↑ Up

iProver---3.9.4.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem  : ALG436-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM

% Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 12:54:24 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.45s 1.28s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.45s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    2
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :    9 (   1 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   17 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   16 (   8   ~;   8   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    3 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    0 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   4 con; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    0 (   0 sgn   0   !;   0   ?;   0   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f543,axiom,
    ( ~ c_Ring__and__Field_Odvd__class_Odvd(v_p,v_r,tc_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex))
    | c_Ring__and__Field_Odvd__class_Odvd(v_p,v_q,tc_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_CHAINED_0) ).

fof(f544,axiom,
    ( ~ c_Ring__and__Field_Odvd__class_Odvd(v_p,v_q,tc_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex))
    | c_Ring__and__Field_Odvd__class_Odvd(v_p,v_r,tc_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_CHAINED_0_01) ).

fof(f545,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ c_Ring__and__Field_Odvd__class_Odvd(v_p,v_q,tc_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex))
    | ~ c_Ring__and__Field_Odvd__class_Odvd(v_p,v_r,tc_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).

fof(f546,negated_conjecture,
    ( c_Ring__and__Field_Odvd__class_Odvd(v_p,v_r,tc_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex))
    | c_Ring__and__Field_Odvd__class_Odvd(v_p,v_q,tc_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_1) ).

tcf(c_897,plain,
    ( c_Ring__and__Field_Odvd__class_Odvd(v_p,v_q,tc_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex))
    | ~ c_Ring__and__Field_Odvd__class_Odvd(v_p,v_r,tc_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex)) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f543]) ).

tcf(c_898,plain,
    ( c_Ring__and__Field_Odvd__class_Odvd(v_p,v_r,tc_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex))
    | ~ c_Ring__and__Field_Odvd__class_Odvd(v_p,v_q,tc_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex)) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f544]) ).

tcf(c_899,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ c_Ring__and__Field_Odvd__class_Odvd(v_p,v_r,tc_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex))
    | ~ c_Ring__and__Field_Odvd__class_Odvd(v_p,v_q,tc_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex)) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f545]) ).

tcf(c_900,negated_conjecture,
    ( c_Ring__and__Field_Odvd__class_Odvd(v_p,v_r,tc_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex))
    | c_Ring__and__Field_Odvd__class_Odvd(v_p,v_q,tc_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex)) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f546]) ).

tcf(c_1321,plain,
    $false,
    inference(prop_impl_just,[status(thm)],[c_899,c_897,c_898,c_900]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : ALG436-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.07/0.34  % Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% 0.07/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.07/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.07/0.34  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.07/0.34  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.07/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.07/0.34  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.07/0.34  % DateTime : Fri Sep 25 05:41:04 UTC 2026
% 0.07/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.07/0.34  Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.12/0.38  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.12/0.38  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s fof_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.12/0.39  
% 0.12/0.39  % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.12/0.39  
% 0.12/0.39  % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.12/0.40  % Proving...
% 0.45/1.28  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 0.45/1.28  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 0.45/1.28  
% 0.45/1.28  %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 0.45/1.28  
% 0.45/1.28  % ------  iProver source info
% 0.45/1.28  
% 0.45/1.28  % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 0.45/1.28  % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 0.45/1.28  % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 0.45/1.28  
% 0.45/1.28  % ------ Parsing...% successful
% 0.45/1.28  
% 0.45/1.28  
% 0.45/1.28  % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel  & Parsing by iProver...% 
% 0.45/1.28  
% 0.45/1.28  % ------ Preprocessing...% 
% 0.45/1.28  
% 0.45/1.28  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 0.45/1.28  
% 0.45/1.28  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 0.45/1.28  
% 0.45/1.28  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------