↑ Up

Prover9---2026-6A.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---2026-6A
% Problem  : ALG438-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 06:50:12 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 1.48s 0.69s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 1.48s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    4
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   10 (   8 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   12 (   7 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :    8 (   6   ~;   2   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    7 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   11 (  11 usr;   5 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   11 (   0 sgn   4   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(clsarity_Complex__Ocomplex__Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__0,axiom,
    class_Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__0(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
    file('theBenchmark.p',clsarity_Complex__Ocomplex__Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__0) ).

cnf(c_373,plain,
    class_Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__0(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[clsarity_Complex__Ocomplex__Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__0]) ).

fof(cls_conjecture_0,axiom,
    c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(c_Polynomial_OpCons(v_a,c_Polynomial_OpCons(v_b,v_p,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),v_q,tc_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex)) != c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(c_Polynomial_Osmult(v_a,v_q,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),c_Polynomial_OpCons(c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(c_Polynomial_OpCons(v_b,v_p,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),v_q,tc_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex)),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex)),
    file('theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).

cnf(c_380,plain,
    c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(c_Polynomial_OpCons(v_a,c_Polynomial_OpCons(v_b,v_p,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),v_q,tc_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex)) != c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(c_Polynomial_Osmult(v_a,v_q,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),c_Polynomial_OpCons(c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(c_Polynomial_OpCons(v_b,v_p,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),v_q,tc_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex)),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex)),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_0]) ).

cnf(c_381,plain,
    c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(c_Polynomial_Osmult(v_a,v_q,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),c_Polynomial_OpCons(c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(c_Polynomial_OpCons(v_b,v_p,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),v_q,tc_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex)),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex)) != c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(c_Polynomial_OpCons(v_a,c_Polynomial_OpCons(v_b,v_p,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),v_q,tc_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex)),
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[c_380]) ).

fof(cls_mult__pCons__left_0,axiom,
    ! [VAR_0,VAR_1,VAR_2,VAR_3] :
      ( c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(c_Polynomial_OpCons(VAR_1,VAR_2,VAR_0),VAR_3,tc_Polynomial_Opoly(VAR_0)) = c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(c_Polynomial_Osmult(VAR_1,VAR_3,VAR_0),c_Polynomial_OpCons(c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(VAR_0),c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(VAR_2,VAR_3,tc_Polynomial_Opoly(VAR_0)),VAR_0),tc_Polynomial_Opoly(VAR_0))
      | ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__0(VAR_0) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',cls_mult__pCons__left_0) ).

cnf(c_427,plain,
    ( c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(c_Polynomial_OpCons(B,C,A),D,tc_Polynomial_Opoly(A)) = c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(c_Polynomial_Osmult(B,D,A),c_Polynomial_OpCons(c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(A),c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(C,D,tc_Polynomial_Opoly(A)),A),tc_Polynomial_Opoly(A))
    | ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__0(A) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[cls_mult__pCons__left_0]) ).

cnf(c_684,plain,
    c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(c_Polynomial_OpCons(A,B,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),C,tc_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex)) = c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(c_Polynomial_Osmult(A,C,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),c_Polynomial_OpCons(c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(B,C,tc_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex)),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex)),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_427,c_373]) ).

cnf(c_686,plain,
    c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(c_Polynomial_OpCons(v_a,c_Polynomial_OpCons(v_b,v_p,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),v_q,tc_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex)) != c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(c_Polynomial_Osmult(v_a,v_q,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),c_Polynomial_OpCons(c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(c_Polynomial_OpCons(v_b,v_p,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),v_q,tc_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex)),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex)),
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[c_381]) ).

cnf(c_685,plain,
    $false,
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_684,c_686]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.05  % Problem  : ALG438-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.00/0.06  % Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.15/0.43  % Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.43  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.43  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.43  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.15/0.43  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.15/0.43  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.43  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.15/0.43  % DateTime : Sat Sep 26 22:00:40 UTC 2026
% 0.15/0.44  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.15/0.44  % Prover9 (64) version 2026-6A, July 2026, CASC-J13.
% 0.15/0.44  % Process 2211392 was started by sandbox2 on n006,
% 0.15/0.44  % Sat Sep 26 22:00:40 2026
% 0.15/0.44  % The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p".
% 0.15/0.47  
% 0.15/0.47  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 1.48/0.69  
% 1.48/0.69  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 1.48/0.69  
% 1.48/0.69  % Proof 1 at 0.21 (+ 0.01) seconds.
% 1.48/0.69  % Length of proof is 6.
% 1.48/0.69  % Level of proof is 2.
% 1.48/0.69  % Maximum clause weight is 56.000.
% 1.48/0.69  % Given clauses 148.
% 1.48/0.69  
% 1.48/0.69  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------