%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Zipperpin---2.1.9999
% Problem : ALG428-1 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.VTc9fompZx true
% Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Oct 2 04:28:46 PM UTC 2025
% Result : Unsatisfiable 3.54s 1.08s
% Output : Refutation 3.54s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : ALG428-1 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.03/0.13 % Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.VTc9fompZx true
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Wed Oct 1 16:57:53 EDT 2025
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.13/0.34 % Running portfolio for 300 s
% 0.13/0.34 % File : /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.13/0.34 % Number of cores: 8
% 0.13/0.34 % Python version: Python 3.6.8
% 0.13/0.35 % Running in FO mode
% 0.54/0.65 % Total configuration time : 435
% 0.54/0.65 % Estimated wc time : 1092
% 0.54/0.65 % Estimated cpu time (7 cpus) : 156.0
% 0.54/0.69 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo6_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.54/0.71 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo3_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.54/0.72 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo1_av.sh running for 75s
% 0.55/0.73 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo7.sh running for 63s
% 0.55/0.74 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo13.sh running for 50s
% 0.55/0.75 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo5.sh running for 50s
% 0.55/0.75 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo4.sh running for 50s
% 3.54/1.08 % Solved by fo/fo3_bce.sh.
% 3.54/1.08 % BCE start: 584
% 3.54/1.08 % BCE eliminated: 143
% 3.54/1.08 % PE start: 441
% 3.54/1.08 logic: eq
% 3.54/1.08 % PE eliminated: -20
% 3.54/1.08 % done 289 iterations in 0.350s
% 3.54/1.08 % SZS status Theorem for '/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p'
% 3.54/1.08 % SZS output start Refutation
% 3.54/1.08 thf(c_lessequals_type, type, c_lessequals: $i > $i > $i > $o).
% 3.54/1.08 thf(c_Suc_type, type, c_Suc: $i > $i).
% 3.54/1.08 thf(c_HOL_Ominus__class_Ominus_type, type, c_HOL_Ominus__class_Ominus:
% 3.54/1.08 $i > $i > $i > $i).
% 3.54/1.08 thf(tc_nat_type, type, tc_nat: $i).
% 3.54/1.08 thf(v_thesis_____type, type, v_thesis____: $o).
% 3.54/1.08 thf(c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless_type, type, c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless: $i > $i > $i > $o).
% 3.54/1.08 thf(tc_Complex_Ocomplex_type, type, tc_Complex_Ocomplex: $i).
% 3.54/1.08 thf(v_p_type, type, v_p: $i).
% 3.54/1.08 thf(c_Polynomial_Odegree_type, type, c_Polynomial_Odegree: $i > $i > $i).
% 3.54/1.08 thf(c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero_type, type, c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero: $i > $i).
% 3.54/1.08 thf(cls_le__neq__implies__less_0, axiom,
% 3.54/1.08 (( c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless @ V_m @ V_n @ tc_nat ) |
% 3.54/1.08 ( ( V_m ) = ( V_n ) ) | ( ~( c_lessequals @ V_m @ V_n @ tc_nat ) ))).
% 3.54/1.08 thf(zip_derived_cl53, plain,
% 3.54/1.08 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 3.54/1.08 ( (c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless @ X0 @ X1 @ tc_nat)
% 3.54/1.08 | ((X0) = (X1))
% 3.54/1.08 | ~ (c_lessequals @ X0 @ X1 @ tc_nat))),
% 3.54/1.08 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [cls_le__neq__implies__less_0])).
% 3.54/1.08 thf(cls_Suc__pred_0, axiom,
% 3.54/1.08 (( ( c_Suc @
% 3.54/1.08 ( c_HOL_Ominus__class_Ominus @
% 3.54/1.08 V_n @ ( c_Suc @ ( c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero @ tc_nat ) ) @ tc_nat ) ) =
% 3.54/1.08 ( V_n ) ) |
% 3.54/1.08 ( ~( c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless @
% 3.54/1.08 ( c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero @ tc_nat ) @ V_n @ tc_nat ) ))).
% 3.54/1.08 thf(zip_derived_cl46, plain,
% 3.54/1.08 (![X0 : $i]:
% 3.54/1.08 (((c_Suc @
% 3.54/1.08 (c_HOL_Ominus__class_Ominus @ X0 @
% 3.54/1.08 (c_Suc @ (c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero @ tc_nat)) @ tc_nat))
% 3.54/1.08 = (X0))
% 3.54/1.08 | ~ (c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless @ (c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero @ tc_nat) @
% 3.54/1.08 X0 @ tc_nat))),
% 3.54/1.08 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [cls_Suc__pred_0])).
% 3.54/1.08 thf(cls_that_0, axiom,
% 3.54/1.08 (( ( c_Polynomial_Odegree @ v_p @ tc_Complex_Ocomplex ) != ( c_Suc @ V_n ) ) |
% 3.54/1.08 ( v_thesis____ ))).
% 3.54/1.08 thf(zip_derived_cl535, plain,
% 3.54/1.08 (![X0 : $i]:
% 3.54/1.08 (((c_Polynomial_Odegree @ v_p @ tc_Complex_Ocomplex) != (c_Suc @ X0))
% 3.54/1.08 | (v_thesis____))),
% 3.54/1.08 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [cls_that_0])).
% 3.54/1.08 thf(cls_conjecture_0, conjecture, (v_thesis____)).
% 3.54/1.08 thf(zf_stmt_0, negated_conjecture, (~( v_thesis____ )),
% 3.54/1.08 inference('cnf.neg', [status(esa)], [cls_conjecture_0])).
% 3.54/1.08 thf(zip_derived_cl583, plain, (~ (v_thesis____)),
% 3.54/1.08 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_0])).
% 3.54/1.08 thf(zip_derived_cl1866, plain,
% 3.54/1.08 (![X0 : $i]:
% 3.54/1.08 ((c_Polynomial_Odegree @ v_p @ tc_Complex_Ocomplex) != (c_Suc @ X0))),
% 3.54/1.08 inference('dp-resolution', [status(thm)],
% 3.54/1.08 [zip_derived_cl535, zip_derived_cl583])).
% 3.54/1.08 thf(zip_derived_cl3607, plain,
% 3.54/1.08 (![X0 : $i]:
% 3.54/1.08 (((c_Polynomial_Odegree @ v_p @ tc_Complex_Ocomplex) != (X0))
% 3.54/1.08 | ~ (c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless @ (c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero @ tc_nat) @
% 3.54/1.08 X0 @ tc_nat))),
% 3.54/1.08 inference('sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl46, zip_derived_cl1866])).
% 3.54/1.08 thf(zip_derived_cl3632, plain,
% 3.54/1.08 (![X0 : $i]:
% 3.54/1.08 (~ (c_lessequals @ (c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero @ tc_nat) @ X0 @ tc_nat)
% 3.54/1.08 | ((c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero @ tc_nat) = (X0))
% 3.54/1.08 | ((c_Polynomial_Odegree @ v_p @ tc_Complex_Ocomplex) != (X0)))),
% 3.54/1.08 inference('sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl53, zip_derived_cl3607])).
% 3.54/1.08 thf(cls_le0_0, axiom,
% 3.54/1.08 (c_lessequals @ ( c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero @ tc_nat ) @ V_n @ tc_nat)).
% 3.54/1.08 thf(zip_derived_cl391, plain,
% 3.54/1.08 (![X0 : $i]:
% 3.54/1.08 (c_lessequals @ (c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero @ tc_nat) @ X0 @ tc_nat)),
% 3.54/1.08 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [cls_le0_0])).
% 3.54/1.08 thf(zip_derived_cl3640, plain,
% 3.54/1.08 (![X0 : $i]:
% 3.54/1.08 (((c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero @ tc_nat) = (X0))
% 3.54/1.08 | ((c_Polynomial_Odegree @ v_p @ tc_Complex_Ocomplex) != (X0)))),
% 3.54/1.08 inference('demod', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl3632, zip_derived_cl391])).
% 3.54/1.08 thf(zip_derived_cl3644, plain,
% 3.54/1.08 (((c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero @ tc_nat)
% 3.54/1.08 = (c_Polynomial_Odegree @ v_p @ tc_Complex_Ocomplex))),
% 3.54/1.08 inference('eq_res', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl3640])).
% 3.54/1.08 thf(cls_dp_0, axiom,
% 3.54/1.08 (( c_Polynomial_Odegree @ v_p @ tc_Complex_Ocomplex ) !=
% 3.54/1.08 ( c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero @ tc_nat ))).
% 3.54/1.08 thf(zip_derived_cl547, plain,
% 3.54/1.08 (((c_Polynomial_Odegree @ v_p @ tc_Complex_Ocomplex)
% 3.54/1.08 != (c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero @ tc_nat))),
% 3.54/1.08 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [cls_dp_0])).
% 3.54/1.08 thf(zip_derived_cl3645, plain, ($false),
% 3.54/1.08 inference('simplify_reflect-', [status(thm)],
% 3.54/1.08 [zip_derived_cl3644, zip_derived_cl547])).
% 3.54/1.08
% 3.54/1.08 % SZS output end Refutation
% 3.54/1.08
% 3.54/1.08
% 3.54/1.08 % Terminating...
% 3.99/1.17 % Runner terminated.
% 3.99/1.18 % Zipperpin 1.5 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------