ class_HOL_Ozero(X1)
| X3 = c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(X1))
| c_Polynomial_Odegree(c_Polynomial_OpCons(X2,X3,X1),X1) = c_Suc(c_Polynomial_Odegree(X3,X1)) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_degree__pCons__eq_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,plain,
v_p != c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex)),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_pe_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,plain,
( c_Polynomial_Osynthetic__div(X2,X3,X1) != c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(X1))
| ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__0(X1)
| c_Polynomial_Odegree(X2,X1) = c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat) ),
c_0_16 ).
cnf(c_0_24,plain,
( ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__0(X1)
| c_Polynomial_Osynthetic__div(c_Polynomial_OpCons(X2,X3,X1),X4,X1) = c_Polynomial_OpCons(c_Polynomial_Opoly(X3,X4,X1),c_Polynomial_Osynthetic__div(X3,X4,X1),X1) ),
c_0_17 ).
cnf(c_0_25,plain,
( v_p != c_Polynomial_OpCons(X1,c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex)),tc_Complex_Ocomplex)
| X1 = c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Complex_Ocomplex) ),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,axiom,
( X1 = c_Polynomial_OpCons(v_sko__Fundamental__Theorem__Algebra__Mirabelle__Xfundamental__theorem__of__algebra__alt__1(X1),c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex)),tc_Complex_Ocomplex)
| c_Polynomial_Opoly(X1,v_sko__Fundamental__Theorem__Algebra__Mirabelle__Xfundamental__theorem__of__algebra__alt__2(X1),tc_Complex_Ocomplex) = c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Complex_Ocomplex) ),
cls_fundamental__theorem__of__algebra__alt_1 ).
cnf(c_0_27,plain,
( v_sko__Fundamental__Theorem__Algebra__Mirabelle__Xfundamental__theorem__of__algebra__alt__1(X1) != c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Complex_Ocomplex)
| c_Polynomial_Opoly(X1,v_sko__Fundamental__Theorem__Algebra__Mirabelle__Xfundamental__theorem__of__algebra__alt__2(X1),tc_Complex_Ocomplex) = c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Complex_Ocomplex) ),
c_0_20 ).
cnf(c_0_28,plain,
( ~ class_HOL_Ozero(X1)
| X3 = c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(X1))
| c_Polynomial_Odegree(c_Polynomial_OpCons(X2,X3,X1),X1) = c_Suc(c_Polynomial_Odegree(X3,X1)) ),
c_0_21 ).
cnf(c_0_29,axiom,
c_Polynomial_Odegree(v_p,tc_Complex_Ocomplex) = c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat),
cls_CHAINED_0_01 ).
cnf(c_0_30,axiom,
class_HOL_Ozero(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
clsarity_Complex__Ocomplex__HOL_Ozero ).
cnf(c_0_31,plain,
v_p != c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex)),
c_0_22 ).
cnf(c_0_32,plain,
c_Suc(X1) != c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_Suc__neq__Zero_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_33,plain,
( ~ class_HOL_Ozero(X1)
| c_Polynomial_OpCons(c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(X1),c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(X1)),X1) = c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(X1)) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_pCons__0__0_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_34,plain,
( ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__0(X3)
| c_Polynomial_OpCons(c_Polynomial_Opoly(X2,X4,X3),c_Polynomial_Osynthetic__div(X2,X4,X3),X3) != c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(X3))
| c_Polynomial_Odegree(c_Polynomial_OpCons(X1,X2,X3),X3) = c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24]) ).
cnf(c_0_35,plain,
c_Polynomial_Opoly(v_p,v_sko__Fundamental__Theorem__Algebra__Mirabelle__Xfundamental__theorem__of__algebra__alt__2(v_p),tc_Complex_Ocomplex) = c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_26])]),c_0_27]) ).
cnf(c_0_36,plain,
c_Polynomial_Odegree(c_Polynomial_OpCons(X1,v_p,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex) = c_Suc(c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat)),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_29]),c_0_30])]),c_0_31]) ).
cnf(c_0_37,axiom,
class_Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__0(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
clsarity_Complex__Ocomplex__Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__0 ).
cnf(c_0_38,plain,
c_Suc(X1) != c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat),
c_0_32 ).
cnf(c_0_39,plain,
( c_Polynomial_Odegree(X2,X1) != c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat)
| ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__0(X1)
| c_Polynomial_Osynthetic__div(X2,X3,X1) = c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(X1)) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_synthetic__div__eq__0__iff_1]) ).
cnf(c_0_40,plain,
( ~ class_HOL_Ozero(X1)
| c_Polynomial_OpCons(c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(X1),c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(X1)),X1) = c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(X1)) ),
c_0_33 ).
cnf(c_0_41,plain,
c_Polynomial_OpCons(c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),c_Polynomial_Osynthetic__div(v_p,v_sko__Fundamental__Theorem__Algebra__Mirabelle__Xfundamental__theorem__of__algebra__alt__2(v_p),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex) != c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex)),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_34,c_0_35]),c_0_36]),c_0_37])]),c_0_38]) ).
cnf(c_0_42,plain,
( c_Polynomial_Odegree(X2,X1) != c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat)
| ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__0(X1)
| c_Polynomial_Osynthetic__div(X2,X3,X1) = c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(X1)) ),
c_0_39 ).
cnf(c_0_43,plain,
c_Polynomial_OpCons(c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex)),tc_Complex_Ocomplex) = c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_40,c_0_30]) ).
cnf(c_0_44,plain,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_41,c_0_42]),c_0_43]),c_0_29]),c_0_37])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02 % Problem : ALG427-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.00/0.04 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.12/0.36 % Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.36 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.12/0.36 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.04/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.04/0.36 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.04/0.36 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 13:20:32 UTC 2026
% 0.04/0.37 % CPUTime :
% 0.04/0.37 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.04/0.40 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.04/0.40 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 54.83/8.49 % Version: 3.5.1
% 54.83/8.49 % Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 54.83/8.49 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 54.83/8.49 % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_S5PRR_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 900s (3) cores
% 54.83/8.49 % Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 54.83/8.49 % Starting new_bool_1 with 600s (2) cores
% 54.83/8.49 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 54.83/8.49 % G-E--_208_B07_F1_S5PRR_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with pid 3572420 completed with status 0
% 54.83/8.49 % Result found by G-E--_208_B07_F1_S5PRR_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y
% 54.83/8.49 % Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 54.83/8.49 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 54.83/8.49 % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_S5PRR_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 900s (3) cores
% 54.83/8.49 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 54.83/8.49 % No SInE strategy applied
% 54.83/8.49 % Search class: FGHSS-FSLM32-DFFFFFNN
% 54.83/8.49 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 3 cores with 900 seconds (900 total)
% 54.83/8.49 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 82s (1) cores
% 54.83/8.49 % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_S5PRR_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 91s (1) cores
% 54.83/8.49 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y with 82s (1) cores
% 54.83/8.49 % G-E--_208_B07_F1_S5PRR_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with pid 3572432 completed with status 0
% 54.83/8.49 % Result found by G-E--_208_B07_F1_S5PRR_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y
% 54.83/8.49 % Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 54.83/8.49 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 54.83/8.49 % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_S5PRR_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 900s (3) cores
% 54.83/8.49 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 54.83/8.49 % No SInE strategy applied
% 54.83/8.49 % Search class: FGHSS-FSLM32-DFFFFFNN
% 54.83/8.49 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 3 cores with 900 seconds (900 total)
% 54.83/8.49 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 82s (1) cores
% 54.83/8.49 % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_S5PRR_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 91s (1) cores
% 54.83/8.49 % Preprocessing time : 0.011 s
% 54.83/8.49 % Presaturation interreduction done
% 54.83/8.49
% 54.83/8.49 % Proof found!
% 54.83/8.49 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 54.83/8.49 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 54.83/8.49 % Parsed axioms : 838
% 54.83/8.49 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 54.83/8.49 % Initial clauses : 838
% 54.83/8.49 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 1
% 54.83/8.49 % Initial clauses in saturation : 837
% 54.83/8.49 % Processed clauses : 27354
% 54.83/8.49 % ...of these trivial : 370
% 54.83/8.49 % ...subsumed : 21675
% 54.83/8.49 % ...remaining for further processing : 5309
% 54.83/8.49 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 3804
% 54.83/8.49 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 54.83/8.49 % Backward-subsumed : 174
% 54.83/8.49 % Backward-rewritten : 275
% 54.83/8.49 % Generated clauses : 158341
% 54.83/8.49 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 137022
% 54.83/8.49 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 54.83/8.49 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 36
% 54.83/8.49 % Paramodulations : 154462
% 54.83/8.49 % Factorizations : 14
% 54.83/8.49 % NegExts : 0
% 54.83/8.49 % Equation resolutions : 3865
% 54.83/8.49 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 54.83/8.49 % Total rewrite steps : 120068
% 54.83/8.49 % ...of those cached : 115159
% 54.83/8.49 % Propositional unsat checks : 1
% 54.83/8.49 % Propositional check models : 0
% 54.83/8.49 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 54.83/8.49 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 54.83/8.49 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 54.83/8.49 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 54.83/8.49 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 54.83/8.49 % Propositional encoding time : 0.285
% 54.83/8.49 % Propositional solver time : 0.278
% 54.83/8.49 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 54.83/8.49 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 54.83/8.49 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 54.83/8.49 % Current number of processed clauses : 4107
% 54.83/8.49 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 542
% 54.83/8.49 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 34
% 54.83/8.49 % Negative unit clauses : 109
% 54.83/8.49 % Non-unit-clauses : 3422
% 54.83/8.49 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 109849
% 54.83/8.49 % ...number of literals in the above : 359843
% 54.83/8.49 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 54.83/8.49 % Current number of archived clauses : 1202
% 54.83/8.49 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 3100412
% 54.83/8.49 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1469374
% 54.83/8.49 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 12788
% 54.83/8.49 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 72466
% 54.83/8.49 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 54.83/8.49 % BW rewrite match attempts : 6802
% 54.83/8.49 % BW rewrite match successes : 466
% 54.83/8.49 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 54.83/8.49 % Condensation successes : 0
% 54.83/8.49 % Termbank termtop insertions : 3589314
% 54.83/8.49 % Search garbage collected termcells : 1508
% 54.83/8.49
% 54.83/8.49 % -------------------------------------------------
% 54.83/8.49 % User time : 7.592 s
% 54.83/8.49 % System time : 0.170 s
% 54.83/8.49 % Total time : 7.762 s
% 54.83/8.49 % Maximum resident set size: 5252 pages
% 54.83/8.49
% 54.83/8.49 % -------------------------------------------------
% 54.83/8.49 % User time : 22.352 s
% 54.83/8.49 % System time : 0.550 s
% 54.83/8.49 % Total time : 22.902 s
% 54.83/8.49 % Maximum resident set size: 5376 pages
% 54.83/8.49 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------